The yield of programmed ventricular stimulation in mitral valve prolapse patients with ventricular arrhythmias

Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: Risk Stratification and Guiding Antiarrhythmic Therapies

Electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has been utilized to induce ventricular tachycardia (VT), thereby improving risk stratification for patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and determining the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapies, especially catheter ablation. A variety of procedural aspects can be modified during PVS in order to alter the sensitivity and specificity of the test including the addition of multiple baseline pacing cycle lengths, extrastimuli, and pacing locations. The definition of a positive result is also critically important, which has varied from exclusively sustained monomorphic VT (>30 seconds) to any ventricular arrhythmia regardless of morphology. In this review, we discuss the history of PVS and evaluate its role in sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a variety of patient populations. We propose an approach to future investigations that will capitalize on the unique ability to vary the sensitivity and specificity of this test. We then discuss the application of PVS during and following catheter ablation. The strategies that have been utilized to improve the efficacy of intraprocedural PVS are highlighted during a discussion of the limitations of this probabilistic strategy. The role of noninvasive programmed stimulation is also reviewed in predicting recurrent VT and informing management decisions including repeat ablations, modifications in antiarrhythmic drugs, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. Based on the available evidence and guidelines, we propose an approach to future investigations that will allow clinicians to optimize the use of PVS for risk stratification and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Developing a Mechanistic Approach to Sudden Death Prevention in Mitral Valve Prolapse

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular fibrillation (VF) can occur in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in the absence of other comorbidities including mitral regurgitation, heart failure or coronary disease. Although only a small proportion with MVP are at risk, it can affect young, otherwise healthy adults, most commonly premenopausal women, often as the first presentation of MVP. In this review, we discuss arrhythmic mechanisms in MVP and mechanistic approaches for sudden death risk assessment and prevention. We define arrhythmogenic or arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) as MVP associated with complex and frequent ventricular ectopy, and malignant MVP (MMVP) as MVP with high risk of SCD. Factors predisposing to AMVP are myxomatous, bileaflet MVP and mitral annular disjunction (MAD). Data from autopsy, cardiac imaging and electrophysiological studies suggest that ectopy in AMVP is due to inflammation, fibrosis and scarring within the left ventricular (LV) base, LV papillary muscles and Purkinje tissue. Postulated mechanisms include repetitive injury to these regions from systolic papillary muscle stretch and abrupt mitral annular dysmotility (excursion and curling) and diastolic endocardial interaction of redundant mitral leaflets and chordae. Whereas AMVP is seen relatively commonly (up to 30%) in those with MVP, MVP-related SCD is rare (2–4%). However, the proportion at risk (i.e., with MMVP) is unknown. The clustering of cardiac morphological and electrophysiological characteristics similar to AMVP in otherwise idiopathic SCD suggests that MMVP arises when specific arrhythmia modulators allow for VF initiation and perpetuation through action potential prolongation, repolarization heterogeneity and Purkinje triggering. Adequately powered prospective studies are needed to assess strategies for identifying MMVP and the primary prevention of SCD, including ICD implantation, sympathetic modulation and early surgical mitral valve repair. Given the low event rate, a collaborative multicenter approach is essential.

Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review

Background

The relationship between mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains controversial. In this systematic review, we evaluate the relationship between isolated MVP and SCD to better define a potential high‐risk subtype. In addition, we determine whether premortem parameters could predict SCD in patients with MVP and the incidence of SCD in MVP.

Methods and Results

Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase for all English literature articles published between 1960 and 2018 regarding MVP and SCD or cardiac arrest. We also identified articles investigating predictors of ventricular arrhythmias or SCD and cohort studies reporting SCD outcomes in MVP. From 2180 citations, there were 79 articles describing 161 cases of MVP with SCD or cardiac arrest. The median age was 30 years and 69% of cases were female. Cardiac arrest occurred during situations of stress in 47% and was caused by ventricular fibrillation in 81%. Premature ventricular complexes on Holter monitoring (92%) were common. Most cases had bileaflet involvement (70%) with redundancy (99%) and nonsevere mitral regurgitation (83%). From 22 articles describing predictors for ventricular arrhythmias or SCD in MVP, leaflet redundancy was the only independent predictor of SCD. The incidence of SCD with MVP was estimated at 217 events per 100 000 person‐years.

Conclusions

Isolated MVP and SCD predominantly affects young females with redundant bileaflet prolapse, with cardiac arrest usually occurring as a result of ventricular arrhythmias. To better understand the complex relationship between MVP and SCD, standardized reporting of clinical, electrophysiological, and cardiac imaging parameters with longitudinal follow‐up is required.

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

The patient with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia represents a common management problem for the cardiologist. The challenges posed by this type of arrhythmia differs from those posed by other arrhythmias, because most instances of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia do not cause symptoms. This article reviews common situations in which nonsustained ventricular tachycardia occurs and their appropriate management.

Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia

Most ventricular tachycardias encountered in clinical practice occur in patients who have structural heart disease. Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia refers to those arrhythmias that occur in patients without structural heart disease, metabolic/electrolyte abnormalities, or the long QT syndrome. Three commonly recognized forms of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia include: (a) ventricular tachycardia associated with mitral valve prolapse, (b) ventricular tachycardia originating from the right ventricular outflow tract, and (c) ventricular tachycardia originating from the left ventricle. Recently, a fourth type of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, termed the Brugada syndrome, has been identified as responsible for some cases of cardiac arrest in persons without apparent structural heart disease. Each form of ventricular tachycardia may be considered a discrete syndrome based on its electrocardiographic characteristics, mechanisms, responses to pharmacologic intervention, and prognosis (good in most cases). Ventricular tachycardias range from the common to the exotic, but all represent syndromes with which the internist and general cardiologist should be familiar.

The effect of panic attack on mitral valve prolapse

It has been reported that panic attacks might cause mitral valve prolapse (MVP) via haemodynamic or indirect effects. Such prolapse can be classified as being physiological (benign course) or pathological (poor course). It is therefore important to consider whether panic attacks, as a risk factor for MVP, are associated with its physiological or pathological type. Our study sample consisted of two groups of patients with panic disorder (PD), one having onset within 1 year (n=24) and the other with a history of more than 10 years (n=21). Demographic data, symptom presentations, auscultatory and echocardiographic findings of both groups were compared, but no significant difference was found except with regard to anticipatory anxiety. It is concluded that panic attack exerts no significant effect on mitral valve prolapse.

Patients with valvular heart disease presenting with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias or syncope: results of programmed ventricular stimulation and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Programmed ventricular stimulation is commonly used to guide therapy in post-myocardial infarction patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). In patients with valvular heart disease presenting with spontaneous VT, VF, or syncope, the usefulness of this technique is still unclear. The aim of the study was to analyze whether programmed ventricular stimulation was helpful in guiding therapy and determining prognosis in 97 patients with valvular heart disease presenting with VT (60%), VF (18%), or syncope (22%).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were classified as having either predominant ventricular pressure or volume overload or no significant pressure or volume overload. Overall, sustained VT or VF was inducible in 38 (39%) and 19 (20%) patients, respectively. Forty-six (47%) patients were discharged on antiarrhythmic drugs, 29 (30%) received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and 22 (23%) remained without therapy. With serial drug testing, inducibility was completely or partially suppressed in 18 (19%) and 9 (9%) patients, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 51 months (n=97), 17 patients (18%) died (sudden death, n=7; heart failure, n=4; noncardiac causes, n=6). One-, 2- and 3-year event-free survival for sudden death, sustained VT, or VF was 77%, 68%, and 61%, respectively. Only inducibility of VT during baseline study (P<.0003) and left ventricular volume overload (P<.008) were significant predictors of arrhythmic events. Recurrence of arrhythmic events occurred in 56% and 56% of patients with complete or partial suppression of inducibility during serial drug testing as well as in 10 of 19 (53%) patients without a change in inducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Although programmed ventricular stimulation seems to predict adverse outcome, serial drug testing is unreliable in guiding therapy. The type of workload imposed on the ventricles influences outcome, being worse in patients with left ventricular volume overload. Therefore, implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator should be considered early for the management of these patients.

Mitral valve prolapse and ventricular arrhythmias: observations in a patient with a 20-year history

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular arrhythmias are a common feature in patients with mitral valve prolapse. In an attempt to determine the origin and underlying electrophysiologic mechanism, we describe a patient with ventricular fibrillation, exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia (VT), and, at the time of diagnosis, prolapse of the posterior mitral valve leaflet without mitral regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Treatment with beta-blockade and diphenylhydantoin prevented the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias for more than 17 years. Discontinuation of the therapy resulted in an immediate reappearance of the VT, which, despite the marked enlargement of the left ventricle (secondary to development of severe mitral valve regurgitation), had a strikingly similar morphology. For hemodynamic reasons, the patient was finally selected for valve replacement. Detailed pre-, peri-, and postoperative studies were performed, including administration of flunarizine, body surface mapping, construction of perioperative epicardial and endocardial maps, and studies of the excised muscles in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed afterdepolarization-induced triggered activity is the mechanism of VT in this mitral valve prolapse patient. The trigger is provided by isolated ventricular premature complexes elicited by a different electrophysiologic mechanism, possibly reentry, which is related to stretch and presumably to fibrosis of the papillary muscles.

Monomorphic right ventricular tachycardia in a patient with mitral valve prolapse

A patient with mitral valve prolapse and symptomatic ventricular ectopy underwent an electrophysiological study during which a sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with a left bundle branch block/right axis deviation morphology was induced. This morphology was replicated by pace mapping at the right ventricular outflow tract. To the best of our knowledge, this finding has not been previously described and suggests that the association between ventricular arrhythmias and mitral valve prolapse may not necessarily be causal.

Ventricular arrhythmia factors in mitral valve prolapse

To assess the prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias and late potentials (LPs) in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and to identify clinical, ECG, and echocardiographic markers of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias, we studied 58 consecutive patients (mean age 46.6 +/- 17.8 years; 29 males, 29 females) with MVP diagnosed by echocardiography. Patients underwent ambulatory ECG recording (n = 58), exercise stress test (n = 56), signal-averaged ECG (n = 58), and programmed ventricular stimulation (n = 52). Ten patients (17.2%) had spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), 26 patients (44.8%) had premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), Lown grade > or = 3 during 24-hour ECG, and 19 had Lown grade > or = 3 PVCs during exercise stress test; 13 patients had LPs (22.4%). We provoked sustained VT in one case and NSVT in ten cases. Patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias during 24-hour ECG and exercise stress test were older and more often had mitral regurgitation. There was a statistical correlation between the presence of LPs and spontaneous VT (46.1% vs 8.9%; P < 0.005) and induced ventricular arrhythmias (50% vs 12.8%; P < 0.005). No correlation was found between spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias and thickness or posterior displacement of the mitral valve. In conclusion, complex ventricular arrhythmia (especially VT) and LPs are frequent in MVP. Patient age and mitral regurgitation seem to be determinant factors of complex ventricular arrhythmias in MVP. On signal-averaged ECG, absence of LPs seems to be a good additional marker to identify MVP patients without spontaneous VT. On the other hand, programmed ventricular stimulation does not appear valuable in determining a MVP subgroup with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmias.

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: identification and management of high-risk patients

NSVT is common in normal persons and in patients with a variety of heart diseases. When present in patients with coronary artery disease, particularly after a recent myocardial infarction, it is associated with an increased risk of sudden and nonsudden cardiac death. However, its prognostic significance in patients with nonischemic heart disease, with the possible exception of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, remains controversial. In patients with coronary artery disease, certain diagnostic tools (e.g., determination of left ventricular function. PVS) help to identify low- and high-risk patients who may or may not benefit from antiarrhythmic treatment. There is no consensus at this point as to the best approach for identifying and treating high-risk patients. Ongoing clinical trials should provide important information on the roles of signal-averaged ECGs and PVS in the management of patients with NSVT and coronary artery disease. In the meantime, treatment should be individualized for each patient. beta-Blockers should probably be the first line of therapy to control symptoms. Asymptomatic potentially high-risk patients (i.e., those with LVEF < 40%) should be referred for enrollment in randomized controlled studies.

Malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse and mild mitral regurgitation

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common disorder that, in general, has a good prognosis. Rare occasions of sudden death have been reported in patients with MVP and it is presumed that the basis of sudden death is arrhythmic. We report seven patients with moderate to severe MVP and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. All patients had trivial to mild mitral regurgitation and normal left ventricular function. Three patients presented with syncope, two with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and three with recurrent palpitations and presyncope. In a mean follow-up period of 2.5 years (range 6 months to 5 years), two patients died suddenly despite successful control of their nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) with sotalol as shown by ambulatory monitoring. Two patients, who had sustained VT despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy, had mitral valve surgery, however, monomorphic VT could be induced in both even after surgery. The arrhythmias in the remaining three patients are controlled on antiarrhythmic drugs. We conclude that a selected subset of patients with MVP, malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and mild mitral regurgitation are at risk of sudden death. Syncope, inferolateral repolarization changes, complex ventricular ectopy, and a markedly myxomatous valve may be pointers to higher risk of sudden death and mitral valve surgery may not provide control of ventricular arrhythmias.

Selection of patients for programmed ventricular stimulation: a clinical decision-making model based on multivariate analysis of clinical variables

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to assess the utility of clinical variables in predicting the inducibility of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in a heterogeneous group of patients undergoing programmed ventricular stimulation.

METHODS

Variables were considered in a simulated chronologic order to determine the incremental information added by the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) and left ventricular ejection fraction. All patients undergoing baseline programmed ventricular stimulation for induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia during a 30-month period were included in the study. Fourteen historical, ECG, signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular wall motion variables were evaluated for their ability in predicting inducibility of a sustained ventricular arrhythmia, a "positive" event, at programmed ventricular stimulation.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis of the clinical variables, comparison between patients with positive or negative results showed significant differences in 10 of the 14 clinical variables: major cardiac diagnosis, history of ventricular tachycardia, myocardial infarction by history or ECG, all five signal-averaged ECG variables, left ventricular ejection fraction and presence of left ventricular aneurysm. On multivariate analysis, five independent variables were determined to be important: history of ventricular tachycardia, historical or ECG evidence of myocardial infarction, history of loss of consciousness, filtered QRS duration on the signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular ejection fraction. However, with sequential multivariate analysis, a model based only on historical and conventional ECG data was found to do as well as a model that included signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular ejection fraction data.

CONCLUSIONS

Routinely available noninvasive historical, ECG, signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular wall motion variables can be used to accurately predict the outcome of programmed ventricular stimulation. The majority of the predictive power was obtained with the routine model, using only historical and ECG data. The signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular wall motion analysis added no significant incremental information.

Mitral valve prolapse: cardiac arrest with long-term survival

Cardiac arrest has been reported in patients with mitral valve prolapse; however, clinical characteristics and survival information are limited since most of the cases reported include autopsy data. Nine patients (2 male, 7 female) with mitral valve prolapse were identified who had cardiac arrest; ventricular fibrillation was documented in 8 patients; resuscitation was unsuccessful in 2. Eight had a history of palpitations (months to 15 years duration) and ventricular arrhythmias, 3 had a history (5-15 years) of recurrent syncope, and 1 was totally asymptomatic. Cardiac catheterization-angiographic studies in 8 patients demonstrated normal coronary artery anatomy and mitral valve prolapse. All 9 patients had auscultatory and echocardiographic evidence of mitral valve prolapse. Seven survivors (6 still alive) were followed from 3 to 14 years after cardiac arrest. A subset of patients with mitral valve prolapse and cardiac arrest is described in whom past medical history is compatible with cardiac arrhythmias or syncope, and whose long-term prognosis appears better than patients with other causes of cardiac arrest.