Effects of cardiac medications on ventricular performance: emphasis on evaluation with radionuclide angiography

A normal electrocardiogram precludes the need for left ventriculography in the assessment of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a normal electrocardiogram can identify good left ventricular function and obviate the need for routine left ventriculography in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

A prospective study of patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation.

SETTING

A regional cardiac centre.

PATIENTS

The electrocardiograms, coronary angiograms, and left ventriculograms of 391 consecutive patients undergoing investigations for suspected coronary artery disease were entered into the study. Patients with arrhythmias and cardiac pathologies other than coronary artery disease were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The electrocardiogram was assessed using a 29 point QRS scoring system, and classified by two cardiologists and a trainee cardiologist as normal or abnormal. Left ventricular function was assessed by digital ventriculography.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of a QRS score of 0 (normal QRS complexes) for discriminating good left ventricular function (ejection fraction > or = 50%) were 92.6%, 41.5%, and 97.2%, respectively. The figures for a normal electrocardiogram as assessed by a doctor were 96.3%, 40.4%, and 98.6% for cardiologist A; 96.3%, 37.4%, and 98.4% for cardiologist B; and 94.4%, 49.6%, and 98.2% for the cardiology trainee.

CONCLUSIONS

If a cardiologist judges the ECG to be normal, left ventriculography is unnecessary and a formal QRS score does not improve reliability of this clinical judgment. Adopting this strategy would save 30-40,000 Pounds in consumables and 65-87 hours of catheter laboratory and staff time for a department catheterising 3000 patients with suspected coronary artery disease annually.

Effects of beta blockade on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function at rest and during exercise in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris

This study examined the effects of beta blockade with betaxolol, a cardioselective, lipid-soluble, beta-adrenergic-blocking agent, on rest and exercise systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in 15 patients, aged 40 to 70 years (mean = 52), with chronic stable angina pectoris. Each patient underwent three upright exercise studies at identical workloads; the first was a baseline study, the second was done 3 hours after a single oral dose, and the third was obtained after chronic therapy for 2 weeks. Beta blockade was evident by significant decreases in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure at rest and during exercise (p less than 0.04). Although there were no significant changes (at rest or during exercise) in mean left ventricular ejection fraction and peak filling rate, individual variations were seen after 3 hours and 2 weeks of therapy. During chronic therapy, the peak filling rate increased in three patients, decreased in five, and remained unchanged in seven. Also, discordant changes in systolic and diastolic functions were seen at rest and during exercise during both acute and chronic therapy. Thus, although acute and chronic beta blockade produces no significant changes in mean measurements of diastolic and systolic left ventricular performance, individual variations and discordant results are seen in many patients. The acute effects are generally consistent with the chronic effects, but exceptions are present.

Effects of esmolol on cardiac function: evaluation by noninvasive techniques

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, the effects of esmolol and propranolol were examined at rest and during peak upright exercise in 15 patients. At rest, both esmolol and propranolol significantly decreased heart rate, systolic blood pressure, rate-pressure product, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac index and right ventricular ejection fraction. During exercise, significant decreases were also found in heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac index in both treatment groups. No significant differences were found between mean esmolol and mean propranolol measurements at rest and during exercise, except for the exercise systolic blood pressure, which was lower during esmolol infusion. Blood levels of esmolol decreased markedly by 30 minutes postinfusion, as did its beta-blocking action. Esmolol was well tolerated with no important local, systemic or laboratory abnormalities. Thus, the effects of esmolol on cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise are similar to those of propranolol.