Occult arrhythmias as the etiology of unexplained syncope in children with structurally normal hearts

[Comparison of patients with paroxysmal junctional tachycardia and syncope with those without syncope]

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study was to determine the possible mechanisms of presyncope in patients who have paroxysmal junctional tachycardias (PJT) and a normal surface ECG between tachycardias.

METHODS

Among 419 patients consecutively recruited for PJT, aged from 10 to 88 years (47+/-19), 78 of them had presented at least one syncope; they had a normal ECG in sinus rhythm. Transesophageal programmed atrial stimulation was performed using one and two atrial extrastimuli delivered in control state and if necessary after infusion of 20-30 microg of isoproterenol; arterial blood pressure was monitored; vagal maneuvers and tilt test (n=25) were performed; echocardiogram was systematic.

RESULTS

Age, sex, method of induction, tachycardia mechanism and the mean heart rate in tachycardia were similar in patients with and without syncope. Syncope was related to a vagal reaction induced by the PJT in 31 patients, to a fast rate during PJT in 15 patients, to a sinus node dysfunction in six patients, to a coronary ischemia in five patients, to a tetany induced by PJT in three patients, to an advanced age in three patients, to multiple causes in three patients and remained unexplained in eight patients. Radiofrequency ablation of reentrant circuit, performed in 28 patients, suppressed syncope in 26 of them.

CONCLUSION

Presyncope or syncope occurred in 18% of patients who had a history of paroxysmal junctional tachycardia. Several mechanisms were implicated; the most frequent causes were coronary ischemia or sick sinus syndrome in old patients, vasovagal reaction or fast rate in tachycardia or tetany in patients of all ages.

Utility of transesophageal atrial pacing in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope associated or not with palpitations

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive studies are often negative in patients with syncope, normal surface ECG and without heart disease. The purpose of the study was to determine the diagnostic impact of an esophageal electrophysiological study performed during a consultation.

METHODS

A total of 154 patients aged from 16 to 87 years were consecutively recruited for unexplained syncope; they had a normal ECG in sinus rhythm, no documented arrhythmia and no patent heart disease. Half of them complained of palpitations. Electrophysiologic study was performed during a consultation by transesophageal route: rate of 2nd d AV block occurrence during atrial pacing and sinus node recovery time were determined; programmed atrial stimulation using one and two atrial extrastimuli were delivered in control state and then after infusion of 0.02-1 microg/min of isoproterenol; arterial blood pressure was monitored.

RESULTS

(1) Electrophysiologic study was positive in 107 patients (69%); (2) sinus node dysfunction was noted in 9 patients (6%); (3) atrioventricular conduction disturbances were noted in 2 patients (1%); (4) vasovagal reaction which associated a junctional bradycardia and a fall of arterial blood pressure and which reproduced spontaneous symptoms was provoked by isoproterenol infusion in 21 patients (14%); (5) sustained atrial fibrillation was induced in 23 patients (15%); and (6) paroxysmal junctional tachycardia was induced in 52 patients (34%). Patients with negative study were younger (44+/-21.5 years) than those with sinus node dysfunction or atrial fibrillation (71+/-9 and 63+/-14 years, respectively). The treatment was guided by these data: patients with inducible atrial fibrillation were treated by antiarrhythmic drugs and those with inducible paroxysmal junctional tachycardia by the radiofrequency ablation of reentrant circuit. Syncope disappeared in all patients but 2.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal electrophysiologic study performed during a consultation was a safe, rapid and economic means to detect an arrhythmia (sinus node dysfunction or supraventricular tachycardia) in patients with dizziness/syncope and palpitations in half cases. Supraventricular tachycardia was clearly an underestimated cause of syncope in this population.

Incidence and mechanism of presyncope and/or syncope associated with paroxysmal junctional tachycardia

The objectives of this study were to: (1) define the incidence of presyncope and/or syncope in patients with paroxysmal junctional tachycardias, (2) determine their causes, and (3) determine the outcome of symptoms. Syncope is a frequent problem and is often caused by paroxysmal tachycardia. The mechanism of hemodynamic instability is unknown. The population study consisted of 281 patients, consecutively recruited because they had paroxysmal tachycardia and a sinus rhythm on a normal electrocardiogram. Fifty-two patients (group I) had presyncope and/or syncope associated with tachycardia. The remaining patients (group II) had no loss of consciousness. Transesophageal programmed atrial stimulation used 1 and 2 atrial extrastimuli, delivered in a control state, and if necessary, after infusion of 20 to 30 microg of isoproterenol. Arterial blood pressure was monitored. Vagal maneuvers and echocardiogram were performed in all patients. Paroxysmal tachycardia was induced in 51 group I patients and 227 group II patients. Comparisons of groups I and II revealed that age (50 +/- 21 vs 49 +/- 17 years), presence of heart disease (10% vs 10%), mechanism of tachycardia with a predominance of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (70.5% vs 76%), and rate of tachycardia (196 +/- 42 vs 189 +/- 37 beats/min) did not differ between the groups. However, there were differences in both groups with regard to significantly higher incidences of positive vasovagal maneuvers (35% vs 4%, p <0.01), isoproterenol infusion required to induce tachycardia (55% vs 17%, p <0.001), and vasovagal reaction at the end of tachycardia (41% vs 4%, p <0.05). Thirty-seven group I patients underwent radiofrequency ablation of the reentrant circuit, which suppressed presyncope and/or syncope in 36 of the 37 patients. Thus, presyncope and/or syncope frequently complicated the history of patients with paroxysmal junctional tachycardia (18.5%). Several mechanisms are implicated, but vasovagal reaction was the most frequent cause. Treatment of the tachycardia typically suppressed presyncope and/or syncope.

Causes of syncope in children: a prospective study

We prospectively evaluated 80 patients with syncope, between January 1991 and January 1992 to determine the causes of syncope in children. There were 35 male and 45 female patients, whose mean age was 10.5 years. A single syncopal attack had occurred in 30 patients and multiple attacks in 50. A cardiovascular cause was established in 22 (27.5%) patients and a noncardiovascular cause in 36 (45%). The cause remained unknown in 22 patients (27.5%). Vasovagal syncope was the leading cause of syncope in these patients with an incidence of 32.5%. These findings suggest that every patient who has even one syncopal attack should be promptly investigated since the underlying cause could be a life-threatening one.

Cardiac issues in the pediatric emergency room

A great variety of problems referable to the cardiovascular system can prompt a visit to the pediatric emergency room. From the initial presentation of congenital heart disease, to the subsequent life-long management of these patients, to miscellaneous problems like Kawasaki disease and chest pain, the front-line pediatrician must be skilled in the recognition and early management of myriad complaints. This article focuses on information that can assist the emergency pediatrician in the evaluation and treatment of the cardiac patient from arrival in the emergency room until transfer of care to the pediatric cardiologist or inpatient staff.

Evaluating the child with syncope

Syncope is a multifactorial disorder; however, most pediatric syncopal episodes result from vasodepressor syndrome or the simple faint. A very detailed history and physical examination should indicate the etiology in the majority of cases. Extensive diagnostic studies are rarely necessary. Tilt table testing is a reliable way of identifying individuals predisposed to vasodepressor syncope, and may provide a means of assessing the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in those who require treatment. Treatment for syncope from etiologies other than vasodepressor syndrome is directed at the underlying cause.