Antihypertensive compounds as antiarrhythmic agents: focus on beta-blocking drugs in ventricular arrhythmias

QT-interval prolonging drugs: mechanisms and clinical relevance of their arrhythmogenic hazards

The antiarrhythmic principle of drug-induced QT-interval prolongation is well known. However, with the widespread use of the presently known and new Class III antiarrhythmic agents under investigation, and the growing number of agents not primarily designed as antiarrhythmic drugs that potentially cause QT prolongation, we have also become aware of the proarrhythmic hazards associated with many of these agents. The proarrhythmic risk differs markedly from one agent to another and interferes with many individual clinical variables (e.g., hypokalemia, sinus bradycardia). This paper summarizes the present data on the proarrhythmic risk of drug-induced QT prolongation, including the value and problems of the rate-corrected QT interval, the mechanisms involved in the genesis of proarrhythmia, and the clinical cofactors that facilitate the occurrence of proarrhythmic events. In addition, an extensive database provides information on the known proarrhythmic risk of all currently used QT-prolonging agents.

Advantages of beta blockers versus antiarrhythmic agents and calcium antagonists in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction

Patients who have sustained greater than or equal to 1 myocardial infarcts are at high risk for sudden death or reinfarction; the risk is highest for those with lowest ventricular ejection fraction, continuing myocardial ischemia and asymptomatic high-density and complex premature ventricular contractions. At present, beta blockers when given prophylactically are the only agents that reduce the incidence of sudden death and reinfarction in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) in the first 2 years. The beneficial effect was shown to correlate with a reduction in heart rate, the effect being absent or deleterious with beta blockers with marked sympathomimetic activity. The effects of beta blockers on ventricular fibrillation appeared to be dissociated from those on premature ventricular contractions. Trials with calcium antagonists indicate that these drugs had no effect or increased the mortality rate. The divergent effect of beta blockers and calcium antagonists is unexplained but may be due in part to a lack of bradycardiac effect of calcium antagonists; there were no differences in effect among different calcium antagonists. Data from trials involving class I antiarrhythmic agents indicate that agents acting by depression of cardiac conduction are either devoid of effect or produce a modest increase in mortality. Results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, employing the newer class I agents flecainide and encainide, were used to determine whether the suppression of premature ventricular contractions in the survivors of acute MI reduces mortality. Flecainide and encainide suppressed premature ventricular contractions greater than 80%, but resulted in an increased mortality rate undoubtedly due to a marked proarrhythmic effect. Whether these data can be extrapolated to all class I agents is uncertain. Preliminary data with class III antiarrhythmic agents suggest that these agents, especially amiodarone, similarly to beta blockers, have the potential to reduce mortality in survivors of MI. Evolving data suggest that in the secondary prevention of morbid events in the survivors of acute MI, the focus must shift away from antiarrhythmic agents that delay conduction and toward beta blockers and antifibrillatory actions resulting from a prolongation of refractoriness.

Suppressant effects of conventional beta blockers and sotalol on complex and repetitive ventricular premature complexes

Beta-blocking drugs have been shown to reduce the overall mortality and risk of sudden cardiac death in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. It is not known whether such an effect is mediated by suppression of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs). The circadian rhythmicity of ventricular arrhythmia can also be suppressed by beta-blocking drugs, and this may help reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death during the morning hours. Recent studies have also shown that beta blockers can provide a safe and effective combination with class IA antiarrhythmic agents when arrhythmias cannot be controlled with class IA agents alone. Sotalol, a nonselective beta antagonist, has unique electrophysiologic properties, and several studies have shown it to be more effective than conventional beta blockers in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias. However, direct comparative studies of the suppression of VPCs are lacking. In a recent double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study, the antiarrhythmic effects of sotalol and propranolol were compared in 172 patients with greater than 30 VPCs/hour. After the initial 1-week washout and 1-week placebo period, patients were randomly assigned to either 160 mg of sotalol administered twice daily (76 patients) or 40 mg of propranolol administered 3 times daily (91 patients). Those responding to therapy (decreases greater than 75% VPCs) continued to take these doses, but nonresponders were given higher doses, 320 mg of sotalol twice daily or 80 mg of propranolol 3 times daily, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)