Hemodynamic effects of intravenous metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction: the role of anatomic subsets in predicting patient response

Failure of intravenous metoprolol to limit acute myocardial infarct size in a nonreperfused porcine model

The usefulness of intravenous beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in limiting infarct size when neither reperfusion nor collateral flow occurs is unknown. The effect of intravenous metoprolol on limiting myocardial infarct size was therefore examined in a nonreperfused porcine model. Closed-chest techniques were used to occlude the left anterior descending coronary artery, after which animals were randomized at 20 minutes to receive intravenous metoprolol, 0.75 mg/kg, or placebo. Infarct size examined at 5 hours with Evans blue and triphenyltetrazolium staining techniques was expressed as a percentage of total ventricular myocardium at ischemic risk. This percentage was not significantly different between the groups (84% +/- 5% with metoprolol vs 90% +/- 4% with placebo; p = 0.4). Myocardial infarct size was not significantly decreased at 5 hours by early administration of intravenous metoprolol when the infarct artery remained occluded and collateral flow was minimal.

Beta receptor antagonists in the treatment of heart failure

The use of beta-receptor antagonists in the treatment of heart failure is controversial. Available data do not allow general recommendations regarding their use. In dilated cardiomyopathy, several studies suggest that long-term treatment in individual patients reduces symptoms and increases exercise capacity. Short-term treatment is usually not beneficial, except in patients with ischemically induced left ventricular dysfunction. In heart failure, post myocardial infarction and in chronic ischemic heart disease, no proper long-term study has been performed to evaluate its effects. However, patients with acute myocardial infarction tolerate beta blockers, despite the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and long-term prognosis is improved. Newer agents, some with ancillary properties, such as intrinsic activity and vasodilatation, may have advantages. In the future we need a better description of the cardiac status in our patients in order to be able to select those that will respond favorably to beta-receptor antagonists. The mechanisms by which some patients improve are still obscure. Protection against receptor downregulation, restoration of receptor density, protection against cardiotoxicity of catecholamines, and improvement in ischemic systolic and diastolic left ventricular function are all possible. The fear that beta-receptor antagonists are dangerous in heart failure is in most instances not warranted, but an initial deterioration may have to be accepted in order to gain long-term beneficial effects. Ongoing studies in both idiopathic cardiomyopathy and in postinfarction failure will hopefully help us to define the use of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in the future.