Clinical and electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation complicating the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Executive Summary: European Heart Rhythm Association Consensus Document on the Management of Supraventricular Arrhythmias: Endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE)

This paper is an executive summary of the full European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, published in Europace. It summarises developments in the field and provides recommendations for patient management, with particular emphasis on new advances since the previous European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The EHRA consensus document is available to read in full at http://europace.oxfordjournals.org.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pharmacologic therapy is commonly used for the acute treatment and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and continues to be an important long-term option for some patients. Drug choice depends on the correct diagnosis of the arrhythmia and an understanding of its mechanism. Pharmacologic agents commonly used in the acute and chronic treatment of SVT are reviewed along with their effect on the various types of SVT. Drugs that are well tolerated with minimal side effects are preferred over agents with perhaps more efficacy but higher risk of toxicity.

New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, the prevalence of which is increasing with the aging of the population. Because of its clinical importance and the lack of highly satisfactory management approaches, AF is the subject of active clinical and research efforts. This paper reviews recent and on-going developments in pharmacological and non-drug management of AF. The ideal therapeutic goal for AF is the production and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Comparative studies suggest that available class I and III drugs have comparable and modest efficacy for sinus rhythm maintenance. Amiodarone, with actions of all antiarrhythmic classes, has recently been shown to have clearly superior efficacy compared with other available drugs. Newer agents are in development, but their advantages are as yet unclear and appear limited. A potentially interesting approach is the prescription of drugs upon the occurrence of an attack, rather than on a continuous basis. Recent insights into AF mechanisms may permit therapy to prevent development of the AF substrate. An alternative to sinus rhythm maintenance is a rate control approach, with no attempt to prevent AF. Drugs to effect rate control include digitalis, beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. Digitalis has limited value for control of exercise heart rate and for paroxysmal AF, but is particularly well suited for patients with concomitant AF and congestive heart failure. AV-nodal ablation and pacing is an effective alternative for rate control but leaves the patient pacemaker dependent. The relative merits of rate versus rhythm control are being evaluated in ongoing trials, preliminary results of which indicate no statistically significant differences in primary endpoints but highlight the risks of rhythm control therapy. In patients requiring pacemakers, physiological pacing (dual chamber devices or atrial pacing) has an advantage over purely ventricular pacemakers in AF prevention. Newer pacing modalities that produce more synchronised atrial activation, as well as pacemakers that prevent excessive atrial rate swings, show promise in AF prevention and may soon see wider use. The usefulness of automatic atrial defibrillators is presently limited by discomfort during shocks. Targeted destruction of pulmonary vein foci by radiofrequency catheter ablation suppresses paroxysmal AF. Efficacy in persistent AF is lower and still under study. Problems include potential recurrence in other veins and a small but nontrivial risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. Surgical division of the atria into zones with limited electrical connection, the MAZE procedure, is highly effective in AF prevention but is a major intervention that is not applicable to most patients. In conclusion, significant advances are being made in the management of patients with AF but much more work remains to be done.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: wide complex tachycardia due to accessory pathway

Tachycardia with a wide QRS complex is usually due to ventricular tachycardia (VT), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with aberrant intraventricular conduction, or an accessory pathway-mediated dysrhythmia. The most common type of accessory pathway causing a wide complex tachycardia is the atrioventricular bypass tract. Distinguishing the accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia from VT or SVT with aberrancy is often difficult, but has important clinical consequences. This article will review the diagnosis of wide complex tachycardia due to an accessory pathway and its related management in the emergent setting.

Clinical features of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome is the most common form of ventricular preexcitation. Understanding this syndrome is fundamental for anyone interested in learning about arrhythmias. This review addresses (1) the historic sequence of events that led to the understanding of this syndrome; (2) the pathologic, embryologic, and electrophysiologic properties of accessory pathways; (3) the epidemiology and genetics of this syndrome; (4) the clinical diagnosis of this syndrome, with special emphasis on the arrhythmias that patients with ventricular preexcitation are predisposed to; and (5) the therapy for patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Sudden Death During Flecainide Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

The Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome can be complicated by atrial fibrillation that may increase morbidity and mortality. Different pharmacologic therapy, includes class IA, IC, and III agents, has been used in such cases with variable success. We now use less pharmacologic intervention with development of an electrode catheter ablation for accessory pathways. However, antiarrhythmic agents are still being used, especially when an electrode catheter ablation is unavailable or if a patient refuses such a procedure. Therefore, it is prudent that one understands each antiarrhythmic agents' electropharmacologic properties as well as its potential proarrhythmic effect in order to accurately assess each drug's risk-benefit ratio. We present a case that illustrates electropharmacologic properties of quinidine, flecainide, sotalol, and amiodarone on various cardiac tissues, as well as possible proarrhythmic effect of flecainide on a structurally normal heart.

Atrial fibrillation: new management strategies

The main goal of therapy in atrial fibrillation is to restore sinus rhythm, if this is possible, to avoid adverse hemodynamic, electrical, and embolic consequences. The restoration of sinus rhythm is urgent if the patient is unstable. In a stable patient, if the duration is shorter than 48 hours and an atrial thrombus is unlikely, then sinus rhythm can be restored after initial rate control. If the duration of atrial fibrillation is more than 48 hours, the embolic risk may be significant, and anticoagulation will be required for 2 to 4 weeks before an attempt at cardioversion. In patients in whom sinus rhythm cannot be restored or maintained, the goal of therapy is rate control and reduction of embolic risk unless the risk of anticoagulation outweighs its benefit. In difficult cases, rate control may be accomplished with AV nodal ablation and pacemaker implantation or with one of the surgical procedures described above with varying degrees of normalization of the physiology. Although not included in this flow chart, we do not advocate episodic intermittent therapy for patients with infrequent episodes of atrial fibrillation because this could be potentially dangerous and may place the patient at a higher risk for developing proarrhythmia.

Flecainide in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The effects of flecainide on electrophysiologic parameters and arrhythmias in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome were reviewed. Acute administration of flecainide blocks conduction across the accessory pathway in the anterograde direction in 40% and in the retrograde direction in 50% of cases and markedly prolongs refractoriness in the remaining cases. Flecainide has a lesser effect on refractoriness of the His-Purkinje system, atrium, ventricle, and atrioventricular node. Flecainide terminates atrioventricular tachycardia in greater than 80% of cases when given intravenously, and oral therapy prevents clinical recurrences in greater than 60% of cases, but may occasionally result in incessant tachycardia. Long-term efficacy is predicted by abolition of conduction across the accessory pathway or prevention of tachycardia induction at acute electrophysiologic testing. Concomitant administration of a beta-adrenoreceptor blocker results in greater long-term efficacy. Administered during preexcited atrial fibrillation, flecainide consistently slows the ventricular response and converts the majority of cases to sinus rhythm. Serious ventricular proarrhythmia is seen almost exclusively in patients with structural cardiac disease. Flecainide is a useful drug for the acute and chronic control of tachycardia in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Amiodarone. An overview of its pharmacological properties, and review of its therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Amiodarone, originally developed over 20 years ago, is a potent antiarrhythmic drug with the actions of all antiarrhythmic drug classes. It has been successfully used in the treatment of symptomatic and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmias. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction amiodarone does not usually produce any clinically significant cardiodepression and the drug has relatively high antiarrhythmic efficacy. Preliminary studies indicate that amiodarone may have a beneficial effect on mortality and survival in certain groups of patients with ventricular arrhythmias, an action probably related to both its antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory effects. The adverse effect profile of amiodarone is diverse, involving the cardiac, thyroid, pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal, ocular, neurological and dermatological systems. Interstitial pneumonitis and hepatitis are potentially fatal, but the vast majority of adverse events are less serious, and some may be dose dependent. Pretreatment monitoring, regular assessments and the use of minimum effective doses are, therefore, necessary. Thus, with appropriate monitoring to control its well recognised adverse effects amiodarone has an important place as an effective 'broad spectrum' antiarrhythmic drug which has, so far, been used when other treatments have proved ineffective. More recent preliminary data also suggest that it may also have a beneficial effect in the prevention of sudden death in some patients.

Combined sotalol and flecainide given at low dosage in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

We determined the effects of combined sotalol (160 mg/day) and flecainide (200 mg/day) in 15 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. After medication given for 3 days, the plasma levels were 0.8 +/- 0.3 micrograms/ml for sotalol and 232 +/- 104 ng/ml for flecainide. Electrophysiologic testing showed complete blockade of the accessory pathway in 4 patients and a decrease in the anterograde conduction capacity by 27% in the remainder. The effect on the accessory pathway was unrelated to the resting conduction properties. Initiation of circus movement tachycardia was prevented in 5 of 11 patients. During a median period of 28 months of follow-up, 87% of patients were either free of tachycardia or satisfactorily improved. No proarrhythmic or adverse drug effects were observed.