Is the residual translesional pressure gradient useful to predict regional myocardial perfusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty?

Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is useful to guide treatment. Whether post-PCI FFR assessment might have clinical impact is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the range of post-PCI FFR values and analyze the relationship between post-PCI FFR and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases with cross-referencing of articles reporting post-PCI FFR and correlating post-PCI FFR values and clinical outcomes. The outcomes of interest were the immediate post-PCI FFR values and the correlations between post-PCI FFR and the incidence of repeat intervention and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

From 1995 to 2015, a total of 105 studies (n = 7470) were included, with 46 studies reporting post-PCI FFR and 59 studies evaluating relationship between post-PCI and clinical outcomes up to 30 months after PCI. Overall, post-PCI FFR values demonstrated a normal distribution with a mean value of 0.90 ± 0.04. There was a positive correlation between the percentage of stent use and post-PCI FFR (P < .0001). Meta-regression analysis indicated that higher post-PCI FFR values were associated with reduced rates of repeat intervention (P < .0001) and MACE (P = .0013). A post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 was associated with significantly lower risk of repeat PCI (odds ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.56, P < .0001) and MACE (odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, P = .0003).

CONCLUSIONS

FFR measurement after PCI was associated with prognostic significance. Further investigation is required to assess the role of post-PCI FFR and validate cutoff values in contemporary clinical practice.

Restenosis after Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was demonstrated in 61 (29%) of 210 successfully treated patients. Mostly it occurred within 4 months after treatment and in arteries less than 3 mm in diameter. Careful clinical follow-up is therefore particularly important early after angioplasty of smaller arteries. Redilation can be performed without increased risk of restenosis.

Coronary pressure measurements in post-myocardial infarction patients

The development of pressure monitoring guide-wires has facilitated the measurements of coronary pressures distal to a stenosis. The ratio of the distal coronary and aortic pressures (P(d)/P(a)) measured during maximal hyperaemia is a useful index for diagnosis and monitoring the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the role of coronary pressure measurements in post- myocardial infarction (MI) patients is not well established. Coronary pressure measurements should be used with caution during the acute phase of MI due to serious micro-vascular impairment. The hyperaemic pressure P(d)/P(a) ratio can identify ischaemic myocardial territories in patients with recent MI. Theoretically, coronary pressure measurements may be of value in predicting myocardial recovery after revascularization in post-MI patients with a moderate stenosis of the infarct-related artery and without angiographically evident collaterals.

Intermediate coronary artery stenosis: evidence-based decisions in interventions to avoid the oculostenotic reflex

The prevalence of intermediate coronary artery stenosis (defined as a diameter stenosis of 40% to 70%) is quite large in patients undergoing PTCA. The coronary angiogram is considered the 'gold standard' for the definition of coronary anatomy, in spite of various limitations associated with its use. In recent years, sensor tipped guidewire based methods of physiologic assessment of stenosis severity, like myocardial fractional flow reserve, and poststenotic coronary flow reserve had established their role in the decision making in catheterization laboratory. The decision making should combine morphologic and physiologic assessment as better evidence based approach in guiding therapy to avoid the 'oculostenotic reflex'.

Coronary physiology revisited : practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Various coronary physiological measurements can be made in the cardiac catheterization laboratory using sensor-tipped guidewires; they include the measurement of poststenotic absolute coronary flow reserve, the relative coronary flow reserve, and the pressure-derived fractional flow reserve of the myocardium. Ambiguity regarding abnormal microcirculation has been reduced or eliminated with measurements of relative coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. The role of microvascular flow impairment can be separately determined with coronary flow velocity reserve measurements. In addition to lesion assessment before and after intervention, emerging applications of coronary physiology include the determination of physiological responses to new pharmacological agents, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers, in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Measurements of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory provide objective data that complement angiography for clinical decision-making.

Clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal translesional pressure-flow velocity measurements

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety and outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with angiographically intermediate lesions that are found not to limit flow, as determined by direct translesional hemodynamic assessment.

BACKGROUND

The clinical importance of some coronary stenoses of intermediate angiographic severity frequently requires noninvasive stress testing. Direct translesional pressure and flow measurements may assist in clinical decision making in patients with such stenoses.

METHODS

Translesional spectral flow velocity (Doppler guide wire) and pressure data were obtained in 88 patients for 100 lesions (26 single-vessel and 74 multivessel coronary artery lesions) with quantitative angiographic coronary narrowings (mean +/- SD diameter narrowing 54 +/- 7% [range 40% to 74%]). Target lesion angioplasty was prospectively deferred on the basis of predetermined normal values, defined as a proximal/distal velocity ratio < 1.7 or a pressure gradient < 25 mm Hg, or both. Patients were followed up for 9 +/- 5 months (range 6 to 30).

RESULTS

In the deferred angioplasty group, translesional velocity ratios were similar to those of a normal reference group (mean 1.1 +/- 0.32 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.55) and significantly lower than those of a reference cohort of patients who had undergone angioplasty (2.27 +/- 1.2, p < 0.05). The mean translesional pressure gradient in the deferred angioplasty group was also lower than that in the angioplasty group (10 +/- 9 vs. 45 +/- 22 mm Hg, p < 0.001). At follow-up in the deferred angioplasty group, four, six, zero and two patients, respectively, had had subsequent angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or myocardial infarction or had died. In one patient, death was related to angioplasty of a nontarget artery lesion, and one patient with multivessel disease had a cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation 12 months after lesion assessment. Among the 10 patients requiring later angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting, only six procedures were performed on target arteries. No patient had a complication of translesional flow or pressure measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the safety, feasibility and clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty of coronary artery narrowings associated with normal translesional coronary hemodynamic variables. Given the practice of performing angioplasty without ischemic testing or when testing is inconclusive, translesional hemodynamic data obtained at diagnostic catheterization can identify patients in whom it is safe to postpone angioplasty.

Translesional pressure-flow velocity assessment in patients: Part I

Interventional physiology presents the operator with objective data to facilitate decision making. A thorough and validated understanding of the alterations of pressure and flow in the human coronary circulation is currently in progress. As illustrated in the case studies, some situations have data which may initially appear contradictory or unhelpful to clinical practice. These data should provide a framework to understand the dynamic physiology producing the clinical syndromes in patients undergoing coronary interventional procedures. Future Interventional Physiology Rounds will examine coronary pressure-flow responses during directional atherectomy, stents, and acute myocardial infarction.

Assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses: analysis of translesional pressure-flow velocity relations in patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the relation among the angiographic severity of coronary artery lesions, coronary flow velocity and translesional pressure gradients.

BACKGROUND

Determination of the clinical and hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses is often difficult and inexact. Angiography has been shown to be an imperfect tool for determining the physiologic significance of eccentric or irregular coronary lumen narrowing.

METHODS

Using a 0.018-in. (0.046 cm) intracoronary Doppler-tipped angioplasty guide wire, spectral flow velocity data both proximal and distal to coronary stenoses were compared with translesional pressure gradient measurements and angiographic data obtained during cardiac catheterization in 101 patients. There were 17 patients with normal angiographic findings and 84 with coronary artery disease, with lesions ranging from 28% to 99% diameter narrowing. Patients with coronary disease were assigned to two groups on the basis of translesional gradients at rest. Group A (n = 56) had gradients < 20 mm Hg, and Group B (n = 28) had gradients > or = 20 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Proximal average peak velocity, diastolic velocity integral and total velocity integral were slightly but statistically lower in Group A; however, the distal average peak velocity and diastolic and total velocity integrals were all markedly (all p < 0.01) decreased in patients with gradients > or = 20 mm Hg (Group B). In addition, the ratio of proximal to distal total flow velocity integral was higher in Group B (2.4 +/- 1.0) than in group A (1.1 +/- 0.3, p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between translesional pressure gradients and the ratios of the proximal to distal total flow velocity integrals (r = 0.8, p < 0.001), with a weaker relation between quantitative angiography and pressure gradients (r = 0.6, p < 0.001). In angiographically intermediate stenoses (range 50% to 70%), angiography was a poor predictor of translesional gradients (r = 0.2, p = NS), whereas the flow velocity ratios continued to have a strong correlation (r = 0.8, p < 0.001). Only two patients with a proximal/distal total flow velocity ratio < 1.7 had a translesional gradient > 30 mm Hg. Both patients had a very proximal lesion in a nonbranching right coronary artery.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that in branching human coronary arteries, a close relation exists between translesional hemodynamics and distal coronary flow velocity. Translesional coronary flow velocity is a new and easily applicable method for determining the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses that is superior to angiography and can be applied at the time of diagnostic catheterization. These data will provide a rational approach to making decisions on the use of coronary interventional techniques when angiographic findings are questionable.

Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Severity of coronary artery stenosis has been defined in terms of geometric dimensions, pressure gradient-flow relations, resistance to flow and coronary flow reserve, or maximum flow capacity after maximum arteriolar vasodilation. A direct relation between coronary pressure and flow, however, may only be presumed if the resistances in the coronary circulation are constant (and minimal) as theoretically is the case during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. In that case, pressure measurements theoretically can be used to predict maximum flow and assess functional stenosis severity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A theoretical model was developed for the different components of the coronary circulation, and a set of equations was derived by which the relative maximum flow or fractional flow reserve in both the stenotic epicardial artery and the myocardial vascular bed and the proportional contribution of coronary arterial and collateral flow to myocardial blood flow are calculated from measurements of arterial, distal coronary, and central venous pressures during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. To test this model, five dogs were acutely instrumented with an epicardial, coronary Doppler flow velocity transducer. Distal coronary pressures were measured by an ultrathin pressure-monitoring guide wire (0.015 in.) with minimal influence on transstenotic pressure gradient. Fractional flow reserve was calculated from the pressure measurements and compared with relative maximum coronary artery flow measured directly by the Doppler flowmeter at three different levels of arterial pressure for each of 12 different severities of stenosis at each pressure level. Relative maximum blood flow through the stenotic artery (Qs) measured directly by the Doppler flowmeter showed an excellent correlation with the pressure-derived values of Qs (r = 0.98 +/- 0.01, intercept = 0.02 +/- 0.03, slope = 0.98 +/- 0.04), of the relative maximum myocardial flow (r = 0.98 +/- 0.02, intercept = 0.26 +/- 0.07, slope = 0.73 +/- 0.08), and of the collateral blood flow (r = 0.96 +/- 0.04, intercept = 0.24 +/- 0.07, slope = -0.24 +/- 0.06). Moreover, the theoretically predicted constant relation between mean arterial pressure and coronary wedge pressure, both corrected for venous pressure, was confirmed experimentally (r = 0.97 +/- 0.03, intercept = 9.5 +/- 13.3, slope = 4.4 +/- 1.2).

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide the experimental basis for determining relative maximum flow or fractional flow reserve of both the epicardial coronary artery and the myocardium, including collateral flow, from pressure measurements during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. With a suitable guide wire for reliably measuring distal coronary pressure clinically, this method may have potential applications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for assessing changes in the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses and for estimating collateral flow achievable during occlusion of the coronary artery.

Inability of coronary blood flow reserve measurements to assess the efficacy of coronary angioplasty in the first 24 hours in unselected patients

To determine functional and anatomic changes in the first 24 hours after coronary angioplasty, we studied at random 15 patients (9 men, mean age 60 years) who underwent coronary angioplasty of 16 coronary arteries. Quantitative coronary angiography and coronary flow reserve measurements from digitized coronary angiograms were performed before, immediately after, and 24 hours after coronary angioplasty. Calculated were the minimal luminal diameter, obstruction area, and percentage diameter stenosis from two preferably orthogonal projections. Prior myocardial infarction in the myocardial region of interest was present in four patients. Seven patients had multivessel disease. Collateral vessels supplying the compromised flow region were observed in three patients. Six patients had refractory unstable angina pectoris. After coronary angioplasty, angiographically visible dissection was noted in six patients, whereas side branch occlusion was observed in one. Minimal luminal diameter before, immediately after, and 24 hours after was 0.93 +/- 0.18 mm, 1.53 +/- 28 mm, and 1.53 +/- 0.21 mm, respectively; obstruction area was 0.70 +/- 0.26 mm2, 1.92 +/- 0.69 mm2, and 1.87 +/- 0.51 mm2, respectively; diameter stenosis was 60.4 +/- 8.0%, 36.8 +/- 11.4%, and 37.6 +/- 5.3%, respectively. The coronary flow reserve (lower limit of normal with this technique 3.4) was essentially the same before and immediately after coronary angioplasty (1.26 +/- 0.59 vs 1.30 +/- 0.42, p = NS) with a slight improvement to 1.78 +/- 0.90 (p less than 0.05) 1 day later. Coronary artery dimensions correlated poorly with coronary blood flow reserve before and after angioplasty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Concept of maximal flow ratio for immediate evaluation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty result by videodensitometry

BACKGROUND

In the setting of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), immediate information about the result of the intervention is important, whereas morphological parameters are often less reliable than in diagnostic coronary arteriography. Recently, a new videodensitometric method was introduced and validated in animal experiments, which allows accurate comparison of maximal myocardial perfusion between situations with different degrees of stenosis. This method uses mean transit time (Tmn) of the contrast agent at maximal hyperemia as a parameter for maximal flow and is strictly in accordance with indicated dilation theory.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 40 patients with angina pectoris, single-vessel disease, and a positive exercise test at the time of acceptance for PTCA, this approach was applied for evaluation of the improvement of maximal flow achieved by the PTCA. Maximal vasodilation was induced immediately before and 15 minutes after PTCA by intracoronary administration of papaverine, and digital angiographic studies were performed. By special breath-holding instruction, almost motionless, triggered image acquisition was possible during 15-20 heartbeats. Excellent subtraction images could be obtained, and reliable determination of Tmn at maximal hyperemia was possible in 33 patients both before and after PTCA. The ratio between maximal flow after and before PTCA, called maximal flow ratio (MFR), was represented by the ratio between Tmn before and after the intervention and compared with the results of exercise testing 24-48 hours before and 7-10 days after the procedure. After correction for pressure changes, MFR was 2.2 +/- 1.5 for the 33 dilated vessels and 1.0 +/- 0.2 for 25 normal vessels serving as a control. In 94% of all patients, an MFR value of more than 1.6 or less than 1.6 discriminated between presence or absence of reversal of exercise test result from positive to negative. If on-line judgment of success was based upon angiographic parameters or measurement of trans-stenotic pressure gradient, the relation with noninvasive functional improvement was present only in 66% and 74% of all patients, respectively. A definite range of what can be called normal Tmn at maximal hyperemia could be distinguished, and post-PTCA values for successfully dilated arteries returned completely to this normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate comparison of maximal myocardial perfusion before and after PTCA is possible in man, improvement of maximal flow is highly related to functional improvement as indicated by exercise test results, and, therefore, this method provides a straightforward way for on-line evaluation of the result of the intervention.