The long-term prognosis of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest but no inducible ventricular tachycardia

Prevention of sudden cardiac death

Although the annual incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is dropping in the United States, therapies for the patient who has survived a SCD episode or is at high risk of developing SCD in the future are now well established. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has emerged from a series of well done randomized clinical trials of the 1990s as providing a survival benefit in carefully defined patient groups with low ejection fraction of any cause. Patients with either an ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and an EF <or=35% show a significant survival benefit with the ICD and maximal medical therapy. Many challenging patients (e.g., those with long QT syndrome or Brugada syndrome) who have a reasonably high incidence of sudden death have not been the subject of clinical trials involving the ICD and therapy depends on risk stratification that is currently not completely agreed upon. An exciting research frontier of the future will be those that attempt to integrate the appropriate role of the ICD with the ability of chronic resynchronization therapy to enhance left ventricular function in the damaged ventricle.

Relationship of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator and chronic resynchronization therapy: the perfect marriage?

BACKGROUND

The two major modes of death in the patient with a reduced ejection fraction (EF) are death due to heart failure and death due to lethal arrhythmia, essentially the two sides of the same coin. Over the last 20 years, two therapies-cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)-have been developed and tested in clinical trials. They are now, in conjunction with appropriate medical therapy, the mainstays of therapy for these two commonly encountered clinical problems.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Both of these therapies were conceived and patented by two Baltimore cardiologists, Michel Mirowski and Morton Mower (Table I). The path to everyday acceptance of both therapies was remarkably similar. The concept and early success of both devices was accomplished but the proof of concept depended on a series of carefully designed randomized clinical trials that showed that both the CRT and ICD devices saved lives in the low EF population, especially when used together. These trials overcame substantial skepticism on behalf of elements of the cardiology and electrophysiology establishment.

CONCLUSION

We are now at a crossroads in the further extension of either therapy. The majority of the indications for either device alone or in combination are established. In the next few years, assuming the continued commitment on the part of regulatory agencies to fully embrace evidence-based medicine, we will see indications extended but only by the careful clinical trials that became the bedrock of their initial acceptance.

Current role of device therapy to reduce sudden cardiac death in heart failure

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be a major contributor to mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) despite recent advances in medical therapy. Device therapy, including the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), serves as an adjunct in reducing HF mortality. Several clinical trials support the prophylactic use of the ICD in reducing mortality in certain HF populations and have established the clinical benefits of CRT in advanced HF. More recently, the Comparison of Medical Therapy Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure trial was the first study to demonstrate a survival benefit of CRT alone or in conjunction with an ICD. This article reviews the most pertinent data regarding the role of device therapy in reducing SCD in HF and addresses future challenges faced by device manufacturers and clinicians.

Prognostic value of baseline electrophysiology studies in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia: the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the value of electrophysiology (EP) testing in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT) with syncope, or sustained VT in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, EP testing is part of the workup of patients with sustained VT or VF. Recently, some have suggested that EP testing is unnecessary in these patients, many of whom are likely to receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS

Within a multicenter trial (Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators) designed to evaluate whether drugs or ICD resulted in a better outcome, data were analyzed regarding EP testing. Although this testing was not required, it was performed in >50% of patients. Information regarding the results of EP testing was correlated to baseline clinical characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

Of 572 patients subjected to an EP test, 384 (67%) had inducible sustained VT or VF. Inducible patients were more likely to have coronary artery disease, previous infarction, and VT as their index arrhythmic event. Inducibility of VT or VF did not predict death or recurrent VT or VF.

CONCLUSIONS

Information derived from EP testing in this patient population, particularly those with VF, is of limited value and may not be worth the risks and costs of the procedure, particularly in those patients likely to receive an ICD.

Syncope: investigation and treatment

Syncope is a common condition that can be both disabling and expensive to treat. Although investigative modalities are sometimes required, a diagnosis can often be made with a good history and physical exam. Recent reports have identified specific historic features that are more suggestive of cardiac syncope as compared with vasovagal syncope and seizures. Advances in ambulatory electrocardiography (in particular the implantable loop recorder) have proven invaluable in both difficult-to-diagnose syncope, and in advancing our knowledge of its mechanisms. When clear dysrhythmias are manifest, appropriate therapies are self-evident. However, recurrent vasovagal syncope continues to be a condition that can be difficult to treat. Fortunately, there are well-conducted trials of both pharmacologic therapies (b-blockers, alpha agonists, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and nonpharmacologic treatments (orthostatic physical training and dual-chamber pacemakers) that should provide more guidance in the near future.

Prevalence and incidence of arrhythmias and sudden death in heart failure

Patients with heart failure are prone to a variety of arrhythmias, symptomatic and asymptomatic, that are prognostically significant and have an important bearing on the management of these patients. However there are some inherent problems in assessing the frequency of these arrhythmias within a large patient population, due to a lack of uniformity in defining heart failure and the transient nature of these rhythms. Patients with heart failure commonly die suddenly. The causes of these deaths are difficult to ascertain accurately and are often presumed arrhythmic. With the advent of effective interventions to prevent sudden death, accurately defining the causal relationship between the arrhythmias and sudden death has assumed great importance to appropriately target therapy. Several attempts have been made to predict such deaths on the basis of non-invasive and invasive diagnostic investigations with variable success. In this article we review the incidence and prevalence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and sudden deaths in epidemiological studies, surveys and randomised control trials of patients with heart failure. We discuss the prognostic significance of these arrhythmias, the inherent problems in their diagnosis and whether their presence predicts the risk of sudden deaths and the mode of such deaths in the heart failure population. The role of various investigations in risk stratification of sudden death has also been discussed.

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: does everybody need one?

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has emerged as an effective, but expensive, therapy for arrhythmic sudden cardiac death. ICD use has been increasing by 20% to 30% per year. Clinical trials have shown that the ICD can be effective for both the primary prevention and the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected populations. Despite the available trial evidence, several issues pertaining to ICD use remain unresolved, including the treatment of patients not represented in clinical trials, the optimal selection of patients who will benefit from an ICD, the duration of benefit from an ICD, the quality of life for patients with an ICD, and both the cost-effectiveness and the cost impact of the ICD. These considerations are discussed in this article.

Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with apparently normal heart. Need for definition and standardized clinical evaluation. Consensus Statement of the Joint Steering Committees of the Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Registry of Europe and of the Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Registry of the United States

BACKGROUND

A wide variety of structural abnormalities are associated with the vast majority of cardiac arrests. However, there is no evidence of structural heart disease in approximately 5% of victims of sudden death, indicating that cardiac arrest in the absence of organic heart disease is more common than previously recognized. The risk of recurrence and the acute and long-term response to therapy are important but unanswered questions. Data from the small series reported so far are of limited value because of the lack of uniform criteria to define and diagnose idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This report originates from a Consensus Conference convened by the Steering Committees of the European (UCARE) and North American (IVF-US) Registries on IVF under the auspices of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Its objective is to provide a unified definition of IVF and to outline the investigations necessary to make this diagnosis. Minimal diagnostic tests for the exclusion of an underlying structural heart disease include non-invasive (blood biochemistry, physical examination and clinical history, ECG, exercise stress test, 24-hour Holter recording, and echocardiogram) and invasive (coronary angiography, right and left ventricular cineangiography, and electrophysiological study) examinations. Programmed electrical stimulation, ventricular biopsy, and ergonovine test during coronary angiography are recommended but not mandatory.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recognized that despite careful evaluation, conditions such as focal cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, or fibrosis and transient electrolyte abnormalities may remain silent. Therefore, patients should undergo careful follow-up, with noninvasive tests repeated every year. The existence of a unified terminology will allow meaningful comparison of data collected by different investigators and will thus contribute to a better understanding of IVF.

Characterization of spontaneous recurrent ventricular arrhythmias detected by electrogram-storing defibrillators in sudden cardiac death survivors with no inducible ventricular arrhythmias at baseline electrophysiologic testing

This retrospective study characterized the recurring ventricular arrhythmias with an electrogram-storing defibrillator in survivors of sudden cardiac death who had no inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias at baseline electrophysiologic testing (EPS). The study group was composed of 24 selected patients with documented ventricular fibrillation (VF) without need of revascularization or chronic antiarrhythmic therapy. The EPS protocol usually consisted of three extrastimuli at two drive cycles at two right ventricular sites. Nonischemic cardiomyopathy was the most frequent structural abnormality (n = 11) followed by coronary artery disease (n = 7). The mean ejection fraction was 0.37 +/- 0.13. Cardiac status did not appear to change during a mean follow-up period of 16.4 +/- 12.5 months, and eight (33%) patients received appropriate shocks in that time period. On the basis of intracardiac electrograms, 7 (88%) patients experienced VF and 1 (12%) patient had ventricular tachycardia as the first recurring arrhythmia. Four patients had additional recurrences and all were VF episodes. VF was usually present from the onset of the arrhythmia. In addition, 9 (38%) patients had nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias that were solely VF in 6 (67%). In conclusion, VF of sudden onset was the most frequent recurring sustained ventricular arrhythmia in this group.

Favourable outcome in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation with treatment aimed at prevention of high sympathetic tone and suppression of inducible arrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

In the absence of an obvious cause for cardiac arrest, patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation are difficult to manage. A subset of patients has inducible arrhythmias. In others sympathetic excitation plays a role in the onset of the cardiac arrest. This study evaluates a prospective stepped care approach in the management of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, with therapy first directed at induced arrhythmias and secondly at adrenergic trigger events.

SETTING

University Hospital.

PATIENTS

10 consecutive patients successfully resuscitated from idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.

INTERVENTIONS

Programmed electrical stimulation to determine inducibility, followed by serial drug treatment. Assessment of pre-arrest physical activity and mental stress status by interview, followed by beta blockade. Cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in non-inducible patients not showing significant arrest related sympathetic excitation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Recurrent cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia.

RESULTS

Five patients were managed with serial drug treatment and four with beta blockade. In one patient a defibrillator was implanted. During a median follow up of 2.8 years (range 6 to 112 months) no patient died or experienced defibrillator shocks. One patient had a recurrence of a well tolerated ventricular tachycardia on disopyramide.

CONCLUSIONS

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation may be related to enhanced sympathetic activation. Prognosis may be favourable irrespective of the method of treatment. Whether the present approach enhances prognosis of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation remains to be determined. However, it may help to avoid potentially hazardous antiarrhythmic drugs or obviate the need for implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators.

Implantable defibrillators for high-risk patients with heart failure who are awaiting cardiac transplantation

The objective of this study was to assess the operative risk and efficacy of implantable defibrillators for preventing sudden death in patients with heart failure awaiting transplantation. The average waiting time for elective cardiac transplantation is 6 months to 1 year. Sudden cardiac death is the major source of mortality in outpatients in stable condition awaiting cardiac transplantation. The efficacy of implantable defibrillator therapy in this population is not established. We analyzed the operative risk, time to appropriate shock, and sudden death in 15 patients determined to be at high risk of sudden death who were accepted onto the outpatient cardiac transplant waiting list. Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in two (13%) subjects with epicardial defibrillating lead systems and in none with transvenous lead systems. Defibrillation energies were 16 +/- 2 J versus 24 +/- 2 J with epicardial and transvenous lead systems, respectively. Sudden death free survival until transplantation was 93%. Most of the patients (60%) had an appropriate shock during a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 12 months. The mean time to an appropriate shock was 3 +/- 3 months. Hospital readmission was required in three (20%) subjects to await transplantation on an urgent basis. However, two of these subjects had received appropriate shocks before readmission. In selected patients at high risk for sudden death while on the outpatient cardiac transplant waiting list, the operative risk is low and adequate defibrillation energies can be obtained to allow implantable defibrillator placement. Most subjects will have an appropriate shock as outpatients before transplantation, and sudden death free survival is excellent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Influence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the long-term prognosis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest not associated with acute myocardial infarction are at high risk for recurrent cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death. The impact of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on long-term prognosis in these patients is uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-one survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (age, 56 +/- 13.7 years) underwent electrophysiologically guided therapy. Implantable defibrillators were placed in 150 patients (45.3%), and 181 patients (54.7%) received pharmacological and/or surgical therapy alone. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 35.2 +/- 16.6% in defibrillator recipients and 45.3 +/- 18.2% in nondefibrillator patients. Median patient follow-up was 24 months in the defibrillator group and 46 months in the nondefibrillator group. In a proportional hazards model, the independent predictors of total cardiac mortality were left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 (relative risk, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.44 to 8.33; P = .0001), absence of an implantable defibrillator (relative risk, 2.70; confidence interval, 1.41 to 5.00; P = .017), and persistence of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (relative risk, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 3.49; P = .045). The 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 were 94.3% and 69.6% with a defibrillator and 82.1% and 45.3% without a defibrillator, respectively. For patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or more, the 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality were 97.7% and 94.6% with a defibrillator and 95.4% and 86.9% without a defibrillator, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the implantable defibrillator is associated with a reduction in cardiac mortality, particularly in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Determinants of the hemodynamic consequence to sustained ventricular arrhythmias after a single myocardial infarction

Patients who have sustained ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction present with either a cardiac arrest or with hemodynamically stable sustained ventricular tachycardia. Recent reports have suggested a different electrophysiologic milieu in these two patient groups and a higher incidence of cardiac arrest in patients with a history of more than one myocardial infarction. No studies have examined patients with only a single previous myocardial infarction. To assess the determinants of the hemodynamic consequence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias more than 3 days after a single myocardial infarction, 82 patients who were resuscitated from arrhythmic cardiac arrest (CA group, 40 patients) or who had hemodynamically stable sustained ventricular tachycardia (No CA group, 42 patients) were examined. Patients in both groups had similar global left ventricular ejection fractions (mean +/- SD; 30% +/- 12% vs 27% +/- 12%; p = NS), proportion of patients with anterior wall infarctions as compared with the proportion of patients with inferior wall infarctions (55% vs 50%; p = NS), time from infarction to arrhythmia development, severity of coronary artery disease, and the proportion of patients with congestive heart failure or bundle branch block. Patients who presented without cardiac arrest, however, more frequently had left ventricular aneurysms (58% vs 28%; p = 0.005). Sixty-seven patients underwent baseline drug-free electrophysiologic studies. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was induced in 79% of patients in the CA group and 85% of patients in the No CA group (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prognosis of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and of survivors of cardiac arrest not inducible by programmed stimulation

The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term clinical outcome of 60 prospectively studied patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia that was not inducible during baseline programmed ventricular stimulation: 39 with cardiac arrest due to noninfarction ventricular fibrillation (VF) and 21 with mild hemodynamically compromising sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 55 +/- 14% in the VF group and 50 +/- 13% in the VT group (difference not significant). Patients were discharged without conventional antiarrhythmic drugs and received only empirical beta-blocker therapy. During a mean follow-up period of 21 +/- 16 months (mean +/- SD), 10 of 60 patients (17%) died suddenly. The actuarial incidence of sudden death at 1 and 4 years was similar in both groups (VF group, 10 and 20%; VT group, 16 and 16%) (p = 0.48). The actuarial incidence of sudden cardiac death was significantly higher in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% than in those with > 40% (1-year incidence in VF group, 40 vs 0%; VT group, 50 vs 0%) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis identified left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% and previous myocardial infarction as the only independent predictor of sudden cardiac death. The occurrence of frequent ventricular pairs during Holter monitoring was the only independent predictor of sustained VT recurrences. It is concluded that patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia in whom arrhythmia was non-inducible during baseline ventricular stimulation and not treated with antiarrhythmic therapy have a favorable outcome if left ventricular ejection fraction is high.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)