Clinical evaluation of cardiac function by ambulatory ventricular scintigraphic monitoring (VEST): validation and study of the effects of nitroglycerin and nifedipine in patients with and without coronary artery disease

Radionuclide monitoring of left ventricular function after sublingual nifedipine administration at rest and during moderate physical activity

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the acute effects of nifedipine administration on left ventricular (LV) function in patients with different degrees of heart failure at a fixed heart rate under resting conditions and during moderate physical activity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven patients with non-rate-responsive DDD pacemakers were studied. According to baseline LV ejection fraction, patients were divided into 2 groups: 6 patients with an ejection fraction of less than 50% (group 1) and 5 patients with an ejection fraction of 50% or more (group 2). LV function was monitored by a radionuclide system (Vest) at rest and during moderate physical activity (10-minute walk test) before and after sublingual nifedipine administration (10 mg). In all patients, both the systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were significantly reduced (P <.05) 6 minutes after nifedipine administration. In group 1, end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction decreased after 3 minutes and remained significantly lower (P <.05) than resting values until 10 minutes after drug administration, whereas end-systolic volume was unchanged. In group 2, nifedipine induced a minor decrease in end-diastolic volume and a slight but not significant decrease in ejection fraction and end-systolic volume. During the walk test, nifedipine induced similar changes in all parameters of cardiac performance in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with impaired LV function, acute nifedipine administration has a negative effect on cardiac performance, which occurs before blood pressure reduction. On the other hand, during moderate physical activity, nifedipine does not affect the improvement in LV function.

Monitoring of left ventricular ejection fraction with a miniature, nonimaging nuclear detector: accuracy and reliability over time with special reference to blood labeling

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of determinations of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by a nonimaging miniature nuclear detector system (Cardioscint) and to evaluate the feasibility of long-term LVEF monitoring in patients admitted to the coronary care unit, with special reference to the blood-labeling technique.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardioscint LVEF values were compared with measurements of LVEF by conventional gamma camera radionuclide ventriculography in 33 patients with a wide range of LVEF values. In 21 of the 33 patients, long-term monitoring was carried out for 1 to 4 hours (mean 186 minutes), with three different kits: one for in vivo and two for in vitro red blood cell labeling. The stability of the labeling was assessed by determination of the activity of blood samples taken during the first 24 hours after blood labeling. The agreement between Cardioscint LVEF and gamma camera LVEF was good with automatic background correction (r = 0.82; regression equation y = 1.04x + 3.88) but poor with manual background correction (r = 0.50; y = 0.88x - 0.55). The agreement was highest in patients without wall motion abnormalities. The long-term monitoring showed no difference between morning and afternoon Cardioscint LVEF values. Short-lasting fluctuations in LVEFs greater than 10 EF units were observed in the majority of the patients. After 24 hours, the mean reduction in the physical decay-corrected count rate of the blood samples was most pronounced for the two in vitro blood-labeling kits (57% +/- 9% and 41% +/- 3%) and less for the in vivo blood-labeling kit (32% +/- 26%). This "biologic decay" had a marked influence on the Cardioscint monitoring results, demanding frequent background correction.

CONCLUSION

A fairly accurate estimate of LVEF can be obtained with the nonimaging Cardioscint system, and continuous bedside LVEF monitoring can proceed for hours with little inconvenience to the patients. Instability of the red blood cell labeling during long-term monitoring necessitates frequent background correction.

Bedside assessment of myocardial performance in the critically ill

No measurement of myocardial performance currently available in the ICU can be regarded is ideal. Table 2 summarises the main features of the major monitoring techniques. As many of the indices of myocardial performance are interdependent, quantifying the contribution of each component to overall cardiac function is not possible currently, and the clinical utility of monitoring each individually is not therefore established. Bedside measurements of LV dimensions, volumes and ejection fraction, and the other indices of systolic and diastolic function can now be made, but the case for their routine use in influencing clinical practice remains unproven. Transoesophageal echocardiography has an important and established diagnostic role and has been used successfully for continuous monitoring during surgery, but practical considerations seriously limit its potential for routine use. Radionuclide techniques allow the measurement of many of the same parameters and have the potential for continuous use, but practical problems and the additional risk of radiation exposure may limit this application in the critical care environment. Doppler techniques are non-invasive, provide continuous data and are simple to operate, but the data provided has important limitations. Although the pulmonary artery catheter has been in use for over twenty years, questions regarding the information is provides concerning myocardial function remain and the extent to which it should influence therapeutic decisions is still controversial. However with the development of additional facilities, particularly the continuous measurement of cardiac output the pulmonary artery catheter seems likely to remain the mainstay of bedside monitoring of myocardial performance in the critically ill in the immediate future.

Ischemia in collateral-dependent myocardium: effects of nifedipine and diltiazem in man

It has recently been shown that ischemia in collateral-dependent myocardium may develop at a very variable threshold in anginal patients; accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess whether nifedipine and diltiazem can increase blood flow to collateralized myocardium in man. Nine patients with complete coronary occlusion filled by collaterals, with no other coronary stenosis, normal left ventricular function, and reproducibly positive exercise tests were studied. They underwent exercise tests off therapy and after acute randomized administration of nifedipine (10 mg sublingually), diltiazem (120 mg orally), and nitroglycerin (0.5 mg sublingually), the latter a drug known to increase blood flow to collateralized myocardium. Following nifedipine, time to 1 mm ST segment depression increased significantly (from 430 +/- 176 to 576 +/- 205 seconds, p < 0.01), while heart rate and rate-pressure product remained unchanged (115 +/- 16 vs 121 +/- 17 beats/min and 199 +/- 29 vs 204 +/- 44 beats/min.mm Hg.10(2), respectively, p = NS for both). Similarly, diltiazem significantly increased time to ischemic threshold from baseline to 638 +/- 125 seconds (p < 0.01), but did not change heart rate and rate-pressure product at 1 mm ST segment depression. Submaximal rate-pressure products were significantly lowered by both nifedipine and diltiazem. Nitroglycerin not only significantly improved time to ischemic threshold (from baseline to 666 +/- 76 seconds, p < 0.01), but also increased heart rate (from baseline to 137 +/- 16 beats/min, p < 0.01) and rate-pressure product (from baseline to 242 +/- 48 beats/min.mm Hg.10(2), p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)