Hypertension in diabetic nephropathy: prevention and treatment

Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: Development and Progression

The purpose of current study aims to investigate the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) in a nationwide population-based cohort in Taiwan. Newly diagnosed DN patients and age- and sex-matched controls were identified from the Taiwanese Longitudinal Health Insurance Database from 2000 to 2010. We studied the effects of age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), and medications on the development of nonproliferative DR (NPDR), proliferative DR (PDR), and diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients with DN. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of the development of DR. Our results show that the adjusted HRs of NPDR and PDR were 5.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.68-5.37) and 9.7 (95% CI = 8.15-11.5), respectively, in patients with DN as compared with patients in the non-DN cohort. At 5-year follow-up, patients with DN showed an increased HR of NPDR progression to PDR (HR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.68-3.03), and the major comorbidities were hypertension (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.10-1.38 with NPDR; HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.02-1.72 with PDR) and DPN (HR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.72-2.41 in NPDR; HR = 2.95, 95% CI = 2.16-4.03 in PDR). Dyslipidemia increased the HR of developing NPDR but not PDR or DME. Moreover, DN did not significantly affect DME development (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.87-2.48) or progression (HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.11-1.20). We concluded that DN was an independent risk factor for DR development and progression; however, DN did not markedly affect DME development in this study, and the potential association between these disorders requires further investigation.

Stabilization and regression of albuminuria in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a one-year randomized study of valsartan versus enalapril

This study was designed to compare the short-term (1-y) tolerability and antiproteinuric efficacy of enalapril and valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes. Forty-two patients with normal renal function or early-stage nephropathy were recruited in Hong Kong and randomized to valsartan 80 mg/day or enalapril 5 mg/day; the doses were increased to 160 mg and 10 mg daily, respectively, as tolerated. Early-morning urine was analyzed for albumin and creatinine and 24-hour urinary albumin excretion at baseline and 1 year after therapy began. Twenty-two patients were randomized to valsartan and 20 to enalapril. The 2 treatment groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, and duration of diabetes or hypertension. Blood pressure decreased to a similar extent (-2.5% to -5.0%) with each drug. Similarly, the 24-hour urinary albumin excretion decreased by 5% to 6% with each drug. The albumin-creatinine ratio in early-morning urine samples and plasma creatinine levels decreased in the valsartan group and increased in the enalapril group, but the difference was not significant. Plasma potassium levels were stable in both groups at the end of study. Cough was reported by 7 (35%) patients receiving enalapril and none of those receiving valsartan (P=.003). In conclusion, enalapril and valsartan both reduced blood pressure and albuminuria to a similar extent with 1 year of therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and normal renal function or early-stage nephropathy. Fewer adverse events were reported with valsartan, but both drugs appear to be relatively safe.

Sympathetic nervous system, diabetes, and hypertension

Hypertension is twice as frequent in diabetic patients than in the general population. Its prevalence is higher in Type 2 than in Type 1 diabetes: in the former, the onset of hypertension often precedes the diagnosis of diabetes, whereas, in the latter it is strictly related to the presence of nephropathy. Sympathetic nerve overactivity is crucial in the pathogenesis of hypertension in diabetes. It can be related to the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system in Type 1 diabetic patients with chronic renal failure, or to a condition of insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia in Type 2 patients with the metabolic syndrome. In patients with early autonomic neuropathy, vagal impairment can lead to a relative predominance of sympathetic activity in the sympatho-vagal balance. In these patients, the onset of hypertension is frequently preceded by reduced nocturnal dipping. Sympathetic overactivity stimulates RAA activity, promotes sodium reabsorption, and increases heart rate, stroke volume and peripheral vascular resistance, thus inducing hypertension and increasing cardiovascular risk. A number of drugs acting either directly or indirectly on sympathetic activity are available for the treatment of hypertension in diabetic subjects. Opinions on the potential advantages of the metabolic profile of some of these drugs are as yet conflicting.

Delapril versus manidipine in hypertensive therapy to halt the type-2-diabetes-mellitus-associated nephropathy

Thirty-nine hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were followed under long-term treatment (mean, 20.7 months) with manidipine hydrochloride, a Ca antagonist, or delapril hydrochloride, an ACE inhibitor, at nine institutions. Both the treatments showed similar antihypertensive effects, although slight but significantly larger decreases were observed in systolic and mean blood pressures at months 12 and 24 in the patients treated with manidipine (P < 0.02). The urinary albumin excretion index (AEI) tended to increase throughout the study in both treatment groups, but no significant difference in AEI was observed between the two treatment groups at any time point. Overt albuminuria developed in four patients on manidipine but did not appear in any of the patients on delapril. The risk of progression to overt albuminuria was significantly different between manidipine and delapril groups (P = 0.011). No increase in serum creatinine (Cr) was observed with delapril. The average excretion indexes of tubular markers such as beta2-microglobulin, alpha1-microglobulin, and NAG tended to be higher in the patients on manidipine than in those on delapril. Taken in sum, these findings suggest that the ACE inhibitor delapril is more beneficial than the Ca antagonist manidipine in the treatment of diabetic renal diseases via mechanisms other than the blood pressure regulation, partly through their different effects on tubular function. In conclusion, delapril was significantly more effective than manidipine in inhibiting progression to overt albuminuria in hypertensive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Drug treatment of hypertension complicating diabetes mellitus

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are both common conditions associated with a high morbidity and mortality. When the two conditions occur together, as they do in 50% of diabetic individuals, the result is a 7.2-fold increase in mortality. If hypertension occurs in association with diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy, mortality rises to 37-fold above that of a healthy population. Despite the increase in incidence of nephropathy, cardiovascular disease remains the major cause of death in diabetic individuals. Therapy should therefore take into consideration the results of large, placebo-controlled trials which have shown reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as a result of active treatment. Although studies with the newer antihypertensive agents such as calcium antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are ongoing, only diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists have been clearly shown to reduce cardiovascular risk. Despite concerns regarding adverse metabolic effects and loss of hypoglycaemic awareness, beta-blockers and diuretics do have a role in the management of diabetic patients. While it is clear that ACE inhibitors reduce the progression of diabetic nephropathy, evidence suggests that diuretics may be just as effective. However, unlike diuretics or beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors have no proven benefit in the prevention of stroke of myocardial infarction. Despite the claims of metabolic neutrality made for many antihypertensive agents there appears to be no advantage in their use in the majority of hypertensive diabetic patients, except where there exist specific contraindications to established therapies.

Renal failure in Arnhem Land: missed opportunities for prevention and treatment

This is a brief clinical description of a group of people from an Arnhem Land community with a population of about 1500. The community has five people on full-time dialysis in Darwin, about 400 km away, and another four people who are being actively prepared for dialysis. Of these nine people, three come from within two generations of one clan: that is, from a group of about 40. This apparent family tendency is one of many factors producing kidney disease in Northern Territory Aboriginal people, who suffer extreme rates of end-stage renal failure (ESRF). Our understanding of these causes is quite embryonic. Despite several years of lobbying by Aboriginal health organisations the Northern Territory government has no coherent plans for ongoing prevention and management of kidney problems, and no services outside the main urban centres. The issues involved are discussed from the perspective of our bush clinic, kilometres away from renal biopsies and formal clinical research.

A practical guideline for management of hypertension in patients with diabetes

Hypertension is common in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and is also an early sign of diabetic nephropathy in those with insulin-dependent diabetes. Hypertension contributes to the progression of both macrovascular disease and nephropathy in patients with diabetes. Certain antihypertensive agents can adversely affect carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers may slow the progression of renal complications in patients with diabetes. The pharmacologic approaches to treatment of hypertension in patients with diabetes potentially differ from those in nondiabetic persons. On the basis of a review of the recent literature related to antihypertensive therapy for patients with diabetes, we describe an empiric approach to treatment of hypertension in such patients. The proposed approach must be modified as new data from randomized clinical trials become available.