Determinants of inducible ventricular tachycardia in patients with clinical ventricular tachyarrhythmia and no apparent structural heart disease

Transitory or permanent regular wide QRS complex tachycardia induced by atrial stimulation in patients without apparent heart disease. Significance

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the frequency of transitory or permanent bundle branch block (BBB) associated with a paroxysmal tachycardia induced by atrial stimulation in patients without heart disease and its significance.

METHODS

Esophageal atrial stimulation was performed in 447 patients suspected to have supraventricular tachycardias (SVT). Sustained regular tachycardia was induced in all of them but three, either in control state (75%) or after administering isoproterenol. In 346 patients, only narrow complex SVTs were induced (77%); in 259 of them, the reentry occurred in the AV node and in remaining patients within a concealed accessory pathway. In 62 patients, a transitory functional BBB was recorded at the onset of the tachycardia (14%). In 33 of them, the reentry occurred in the AV node and in the remaining 29 patients within a concealed accessory pathway. In 36 patients (8%), a permanently wide QRS complex tachycardia was induced. Three patients had also inducible narrow complex SVT. Atrial pacing induced a BBB similar to the aberrancy in tachycardia in 22 patients: the reentry occurred in the AV node in 17 patients, within a concealed accessory pathway in three patients and in a Mahaim bundle in two patients. In other patients, QRS complex remained normal during atrial pacing: all 14 patients had a ventricular tachycardia (VT), either a verapamil-sensitive VT (n = 7) or catecholamine-sensitive VT (n = 4) or bundle branch reentry (n = 3). Followed from 2 to 12 years, the prognosis of these patients was excellent.

CONCLUSION

Transitory BBB at the onset of an SVT is noted in 14% of the population, is more frequent in patients with accessory pathway reentrant tachycardia, but is helpful for this diagnosis in only 12% of cases. A regular tachycardia with permanent left or right bundle branch morphology induced by atrial stimulation in a patient without heart disease and without BBB during atrial pacing is due to a VT even if this patient has also narrow complex tachycardias. This mechanism does not affect the excellent prognosis of this population.

Clinical assessment of adrenergic tone and responsiveness to beta-blocker therapy in patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia and no apparent structural heart disease

To further define the relation between changing adrenergic tone, beta-blocker therapy, and clinical ventricular tachycardia (VT), we evaluated these factors in 35 patients with VT unrelated to coronary artery disease or ventricular dysfunction. Testing included Holter monitoring (91% had VT), exercise test (69% had VT), Adrenergic responsiveness of VT was graded according to diurnal variation, response to exercise, isoproterenol infusion, and response to beta-blockers. beta-Blockers were effective and well tolerated in this population. There was also a predictable relation between changing adrenergic tone and the arrhythmia response to beta-blocker therapy.