Tolerability of enalapril initiation by patients with left ventricular dysfunction: results of the medication challenge phase of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Implications of Sex Differences on the Treatment Effectiveness in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Related to Clinical Endpoints and Quality of Life

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

This narrative review will emphasize the necessity for more female enrollment in heart failure (HF) trials and proposes future investigations regarding optimal dosages. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of the unique pathophysiology and medication responses in both men and women is crucial for effective HF management and may improve the quality of life in women.

RECENT FINDINGS

An analysis of 740 cardiovascular studies reveals that women make up only 38.2% of participants on average. Regarding to trials testing the effectiveness of HF medications, women's involvement are as low as 23.1%. While current guidelines lack sex-specific treatment recommendations, emerging research suggests differential medication dosages could be beneficial. Studies indicate that women may achieve comparable outcomes with lower doses of certain medications (angiotensin-receptor blockers) compared to men, signaling potential for more tailored dosing approaches. We advocate that the next step in HF research should prioritize the importance of tailoring treatment for HF patients by taking into account the variations in drug absorption and distribution among women.

Self-care of heart failure patients: practical management recommendations from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Self-care is essential in the long-term management of chronic heart failure. Heart failure guidelines stress the importance of patient education on treatment adherence, lifestyle changes, symptom monitoring and adequate response to possible deterioration. Self-care is related to medical and person-centred outcomes in patients with heart failure such as better quality of life as well as lower mortality and readmission rates. Although guidelines give general direction for self-care advice, health care professionals working with patients with heart failure need more specific recommendations. The aim of the management recommendations in this paper is to provide practical advice for health professionals delivering care to patients with heart failure. Recommendations for nutrition, physical activity, medication adherence, psychological status, sleep, leisure and travel, smoking, immunization and preventing infections, symptom monitoring, and symptom management are consistent with information from guidelines, expert consensus documents, recent evidence and expert opinion.

Adverse Drug Reactions to Guideline-Recommended Heart Failure Drugs in Women: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to summarize all available evidence on sex differences in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to heart failure (HF) medication.

BACKGROUND

Women are more likely to experience ADRs than men, and these reactions may negatively affect women's immediate and long-term health. HF in particular is associated with increased ADR risk because of the high number of comorbidities and older age. However, little is known about ADRs in women with HF who are treated with guideline-recommended drugs.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed to collect all available information on ADRs to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, ivabradine, and digoxin in both women and men with HF.

RESULTS

The search identified 155 eligible records, of which only 11 (7%) reported ADR data for women and men separately. Sex-stratified reporting of ADRs did not increase over the last decades. Six of the 11 studies did not report sex differences. Three studies reported a higher risk of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-related ADRs in women, 1 study showed higher digoxin-related mortality risk for women, and 1 study reported a higher risk of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist-related ADRs in men. No sex differences in ADRs were reported for angiotensin II receptor blockers and β-blockers. Sex-stratified data were not available for ivabradine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results underline the scarcity of ADR data stratified by sex. The study investigators call for a change in standard scientific practice toward reporting of ADR data for women and men separately.

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes Associated With Hypotensive Episodes Among Heart Failure Patients Receiving Sacubitril/Valsartan or Enalapril: The PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure)

BACKGROUND

In PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure), heart failure treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared with enalapril but resulted in more symptomatic hypotension. Concern on hypotension may be limiting use of sacubitril/valsartan in appropriate patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We characterized patients in PARADIGM-HF by whether they reported hypotension during study run-in periods (enalapril, followed by sacubitril/valsartan) and after randomization and assessed whether hypotension modified the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan. Of the 10 513 patients entering the enalapril run-in, 136 (1.3%) experienced hypotension and 93 (68%) were unable to continue to the next phase; of 9419 patients entering the sacubitril/valsartan run-in period, 228 (2.4%) patients experienced hypotension and 51% were unable to successfully complete the run-in. After randomization, 388 (9.2%) participants had 501 hypotensive events with enalapril, and 588 (14.0%) participants had 803 hypotensive events with sacubitril/valsartan (P<0.001). There was no difference between randomized treatment groups in the number of participants who discontinued therapy because of hypotension. Individuals with a hypotensive event in either group were older, had lower blood pressure at randomization, and were more likely to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Participants with hypotensive events during run-in who were ultimately randomized derived similar efficacy from sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril as those without hypotensive events (P interaction>0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypotension was more common with sacubitril/valsartan relative to enalapril in PARADIGM-HF but did not differentially affect permanent discontinuations. Patients with hypotension during run-in derived similar benefit from sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril as those who did not experience hypotension.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as therapeutic targets for heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a common clinical syndrome that affects more than 23 million individuals worldwide. Despite the marked advances in its management, the mortality rates in HF patients have remained unacceptably high. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear transcription regulators, involved in the regulation of fatty acid and glucose metabolism. PPAR agonists are currently used for the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia; however, their role as therapeutic agents for HF remains under investigation. Preclinical studies have shown that pharmacological modulation of PPARs can upregulate the expression of fatty acid oxidation genes in cardiomyocytes. Moreover, PPAR agonists were proven able to improve ventricular contractility and reduce cardiac remodelling in animal models through their anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-fibrotic, and anti-apoptotic activities. Whether these effects can be replicated in humans is yet to be proven. This article reviews the interactions of PPARs with the pathophysiological mechanisms of HF and how the pharmacological modulation of these receptors can be of benefit for HF patients.

Self-reported adverse drug events and the role of illness perception and medication beliefs in ambulatory heart failure patients: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with heart failure (HF) who are at risk of experiencing symptomatic adverse drug events (ADEs) is important for improving patient care and quality of life. Several demographic and clinical variables have been identified as potential risk factors for ADEs but limited knowledge is available on the impact of HF patients' beliefs and perceptions on their experience of ADEs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to identify the relationship between HF patients' illness perception and medication beliefs and self-reported ADEs.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was performed between November 2008 and March 2009.

SETTINGS

One university medical centre, two regional hospitals and 20 general practitioners in the Netherlands participated in the study.

PARTICIPANTS

495 patients with HF were included.

METHODS

Patients completed the validated Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) and the Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire (BMQ) which collected data on their illness perception and medication beliefs. In addition, data on ADEs as experienced in the previous four weeks were collected through an open-ended question and a symptom checklist. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with these ADEs.

RESULTS

In total, 332 (67%) patients had experienced ADEs in the previous four weeks, of whom 28% reported dry mouth, 27% dizziness and 19% itchiness as the most prevalent. In the adjusted multivariate analysis, disease-related symptoms (illness identity) (OR for 1-5 symptoms 3.57; 95% CI 2.22-5.75, OR for >5 symptoms 7.37; 95% CI 3.44-15.8), and general beliefs about medication overuse (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.13) were independently associated with experiencing ADEs, whereas none of the demographic or clinical factors were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

HF patients who perceive a high number of disease symptoms and have negative medication beliefs are at higher risk of experiencing self-reported ADEs. We suggest that future studies and interventions to improve ADE management should focus on negative medication beliefs and assisting patients in differentiating disease symptoms from ADEs.

Perceived medication adverse effects and coping strategies reported by chronic heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

Data on medication adverse effects (AEs) in chronic heart failure (CHF) are primarily based on results from clinical trials. Little is known about AEs perceived by CHF patients in daily practice and how patients deal with these subjective AEs.

AIMS

To describe the scope and nature of perceived AEs of CHF patients, their coping strategies and the relationship of perceived AEs to medication, patient characteristics and quality of life.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study included a sample of 680 patients previously hospitalised for CHF. Perceived AEs and coping strategies were collected by interviews based on a structured questionnaire. Medication and clinical information were collected by chart review.

RESULTS

Of the 670 CHF patients completing the questionnaire, 17% reported at least one AE. In total, 186 AEs were reported of which 15% could not be linked to any medication. Nausea (4%), dizziness (4%), itches (3%) and rash (3%) were the most prevalent. The drug associated with the highest AE rate was pravastatin (27%). On average, more than five different drugs could be related to the AEs headache, dizziness and nausea. Patients reporting AEs had a lower general health perception, younger age and were more often using antiarrhythmic drugs. Of patients experiencing AEs, 69% conferred with their doctor, 24% reported having done nothing in reaction and 2% discontinued their medication without discussing it with the doctor.

CONCLUSION

Adverse effects are frequently perceived by CHF patients, but they are difficult to recognise and manage in daily practice.

Quantification of the risk and predictors of hyperkalemia in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trials

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available to predict the occurrence of hyperkalemia. Risk assessment is complicated by the lack of consistency of definition between trials.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD to evaluate the incidence of hyperkalemia and the value of several baseline characteristics as predictors of hyperkalemia in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

RESULTS

The incidence of hyperkalemia was 6.0% and 1.1% using a definition of > or = 5.5 and > or = 6.0 mmol/L, respectively. Independent predictors of hyperkalemia (> or = 5.5 mmol/L) were randomization to enalapril, baseline serum creatinine, serum potassium, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, a history of diabetes, and atrial fibrillation (all P < .05). The use of loop diuretics was also associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia but only in patients included in the SOLVD prevention trial. Similar results were obtained when renal function was evaluated using the estimated creatinine clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The definition of hyperkalemia is important when evaluating its incidence in clinical trials. Renal dysfunction, baseline serum potassium, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association functional class, and treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor are factors associated with the development of hyperkalemia in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. More specifically, our results suggests that before initiating drugs that can cause hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure, a strong consideration should be given to calculate creatinine clearance and that patients with a creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min should undergo a close monitoring of their serum potassium to prevent the development of hyperkalemia.

Predictors of Mortality and Hospitalization in Women with Heart Failure in the Digitalis Investigation Group Trial

We performed a retrospective follow-up study of 1926 women with heart failure who participated in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for covariates that were significant independent predictors of all-cause mortality were age in years (1.02; 1.01-1.03; P<0.001), NYHA class IH-IV (1.56; 1.31-1.87), diabetes (1.63; 1.36-1.95), glomerular filtration rate in mL/min/1.73 m(2) (0.99; 0.98-4).996; P=0.001), pulmonary congestion by chest x-ray (1.57; 1.22-2.02), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (0.99; 0.98-0.993; P<0.001), and use of digoxin (1.20; 1.02-1.42). Covariates that were significant independent predictors of hospitalization due to worsening heart failure were: nonwhite race (1.28; 1.03-1.58), NYHA class III-IV (1.55; 1.30-1.84), diabetes (1.75; 1.47-2.09), glomerular filtration rate as mL/min/1.73 m(2) (0.99; 0.986-0.996; P<0.001), pulmonary congestion by chest x-ray (1.42; 1.12-1.81), and use of ACE inhibitors (0.67; 0.49-0.91). Longer duration of heart failure, higher NYHA classes, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, pulmonary congestion, and lower LVEF were significant independent predictors of all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and hospitalization for heart failure in women with heart failure.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers: what we know and current controversies

A little more than a decade ago, management of heart failure was changed forever when a number of randomized clinical trials confirmed that a class of drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, could improve survival in patients with heart failure. The recognition that blockade of one of the neurohumoral systems activated in heart failure could improve outcomes prompted widespread testing of other neurohumoral blockers, such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents, aldosterone antagonists, and most recently, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of heart failure. This article describes what is known about the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in the management of heart failure and presents the current controversies surrounding the use of these agents.

Development of circulatory-renal limitations to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors identifies patients with severe heart failure and early mortality

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the hypothesis that patients who develop angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor intolerance attributable to circulatory-renal limitations (CRLimit) have more severe underlying disease and worse outcome.

BACKGROUND

Although the renin-angiotensin system contributes to the progression of heart failure (HF), it also supports the failing circulation. Patients with the most severe disease may not tolerate inhibition of this system.

METHODS

Consecutive inpatient admissions to the cardiomyopathy service of the Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2000 and 2002 were reviewed retrospectively for initial profiles, discharge medications, and documented reasons for discontinuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Outcomes of death and transplantation were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 259 patients, 86 were not on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor at discharge. Circulatory-renal limitations of symptomatic hypotension, progressive renal dysfunction, or hyperkalemia were documented in 60 patients (23%); other adverse effects, including cough, in 24 patients; and absent reasons in 2 patients. Compared with patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, patients with CRLimit were older (60 vs. 55 years; p = 0.006), with longer history of HF (5 vs. 2 years; p = 0.009), lower systolic blood pressure (104 vs. 110 mm Hg; p = 0.05), lower sodium (135 vs. 138 mEql/l; p = 0.002), and higher initial creatinine (2.5 vs. 1.2 mg/dl; p = 0.0001). Mortality was 57% in patients with CRLimit and 22% in the patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors during a median 8.5-month follow-up (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Development of CRLimit to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor intolerance identifies patients with severe disease who are likely to die during the next year. New treatment strategies should be targeted to this population.

Clinical features and contemporary management of patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: baseline characteristics of patients in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme

AIMS

To describe the clinical characteristics and contemporary treatment of a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) randomised in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme, consisting of three component studies comparing placebo to candesartan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CHARM Alternative, CHARM Added and CHARM Preserved enrolled 2028 low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ACE inhibitor intolerant patients, 2548 low LVEF ACE inhibitor treated patients and 3025 preserved LVEF patients, respectively. Patients in CHARM Preserved were more often female. The proportion of women in CHARM Preserved was 40% compared to 32% in CHARM Alternative and 21% in CHARM Added. Patients in CHARM Preserved were also more often hypertensive than in the other two trials (64% vs. 50% and 48%, respectively). Symptoms and signs (with the exception of a third heart sound) were similar in all three patient groups. Beta-blockers were used in over half of patients in all three groups. Digoxin and spironolactone were used less frequently and calcium antagonists more frequently in CHARM Preserved. Spironolactone was used most frequently in CHARM Alternative, i.e. in ACE inhibitor intolerant patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHARM Programme provides the largest and most detailed comparison to date of patients low- and preserved-LVEF CHF. It also describes the causes of ACE-inhibitor intolerance in a large cohort of patients and the other treatment which these patients receive.

Psychosocial issues in patients with congestive heart failure

Psychosocial issues are important variables that need to be addressed in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Unfortunately, these issues are often overlooked. Depression and lack of social support have been shown to have a negative impact on patients with CHF. Patients with CHF who are depressed or who lack social support have been shown to have increased morbidity and hospital readmission rates, to be less adherent to their medical regimen, and to have an overall increase in cost of care. The variables are often interrelated, as high levels of social support may lessen the impact of depression on mortality. In addition, certain biologic factors may influence the impact of psychosocial factors in patients with CHF. This review addresses the effects of depression, treatment adherence, and social support in patients with CHF and suggests interventions targeted to these problems. Health care professionals must assess these issues in all patients with CHF, address their specific needs, and intervene appropriately when warranted.

Neurohormonal and clinical responses to high- versus low-dose enalapril therapy in chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the neurohormonal responses and clinical effects of long-term, high-dose versus low-dose enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

BACKGROUND

Examination of neurohormonal and clinical responses in patients receiving different doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may provide insight into the potential for additional suppression with angiotensin II (AT-II) or aldosterone antagonists.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with CHF were randomized to receive either high-dose (40 mg/day, n = 37) or low-dose (5 mg/day, n = 38) enalapril over six months. The results from exercise testing, echocardiography, tissue-specific ACE activity and monthly pre- and post-enalapril neurohormonal levels were compared.

RESULTS

Despite greater intra-group improvements in plasma renin activity and serum aldosterone levels in the high-dose group, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in all variables, except for serum ACE activity at the end of study. Elevated serum aldosterone and plasma AT-II levels were observed in 35% and 85% of patients, respectively, at 34 weeks, an inter-group difference that was not statistically significant. A trend toward higher levels of tissue-specific ACE activity in the high-dose group compared with the low-dose group at the end of study was observed (p = 0.054). A predefined composite end point of clinical events had a trend toward better improvement in the high-dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could not demonstrate a difference between high- and low-dose enalapril in terms of serum aldosterone and plasma AT-II suppression, despite a dose-dependent reduction in serum ACE activity. Even at maximal doses of enalapril, elevated serum aldosterone and plasma AT-II levels were frequently observed.

Predictors of quality of life in women with heart failure. SOLVD Investigators. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Two and one half million women have heart failure (HF). Yet little is known about quality of life (QOL) in this population and the factors influencing it. Given the importance of QOL as an outcome of care, we conducted a study to evaluate predictors of QOL in women with HF.

METHODS

Using baseline QOL data collected in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trials, we studied predictors of QOL in 691 women with HF. Univariate, bivariate, and multiple regression analyses were used. Potential predictors included age, education, tobacco use, social isolation, life stresses, comorbidity index, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, HF symptoms, etiology, and medications. We measured global QOL and QOL dimensions of physical function, emotional distress, and social and general health.

RESULTS

Women were older (61+/-10.5 years), predominantly Caucasian (75%), and their mean ejection fraction was 0.27 (+/-6.51). Variables with the strongest relationship to QOL included dyspnea, NYHA class, and life stresses. As dyspnea, life stresses, and NYHA class increased, QOL decreased. Additionally, smoking behavior and vasodilator use was associated with decreased QOL. Heart failure etiology of ischemic origin was associated with decreased social life satisfaction, and use of digitalis was predictive of increased social life satisfaction. Finally, increasing age was related to an increase in general life satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Symptom amelioration, which may improve functional ability, has the greatest potential for increasing QOL in women with HF. Programs to increase physical activity in women with HF should be developed and tested. Finally, clinicians may need to optimize HF medications in women.

Predictors of decreased renal function in patients with heart failure during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: results from the studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD)

BACKGROUND

Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy reduces mortality rates in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), it may also cause decreased renal function. Little information is available to predict which patients are at highest risk for this complication.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify specific clinical predictors of reduction in renal function in patients with CHF who are prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

METHOD

We analyzed data from the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of enalapril for the treatment of CHF. There were 3379 patients randomly assigned to enalapril with a median follow-up of 974 days and 3379 patients randomly assigned to placebo with a mean follow-up of 967 days. Decreased renal function was defined as a rise in serum creatinine >/=0.5 mg/dL (44 micromol/L) from baseline. We used time-to-event analysis to identify potential predictors of decrease in renal function including age, baseline ejection fraction, baseline creatinine, low systolic blood pressure (<100 mm Hg), history of hypertension, diabetes, and use of antiplatelet, diuretic, and beta-blocker therapy.

RESULTS

Patients randomly assigned to enalapril had a 33% greater likelihood of decreased renal function than controls (P =.003). By multivariate analysis, in both the placebo and enalapril groups older age, diuretic therapy, and diabetes were associated with decreased renal function, whereas beta-blocker therapy and higher ejection fraction were renoprotective. Older age was associated with a greater risk of developing decreased renal function in both groups, but significantly more so in the enalapril group (enalapril: risk ratio [RR] 1.42 per 10 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-1.52 with enalapril; placebo: RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.25). Diuretic therapy was likewise associated with a greater risk of decreased renal function in the enalapril group (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.70-2.08) than in the placebo group (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66). Conversely, enalapril had a relative renoprotective effect (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.53) compared with placebo (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.57-2.44) in patients with diabetes. A lower risk of renal impairment was seen in both groups with beta-blocker therapy (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85) and higher baseline ejection fraction (RR 0.93 per 5% increment, 95% CI 0.91-0. 96).

CONCLUSIONS

Enalapril use caused a 33% increase in the risk of decreased renal function in patients with CHF. Diuretic use and advanced age increased this risk. Diabetes was associated with an increased risk of renal impairment in all patients with CHF, but this risk was reduced in the enalapril group compared with the placebo group. beta-Blocker therapy and higher ejection fraction were renoprotective in all patients regardless of therapy.

Contemporary management of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Results from the Study of Patients Intolerant of Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (SPICE) Registry

AIMS

The reported prevalence of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use in patients with heart failure varies considerably. Recent reports suggest that many patients who could benefit from such therapy are not receiving ACE inhibitors. The Study of Patients Intolerant of Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (SPICE) Registry was established to understand better the demographics, characteristics, and contemporary use of ACE inhibitors in an international registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between August 1996 and April 1997, each of 105 study centres from eight countries in North America and Europe was invited to review retrospectively the medical records of 100 consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fractions </=35%. The median age of the 9580 Registry patients was 66 years, 26% were women, the median ejection fraction was 27%, and the primary aetiology of left ventricular dysfunction was ischaemic (63%). Eighty percent of patients were receiving ACE inhibitors. The most common reason for non-use of ACE inhibitors was intolerance (9%).

CONCLUSION

The SPICE Registry provides a contemporary description of the demographics and management of patients with documented left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The contemporary use of ACE inhibitors (80%) appears to be higher than previously reported and the main reason for non-use is perceived intolerance (9%).

The AHCPR clinical practice guideline for heart failure revisited

OBJECTIVE

To review the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) clinical practice guideline for heart failure and comment on the guideline regarding pharmacotherapy from the perspective of the latest clinical trial data and the authors' clinical experience.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966 to June 1997) of English-language literature pertaining to the pharmacotherapy of heart failure was performed. Special emphasis was placed on literature published in the last 5 years. Additional literature was obtained from reference lists of key articles identified through the search.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pertinent clinical trials were reviewed and considered along with information from the authors' database of over 800 patients with heart failure. Evidence concerning the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at appropriate dosages in all New York Heart Association classes of heart failure and the inclusion of digoxin as part of triple therapy in all symptomatic patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction are reviewed. Strategies to circumvent clinical problems that may limit the proper application of standard therapeutic agents are considered, and the possible future role of beta-blockers as the therapeutic agents in patients with heart failure is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The AHCPR guideline provides the clinician with an excellent framework for treating the patient with heart failure. Building on the fundamentals of the guideline, the clinician can carefully apply current therapy at appropriate dosages and in the best combinations to individualize and thereby optimize pharmacologic therapy for this patient population.

Association of calcium channel blocker use with increased rate of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

The Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) assessed the effect of enalapril in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). We performed retrospective analyses of the association between calcium channel blocker (CCB) use and fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) in these patients. MI occurred in 11.5% of 845 patients receiving CCBs versus 7.5% of 2551 patients not receiving CCBs in the enalapril group and in 14.4% of 874 patients receiving CCBs versus 9.3% of 2527 patients not receiving CCBs in the placebo group. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusting for comorbidity, cause and severity of LVD, heart failure, and concomitant drug use, CCB use was an independent predictor of MI (relative risk [RR] 1.37, confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 1.63). The increase in MI risk was greater among patients with a higher heart rate (RR 1.46, CI 1.14 to 1.86) and lower blood pressure (RR 1.45, CI 1.14 to 1.86). The adjusted risk ratio for all-cause mortality associated with CCB use was 1.14 (CI 1.00 to 1.28; p = 0.0454). In this analysis of patients with LVD, CCB use was associated with significantly increased risk of fatal or nonfatal MI.

Adverse effects of enalapril in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). SOLVD Investigators

In the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (LVD), enalapril or placebo was administered in a double-blind fashion to 6797 participants with ejection fraction < or = 0.35. During 40 months' average follow-up, 28.1% of participants randomized to enalapril reported side effects compared with 16.0% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Enalapril use was associated with a higher rate of symptoms related to hypotension (14.8% vs 7.1%, p < 0.0001), azotemia (3.8% vs 1.6%, p < 0.0001), cough (5.0% vs 2.0%, p < 0.0001), fatigue (5.8% vs 3.5%, p < 0.0001), hyperkalemia (1.2% vs 0.4%, p = 0.0002), and angioedema (0.4% vs 0.1%, p < 0.05). Side effects resulted in discontinuation of blinded therapy in 15.2% of the enalapril group compared with 8.6% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Thus enalapril is well tolerated by patients with LVD; however, hypotension, azotemia, cough, fatigue, and other side effects result in discontinuation of therapy in a significant minority of patients.

ACE inhibitors. Differential use in elderly patients with hypertension

High blood pressure (BP) in the elderly must not be ignored as a normal consequence of aging. The criteria for the diagnosis of hypertension and the necessity to treat it are the same in elderly and younger patients. The aim of treatment of elderly hypertensive patients is to decrease BP safely and to reduce risk factors associated with cerebrovascular, cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. The treatment of elderly hypertensive patients should be adjusted according to the needs of the individual, based upon age, race, severity of hypertension, co-existing medical problems, other cardiovascular risk factors, target-organ damage, risk-benefit considerations and costs. In addition to the elevated BP, other cardiovascular risk factors include smoking, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinaemia, dyslipidaemia, hypercreatininaemia, peripheral vascular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and microalbuminuria (or albuminuria). Thus, the choice of initial antihypertensive therapy in elderly hypertensive patients should be based not only on the expected response, but also on the effects of therapy on lipid, potassium, glucose and uric acid levels, and left ventricular anatomy and function. Co-existing medical conditions (such as asthma, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, renal failure, gout, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidaemia and peripheral vascular disease) are major determinants for the selection of antihypertensive medications. With previous therapies (diuretics, beta-blockers, etc.), good BP control in the elderly was associated with clear and statistically significant reductions in stroke-related morbidity and mortality, but the overall effects on cardiovascular and renal complications of hypertension was either more variable or less obvious. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are not only efficacious antihypertensive agents in the elderly, but also appear promising in counteracting some of the cardiovascular and renal consequences of hypertension. They are well tolerated and have a relatively low incidence of adverse effects. ACE inhibitors possess ancillary characteristics that are potentially beneficial for many elderly patients, including reduction of left ventricular mass, lack of metabolic and lipid disturbances, no adverse CNS effects, no risk of induction of heart failure, and a low risk of orthostatic hypotension. Since ACE inhibitors may improve perfusion to the heart, kidney and brain, they are well worth considering for the treatment of elderly patients with hypertensive target organ damage, especially in patients with heart failure, and diabetic patients with early nephropathy.