Importance of immediate and very early postprocedural angiographic and thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomographic perfusion measurements in predicting late results after coronary intervention

Reversible defects on myocardial perfusion imaging early after coronary stent implantation: a predictor of late restenosis

PURPOSE

If coronary artery was treated with optimal stent implantation, myocardial perfusion in the territory supplied by a dilated coronary artery should be not reversible. However, several studies have demonstrated reversible perfusion in the territory supplied by a coronary artery with an optimally implanted stent. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of reversible defects detected by M-SPECT early after optimal PTCA with stent implantation. Its second objective was to determine the predictive value of detecting reversible defects after stent implantation for late restenosis.

METHODS

About 66 patients that underwent M-SPECT within 24 h of successful PTCA with stent implantation were included. All patients were followed up clinically and angiographically. The incidence of reversible perfusion defects on M-SPECT and the rate of late restenosis in target coronary arteries were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Reversible perfusion defects on M-SPECT were observed in 26% of the patients and in 36% of lesions following successful PTCA with stent implantation. The incidence of late restenosis was significantly higher in patients and lesions with reversible perfusion defects (47% vs. 18%). According to binary logistic regression analysis, the presence of a reversible perfusion defects was the only independent predictor of late restenosis.

Usefulness of BMIPP SPECT to evaluate myocardial viability, contractile reserve and coronary stenotic progression after reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction

Using combined 123I-BMIPP (BMIPP), 201Tl (Tl) and 99mTc-PYP (PYP) myocardial SPECT imaging, risk areas of acute myocardial infarction were documented in the acute stage, and then these images were evaluated for how well they reflected muscle viability, contractile reserve and coronary stenotic progression subsequent to reperfusion therapy. Patients who only experienced a first attack of myocardial infarction were enrolled. In total, 36 cases who had had the occluded artery successfully reperfused were examined during the past year. They had no significant vessel disease except for the culprit single artery. The patients were comprised of 32 men and 4 women. The mean age was 59.5 years. All patients underwent coronary angiography and left ventricular (LV) angiography in the emergency room. BMIPP/Tl and PYP myocardial SPECT were conducted in the acute stage and chronic stage. In the chronic stage LV angiography was repeated to assess the improvement of LV wall motion. The response to postextrasystolic potentiation (PESP) testing was performed to estimate myocardial contractile reserve. The risk area of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was documented by reduced BMIPP accumulation. The size of reduced BMIPP accumulation was larger than that of PYP accumulation. A BMIPP/Tl discrepancy and PYP accumulation were documented to assess myocardial viability. Both improvement in LV wall motion and augmentation of PESP response were more closely related to a BMIPP/Tl discrepancy in the presence or absence of PYP accumulation. Therefore, it would be possible to evaluate myocardial viability and contractile reserve by the BMIPP/Tl discrepancy. In patients with good viability, it is important to predict whether there is coronary stenotic progression or not. In this study, we demonstrated that most patients with improved BMIPP images had no significant progression at the site of intervention. Serial observation of BMIPP images from the acute stage to the chronic stage might enable us to predict the progression of coronary stenosis.

Importance of diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension rather than completeness of revascularization in determining long-term outcome after coronary balloon angioplasty (the LDCMC registry). Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center

The study examined the 10-year outcome in a cohort of 227 unselected, consecutive patients (age 58+/-10 years) undergoing coronary balloon angioplasty between 1984 and 1986 and followed in a single cardiac center (Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center registry). In particular, we sought to identify the relative importance of the systemic risk factors diabetes and hypertension and the extent of coronary disease as opposed to procedure-related technical variables, the immediate success of the procedure, or completeness of revascularization. By life-table analysis (99% follow-up), 94% of the patients were alive at 5 years, and 77% at 10 years after angioplasty. Ten-year survival was reduced in patients with diabetes mellitus (59% vs 83%, p = 0.0008), in patients with previous myocardial infarction (68% vs 85%, p = 0.01), in patients with ejection fraction <50% (55% vs 82%, p = 0.005), and in patients with 3-vessel disease (58% vs 84% and 86% for 1- and 2-vessel disease, respectively, p = 0.04). Diabetes mellitus was the major independent predictor of poor survival (adjusted odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 6.19, p = 0.001). Survival at 10 years was identical in 199 patients in whom angioplasty was complete and in 25 in whom the balloon catheter did not cross the lesion, although bypass surgery was more frequent in the latter group (45% vs 21%, p = 0.001). Incomplete revascularization did not predict poor survival (72% vs 79% with complete angioplasty, p = NS). Event-free survival at 10 years for the whole group was 29%, and 49% of patients survived with no event other than a single repeat angioplasty procedure. Multivessel disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of decreased event-free survival, but incomplete revascularization was not. Thus, long-term outcome after coronary balloon angioplasty was related to diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, and extent of coronary disease, but not to the immediate success of the procedure or completeness of revascularization.