Implantable defibrillators for high-risk patients with heart failure who are awaiting cardiac transplantation

Association between implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and survival in patients awaiting heart transplantation: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Patients with end-stage heart failure are at high risk for sudden cardiac death. However, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is not routinely implanted given the high competing risk of pump failure. A unique population worth separate consideration are patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting heart transplantation, as prolonged survival improves the chances of receiving transplant.

Objective

To compare clinical outcomes of heart failure patients with and without an ICD awaiting heart transplant.

Methods

We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared end-stage heart failure patients with and without an ICD awaiting heart transplantation. We separately assessed the rates of total mortality, sudden cardiac death, nonsudden cardiac death, and heart transplantation. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The random effects model was used owing to heterogeneity across study cohorts.

Results

Ten studies with a total of 36,112 patients were included. A total of 62.5% of patients had an ICD implanted. Patients with an ICD had decreased total mortality (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51–0.71, P < .00001) and sudden cardiac death (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.66, P = .004) and increased rates of heart transplantation (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05–1.14, P < .0001). There was no difference in prevalence of nonsudden cardiac death (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.04, P = .07).

Conclusion

ICD implantation is associated with improved outcomes in patients awaiting heart transplant, characterized by decreased total mortality and sudden cardiac death as well as higher rates of heart transplantation.

Improved survival of cardiac transplantation candidates with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: role of beta-blocker or amiodarone treatment

INTRODUCTION

Survival in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is poor due to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. The potential role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in this group of patients has been the subject of increasing interest. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether ICDs improve the survival rate of patients on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation and whether any improvement is independent of concomitant beta-blocker or amiodarone therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data comprised findings from 310 consecutive patients at a single center who were evaluated and deemed suitable for cardiac transplantation and placed on the waiting list. Kaplan-Meier actuarial approach was used for survival analysis. Survival analysis censored patients at time of transplantation or death. Of the 310 patients, 111 (35.8%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and 164 (52.9%) died while waiting; 35 patients remain on the waiting list. Fifty-nine (19%) patients had ICD placement for ventricular arrhythmias prior to or after being listed. Twenty-nine (49.1%) ICD patients survived until cardiac transplantation, 13 (22%) patients died, and 17 (28.8%) remain on the waiting list. Among non-ICD patients, 82 (32.7%) received transplants, 151 (60.2%) died, and 18 (7.2%) remain on the waiting list. Survival rates at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were better for all ICD patients compared to non-ICD patients (log-rank x2, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, ICD therapy and beta-blocker treatment were the strongest predictors of survival. Further, ICD treatment was associated with improved survival independent of concomitant treatment with beta-blocker or amiodarone. Among ICD and non-ICD patients treated with a beta-blocker or amiodarone, survivals at the 1 and 4 years were 93% vs 69% and 57% vs 32%, respectively (log-rank x2, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

ICD therapy is associated with improved survival in high-risk cardiac transplant candidates, and ICD benefit appears to be independent of concomitant treatment.

Management of arrhythmias in heart failure

Arrhythmias continue to contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality in heart failure. Implantable defibrillators have assumed an increasingly important role in preventing sudden death and are recommended for patients who have been resuscitated from cardiac arrest, have unexplained syncope, or exhibit inducible ventricular tachycardia in the setting of prior myocardial infarction. The extension of survival conferred by implantable defibrillators is likely to be limited in patients with advanced heart failure. Ongoing trials will help define the use of these devices in heart failure populations, in whom atrial fibrillation is common and rate control and anticoagulation are of major importance. Among pharmaceutical options, amiodarone and dofetilide are the major agents for maintenance of sinus rhythm. The complexity of coexistent heart failure and arrhythmia management warrants close collaboration between heart failure and arrhythmia specialists.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in heart failure

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators provide effective and reliable treatment of spontaneous VT and VF. These devices can be expected to decrease the risk for arrhythmic death in patients with heart failure but do not improve overall survival when death from severe pump dysfunction is imminent. Appropriate patient selection is a major aspect of arrhythmia management. Future devices will incorporate features that have the potential to reduce atrial arrhythmias, improve ventricular function, monitor hemodynamics, and prevent sudden arrhythmic death.

[Prevention of sudden death in patients awaiting heart transplantation]

Sudden death, unexpectedly alters outcome in many patients awaiting heart transplantation. The prevention of sudden death in these patients has been the focus of intensive research to achieve a larger number of patients who finally receive transplants. Recent advances in the medical treatment of heart failure, have reduced mortality and in particular, that caused by sudden death. Nonetheless sudden death remains a frequent cause of mortality in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation. The recognition of patients at very high risk for sudden death is relatively easy, but most patients who suffer sudden death while awaiting cardiac transplantation, are not among those initially included in the overall high risk category. The betablockers, when patients are able to use them, can reduce sudden and total mortality. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs should not be used in patients with cardiac failure. Amiodarone does not increase mortality and may have a beneficial effect in some patients, but its efficacy is lower than that of the implantable defibrillator and its widespread use is not justified. The implantable defibrilator is the reference treatment to reduce sudden death in selected patients, awaiting transplantation.

Improved survival in patients with nonischemic advanced heart failure and syncope treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

The purpose of this study was to assess whether in patients with syncope and heart failure due to nonischemic cardiomyopathy, treatment with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) compared with conventional medical therapy is associated with a reduction in sudden death and total mortality. Patients with advanced heart failure who have syncope have been shown to be at high risk for sudden death. Further risk stratification has been difficult in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in whom inducibility on electrophysiologic study is not predictive of future risk. Of 639 consecutive patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy referred for heart transplantation, 147 patients with history of syncope and no prior history of sustained ventricular tachycardia or cardiac arrest were identified. Outcomes were compared for the 25 patients managed with an ICD and 122 patients managed with conventional medical therapy. There were no differences in the baseline variables in the 2 groups of patients, including age, ejection fraction, and medical treatments for heart failure, but patients receiving an ICD were more likely to have had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (56% vs. 15%, p = 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 22 months, there were 31 deaths, 18 sudden, in patients treated with conventional therapy, whereas there were 2 deaths, none sudden, in patients treated with an ICD. An appropriate shock occurred in 40% of the ICD patients. Actuarial survival at 2 years was 84.9% with ICD therapy and 66.9% with conventional therapy (p = 0.04). Thus, in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and syncope, therapy with an ICD is associated with a reduction in sudden death and an improvement in overall survival.

Multicenter evaluation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator testing after implant: the Post Implant Testing Study (PITS)

To reassess the function of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) many electrophysiology centers perform a second test after the initial test at implant. A prospective multicenter study evaluated the necessity and yield of routine postimplant defibrillator testing. The results of 843 postimplant defibrillator tests were collected from 31 centers. The 764 routine tests in which ventricular fibrillation was successfully induced were analyzed. Variables examined included patient age, presenting arrhythmia, underlying heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, defibrillator age, make and model of ICD, electrode system, defibrillation threshold, polarity, and waveform. The overall failure rate was 3.1% (24/764). Units tested later than 365 days after implant tended to have a higher failure rate than those tested within the first month or the next eleven months (6.5%, 3.0%, 2.3%, respectively, P = 0.374). The failure rate was higher in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% than those with higher ejection fractions (3.8% vs 2.0%, P = 0.167). These trends did not reach statistical significance. No other baseline characteristic was associated with higher failure rates. Routine testing of ICDs reveals an overall failure rate of 3.1%. While the rate was low, defibrillator failure places the patient at high risk for sudden cardiac death. As any failure in this population is associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death, routine defibrillator testing may be justified.

Sudden death and tailored medical therapy in elective candidates for heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Due to the shortage of donor organs there is a long waiting time for heart transplantation. As a consequence, a high mortality rate on the waiting list diminishes the potential benefit of the procedure. Tailored medical therapy optimized according to the individual patients demands was introduced to select responding HTx candidates for continued management without transplantation. The development of modes of death over time (heart failure, sudden arrhythmic) in this population is unknown.

METHODS

In 434 elective candidates for heart transplantation, submitted to our institution in the years 1984-1997 (50% coronary artery disease, mean age 51.6 +/- 12 years, 86% males) medical therapy was adjusted according to the results of repeated right heart catherizations. Adjuncts to conventional therapy with ACE inhibitors, digitalis and diuretics were amiodarone, beta-blockers, spironolactone, oral anticogulants, molsidomine or nitrates. Only patients not responding to these measures were processed to HTx. Clinical events (death, mode of death, HTx, resuscitation) were noted and analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and related to patients characteristics by multivariance analysis.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up of 2.36 +/- 2.4 years only 113 patients (25%) received a donor heart. One hundred-sixteen patients (26%) died without transplantation. Eighty-three (72%) of the deaths were sudden, 24 (20%) due to progression of heart failure and 9 (8%) due to other reasons. A shift from heart failure to sudden death was observed. Including 8 successful resuscitations due to documented VT/VF, there is a 20% risk of having a major arrhythmic event during the first two years of observation. Long-term (>1 year) medical responders had better hemodynamics at entry. Patients who died suddenly had similar clinical and hemodynamic data at entry than patients who needed an early transplant, but were in a comparable NYHA stage before death than long-term medical responders (2.15 +/- 0.8 vs 1.82 +/- 0.6, NS). Patients dying suddenly had significant more ventricular premature beats (1.6 +/- 2.9%/24 hours vs 1.06 +/- 2.8%/24 hours, p < .01) and complex ventricular arrhythmias (7.3 +/- 2.7/24 hours vs 1.98 +/- 5.6/24 hours, p < .01) than long-term responders. Seventy-five percent of all sudden death occurred during the first 2 observation years.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of heart failure death in elective candidates for heart transplantation under optimized medical therapy is low when patients are followed closely and transplant can be done rapidly after deterioration is recognized. Sudden death represents the highest risk for most patients. This event occurred predominantly in stable patients under tailored medical therapy without indication for HTx at that time. Our results strongly demand strategies for risk stratification and the investigation of prophylactic measures in this population.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Implantable defibrillators have become the dominant therapeutic modality for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Current defibrillators are small (<60 mL) and implanted with techniques similar to standard pacemakers. They provide high-energy shocks for ventricular fibrillation and rapid ventricular tachycardia, antitachycardia pacing for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, as well as antibradycardia pacing. Newer devices incorporating an atrial lead allow dual-chamber pacing and better discrimination between ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Randomized controlled trials have shown superior survival with implantable defibrillators than with antiarrhythmic drugs in survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. Complications associated with implantable defibrillator therapy include infection, lead failure, and spurious shocks for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Most patients adapt well to living with an implantable defibrillator, although driving often has to be restricted. Limited evidence suggests that implantable defibrillator therapy is cost-effective when compared with other widely accepted treatments. The use of implantable defibrillators is likely to continue to expand in the future. Ongoing clinical trials will define further prophylactic indications of the implantable defibrillator and clarify its cost-effectiveness ratio in different clinical settings.

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator as a "bridge to transplant": a viable clinical strategy?

Heart transplantation is an accepted therapeutic option for patients with end-stage heart disease. However, because the availability of heart donors fails to keep pace with the growing demand, increasing numbers of potential recipients are placed on the waiting list, resulting in longer waiting times. About 20% of patients die while awaiting heart transplantation. The majority die from progressive pump failure (46%), whereas about 30% of all deaths occur suddenly. Monitored terminal cardiac electrical activity in patients dying while awaiting transplantation reveals that bradyarrhythmias and/or electromechanical dissociation are involved in 68% of cases and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 32% of cases. Patients with a history of aborted cardiac arrest are at highest risk for recurrent malignant arrhythmias. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective therapy for preventing sudden cardiac death from ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Pooled data from a total of 75 sudden death survivors listed for cardiac transplantation demonstrate that ICD therapy can be applied with low mortality, low morbidity, and high efficacy, with up to 94% of the patients receiving appropriate shocks during the waiting period. However, there is considerable concern that this early survival benefit conferred by the ICD may be nullified by the competing risk of death due to terminal pump failure, as the waiting list and waiting time to transplantation lengthens. In advanced heart failure, risk stratification for sudden tachyarrhythmic death is only of limited value. Therefore, although sudden tachyarrhythmic death appears to constitute only a minor fraction of total cardiac death in patients awaiting heart transplantation, prophylactic ICD implantation as on electronic bridge to transplant may be considered. To define conclusively the role of prophylactic ICD therapy in this setting, prospective randomized studies are needed.

Cardiac death and stored electrograms in patients with third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

OBJECTIVES

We sought to utilize terminal stored intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) to study the electrophysiologic events that accompany mortality in patients with third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).

BACKGROUND

Despite their ability to effectively terminate ventricular tachyarrhythmias, cardiac mortality in patients with ICDs remains high. The mechanisms and modes of death in these patients are not well understood.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and stored EGMs from patients enrolled in the clinical trial of the Ventritex Cadence ICD. Of the 1,729 patients 119 died during 6 years of follow-up. The final recorded EGM was reviewed. Postimplant EGMs as well as 50 control EGMs were used to define normal EGM characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 36 noncardiac deaths (30%) and 83 cardiac deaths (70%). Of the cardiac deaths, 55 (66%) were nonsudden and 28 (34%) were sudden. When cardiac deaths were analyzed, 46 (55%) had no stored EGMs within 1 h of death, implying that the deaths were not directly related to tachyarrhythmias. In 37 cardiac deaths (18 nonsudden, 19 sudden), stored EGMs were present within 1 h of death. In these 37 deaths, the final EGM recorded was wide (>158 ms) in 33 (89%). Wide EGMs were interpreted as ventricular tachycardia in 27 and ventricular fibrillation in 6. In 13 of the 33 patients (39%) with wide EGMs, therapy was not delivered by the ICD, as it incorrectly detected a spontaneous termination of the arrhythmia. EGMs were significantly wider if recorded within 1 h, as compared with those recorded from 1 to 48 h before death (261+/-124 vs. 181+/-93 ms, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 37 patients (31%) who died after placement of an ICD had a stored EGM within 1 h of the time of death, suggesting that the majority of deaths (69%) were not the immediate result of a tachyarrhythmia. When EGMs were recorded, they were wide in 89% of patients. These wide EGMs most likely represent intracardiac recordings of electromechanical dissociation. Thus, of the 119 deaths, 112 (94%) were not the immediate result of a tachyarrhythmia.

Predictors of outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular node for atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure

BACKGROUND

Although radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) with uncontrolled ventricular response, factors that predict clinical outcome in patients with associated congestive heart failure (CHF) are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AV node ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation was performed in 44 consecutive patients (mean age 71+/-10 years) with CHF and AF associated with uncontrolled ventricular response. Immediately before ablation, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) measured by 2-dimensional echocardiogram was 34.6%+/-9.8%, mean exercise tolerance time was 2.6+/-1.8 minutes, and mean quality of life score was 62.3+/-19.7. Complete AV block was achieved in all 44 patients but was complicated by death in 1 patient from cardiogenic shock soon after ablation. By 1 month after ablation, EF increased to 43.8%+/-13.7% (P < .01), exercise tolerance time was 4.0+/-2.5 minutes (P < .01), and mean quality of life score decreased to 35.6+/-18.1 (P < .01). Improved cardiac performance (increase in EF > or = 9% over baseline EF) was detected in 20 (45%) of the patients. During a mean follow-up of 17+/-9 months, 5 patients died suddenly of presumed ventricular tachyarrhythmia and 4 others died of progressive CHF. Multivariate Cox survival analysis identified baseline EF < or = 30%, presence of significant mitral regurgitation (>2+) before ablation, and failure to exhibit improved cardiac performance by 1 month after ablation as the only independent predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline variables and failure of EF to improve soon after AV node ablation identifies patients with CHF and AF who have a high mortality rate. Adjunctive therapy to reduce sudden death and progressive heart failure should be evaluated in this subgroup.

Early benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in patients waiting for cardiac transplantation

The ICD can effectively recognize and treat ventricular arrhythmias that can lead to sudden death. Sudden death is a major problem in patients awaiting heart transplantation. We reviewed our experience with the ICD in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias waiting for cardiac transplantation. Nineteen patients were included. Seventeen were men, mean age was 54 +/- 11 years (range 17-66) and the left ventricular ejection fraction was 22% +/- 10% (range 9%-46%). After a mean follow-up of 6 +/- 5 months (range 1-20 months), 17 patients reached heart transplantation. One patient died and the other is waiting for a transplant. Before transplantation 71% of patients received an appropriate discharge. The mean time to the first appropriate discharge was 2 +/- 2 months (range < 1-6 months), which was significantly shorter than the mean time to first discharge in the other patients (n = 182) receiving a defibrillator in our center (11 +/- 10 months; range 1-58 months) (P < 0.0004). In conclusion, cardiac transplantation candidates with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias can effectively be protected against sudden arrhythmic death by ICD. These patients have a high incidence of appropriate shocks occurring very early after implantation.

Arrhythmias and sudden death in heart failure

Survival of patients with heart failure has improved over the past decade due to advances in medical therapy. Sudden death continues to cause 20 to 50% of deaths. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure. Ventricular hypertrophy, scars from prior myocardial infarction, sympathetic activation, and electrolyte abnormalities contribute. Some sudden deaths are due to bradyarrhythmias and electromechanical dissociation rather than ventricular arrhythmias. The risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapies continue to be defined. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided due to proarrhythmic and negative inotropic effects that may increase mortality. For patients resuscitated from sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be considered. ICDs markedly reduce sudden death in VT/VF survivors, but in advanced heart failure, this may not markedly extend survival. Catheter or surgical ablation can be considered for selected patients with bundle branch reentry VT or difficult to control monomorphic VT. For patients who have not had sustained VT/VF antiarrhythmic therapy should generally be avoided, but may benefit some high risk patients. Amiodarone may be beneficial in patients with advanced heart failure and rapid resting heart rates. ICDs may improve survival in selected survivors of myocardial infarction who have inducible VT.