Comparison in normal volunteers of three converting enzyme inhibitors: RHC 3659, MK 421 and captopril

Evaluation of the angiotensin challenge methodology for assessing the pharmacodynamic profile of antihypertensive drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system

AIMS

The performance of the experimental paradigm of angiotensin challenges with continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement was evaluated. Angiotensin dose-response relationships were characterized, along with the influence of clinical covariates. The stability of angiotensin-induced peaks and the variability of the angiotensin doses were assessed. Finally, the predictive value of studies based on angiotensin challenges to determine drug doses effective in therapeutics was evaluated.

METHODS

The data were gathered from 13 clinical studies on nine angiotensin II receptor antagonists, one ACE inhibitor and one dual ACE-NEP inhibitor, using Finapres for measuring the response to exogenous angiotensin challenges. Modelling of angiotensin dose-response curves and determination of the inter and intrasubject variability were performed by nonlinear regression (NONMEM). The different sources of variations in angiotensin I and II doses and angiotensin-induced peaks were evaluated by analyses of variance. The dose of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists inhibiting blood pressure increase by at least 75%, as measured by this method, was chosen for comparison with the labelled starting dose.

RESULTS

Angiotensin challenges exhibited a clear dose-response relationship which can be characterized both by an Emax or a log linear model. The log linear model gave an average systolic/diastolic response of 24+/-6/20+/-5 mmHg for a unit dose of 1 microgram of angiotensin II equivalents, and an increase of 6/6 mmHg for each doubling of the dose. The angiotensin ED50 calculated values were 0.67 microgram for systolic and 0.84 microgram for diastolic blood pressure. The angiotensin doses for eliciting a given response and the angiotensin induced peaks were fairly constant between period and subject, but vary significantly between studies. Based on an inhibition of blood pressure by 75%, the agreement was good between the doses of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists predicted from studies using the methodology of angiotensin challenges and the doses shown to be clinically efficacious, in spite of high intersubject and intrasubject variabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

This experimental method represents a valid surrogate for the therapeutic target and a useful tool for the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiling of drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system.

Ketanserin alone and in combination with enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension: assessment of the haemodynamic effects

The antihypertensive and haemodynamic efficacies of ketanserin and ketanserin plus enalapril were compared. The monotherapy phase of the study involved the oral administration of 40 mg ketanserin twice daily or 20 mg enalapril once daily for 12 weeks to 25 hypertensive patients. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced by both drugs. Left ventricular function both at rest and during effort improved significantly with either drug. This was due to a reduction of end-systolic volume; end-diastolic volume decreased only with the use of enalapril. Combination therapy, involving 16 patients and both drugs given at the original dosage schedule for 12 weeks, resulted in further reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and an improvement in left ventricular function; indices of diastolic function were not modified. In conclusion, ketanserin and enalapril showed comparable antihypertensive and haemodynamic activities. A combination of ketanserin and enalapril increased the favourable characteristics of both drugs.

Enalapril: a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor

Enalapril maleate is a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor marketed in the U.S. by Merck Sharp and Dohme. It has been demonstrated to actively interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This is reflected by both hemodynamic (decreased blood pressure) and humoral (increased plasma renin, angiotensin I, and decreased angiotensin II) responses to enalapril therapy. Activity in the kallikrein-bradykinin system is still controversial. Enalapril maleate is a prodrug which is quickly absorbed, hydrolyzed by the liver to the active metabolite enalaprilic acid, and excreted 33 percent in the bile and 61 percent in the urine. The therapeutic dosage range is 10-40 mg/d, maximum of 40 mg, given once or twice daily. The onset and duration of action are dose related. Vertigo and headache have been the most commonly reported side effects. Clinical comparison of enalapril to hydrochlorothiazide, beta-adrenergic blockers, and captopril find it efficacious in the treatment of essential hypertension. Efficacy in treating congestive heart failure and hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis has also been demonstrated for both angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The overall efficacy and safety of enalapril and captopril appear equivalent when used at low doses in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.

Double-blind comparison of captopril and enalapril in mild to moderate hypertension

To compare the antihypertensive and humoral effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and enalapril, 20 patients with essential hypertension, not receiving treatment for 2 weeks and consuming a prescribed sodium ion intake, were randomly assigned to two parallel, double-blind treatment groups with stratification based on race and untreated seated diastolic blood pressure. These groups received a placebo (day -1) followed by either captopril, 200 mg every 12 hours (n = 9), or enalapril maleate, 20 mg every 12 hours (n = 11), alone (days 1 to 14) and then with hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg every 12 hours (days 16 to 28). Captopril and enalapril were coadministered alone (day 15) and with hydrochlorothiazide (day 29) to assess whether further decreases in blood pressure would occur. Captopril and enalapril alone caused comparable decreases (p less than 0.05) in the mean 12 hour time-averaged seated diastolic blood pressure from values on day -1 (placebo), on day 1 (11 and 9 mm Hg, respectively) and day 14 (8 and 7 mm Hg, respectively). The addition of hydrochlorothiazide further decreased (p less than 0.05) blood pressure in each group (7 and 8 mm Hg, respectively) from values on day 14. Combined use of captopril and enalapril did not result in further reduction. Coupled with the comparable changes observed in each treatment group in serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration, these data support the view that captopril and enalapril have similar antihypertensive effects and mechanisms.

Enalapril. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure

Enalapril maleate is an orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. It lowers peripheral vascular resistance without causing an increase in heart rate. Enalapril 10 to 40 mg/day administered either once or twice daily is effective in lowering blood pressure in all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension, and shows similar efficacy to usual therapeutic dosages of hydrochlorothiazide, beta-blockers (propranolol, atenolol and metoprolol) and captopril. Most patients achieve adequate blood pressure control on enalapril alone or with hydrochlorothiazide. In patients with severe congestive heart failure resistant to conventional therapy, enalapril improves cardiac performance by a reduction in both preload and afterload, and improves clinical status long term. Enalapril appears to be well tolerated, with few serious adverse effects being reported. It does not induce the bradycardia associated with beta-blockers or the adverse effects of diuretics on some laboratory values. In fact, the hypokalaemic effect of hydrochlorothiazide is attenuated by the addition of enalapril. The incidence of the main (but rare) side effects of hypotension in hypovolaemic patients and reduced renal function in certain patients with renovascular hypertension, which are also seen with captopril, might be reduced by careful dosage titration, discontinuation of diuretics, and monitoring of at-risk patients. Thus, enalapril is a particularly worthwhile addition to the antihypertensive armamentarium, as an alternative for treatment of all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension. It also shows promise in the treatment of congestive heart failure.

Recent developments in the design of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Orally-active angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are rapidly establishing themselves in the therapy of hypertension and congestive heart failure. Concerted efforts in a number of laboratories have now led to the discovery or synthesis of an unparalleled variety of potent inhibitors. The manner in which several of these inhibitors bind to ACE is beginning to be understood. It is hoped that some of the insights to be derived from the SAR and structural studies done with ACE inhibitors will be applicable to other enzyme targets as well. The success of ACE inhibitors as pharmacological tools and in the clinic will also quite certainly encourage future efforts to develop new enzyme inhibitor approaches to drug therapy.

Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of enalapril (MK-421) in congestive heart failure

Enalapril, a new long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, was administered orally to 12 patients with stable congestive cardiac failure, NYHA function class III-IV. Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects were evaluated in addition to clinical response. The results of this open pilot study indicated marked reduction of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from 21.8 +/- 5.9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD) to 13.3 +/- 4.5 mm Hg (P less than 0.01) and peripheral resistance from 1837 +/- 860 dynes X sec-1 X cm-5 to 1063 +/- 584 dynes X sec-1 X cm-5 at 6 hr (P less than 0.01). Well-tolerated hypotension with mean arterial pressure from 88.0 +/- 11.6 mm Hg to 73.1 +/- 11.7 mm Hg at 6 hr (P less than 0.01) was recorded. No significant increase in cardiac output was observed. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was powerfully inhibited at the time of peak hemodynamic effect from 25.3 +/- 9.8 U/ml to 4.9 +/- 3.4 U/ml (P less than 0.01) and sustained, but attenuated reduction at 24 hr (8.7 +/- 4.7 U/ml) was observed. All patients reported subjective improvement and this clinical improvement has been sustained during follow-up from 19 to 21 months although baseline hemodynamic parameters at chronic re-catheterization did not demonstrate significant improvement. The pharmacodynamics and toxicity of enalapril as compared to captopril are discussed. The long half-life, low toxicity and gradual onset of action are seen as representing a clinical advantage with regard to patient therapy.

Enalapril (MK421) and its lysine analogue (MK521): a comparison of acute and chronic effects on blood pressure, renin-angiotensin system and sodium excretion in normal man

The immediate and long-term effects of enalapril (MK421) and its lysine analogue (MK521) in once-daily dosage, were compared in a study of 12 normal subjects. Both compounds lowered blood pressure equally throughout 24 h without causing tachycardia. The biochemical changes with MK521 were more sustained than with MK421, but this did not affect the magnitude of blood pressure reduction. Twenty-four hours after the previous dose, with both active drugs, plasma renin concentration was significantly higher on day 8 than on day 1, though angiotensin I did not increase in proportion; this probably reflects a fall in renin-substrate with prolonged converting enzyme inhibition. There was an early natriuresis with each compound but this effect was no longer apparent after 8 days of continuous therapy. Both MK421 and MK521 were well tolerated with no serious side effects.

[Reproducibility of acute captopril-induced renal insufficiency with enalapril]

In this case we are reporting on a patient suffering from malignant renovascular hypertension and chronic renal failure due to occlusion of both renal arteries. The acute renal insufficiency after Captopril and later on after Enalapril treatment was fully reversible. We believe that the acute reversible renal insufficiency was caused by the blockage of glomerular autoregulation depending on Angiotensin II.

Enalapril (MK-421), a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Acute and chronic effects in heart failure

Enalapril (MK-421) is a new oral angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor which was administered to eight patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Four hours after enalapril administration (10 to 20 mg), mean arterial pressure fell from 95.6 +/- 11.4 (SD) to 84.8 +/- 17.6 mm Hg (p less than 0.05), systemic vascular resistance fell from 18.5 +/- 3.0 to 15.8 +/- 4.1 units (p less than 0.02), while pulmonary artery wedge pressure changed insignificantly from 17.5 +/- 9.2 to 14.5 +/- 10.2 mm Hg and cardiac index rose insignificantly from 2.63 +/- 0.46 to 2.82 +/- 0.75 L/min/m2. These hemodynamic effects persisted during one month of enalapril administration. Baseline plasma renin activity of 0.76 +/- 1.07 ng/ml/hr rose to 3.23 +/- 2.87 ng/ml/hr (p less than 0.05) after one month of enalapril administration. During the month of enalapril administration, maximal exercise duration rose from 465.1 +/- 233.0 to 572.3 +/- 233.7 seconds (p less than 0.05), and maximal oxygen uptake increased from 12.3 +/- 2.7 to 16 +/- 11.2 ml/min/kg (p less than 0.05). No major side effect occurred. These sustained effects may be clinically beneficial, and enalapril deserves further evaluation in the long-term treatment of patients with chronic congestive heart failure.