Effects of nifedipine on hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction already treated with propranolol

Myocardial metabolic and hemodynamic effects of a sustained intravenous infusion of nifedipine with and without metoprolol in patients with unstable angina

We tested the usefulness of a sustained intravenous infusion of nifedipine and a combination of nifedipine and metoprolol in the early management of 14 patients with unstable angina pectoris. After a 24-hour run-in period, nifedipine was titrated in a stepwise fashion (mean dose 27 +/- 7 micrograms/min). After nifedipine treatment coronary blood flow increased from 150 +/- 66 to 183 +/- 74 ml/min (p less than 0.05), whereas double product, myocardial oxygen consumption, and both arterial and coronary sinus (nor)epinephrine levels were unchanged. Myocardial lactate uptake increased from 3.4 +/- 26.1 to 31.3 +/- 26.6 mumol/min (p less than 0.005) and free fatty acid uptake from 7.2 +/- 22.1 to 34.5 +/- 33.7 mumol/min (p less than 0.05). A small nonsignificant improvement in amino acid metabolism was observed. Metoprolol was added in seven patients and led to a decrease in double product (-2.2 +/- 1.6 x 10(3); p less than 0.01) and myocardial oxygen consumption (-3.2 +/- 3.8 ml/min; p less than 0.05). The lactate uptake/oxygen uptake ratio increased by 18% after metoprolol (p = NS). The number of episodes of chest pain decreased from 2.4 +/- 1.1/24 hours to 0.1 +/- 0.2 in the nifedipine group and from 2.9 +/- 1.1/24 hours to 0.3 +/- 0.5 in the nifedipine plus metoprolol group (both p less than 0.01). We conclude that in the acute phase of unstable angina, intravenous nifedipine can be carefully titrated to improve coronary blood flow and oxidative metabolism. The addition of metoprolol is also associated with a reduction in myocardial oxygen demand. This treatment results in significant hemodynamic stability.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to compare the efficacy and safety of chronic nifedipine therapy with that of isosorbide dinitrate and their combination in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to compare the efficacy and safety of vasodilation with the calcium entry blocker nifedipine with that of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and their combination as treatment for heart failure. Twenty-eight patients with New York Heart Association Functional class II or III chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction were studied. All patients were maintained on a constant dose of digitalis and diuretics throughout the study. Eight weeks of therapy with nifedipine alone or in combination with ISDN resulted in a significantly higher incidence of heart failure deterioration necessitating hospitalizations and/or additional diuretics. Twenty-four percent of patients required hospitalization during nifedipine therapy and 26% required hospitalization during nifedipine-ISDN combination therapy in comparison to 0% requiring hospitalization during ISDN therapy alone. The total number of heart failure-worsening episodes was nine among patients on nifedipine, three among patients on ISDN (p less than 0.09 versus nifedipine), and 21 among patients on nifedipine-ISDN combination (p less than 0.001 versus nifedipine, p less than 0.0001 versus ISDN). Premature discontinuation of drug administration due to clinical deterioration or other side effects occurred in 29% of patients during nifedipine therapy, 5% of patients during ISDN therapy (p = 0.05 versus nifedipine), and 19% of patients during the combination therapy. A comparison of eight patients who demonstrated clinical deterioration on nifedipine with the remainder of the patients demonstrated no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (0.24 +/- 0.06 versus 0.23 +/- 0.07) or maximal oxygen uptake during exercise (13 +/- 3 versus 14 +/- 2 ml/kg/min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic and volumetric effects of venodilation with nitroglycerin in chronic mitral regurgitation

To evaluate the potential value of nitrate therapy in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation, the hemodynamic and angiographic effects of intravenous nitroglycerin were studied in 10 such patients. Nitroglycerin infusion, titrated to reduce mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure at least 20%, resulted in a significant reduction in mean blood pressure (from 91 +/- 12 to 77 +/- 13 mm Hg, p less than 0.0001), mean right atrial pressure (12 +/- 6 to 7 +/- 4 mm Hg, p less than 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (22 +/- 7 to 13 +/- 5 mm Hg, p less than 0.0001) and peak V wave of indirect left atrial pressure (34 +/- 9 to 20 +/- 10 mm Hg, p less than 0.001). Changes in systemic vascular resistance (1,986 +/- 468 vs 1,582 +/- 534 dynes s cm-5) and forward stroke volume (39 +/- 14 vs 45 +/- 8 ml) were not statistically significant. Angiographic data showed a decrease in both end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes (248 +/- 51 to 216 +/- 54 ml, p = 0.06 and 127 +/- 69 to 99 +/- 48 ml, p less than 0.05, respectively) and an improvement in ejection fraction, from 0.52 +/- 0.15 to 0.55 +/- 0.15 (p less than 0.05). There was no significant change in the group values for mitral regurgitant volume and fraction (from 85 +/- 32 to 72 +/- 32 ml and 67 +/- 10 to 64 +/- 5%, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)