The changing etiology of constrictive pericarditis in a large referral center

[Management of Constrictive Pericarditis : A study of 43 operated cases]

Chronic constrictive pericarditis is a rare condition characterized by clinical signs of right heart failure, due to the symphysis of the two pericardial leaflets. Our study focused on a retrospective analysis of 43 CCP surgery observations collected over an 11-year period (2003-2013). The mean age of the patients was 32 years; 65% were male; exercise dyspnea (95%) was the most frequent sign. Two main etiologies were observed: tuberculosis 58% and idiopathic causes 42%. All of our patients received a subtotal pericardectomy per median sternotomy, of which 95% had no cardiopulmonary bypass.

Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Disease

The pericardium serves many important functions but is not essential for life. Pericardial heart disease comprises only pericarditis and its complications, tamponade and constriction, and congenital lesions. However, the pericardium is affected by virtually every category of disease. Thus the critical care physician is likely to encounter the patient with pericardial disease in a variety of settings, either as an isolated phenomenon or as a complication of a variety of systemic disorders, trauma, or certain drugs. Despite exhaustive etiological lists, the cause of pericardial heart disease is often never identified. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic pericarditis with an emphasis on those areas of greatest interest to the intensivist.

Heart in An Eggshell Calcification: Idiopathic Calcific Constrictive Pericarditis

Constrictive pericarditis is caused by fibrosis and calcification of the pericardium, which inhibits diastolic filling of the heart. Chest roentgenogram can show the calcification as a mass or sheet over the heart and computed tomography scan allows anatomic delineation of the pericardium and determines the extent of calcification. We reported a case of eggshell calcification of idiopathic chronic constrictive pericarditis diagnosed by echocardiography and multi-detector computed tomography.

Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the association of etiology of constrictive pericarditis (CP), pericardial calcification (CA), and other clinical variables with long-term survival after pericardiectomy.

BACKGROUND

Constrictive pericarditis is the result of a spectrum of primary cardiac and noncardiac conditions. Few data exist on the cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. The impact of CA on survival is unclear.

METHODS

A total of 163 patients who underwent pericardiectomy for CP over a 24-year period at a single surgical center were studied. Constrictive pericarditis was confirmed by the surgical report. Vital status was obtained from the Social Security Death Index.

RESULTS

Etiology of CP was idiopathic in 75 patients (46%), prior cardiac surgery in 60 patients (37%), radiation treatment in 15 patients (9%), and miscellaneous in 13 patients (8%). Median follow-up among survivors was 6.9 years (range 0.8 to 24.5 years), during which time there were 61 deaths. Perioperative mortality was 6%. Idiopathic CP had the best prognosis (7-year Kaplan-Meier survival: 88%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76% to 94%) followed by postsurgical (66%, 95% CI 52% to 78%) and postradiation CP (27%, 95% CI 9% to 58%). In bootstrap-validated proportional hazards analyses, predictors of poor overall survival were prior radiation, worse renal function, higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAP), abnormal left ventricular (LV) systolic function, lower serum sodium level, and older age. Pericardial calcification had no impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival after pericardiectomy for CP is related to underlying etiology, LV systolic function, renal function, serum sodium, and PAP. The relatively good survival with idiopathic CP emphasizes the safety of pericardiectomy in this subgroup.

Calcific constrictive pericarditis: is it still with us?

BACKGROUND

The presence of pericardial calcification on a plain radiograph strongly suggests constrictive pericarditis in patients with heart failure. However, calcific constrictive pericarditis is considered rare in the United States since tuberculosis incidence has decreased, and doubt has therefore been raised about the importance of this radiologic finding in modern cardiovascular practice.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical and prognostic significance of pericardial calcification on radiography in patients with constrictive pericarditis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A consecutive series of 135 patients (mean age +/- SD, 56 +/- 16 years) who from 1985 through 1995 had constrictive pericarditis confirmed surgically (n = 133) or by autopsy (n = 2). Patients were divided into two groups: those with pericardial calcification on chest radiography (group I) and those without (group II).

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical and diagnostic findings were compared in both groups, and outcome was compared in 132 patients who had pericardiectomy.

RESULTS

Pericardial calcification was seen in 36 patients (27%). The cause of constrictive pericardial disease was indeterminate in 67% of patients in group I and in 21% of patients in group II (P < 0.001). Patients in group I had had symptoms for a longer period and were more likely to have pericardial knock, larger atrial size, and atrial arrhythmia. Significantly more perioperative deaths were seen in group I, but incidence of late survival and incidence of noncalcific disease were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pericardial calcification is a common finding in patients with constrictive pericarditis. It is often associated with idiopathic disease and other markers of disease chronicity and is an independent predictor of increased perioperative mortality rates.

Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy

BACKGROUND

The clinical spectrum of constrictive pericarditis (CP) has been affected by a change in incidence of etiological factors. We sought to determine the impact of these changes on the outcome of pericardiectomy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The contemporary spectrum of CP in 135 patients (76% male) evaluated at the Mayo Clinic from 1985 to 1995 was compared with that of a historic cohort. Notable trends were an increasing frequency of CP due to cardiac surgery and mediastinal radiation and presentation in older patients (median age, 61 versus 45 years). Perioperative mortality decreased (6% versus 14%, P = 0.011), but late survival was inferior to that of an age- and sex-matched US population (57+/-8% at 10 years). The long-term outcome was predicted independently by 3 variables in stepwise logistic regression analyses: (1) age, (2) NYHA class, and most powerfully, (3) a postradiation cause. Of 90 late survivors in whom functional class could be determined, functional status had improved markedly (2.6+/-0.7 at baseline versus 1.5+/-0.8 at latest follow-up [P<0.0001]), with 83% being free of clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The evolving profile of CP, with increasingly older patients and those with radiation-induced disease in the past decade, significantly affects postoperative prognosis. Long-term results of pericardiectomy are disappointing for some patient groups, especially those with radiation-induced CP. By contrast, surgery alleviates or improves symptoms in the majority of late survivors.

Constrictive Pericarditis

Constrictive pericarditis is an uncommon but treatable cause of heart failure that results from a variety of acute inflammatory processes. Corticosteroids appear to prevent the development of constriction in selected patients with active pericardial inflammation. Symptoms of right-sided heart failure usually predominate and can be adequately managed with diuretics. Complete surgical pericardiectomy remains the only definitive treatment. The mortality risk is markedly increased in patients with advanced symptoms, and surgery should be performed in earlier stages. The majority of patients (95% on average) will survive the surgery; complete relief of symptoms occurs in about 50% of survivors. Ten percent of patients will have persistent symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV) and experience poor late outcomes, however, particularly when residual myocardial dysfunction coexists.

Constrictive pericarditis

The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis remains a challenge because its physical findings and hemodynamics mimic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Various diagnostic advances over the years enable us to differentiate between these two conditions. This review begins with a case report of constrictive pericarditis, followed by a brief history and discussions of etiologies. Clinical features, radiologic, electrocardiographic, angiographic findings, and hemodynamics of constrictive pericarditis are reviewed. The echocardiographic findings are detailed and the recent advances in Doppler flow velocity patterns of pulmonary, mitral, tricuspid valves and hepatic veins are reported. Nuclear ventriculograms depict rapid ventricular filling in constrictive pericarditis and differentiate it from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Endomyocardial biopsy helps further in recognizing the various types of restrictive cardiomyopathies. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging delineate abnormal pericardial thickness in constrictive pericarditis. Association of characteristic hemodynamic changes and abnormal pericardial thickness > 3 mm usually confirms the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Effusive and occult varieties of constrictive pericarditis are briefly described. This review concludes with emphasizing the importance of pericardial resection.

Constrictive pericarditis: its history and current status

The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis remains a challenge because it is often mimicked by restrictive cardiomyopathy. The last few years have seen numerous advances in our ability to differentiate between these two conditions which often have similar physical findings and hemodynamics. This review begins with a brief history of constrictive pericarditis; this is followed by an extensive discussion of newer etiologies, and then the classical clinical history and physical examination findings are described. Radiologic, electrocardiographic, and angiographic findings are discussed. The hemodynamics of constrictive pericarditis are reviewed. Recent results of echocardiographic and echo-Doppler investigations are presented. Emphasis is placed upon the limitations of M-mode echocardiography in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. The value of echocardiographic Doppler studies of mitral and tricuspid flow velocity patterns, as well as of those in the pulmonary veins and hepatic veins, is described. Nuclear ventriculograms and angiocardiograms tend to show more rapid ventricular filling in constrictive pericarditis than in restrictive cardiomyopathy. Although only a small number of patients has been studied, these evaluations seem to have merit in separating restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis. The role of computed tomography scanning and magnetic resonance imaging studies of pericardial thickness in confirming the presence of constrictive pericarditis is discussed. Abnormal pericardial thickening (> 3 mm) confirms the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis, but only if the characteristic hemodynamic pattern is present. The usefulness of endomyocardial biopsy in recognizing specific varieties of restrictive cardiomyopathy is presented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Constrictive pericarditis versus restrictive cardiomyopathy: a reappraisal and update of diagnostic criteria

Distinguishing constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy is a difficult clinical challenge. We review published reports in which hemodynamic criteria were used to differentiate these two diagnoses. There were 82 cases of constriction and 37 cases of restriction. The overall predictive accuracy of the difference between right and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures (RVEDP and LVEDP), RV systolic pressure, and the ratio of RVEDP to RV systolic pressure were 85%, 70%, and 76%, respectively. If all three criteria were concordant, the probability of having correctly classified the patient was greater than 90%. However, one fourth of patients could not be classified by hemodynamic criteria. There are few data to support the use of hemodynamic measurements after exercise or volume infusion to separate these two groups. Numerous recent studies have reported on the ability of left ventriculography, Doppler echocardiography, or radionuclide angiography to distinguish constriction from restriction. Many of the proposed indices appear promising, but these studies suffer from small sample size, potential selection bias, and complexity of the proposed criteria, which have limited their widespread application. New imaging technologies, such as CT scanning or MRI have been applied in a limited number of cases, but appear to be a sensitive means of detecting abnormal pericardium. Endomyocardial biopsy has proven useful in establishing the diagnosis of infiltrative cardiomyopathies, eliminating in those cases the need for surgical intervention. The finding of myocarditis must be considered a nonspecific finding that does not preclude thoracotomy. Since constrictive pericarditis is a surgically curable condition, the distinction between constrictive and restrictive disease is of critical importance. Taking into account the relative contribution of data derived from hemodynamic, imaging,and biopsy studies, we propose an algorithm for the selection of appropriate candidates for pericardial biopsy and stripping.

Salmonella: a rare cause of subacute effusive-constrictive pericarditis

A 36 year old woman had emergency pericardectomy because of subacute effusive-constrictive pericarditis. The pericardial fluid and tissue culture showed that this was caused by infection with Salmonella enteritidis. Cardiac involvement with salmonella does not usually present in such an aggressive manner and it has not previously been reported to cause this rare type of cardiac constriction.

Constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery: report of three cases and review of the literature

Constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery is a rare phenomenon occurring with an incidence of 0.2% to 0.3%. To date only 158 cases have been reported in the world literature. Symptoms include dyspnea (81%), chest pain (34%), and fatigue (29%). Peripheral edema (90%) and an elevated jugular venous pressure (86%) were the most common abnormal signs found during physical examination. Chest x-ray and ECG abnormalities were not helpful in making the diagnosis, and abnormal echocardiographic findings were reported in less than half of the cases. Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans of the heart were usually of great diagnostic benefit. Diastolic equalization of cardiac pressures remains the sine que non for diagnosis. Oral steroids have been reported to favorably alter the course early in the disease, but pericardial stripping remains the definitive form of therapy. Operative mortality rates vary from 5.5% to 14.5%.

Chronic constrictive pericarditis associated with asbestosis

Observation of chronic constrictive pericarditis associated with pulmonary asbestosis is reported here. Heart catheterization revealed typical patterns of cardiac constriction. The diagnosis of asbestosis was based on pathologic features associated with a long history of asbestos dust exposure without evidence for tuberculosis. The etiology of this constrictive pericarditis was related to an asbestosis pericarditis involvement.