Effect of pharmacologic autonomic blockade on ventriculoatrial conduction

Effects of cardioactive medications on retrograde conduction: Continuing relevance for current devices

INTRODUCTION

Retroconduction (ventriculo-atrial conduction) remains a problem for patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices. Pacemaker algorithms can detect and terminate endless loop tachycardia (ELT), but actual prevention of ELT may require anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Similarly, AADs can affect ICD rhythm discrimination algorithms that depend on atrio-ventricular ratios. There is concern whether these drugs remain effective during stress situations.

METHODS

Electrophysiologic studies that included retroconduction testing using slow ramp pacing were done in 1332 patients. The presence or absence of retroconduction at baseline and with drug was recorded, as was the rate at block. As a stress surrogate, isoproterenol was used to test retroconduction and reversal of drug-induced block.

RESULTS

Procainamide, mexiletine, phenytoin, disopyramide, quinidine, beta-blockers, encainide, and amiodarone caused complete retrograde block or decreased the rate at which block occurred (mean 76% of patients, p < 0.008), whereas digoxin, lidocaine, diltiazem, and verapamil did not. Isoproterenol (in the absence of AADs) increased the rate at block in 82% of 404 patients with retroconduction at baseline (p < 0.005). Of 319 patients without retroconduction at baseline, 134 (42%) developed retroconduction after isoproterenol. Isoproterenol reversed retrograde block in 39% of patients with block on an AAD. Amiodarone, digoxin, and the combination of digoxin plus a beta-blocker were most effective at resisting this reversal of ventriculo-atrial block (80%, 68%, and 75% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Most of the AADs reviewed increase the cycle length at block or abolish retroconduction, while isoproterenol has the opposite effect. Anti-arrhythmic medications, particularly amiodarone, digoxin, and the combination of digoxin plus a beta-blocker may be considered for a patient with multiple ELT episodes or certain ICD detection problems.

Junctional tachycardia during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: effects of autonomic blockade

INTRODUCTION

The autonomic nervous system richly innervates the peri-AV nodal region and may be activated during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, resulting in the generation of junctional tachycardia. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the role of the autonomic nervous system in the genesis of junctional tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the characteristics of junctional tachycardia in patients with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) autonomic blockade undergoing RF ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Intravenous administration of atropine (0.04 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) were used to block the autonomic nervous system. There were no differences in clinical variables and baseline electrophysiologic characteristics between the two groups except for slightly longer effective refractory periods of the fast pathway and of the atrium in the autonomic blockade group. The autonomic blockade shortened the baseline sinus cycle length and effective refractory period of the ventricle only but not other electrophysiologic characteristics of the AV node. The junctional tachycardia was observed during ablation in each patient, but its occurrence and cycle length, as well as numbers of consecutive junctional beats, were not altered by the autonomic blockade.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the muscarinic and beta-adrenergic components of the autonomic nervous system play no role in the genesis of junctional tachycardia.

Shortening of fast pathway refractoriness after slow pathway ablation. Effects of autonomic blockade

BACKGROUND

Shortening of the anterograde effective refractory period (ERP) of the fast pathway has been reported after radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway. We hypothesized that ERP shortening may be related to autonomic changes, possibly catecholamine release, as a result of ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To test this, 10 consecutive patients with atrioventricular node reentry undergoing slow pathway ablation were given autonomic blockade before the ablation procedure. This was achieved by atropine 0.03 mg/kg and propranolol 0.15 mg/kg IV supplemented by half the initial dose after ablation and before the final study. A control group of 10 patients underwent the protocol without autonomic blockade. Before ablation, autonomic blockade did not alter the ERP of either the fast pathway (295 +/- 22 versus 298 +/- 26 milliseconds) or the slow pathway (264 +/- 36 versus 269 +/- 38 milliseconds). Autonomic blockade obscured dual pathway physiology in 2 patients and brought it out in another 2 without dual pathway physiology initially. Slow pathway ablation shortened the ERP of the fast pathway for the group as a whole (331.5 +/- 54 versus 305.5 +/- 60 milliseconds, mean +/- SD, n = 20, P < .04). There was no difference in degree of ERP shortening in control patients (23.5 +/- 58 milliseconds) or autonomic blockade patients (25.5 +/- 52 milliseconds).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that shortening of the ERP of the fast pathway after slow pathway ablation is not mediated by autonomic changes.

Electrophysiologic characteristics of manifest and latent retrograde conduction in dogs

Atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry requires intact retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the contribution of various pacing and pharmacologic techniques to uncover VA conduction during apparent unidirectional VA block, and to evaluate the role of several biologic and electrophysiologic factors in concealment of retrograde conduction. Forty healthy dogs underwent catheter-electrophysiologic studies of AV and VA conduction. Group I (20 animals) had intact VA conduction. Group II (six animals) had VA dissociation with ventricular pacing initiated during sinus rhythm, but the presence of VA conduction was confirmed by isoproterenol infusion or by premature ventricular stimulation. In group III (14 animals), the above techniques failed to uncover VA conduction. Eight of 14 group III animals underwent thoracotomy and crushing or freezing of the sinoatrial (SA) node. Ventricular pacing initiated during sinus standstill was associated with 1:1 VA conduction in each experiment. VA conduction time and retrograde Wenckebach cycle length, both in the baseline state and during isoproterenol infusion, were significantly longer in the eight animals in group III than in those in group I. Age, gender, weight, breed, sinus cycle length, and anterograde AV conduction properties were not significantly different between groups I, II, and III. The data suggest that (1) in normal dogs, complete unidirectional VA block probably does not exist; (2) in the presence of anterograde input to the AV node, even sophisticated pacing and pharmacologic maneuvers may fail to uncover the presence of VA conduction; (3) although anterograde input is essential for concealment of VA conduction, the phenomenon is more closely associated with depressed retrograde than with anterograde AV nodal characteristics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electrophysiological effects of alpha-adrenergic stimulation

Autonomic blockade for in vivo electrophysiological studies generally involves atropine and beta blockers, ignoring the potential role of alpha-adrenergic activity. To evaluate the importance, if any, of alpha-adrenergic tone, the electrophysiological effects of incremental doses of phenylephrine were examined in eight chloralose-anesthetized dogs. In order to study direct effects, all dogs were both beta blocked (with nadolol) and vagally blocked (with the combination of vagotomy and atropine). Results were also obtained after normalization of blood pressure with nitroprusside or the alpha-blocker, prazosin. Phenylephrine caused dose-dependent increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This was accompanied by consistent but modest decreases in sinus cycle length (control RR interval 492 +/- 34 msec vs 459 +/- 29 msec after dose 1 of phenylephrine, P less than 0.05, 516 +/- 41 vs 484 +/- 34 msec control versus dose 2, P less than 0.05). These increases in automaticity were not prevented after normalization of arterial pressure by nitroprusside, but were reversed when concomitant alpha-receptor blockade was achieved with prazosin, suggesting that sinus node acceleration resulted directly from alpha-receptor stimulation. No effects on atrial, AV nodal or His-Purkinje conduction were noted. In addition, phenylephrine did not affect atrial, AV nodal, or ventricular refractoriness. In conclusion, conduction and refractoriness of normal cardiac tissue (other than the sinus node) are unaffected by direct alpha-receptor stimulation. This justifies the use of combined beta and muscarinic blockers to achieve autonomic blockade under most circumstances.

Effects of upright posture on anterograde and retrograde atrioventricular conduction in patients with coronary artery disease, mitral valve prolapse or no structural heart disease

To assess the effects of posture on anterograde and retrograde atrioventricular conduction, electrophysiologic testing was performed in 25 patients in both the supine and 45 degrees upright positions on a tilt table. Retrograde conduction was present during ventricular pacing in 17 patients in the supine position; all 17 continued to manifest retrograde conduction in the upright position. In all patients with absent retrograde conduction while supine, retrograde conduction could not be demonstrated while upright. Upright posture significantly (p less than 0.05) shortened the sinus cycle length (from 808 +/- 34 to 678 +/- 26 ms, mean +/- standard error of the mean), AH interval during sinus rhythm (78 +/- 6 to 69 +/- 6 ms), and AH interval during atrial pacing at cycle length 500 ms (123 +/- 13 to 91 +/- 9 ms). Total atrioventricular conduction time during atrial pacing shortened significantly (from 169 +/- 13 to 136 +/- 10 ms), as did ventriculoatrial conduction time during ventricular pacing (from 192 +/- 9 to 178 +/- 7 ms). Upright posture also significantly shortened both anterograde block cycle length (390 +/- 20 to 328 +/- 17 ms) and retrograde block cycle length (466 +/- 27 to 354 +/- 18 ms). However, the effect of upright posture on retrograde block cycle length was significantly greater than on anterograde block cycle length: a 21% decrease retrograde vs a 14% decrease anterograde (p less than 0.05). These effects may produce clinically important changes in characteristics of arrhythmias that depend on the properties of anterograde and retrograde conduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)