Facilitating influence of disopyramide on atrial flutter termination by overdrive pacing

Atrial Flutter, Typical and Atypical: A Review

Clinical electrophysiology has made the traditional classification of rapid atrial rhythms into flutter and tachycardia of little clinical use. Electrophysiological studies have defined multiple mechanisms of tachycardia, both re-entrant and focal, with varying ECG morphologies and rates, authenticated by the results of catheter ablation of the focal triggers or critical isthmuses of re-entry circuits. In patients without a history of heart disease, cardiac surgery or catheter ablation, typical flutter ECG remains predictive of a right atrial re-entry circuit dependent on the inferior vena cava-tricuspid isthmus that can be very effectively treated by ablation, although late incidence of atrial fibrillation remains a problem. Secondary prevention, based on the treatment of associated atrial fibrillation risk factors, is emerging as a therapeutic option. In patients subjected to cardiac surgery or catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or showing atypical ECG patterns, macro-re-entrant and focal tachycardia mechanisms can be very complex and electrophysiological studies are necessary to guide ablation treatment in poorly tolerated cases.

Suppression of atrial tachyarrhythmias by pacing

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) remains difficult in many patients. Accordingly, new therapeutic approaches for AT suppression are evaluated. Atrial pacing may prevent ATs by modifying the electrophysiologic conditions required for sustained ATs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

New pacing algorithms for prevention of AT are aimed at permanent overdrive suppression of arrhythmic activity, reduction of dispersion of atrial refractoriness produced by short-long cycles, more aggressive overdrive pacing after spontaneous sinus conversion to prevent early reinitiation of ATs, and prevention of inadequate rate decay in patients with vagally induced ATs. AT prevention may be achieved by dedicated atrial pacing sites, e.g., pacing at the insertion of Bachmann's bundle or biatrial pacing, which compensates for interatrial conduction delay. Preexciting regions of critical conduction delay, pacing at the triangle of Koch or coronary sinus os, and dual-site right atrial pacing have shown antiarrhythmic effects. Atrial preventive pacing and pharmacologic treatment may work synergistically in the concept of hybrid therapy. To prevent atrial electrical remodeling, early termination of AT seems desirable. This may be achieved by implanted devices that automatically detect ATs and provide atrial antitachycardia pacing for organized ATs. Initial studies showed that regular AT can automatically be terminated in approximately 50% of treated episodes.

CONCLUSION

Pacing for prevention of AT and termination of organized AT episodes may become important steps within the concept of hybrid therapy of AT. However, their clinical efficacy and optimal patient selection remain to be evaluated in prospective, well-designed clinical trials.

Overdrive atrial pacing for conversion of atrial flutter: comparison of postoperative with nonpostoperative patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported varying success rates in overdrive pace termination of atrial flutter. We hypothesized that these discrepancies might be caused by differences in study populations. Accordingly, we prospectively compared the success rate of pacing in patients with atrial flutter that occurred after heart surgery with that of patients with atrial flutter from other causes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population consisted of 65 consecutive patients referred for pace termination of typical (type I) atrial flutter. Pacing was performed in 30-second bursts, starting at the flutter cycle length, and repeated in 5-ms decrements until normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation occurred. Normal sinus rhythm was restored in 38 (65%) patients. Of 20 patients whose flutter was precipitated by heart surgery, 19 (95%) were successfully pace terminated. In contrast, pace termination was successful in only 47% of the remainder of the population (P <.001). No other clinical parameters were predictive of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that overdrive pacing is an effective means of terminating atrial flutter that has occurred after heart surgery. Alternative methods should be considered as the initial therapeutic approach in patients with atrial flutter from other causes.

Comparative efficacy of intravenous ibutilide versus procainamide for enhancing termination of atrial flutter by atrial overdrive pacing

This study compares the influence of intravenous ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, with procainamide, a class IA antiarrhythmic agent, and with placebo on its ability to terminate atrial flutter using rapid atrial pacing. Fifty-nine episodes of atrial flutter in 54 patients who failed to terminate with an intravenous infusion of ibutilide, procainamide, or placebo alone underwent attempts at pacing termination using a standard protocol of burst atrial overdrive pacing. Atrial flutter cycle length and atrial monophasic action potential duration recorded from the right atrium during atrial flutter were measured at baseline and following infusion of ibutilide, procainamide, or placebo. Both ibutilide and procainamide significantly enhanced (p <0.001) pacing-induced termination of atrial flutter compared with placebo. Pacing converted 2 of 11 patients (18%) who received placebo, 13 of 15 patients (87%) who received ibutilide, and 29 of 33 patients (88%) who received procainamide to sinus rhythm. Ibutilide and procainamide compared with placebo markedly reduced (p <0.001) the incidence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation. The atrial flutter cycle length was prolonged significantly less (p <0.001), and the atrial monophasic action potential duration was increased significantly more (p <0.001) by ibutilide than by procainamide. Although the electrophysiologic changes induced by these antiarrhythmic agents contributed to facilitating pacing-induced termination, neither tachycardia cycle length nor action potential duration were useful predictors of the ability of pacing to terminate atrial flutter. In conclusion, despite differing electrophysiologic effects, the use of intravenous ibutilide or procainamide enhances the termination of atrial flutter by atrial overdrive pacing.

Atrial flutter termination by overdrive transesophageal pacing and the facilitating effect of oral propafenone

Transesophageal overdrive atrial pacing is effective and safe for atrial flutter termination. The influence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy on this procedure is controversial. In this study, we investigated whether oral propafenone may facilitate this procedure. Thirty patients with type I atrial flutter were randomized into 2 groups in which transesophageal pacing was attempted: group A, without treatment; and group B, after oral administration of propafenone 600 mg. Transesophageal pacing was effective in interrupting atrial flutter in 53% of patients (8 of 15) in group A and in 87% of patients (13 of 15) in group B. A significant lengthening of the flutter cycle was observed with respect to the baseline in patients given propafenone (261 +/- 23 vs 217 +/- 25, p < 0.01). Sinus rhythm resumed at a shorter paced cycle in group A patients (166 +/- 13 vs 187 +/- 14 ms, p < 0.01). The transesophageal threshold for stable atrial capture was significantly lower in group A (20.5 +/- 0.2 vs 23.3 +/- 1.2, p < 0.01). In no patient was the threshold for atrial capture higher than the pain threshold. We did not observe abrupt enhancement of atrioventricular conduction. We conclude that propafenone is effective and safe when used with transesophageal pacing in the termination of atrial flutter. The slowing effect of the drug on intraatrial conduction and the possible stabilizing effect on the reentry circuit appear to be outweighed by the positive effect of propafenone on the excitable gap of the circuit, facilitating its capture and accounting for the beneficial effect of the drug on arrhythmia termination.

Overdrive pacing for atrial flutter

To determine the incidence and predictors of conversion to normal sinus rhythm, a total of 124 procedures using a standard pacing protocol were performed in 101 consecutive inpatients referred for pace termination of atrial flutter. Normal sinus rhythm was achieved in 75 pace termination procedures (60%), including 10 in which atrial fibrillation occurred initially and later converted spontaneously. Sustained atrial fibrillation was provoked in 39 procedures, and atrial flutter persisted in 10. Clinical and laboratory parameters, including use of antiarrhythmic drugs, were not helpful in predicting the outcome of pacing. Of 17 patients undergoing repeat pacing for recurrent flutter, concordant results were obtained in only 4. It is concluded that: (1) overdrive pacing is only a moderately effective means of restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial flutter, although some change in rhythm occurs in the vast majority; (2) pacing-induced atrial fibrillation may be unstable and spontaneously converts to sinus rhythm in > 20% of cases; (3) there are no clinically useful predictors of success; (4) antiarrhythmic drugs do not facilitate pacing-induced conversion to sinus rhythm; and (5) failure to convert to sinus rhythm with 1 episode of flutter does not preclude success on subsequent occasions.

Efficacy of rapid atrial pacing for conversion of atrial flutter in medically treated patients

To determine factors affecting the success rate of rapid atrial pacing in converting atrial flutter to sinus rhythm in medically treated patients, we prospectively used this technique for 120 consecutive episodes in a total of 110 patients (94 male, 16 female, mean age 63 +/- 14 years). Structural heart disease was present in 77%, and all patients were receiving antiarrhythmic drugs at the time of the procedure. Atrial flutter type I was present in 92 of 110 patients (84%), and atrial flutter type II in 18 of 110 (16%). Primary success rate (return to sinus rhythm either immediately or after < 10 min of atrial fibrillation) was 70% (71/102) for flutter type I, and 6% (1/18) for flutter type II (p < 0.001). Delayed success (conversion to sinus rhythm in > 10 min but < 24 h) was observed in 15 additional episodes of flutter type I (15%) and in 1 additional episode of flutter type II (6%). The only clinical factors predicting primary success were (a) characteristics of flutter waves on the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram, (b) duration of flutter (primary success rate of 81% if flutter < 1 month vs. 57% if > 1 month, p < 0.05), and (c) flutter rate (primary success rate of 78% if < 260/min vs. 56% if > 260/min, p < 0.05). In 6/71 episodes of flutter type I (8%), prolonged sinus pauses or severe bradyarrhythmias occurred after conversion to sinus rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A comparison of transoesophageal atrial pacing and direct current cardioversion for the termination of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of transoesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) with an easily swallowed pill electrode and direct current cardioversion (DCC) in patients with atrial flutter that was refractory to appropriate medical treatment.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

Community based United States naval hospital.

SUBJECTS

Twenty one consecutive patients with refractory atrial flutter selected consecutively from the inpatient cardiology consultation service. All patients were haemodynamically stable and medical treatment with a class IA or IC antiarrhythmic agent had failed. Eleven patients were treated with TAP and 10 patients were treated with DCC.

INTERVENTIONS

Digoxin was given to all patients to control the ventricular rate to < 100/minute.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Conversion to normal sinus rhythm and arrhythmias after cardioversion.

RESULTS

Conversion to normal sinus rhythm was similar in both groups (TAP 8/11, DCC 9/10, p = 0.31). Arrhythmias after cardioversion including third degree heart block and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were more frequent in the DCC group (TAP 0/11, DCC 6/10, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Transoesophageal atrial pacing with an easily swallowed pill electrode is safe, well tolerated, and is as efficacious as DCC for refractory atrial flutter.

Atrial flutter--update on the mechanism and treatment

Atrial flutter is a common and usually benign but symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia. There is a striking similarity between patients with atrial flutter suggesting a common substrate despite the presence or absence of underlying heart disease. In man, the mechanism is a single reentrant circuit originating in the right atrium whose center appears to be functional within the anatomical constraints of the right atrium. The reentrant circuit of atrial flutter contains an area of slow conduction in the inferior right atrium but the size and exact location is uncertain. Drug therapy directed at terminating and preventing atrial flutter has been available for many years. The efficacy and safety of this therapy is not as well tested as is the same therapy for atrial fibrillation. The most effective way to terminate atrial flutter is a nonpharmacological approach. Several nonpharmacological methods provide new treatment options in the management of patients with drug resistant or hemodynamically unstable atrial flutter. The use of anticoagulation for this disorder is still evolving. There is a risk of clinically apparent thromboemboli in some patients with atrial flutter although the risk appears less than that for atrial fibrillation. In the future, refinements and improvements in therapy for atrial flutter will likely be derived from a better understanding of its mechanism.

Pharmacologic treatment of supraventricular tachycardia: the German experience

Tachyarrhythmias that originate above the bifurcation of the bundle of His or in tissue proximal to it are classified as supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs). Primary treatment of SVT tries to influence the underlying disease. Symptomatic therapy is subdivided into drug therapy, electrotherapeutic tools (e.g., antitachycardia pacemakers, catheter ablation), and antiarrhythmic surgery. Antiarrhythmic agents that slow conduction and suppress premature beats are efficient for emergency and long-term treatment of SVTs. We evaluated some of the most relevant antiarrhythmic drugs in SVT, including propafenone, diprafenone, cibenzoline, sotalol, and diltiazem; in addition, usage and efficacy of quinidine/verapamil, disopyramide, amiodarone, ajmaline, adenosine, and flecainide are summarized. In 1990, the case load of supraventricular arrhythmias per physician in Germany was more than 30 patients seen per month. About 50% of them were treated with drug therapy; i.e., approximately 17 patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs per month per physician for supraventricular arrhythmias. The most important antiarrhythmic agents used in Germany are propafenone (40%), combination of quinidine and verapamil (23%), sotalol (12%), disopyramide (6%), flecainide (6%), and other (13%).

Usefulness of excitable gap and pattern of resetting in atrial flutter for determining reentry circuit location

Clinical and experimental data show that type I atrial flutter is due to a reentry mechanism with an excitable gap. To define the location of the reentry circuit of atrial flutter, width of excitable gap, poststimulation cycle and pattern of reset after premature stimulus were analyzed in 18 patients during atrial flutter at multiple atrial sites (high, lateral, posterior and septal right atrium, and coronary sinus). The pattern of reset was defined as flat or increasing whether the return cycle remained unchanged or prolonged with increasing prematurity. Shorter values of the excitable gap were found at the coronary sinus (33 +/- 8 ms) and high right atrium (30 +/- 10 ms) than at the posterior (43 +/- 9 ms) or septal right atrium (45 +/- 11 ms). Intermediate values (36 +/- 8 ms) were measured at the lateral right atrium. Poststimulation cycle, corrected for atrial flutter cycle length, was shorter in the posterior (6 +/- 7 ms) and septal right atrium (5 +/- 7 ms) than in the coronary sinus (35 +/- 9 ms), and the high (23 +/- 10 ms) and lateral right atrium (15 +/- 9 ms). A flat pattern of resetting occurred more frequently at the septal (18 of 18 patients) and posterior right atrium (15 of 18) than at the lateral (8 of 18) and high right atrium (2 of 17), and was never observed at the coronary sinus. Atrial flutter was successfully terminated by overdrive atrial pacing in 15 of 18 patients, and termination was more easily obtained from the septal and posterior right atrium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electrophysiologic determinants of recurrent atrial flutter after successful termination by overdrive pacing

The potential ability of electrophysiologic abnormalities to predict recurrence of atrial flutter was evaluated. Twenty-five patients with chronic atrial flutter resistant to combined digitalis and quinidine therapy were studied electrophysiologically after restoration of sinus rhythm by overdrive pacing or by eventual direct current cardioversion. Recurrence of atrial flutter was observed in 12 patients during a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range 3 to 50). Electrophysiologic testing included programmed high right atrial stimulation at a paced drive cycle length of 600 ms and incremental pacing up to 200-ms paced intervals. When coupling intervals of 90% of the drive cycle length were compared to coupling intervals of 48% of the drive cycle length, the increase in S1A1 interval, defined as the interval between the stimulus artifact and the atrial activation near the atrioventricular junction, was greater in patients with subsequent recurrence of atrial flutter (47 +/- 11 vs 21 +/- 18 ms). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the S1A1 increase to be the sole independent predictor of recurrence (p = 0.0082) while previous episodes of atrial flutter or the presence of organic heart disease were identified as dependent variables. Reclassification showed a 91% sensitivity and a 92% specificity. Correct classification was achieved in 92% of patients. The initiation of atrial dysrhythmia had no predictive value. The assessment of the S1A1 interval by programmed atrial stimulation appears helpful in delineating the patient risk of recurrent atrial flutter after termination by overdrive pacing.

Effects of disopyramide on cycle length, effective refractory period and excitable gap of atrial flutter, and relation to arrhythmia termination by overdrive pacing

The administration of class IA antiarrhythmic drugs facilities termination of atrial flutter by overdrive pacing. To investigate the electrophysiologic determinants of this effect, changes in the cycle length, the effective refractory period and the excitable gap of spontaneous type I atrial flutter were studied in 11 patients given intravenous disopyramide (3 mg/kg in 1 hour). After drug infusion, the cycle length of atrial flutter increased from 238 +/- 26 to 298 +/- 38 ms (+25%; p less than 0.001) and the effective refractory period prolonged from 169 +/- 19 to 192 +/- 25 ms (+14%; p less than 0.01). The excitable gap prolonged from 62 +/- 16 to 96 +/- 27 ms (+55%; p less than 0.001). Atrial flutter was terminated by overdrive pacing (mean cycle 203) in 10 of 11 patients; in 1 patient atrial fibrillation resulted after high rate stimulation. In the setting of an anatomically defined reentry circuit, as in type I atrial flutter, the administration of disopyramide prolongs both cycle length and refractory period. The finding of an increased excitable gap suggests that the drug exerts its prominent effect by depressing conduction velocity. A wider excitable gap allows easier penetration of the stimulus in the reentry circuit and accounts for the beneficial effects of type IA antiarrhythmic drugs on the termination of atrial flutter by overdrive pacing.

Antiarrhythmic drugs for supraventricular tachycardia

Many antiarrhythmic drugs are available for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. Selection of the appropriate drug is helped by the identification of the site of origin, mechanism and pathway of the arrhythmia. For most types of supraventricular tachycardia greater than 1 antiarrhythmic drug is available. Comparative studies between the effect of different antiarrhythmic drugs on the same arrhythmia are few, preventing scientifically proved advice on "the best" drug for a given arrhythmia. Familiarity with a limited number of antiarrhythmic drugs will increase therapeutic efficacy and reduce the incidence of unpleasant surprises to patient and physician.