Clinical predictors of arrhythmia worsening by antiarrhythmic drugs

Aggravation of Arrhythmia by Antiarrhythmic Drugs (Proarrhythmia)

Arrhythmia aggravation by antiarrhythmic drugs (proarrhythmia) can be caused by worsening or a change of a preexisting arrhythmia, development of a new arrhythmia, or development of a bradyarrhythmia. Aggravation of arrhythmia usually occurs within several days of beginning an antiarrhythmic drug or increasing the dose of the drug. The time of occurrence is based on the particular drug and its pharmacokinetic properties. Although there are no ways to predict the patient at risk for developing arrhythmia aggravation with any specific agents, risk factors include QT interval prolongation, elevated serum levels of the drug, electrolyte abnormalities, presence of heart failure, a history of a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and underlying myocardial ischemia.

Chronic Suppression of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with ICDs

In this review, we examine the data evaluating the role of adjuvant therapy with antiarrthymic drugs (AADs) in chronic suppression of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the patient with an ICD. It must be noted that all uses of AADs for this indication represent "off-label" prescription. No AAD is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) specifically as a therapy to reduce ICD shocks.

Quinidine for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis in 501 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Although quinidine has been used to terminate atrial fibrillation (AFib) for a long time, it has been recently classified to be used as a third-line-drug for cardioversion. However, these recommendations are based on a few small studies, and there are no data available of a larger modern patient population undergoing pharmacological cardioversion of AFib. Therefore, we evaluated the safety of quinidine for cardioversion of paroxysmal AFib in patients after cardiac surgery and coronary intervention.

METHODS

In 501 consecutive patients (66 +/- 9 years, 32% women), 200-400 mg of quinidine were administered every 6 hours until cardioversion or for a maximum of 48 hours. Patients were included with QT interval < or =450 ms, ejection fraction (EF) > or =35%, and plasma potassium >4.3 mEq/L. Exclusion criteria were: unstable angina, myocardial infarction <3 months, and advanced congestive heart failure. Patients received verapamil, beta-blockers, or digitalis to slow down ventricular rate <100 bpm.

RESULTS

Quinidine therapy did not have to be stopped due to adverse drug reactions (ADR), and no significant QTc interval prolongation (Bazett and Fridericia correction) and no life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia occurred. Mean quinidine dose was 617 +/- 520 mg and 92% of the patients received verapamil or beta-blocker to decrease ventricular rate. Cardioversion was successful in 84% of patients. All ADRs were minor and transient. Multivariate analysis revealed female gender (OR 2.62, CI 1.61-4.26, P < 0.001) and EF 45-54% (OR 1.97, CI 1.15-3.36, P = 0.013) as independent risk factors for ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinidine for pharmacological cardioversion of AFib is safe and well tolerated in this subset of patients.

Clinical Study of Amiodarone-Associated Torsade De Pointes in Chinese People

OBJECTS

Amiodarone-associated torsade de pointes (Tdp) has been reported increasingly in China in recent years. In this study, we made clinical analysis of amiodarone-associated Tdp in Chinese people.

METHODS

Two major Chinese medical databases were searched to identify articles published during the last 26 years that presented data on amiodarone-associated proarrhythmic events. The articles were divided into two categories: case reports and observational studies.

RESULTS

Fifty-two Chinese-language case reports with 98 patients and 2 patients registered in our hospital, total 100 patients about amiodarone-associated Tdp, were enrolled in the study. Amiodarone-associated Tdp occurred more frequently in females (68.0%, 68/100). The major primary disease of females was rheumatic heart disease (40.7%, 24/59), while that of males was coronary heart disease (45.8%, 11/24). In most patients, Tdp occurred repeatedly and terminated in 24-48 hours. Some Tdp worsen to ventricular fibrillation and caused 19 patients' death (mortality rate 21.8%, 19/87). Known predisposing factors to the development of Tdp, such as heart failure, hypokalemia, drugs combination, and bradyarrhythmia, existed in many cases. Tdp also occurred in six patients (4 females, 2 males) without any known predisposing factors except QTc interval prolongation. Fourteen observational studies each reported data from at least 100 patients who were treated with amiodarone for at least 1 month. Of 2,354 patients included in these studies, 455 patients exposed to amiodarone were reported to have proarrhythmic events (an overall incidence of 19.3%), while only 4 patients were reported to have Tdp or ventricular fibrillation (an incidence of 0.17%).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, approximately one-fifth of the patients have amiodarone-induced proarrhythmic events, while the incidence of Tdp or ventricular fibrillation is remarkably low. Amiodarone-associated Tdp occurred more frequently in Chinese females. Known predisposing factors for occurrence of Tdp prevailed in Chinese patients. QTc interval prolongation may be an independent risk factor of amiodarone-associated Tdp.

Proarrhythmia

Proarrhythmia is defined as the aggravation of an existing arrhythmia or the development of a new arrhythmia secondary to antiarrhythmic drug. Proarrhythmic events include drug-induced bradyarrhythmias, atrial and ventricular proarrhythmias. New onset sustained or incessant ventricular tachycardia and torsade de pointes can be life threatening. This article reviews the incidence, aggravating factors, and treatment of proarrhythmia.

Epidemiology and natural history of atrial fibrillation: clinical implications

With a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality, the growing "epidemic" of atrial fibrillation (AF) intersects with a number of conditions, including aging, thromboembolism, hemorrhage, hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction. Currently, the epidemiology and natural history of AF govern all aspects of its clinical management. The ongoing global investigative efforts toward understanding AF are also driven by epidemiologic findings. New developments, by affecting the natural history of the disease, could eventually alter the nature of decision making in patients with AF. The crucial issue of rate versus rhythm control awaits completion of the AF Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management trial. The processes of electrical and structural remodeling that perpetuate AF appear to be reversible. In the era of functional genomics, the molecular basis of this ubiquitous arrhythmia is in the process of being defined. Unraveling the molecular genetics of AF might provide new insights into the structural and electrical phenotypes resulting from genetic mutations and, as such, new approaches to treatment of this arrhythmia at the ion channel and cellular levels. Thus, current adverse trends are superimposed on a background of a rapidly developing knowledge base and potentially exciting new therapeutic options. Consequently, an understanding of the epidemiology and natural history of AF is crucial to the future allocation of resources and the utilization of an expanding range of therapies aimed at reducing the impact of this disease on a changing patient population.

Effect of beta-blocker therapy on severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Beta-blocker therapy has been shown to improve cardiac function and prognosis in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, whether beta-blockers reduce severe ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death has not been clarified. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of beta-blockers on non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and sudden cardiac death in patients with DCM. Sixty-five patients with DCM treated with diuretics, digitalis and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were assigned to receive beta-blockers (n = 33) or not (n = 32). Mean follow-up was 53+/-30 months. The echocardiographic indices of cardiac function, the incidence of non-sustained VT on Holter monitoring electrocardiograms, and sudden cardiac death rate were compared between the 2 groups. Comparable improvement in cardiac function on echocardiograms was found in the 2 treatment groups. The patient group treated with beta-blockers showed a significant reduction in the prevalence of VT (from 43 to 15%, p<0.05) and the development of new episodes of VT (5 vs. 16%) compared to the group without beta-blockers. The sudden cardiac death rate did not differ between the 2 groups. The results of the present study suggest that beta-blockers are effective in reducing severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with DCM.

Arrhythmias in heart failure: current concepts of mechanisms and therapy

About one half of deaths in patients with heart failure are sudden, mostly due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) degenerating to ventricular fibrillation or immediate ventricular fibrillation. In severe heart failure, sudden cardiac death also may occur due to bradyarrhythmias. Other dysrhythmias complicating heart failure include atrial and ventricular extrasystoles, atrial fibrillation (AF), and sustained and nonsustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The exact mechanism of the increased vulnerability to arrhythmias is not known. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, different preconditions, including ischemia or structural alterations such as fibrosis or myocardial scarring, may be prominent. Reentrant mechanisms around scar tissue, afterdepolarizations, and triggered activity due to changes in calcium metabolism significantly contribute to arrhythmogenesis. Furthermore, alterations in potassium currents leading to action potential prolongation and an increase in dispersion of repolarization play a significant role. Treatment of arrhythmias is necessary either because patients are symptomatic or to reduce the risk for sudden cardiac death. The individual history, left ventricular function, electrophysiologic testing, and the signal-averaged ECG give useful information for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has evolved as a promising therapy for life-threatening arrhythmias. A potential role may exist for antiarrhythmic drugs, mainly amiodarone. There is growing evidence that patients with sustained VT or a history of resuscitation have the best outcome with ICD therapy regardless of the degree of heart failure. Many of these patients require additional antiarrhythmic therapy because of AF or nonsustained VTs that may activate the device. Catheter ablation or map-guided endocardial resection are additional options in selected patients but seldom represent the only therapeutic strategy.

Proarrhythmia, a serious complication of antiarrhythmic drugs

Aggravation of arrhythmia with antiarrhythmic drugs is not an infrequent side effect associated with antiarrhythmic drugs. Defined as the provocation of a new arrhythmia or a significant increase in the frequency of a preexisting arrhythmia, it occurs with all antiarrhythmic agents, although the incidence varies from 6% to 23% with the different drugs. In general, arrhythmia aggravation is an early event, occurring within the first several days of initiating drugs therapy. It has been found, however, that this complication can also occur as a late event, particularly in patients who have evidence of ongoing ischemia that may be overt or silent. Although there is no good way to predict the patient who is likely to experience this complication, it has been observed that there several predictors of an increased risk for experiencing arrhythmia aggravation including significant underlying heart disease, congestive heart failure, evidence of active or potentially active ischemia, and electrolyte abnormalities, particularly hypokalemia.

Risk Factors for Tachycardia Events Caused by Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Experience From the ESVEM Trial

BACKGROUND: In the Electrophysiology Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, up to seven antiarrhythmic drugs were randomly assigned to 486 patients with a history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia. At baseline, all the patients had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and had >/=10 premature ventricular beats (PVBs) per hour on 48-hour Holter monitoring. A total of 1,229 drug trials were performed. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued during hospitalization because of ventricular tachyarrhythmias thought to be a proarrhythmic effect of the antiarrhythmic drugs in 96 of 479 patients (20%) who received drugs. Proarrhythmic effects were defined as sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation or arrhythmic death, torsade de pointes, or distinct intolerable worsening of the baseline arrhythmia after at least three doses of the drug. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen baseline characteristics were analyzed for factors that would predict a higher incidence of proarrhythmia. These included type of heart disease, previous myocardial infarction, symptom activity scale, gender, type of arrhythmia, VT/ventricular fibrillation, age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), PVB frequency, heart rate, QRS duration, and QT interval. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified increased mean PVB frequency (P =.003) and increased heart rate (P =.026) as significant predictors of proarrhythmia. Decreased LVEF (<25%) exhibited only a trend toward significance (P =.073). When proarrhythmia was redefined as sustained VT, cardiac arrest of arrhythmic death, or torsade de pointes (n = 59), PVB frequency (P =.003) and heart rate (P =.034) were still the only significant baseline predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In the ESVEM study, higher PVB frequency and higher heart rate were significant predictors of drug-induced proarrhythmia.

Impact of structural heart disease on the selection of class III antiarrhythmics for the prevention of atrial fibrillation and flutter

Antiarrhythmic agents may be beneficial or harmful. Among the harmful effects, or risks, is proarrhythmia. One of several factors that underlie proarrhythmic risk is the presence and nature of any underlying structural heart disease at the time of antiarrhythmic drug administration. The structural disease-antiarrhythmic drug interaction has been best studied and clearly delineated for class I antiarrhythmics. This review provides information to suggest that structural disease can enhance proarrhythmic risk with class III drugs as well, although this is least evident with amiodarone. Particularly pertinent are disorders that prolong action potential duration (such as ventricular hypertrophy or chronic dilatation), inhomogeneous dispersion of refractoriness (including conditions with cellular uncoupling), and reduced ventricular fibrillation threshold. These issues must be considered when choosing an antiarrhythmic drug for atrial and for ventricular arrhythmias and when selecting the dosing and monitoring protocol to be used.

Divergent effect of acute ventricular dilatation on the electrophysiologic characteristics of d,l-sotalol and flecainide in the isolated rabbit heart

INTRODUCTION

The interaction between acute ventricular dilatation (AVD) as one aspect of ventricular dysfunction and Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs is uncertain. We therefore investigated the effects of AVD on the electrophysiologic properties of d,l-sotalol and flecainide.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The isolated rabbit heart was used as a model of AVD. The ventricular size and, therefore, the diastolic pressure were modified by sudden volume changes of a fluid-filled balloon placed in the left ventricle. Pacing was performed alternately using epi- and endocardial monophasic action potential (MAP)-pacing catheters at cycle lengths from 1,000 to 300 msec. d,l-Sotalol (10 microM) resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) lengthening of refractoriness (+13.5% +/- 3.1%), MAP duration (+14.9% +/- 3.2%), and QT interval (+15.5% +/- 4.1%) (mean +/- SEM at 1,000 msec). These effects had a reverse rate-dependence. AVD to a diastolic pressure of 30 mmHg reduced refractoriness and left ventricular MAP duration. In comparison with the control group with the same extent of AVD, d,l-sotalol still led to a significant prolongation of repolarization for all cycle lengths except 300 msec, so that its effects were not absolutely but relatively preserved. In contrast, flecainide (2 microM) had no significant effects on refractoriness or MAP duration. It led to a significant, rate-dependent increase of pacing thresholds (+47.6% +/- 8.2%), prolongation of QRS (+48.8% +/- 5.6%), and conduction time (+78.6% +/- 8.6%) (mean +/- SEM at 300 msec). In the flecainide group, AVD significantly increased the normal rate-dependent prolongation of QRS (+16.7% +/- 5.5%) and conduction time (+17.1% +/- 4.3%).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that, during AVD, the Class III effect of d,l-sotalol is preserved, whereas flecainide's effect of slowing conduction is exaggerated. This may contribute to flecainide-related proarrhythmia in certain clinical situations.

Comparison of class Ia/Ib versus class III antiarrhythmic drugs for the suppression of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease

Previous studies suggest that class Ia drugs are ineffective in suppression of sustained ventricular tachycardia by programmed stimulation. More favorable results have been described with combinations of Ia and Ib drugs and also with class III antiarrhythmic drugs, but there have been no direct comparisons between these 2 regimens. The present study was undertaken to compare the electrophysiologic efficacy and predictors of success of these 2 regimens in patients with ischemic heart disease and inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. The population consisted of 136 patients with documented coronary artery disease. All had sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia inducible during baseline electrophysiologic study and following intravenous procainamide. Follow-up studies were performed with a combination of oral class Ia and Ib or class III antiarrhythmic drugs. A positive response was the inability to induce a sustained ventricular arrhythmia with up to 3 extrastimuli at 2 right ventricular pacing sites. Response rates were 13% for Ia/Ib combination and 19% for class III agents (p = 0.40). Congestive heart failure differentially affected response rates. Only 8% of those responding to Ia/Ib therapy had heart failure compared with 59% of responders to class III (p <0.01). Multivariate analysis identified heart failure (RR 12.2, p = 0.03) as the only parameter with independent predictive value of response to Ia/Ib therapy. These results indicate that congestive heart failure is a potent predictor of a negative response to a combination of class Ia and Ib antiarrhythmic drugs. In this population, class III drugs or nonpharmacologic therapy should be considered as initial treatment.

Electrophysiological mechanisms for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with myocardial ischemia: anesthesiologic considerations, Pt II

This is the second half of a two-part review article that discusses ventricular tachyarrhythmias, either induced by acute ischemia or consequent to chronic myocardial ischemia, and their anesthestic implications. The first half of the article was published in the June 1997 Issue of The Journal.

Safety and tolerability of long-term propafenone therapy for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The Propafenone Multicenter Study Group

An important issue regarding the long-term use of antiarrhythmic drugs concerns the safety of these agents, particularly with regard to cardiac toxicity. Propafenone is an effective drug for preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, but the incidence of side effects during longterm therapy in patients with such arrhythmias has not been adequately reported. A total of 480 patients received oral propafenone as therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or supraventricular tachycardia. During the follow-up (mean 14.4 months), 290 patients (60%) discontinued propafenone therapy, but in only 70 patients (15%) was the reason for discontinuation an adverse drug reaction. Overall, 284 patients (59%) experienced at least 1 adverse reaction, and the incidence was related to dose and age >65 years. The overall incidence of side effects was not related to structural heart disease; however, cardiovascular toxicity including arrhythmia aggravation, congestive heart failure, and serious conduction disturbances occurred more often in those with heart disease (20% vs 13%). Sixteen patients died during drug therapy, but in only 1 case was the drug considered contributory. For patients with a supraventricular arrhythmia, propafenone was well tolerated and was infrequently discontinued because of side effects. The incidence of serious cardiac toxicity when propafenone was used to treat supraventricular arrhythmia was low, and these side effects were more frequent in patients with structural heart disease.

Data-driven Decisions: The Importance of Clinical Trials in Arrhythmia Management

As a result of clinical trials, the measurement of arrhythmias has evolved over the past three decades. In the late 1960s, customary teaching was that ventricular premature depolarizations were dangerous and antiarrhythmic therapy, in hopes of reducing fatal consequences, became common place; however, following clinical trials such as CAST, IMPACT, and SWORD, we learned that, at least in postinfarct patients, arrhythmia suppression may lead to increased rather than reduced mortality. Such trials have led to a marked reduction in therapy of indiscriminate ventricular ectopy and have led to ongoing testing of specific subgroups identified as having particularly higher adverse prognostic risk. With the advent of cardiac monitoring and the confirmation that ventricular tachyarrhythmias are the most common cause for sudden death, their therapy, too, has evolved and matured, again aided by clinical trials. The ESVEM study prospectively examined the role of monitor-guided versus electrophysiologically guided drug therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and confirmed that both approaches may have a role in reducing arrhythmic deaths-though the specific benefits of each technique remain somewhat unsettled. Both the ESVEM and CASCADE studies suggested that the most effective drugs for ventricular tachyarrhythmias are the class II/III drugs, sotalol and amiodarone, both appearing more effective than our older class I agents. These should now be viewed as the first-line drugs for these arrhythmias. The relative benefits of these two agents with respect to each other and to implantable cardioverter defibrillators, however, remains to be determined by further clinical trials, such as AVID and CIDS. The therapy of atrial tachyarrhythmias has similarly evolved with the aid of clinical observations. While rate control is required in all patients with atrial fibrillation, we have come to realize that the applications of antiarrhythmic drugs for the purpose of maintaining sinus rhythm must be used only selectively rather than uniformly. Both a meta-analysis by Coplen and colleagues and a report by the SPAF investigators suggested that with atrial arrhythmias, too, antiarrhythmic drug therapy may result in enhanced rather than reduced mortality in some circumstances. Additional clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of antiarrhythmic therapy of atrial fibrillation.

Efficacy and safety of d-sotalol, a pure class III antiarrhythmic compound, in patients with symptomatic complex ventricular ectopy. Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding study. The d-Sotalol PVC Study Group

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in pure class III antiarrhythmic compounds, ie, drugs in which the electrophysiological effect is confined to the propensity for producing an isolated lengthening of action potential duration. d-Sotalol represents the prototype of such pure class III agents. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized dose-finding study evaluated the antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of d-sotalol in patients with symptomatic chronic ventricular ectopy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 233 patients presenting with > or = 30 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) per hour during drug-free Holter monitoring randomly received placebo or d-sotalol at dosages of 50, 100, or 200 mg BID. Drug efficacy was assessed by repeat Holter monitoring at the end of double-blind therapy. There was a dose-dependent increase in QT and QTc duration, indicating class III activity. A dose-related decrease in hourly PVC counts was observed, reaching statistical significance for patients receiving 200 mg d-sotalol BID (311 PVCs/h during baseline compared with 135 PVCs/h during active treatment, P < .05). Analysis of the primary efficacy criterion (ie, > or = 75% reduction in total PVCs/h) revealed a significant treatment effect only for the highest d-sotalol dose, with 8 patients (14%) meeting this criterion. Eighteen patients reported side effects, which led to drug discontinuation in 5. One sudden death and one nonfatal cardiac arrest occurred in patients with dilative cardiomyopathy receiving 200 mg d-sotalol BID. No incidence of torsade de pointes was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

d-Sotalol exerts dose-dependent class III activity in patients with symptomatic ventricular ectopy. Its PVC-suppressing activity is modest and becomes evident predominantly at dosages of 200 mg administered BID. The observation of drug-associated serious adverse arrhythmic events emphasizes the need for individualized careful dose titration, particularly in patients with advanced organic heart disease.

Cocaine-related sudden cardiac death: a hypothesis correlating basic science and clinical observations

Sudden, unexpected death due to cocaine in young otherwise healthy individuals occurs in an idiosyncratic manner and is commonly felt to be arrhythmogenic in nature, although the exact cause of death is rarely documented. In addition to indirect sympathomimetic actions, cocaine is a potent sodium channel blocking drug and, in this regard, most closely resembles agents such as flecainide. We suggest that sudden death due to cocaine is proarrhythmic in nature, occurring under similar circumstances as that due to specific antiarrhythmic drugs.

Interaction of acute ventricular dilatation and d-sotalol during sustained reentrant ventricular tachycardia around a fixed obstacle

BACKGROUND

Antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular tachycardia is associated with decreased efficacy and increased proarrhythmia in patients with congestive heart failure, but the explanation for these observations is not known. This study examined the interaction of ventricular dilatation and d-sotalol in a model of reentry ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thin epicardial layers of anisotropic myocardium were created in Langendorff-perfused rabbit left ventricles by a cryo procedure. A fluid-filled, latex balloon was secured within the left ventricle to change ventricular volume. Sustained reentrant ventricular tachycardia, around a central cryolesion, was induced by rapid pacing in all preparations (n = 7). Epicardial mapping was performed through 248 electrodes. Single premature beats introduced within the reentry circuit were used to define the excitable gap. Dilatation did not influence ventricular tachycardia cycle length or conduction velocity. A 1.25-mL increase in left ventricular volume widened the excitable gap by 12% (range, 5% to 29%) (P < .001) because of a decrease in myocardial refractoriness. d-Sotalol (final concentration, 10 mg/L) narrowed the excitable gap 18% (range, 7% to 29%) (P = .002) in the undilated left ventricle. d-Sotalol was less effective in the dilated left ventricle, narrowing the excitable gap only 9%, a difference that was not statistically significant. During pacing to induce or terminate tachycardia, tachycardia acceleration was observed significantly more frequently in the dilated than in the undilated ventricle. Ventricular tachycardia acceleration was due to the development of double-wave reentry (two successive waves traveling in the same circuit in the same direction). d-Sotalol, which narrowed the excitable gap, prevented tachycardia acceleration and double-wave reentry.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiarrhythmic efficacy may be decreased by dilatation because of widening of the initial excitable gap and a decrease in the gap-narrowing effect of these agents. Double-wave reentry, more likely with a widening of excitable gap, may partially explain tachycardia acceleration in the dilated ventricle.

Antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with congestive heart failure

Current information suggests that in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) who have asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, coronary artery disease (dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy), and a positive signal-averaged electrocardiogram, electrophysiologic studies are useful for stratifying risk and guiding therapy. Therapy with amiodarone hydrochloride (Cordarone) appears to improve survival in patients after myocardial infarction. In CHF patients with asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias and dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy, electrophysiologic studies are of little value in risk stratification because of their low yield of sustained monomorphic tachycardias. There is little evidence that therapy with conventional antiarrhythmic agents improves survival. Although amiodarone can suppress ventricular ectopic beats, no trial yet conducted has detected an effect on mortality. Randomized, controlled trials with low-dose amiodarone are needed for more definitive information. Most symptomatic patients should undergo electrophysiologic testing and receive guided therapy, either with antiarrhythmic drugs or with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Proarrhythmia of nonantiarrhythmic drugs

Proarrhythmic effects of nonantiarrhythmic drugs have not been as extensively studied or reported compared with the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs. The proarrhythmic incidence of many of these agents is not accurately known. In some instances, the facilitation of arrhythmias may be the result of compounding clinical factors. Many agents, however, share structural similarities to antiarrhythmics and manifest the same arrhythmic tendencies. Many reports of proarrhythmia may represent toxic rather than proarrhythmic effects, and in vitro studies to elicit the underlying mechanisms may be warranted for the more common drugs. This report summarizes reported arrhythmic effects of a variety of commonly utilized nonantiarrhythmic drugs. The incidence and mechanism of the proarrhythmia is not always clear. The clinician, however, should be aware of reported events to appropriately diagnose and treat the arrhythmia.

Aggravation of arrhythmia: a complication of antiarrhythmic drugs

Aggravation of arrhythmia, defined as worsening of a preexisting arrhythmia or the occurrence of a new arrhythmia, is a common complication of antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Although it is largely an unpredictable event, patients at greatest risk are those with a history of congestive heart failure due to systolic dysfunction who present with a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. As a rule, aggravation of arrhythmia is an early event, occurring within the first few days of initiating therapy. However, in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), the increased sudden death mortality due to drug therapy, which was a result of arrhythmia aggravation, occurred throughout the entire duration of the trial, suggesting that arrhythmia aggravation can also be a late complication of therapy. Also disturbing was the fact that patients in CAST were low risk and did not have congestive heart failure or a serious ventricular tachyarrhythmia. This suggests that another important risk factor is myocardial ischemia and its potentially dangerous interaction with antiarrhythmic drugs. In patients with heart disease, especially those with coronary artery disease, antiarrhythmic drugs must therefore be used cautiously. Close and continuous follow-up is mandatory.

Effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate on arrhythmias in patients with congestive heart failure

Intravenous magnesium is an effective treatment for ventricular tachycardia of some etiologies, and in patients with congestive heart failure low serum magnesium concentrations are associated with frequent arrhythmias and high mortality. This suggests that magnesium administration may decrease the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure. We therefore assessed the impact of an intravenous magnesium infusion upon the frequency of ventricular premature depolarizations in 40 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure and serum magnesium < or = 2.0 mg/dl. Within 1 week of a baseline 6-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recording, an infusion of 0.2 mEq/kg of MgSO4 was given over 1 hour and a repeat 6-hour recording was obtained. There was an inverse relationship between the change in magnesium concentration and the change in frequency of premature ventricular depolarizations; premature ventricular depolarizations declined by 134 +/- 207 hr-1 in patients in whom serum magnesium concentration increased > or = 0.75 mg/dl, but increased by 72 +/- 393 hr-1 in patients with a change < 0.75 mg/dl (p < 0.05). For all patients, the frequency of premature ventricular depolarizations was 283 +/- 340 hr-1 pretreatment and 220 +/- 269 hr-1 following magnesium infusion (p = 0.21). Patients with > or = 300 premature ventricular depolarizations hr-1 demonstrated a decrease from 794 +/- 309 to 369 +/- 223 hr-1 (p < 0.001). Intravenous magnesium administration decreased the frequency of couplets from 233 +/- 505 to 84 +/- 140 (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with amiodarone and type I agents for treatment of inducible ventricular tachycardia

In a prospective study the efficacy of amiodarone in combination with the three Class I drugs mexiletine, flecainide, or encainide was evaluated consecutively in 12 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VT) by programmed stimulation. None of the tested drug combinations suppressed induction of sustained VT. The combination of amiodarone with Class IC drugs flecainide and encainide prolonged the cycle length of VT significantly, whereas the combination with mexiletine did not have the same degree of slowing on the VT cycle length. Several proarrhythmic effects occurred during the combination therapy with encainide: (1) frequent, spontaneous recurrences of hemodynamically well tolerated VT in four patients; (2) enhanced inducibility of VT in three patients; (3) impaired termination of VT in three patients. Though a marked increase in QRS and QTc intervals was observed by combined treatment with encainide, no significant correlation could be established between aggravation of arrhythmia and plasma levels of encainide, degree of QRS widening, JT or QTc prolongation. The only predictor for the occurrence of proarrhythmic events was found in left ventricular ejection fraction. These findings suggest that in patients refractory to amiodarone alone or a combination with mexiletine, the combined treatment of amiodarone with other Class IC drugs prolongs the VT cycle length but does not suppress induction of VT during programmed stimulation. Combination therapy of amiodarone with encainide was associated with a high incidence of proarrhythmic effects.

The prevalence of proarrhythmic events during moricizine therapy and their relationship to ventricular function

The prevalence of proarrhythmic events during moricizine therapy was studied in 144 patients who were treated for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The overall incidence of proarrhythmia was 15.3%. (Twenty-two patients exhibited 23 events.) Ventricular fibrillation occurred in six patients (which led to three deaths), incessant ventricular tachycardia occurred in seven, and new sustained ventricular tachycardia in four. Patients with proarrhythmia had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (24% vs 39%; p less than 0.0001), higher prevalence of congestive heart failure (68% vs 36%; p less than 0.005), and higher incidence of previous proarrhythmia (45% vs 9%; p less than 0.0001). No significant difference between the two groups was found in respect to age, arrhythmia at presentation, underlying heart disease, moricizine dose, or concomitant drug therapy.

Surrogate endpoints: a basis for a rational approach

In clinical trials, the clinical endpoint is often replaced by an intermediate endpoint, known in some instances as a "surrogate" endpoint. The reasons for the substitution are often both practical and financial. At present, no theoretical basis or practical guidelines exist to help in the choice of surrogate endpoints. An approach is proposed here, based on three provisos which can be verified using one of a series of equations, if sufficient data on the pathophysiology and epidemiology of the disease are available. It is shown that even a strong statistical correlation is not a sufficient criterion for the definition of a surrogate endpoint. It is apparent that results obtained with the commonly used "surrogate" endpoints should be cautiously considered, and that the assessment of treatments should, when possible, be based on clinical rather than intermediate endpoints.

Ventricular arrhythmia in congestive heart failure

The importance of ventricular arrhythmia is based on its association with sudden death. In certain groups of patients, ventricular arrhythmia--primarily runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT)--is associated with an increased risk for sudden death. Although this relationship has been most often reported in patients with recent myocardial infarction, it has also been recognized in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, regardless of etiology. Therefore, ventricular arrhythmia is common in patients with CHF due to cardiomyopathy. A number of studies have reported that 70-95% of patients with cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (CHF) have frequent ventricular premature beats, and 40-80% will manifest runs of NSVT. Many factors are responsible for ventricular arrhythmia in such patients, including structural abnormalities, electrolyte imbalance, hemodynamic impairment, activation of neurohormonal mechanisms, and pharmacologic therapy. Many studies have reported a high yearly mortality in patients with cardiomyopathy and CHF; greater than 40% of deaths are sudden, most often the result of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Most studies have noted an association between presence (and frequency) of NSVT and risk of sudden cardiac death in these patients. Unfortunately, other techniques--such as the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and electrophysiologic testing--are not helpful in identifying the individual at risk. Although several drug interventions will reduce mortality from progressive CHF, these drugs have not been shown to reduce sudden death and, indeed, have a variable effect on ventricular arrhythmia. Although NSVT is a marker for increased risk for sudden death, it is uncertain if antiarrhythmic drugs will prevent this outcome. Antiarrhythmic drugs have not been shown to be effective for preventing sudden death, although there are as yet no well-controlled randomized trials. Several studies suggest that amiodarone and beta blockers are beneficial, but this requires confirmation. For patients who have been resuscitated following an episode of sudden death due to a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, antiarrhythmic therapy guided by invasive and noninvasive techniques appears to reduce risk of recurrent arrhythmia. However, the response rate to antiarrhythmic agents is low and side effects are common in patients with CHF. Especially important is the increased risk of precipitating CHF and aggravating the arrhythmia being treated. For many such patients who have had serious ventricular tachyarrhythmia, the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator may prove a better option. Other drugs used for management of CHF reduce overall mortality, but not risk of sudden death.

Sudden death in patients with congestive heart failure: future directions

Sudden, unexpected cardiac death continues to be a major clinical problem in patients with congestive heat failure. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the identification and management of these patients. The roles of ambulatory ECG monitoring, electrophysiological testing, signal-averaged ECG, and other methods of predicting increased risk of sudden death are discussed. The modes of sudden cardiac death and the potential mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias in congestive heart failure are reviewed. Current therapeutic options including antiarrhythmic drugs, neurohormonal blockade, and automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators are discussed. Finally, future directions and ongoing clinical investigations of the management of these complex patients are considered.

Provocation of supraventricular tachycardias by an intravenous class I antiarrhythmic drug

Antiarrhythmic drugs may aggravate or induce ventricular arrhythmia. The induction of a supraventricular tachycardia or its facilitation has rarely been reported. The purpose of the study was to know whether the potential for supraventricular proarrhythmic effect of a class Ia intravenous antiarrhythmic drug can be exposed during electrophysiologic study. Ajmaline was chosen because of its short duration of action. The protocol of the study consisted of an electrophysiological study and programmed atrial stimulation using 1 and 2 extrastimuli on driven rhythm and atrial pacing up to second-degree atrioventricular block. Then 1 mg/kg of ajmaline was injected and atrial pacing was performed 3 minutes after its injection. Supraventricular proarrhythmic effect of ajmaline was defined as the spontaneous occurrence of a supraventricular tachycardia or the facilitation of its induction. Seventy patients among 1955 presented a proarrhythmic effect: 63 developed a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (atrial flutter, fibrillation, tachycardia) and 7 an atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, either spontaneously (n = 23) or during atrial pacing (n = 47). Risk factors were identified in most patients: old age, underlying heart disease, history of spontaneous supraventricular tachycardia and/or induction of a supraventricular tachycardia by 2 extrastimuli on driven rhythm in the control state (34 patients), sinus node dysfunction (22 patients). Compared with patients without proarrhythmic supraventricular effect only the history of spontaneous supraventricular tachycardia and the existence of a sinus node dysfunction were significantly more frequent (P less than 0.05) in patients with proarrhythmic effect of ajmaline. In conclusion, the supraventricular proarrhythmic effect of intravenous ajmaline exists and is related both to the electrophysiologic characteristics of the drug and to the arrhythmia substrate. The results indicate that a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia may be induced by a class I antiarrhythmic drug.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in congestive heart failure. Indications and complications

High-grade ventricular arrhythmias are common in congestive heart failure (CHF). However, antiarrhythmic drug therapy is indicated only for patients with symptomatic or hemodynamically significant sustained arrhythmias. Before such therapy is initiated, reversible causes of arrhythmias (eg, electrolyte imbalance, drug interactions and toxicity, decompensation of CHF, ongoing ischemia) should be sought out and corrected. Patients with poor ventricular function or a history of CHF should be hospitalized and monitored continuously during initiation and evaluation of antiarrhythmic therapy so that early detection of proarrhythmic response is possible. Therapy should be initiated with the smallest effective dose, which then is increased slowly to minimize the risk of side effects. Drug selection should be guided electrophysiologically or noninvasively, and empirical antiarrhythmic drug therapy must be avoided.

Metabolic, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic responses to increased circulating adrenaline: effects of pretreatment with class 1 antiarrhythmics

In order to study the effects of treatment with class 1 antiarrhythmics on the metabolic, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic responses to adrenaline, 12 healthy volunteers were infused on four occasions, after pretreatment with placebo, disopyramide, mexiletine, and flecainide, respectively, with adrenaline at a rate producing serum adrenaline concentrations comparable with those seen in acute myocardial infarction. After pretreatment with placebo adrenaline caused significant falls in serum potassium, serum magnesium, serum calcium, and serum phosphate and a significant increase in blood glucose. Adrenaline also caused a significant increase in heart rate and systolic blood pressure and a significant fall in diastolic blood pressure. On the electrocardiogram a significant prolongation of QTc duration and a flattening of the T-wave amplitude were seen. Pretreatment with disopyramide had no effect on the hemodynamic response to adrenaline but caused a significant prolongation of Qtc duration before the adrenaline infusion. Pretreatment with mexiletine was associated with a significantly greater fall in serum potassium during adrenaline infusion, and pretreatment with flecainide with a greater fall in serum magnesium, as compared with placebo pretreatment Flecainide also caused a significant prolongation of the QRS duration before adrenalin infusion, and after all the active pretreatments a prolongation of QRS duration was seen during adrenaline infusion. The metabolic and hemodynamic changes during adrenaline infusion may not only reduce the antiarrhythmic efficacy of antiarrhythmics but may also increase the risk of proarrhythmic effects in a clinical setting. These results may help to explain why treatment with antiarrhythmics seems to be without beneficial effect on mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients.

Long-term effect of mexiletine on left ventricular function and relation to suppression of ventricular arrhythmia

The effects of oral mexiletine on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and ventricular arrhythmias--and a possible relation between these effects--were evaluated during 3 months of therapy in 29 patients with chronic ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) and a moderately reduced to normal LVEF by 24-hour Holter monitoring and by radionuclide ventriculography at rest and during maximum tolerable exercise testing. After an average titration period of 13 days, a mean daily mexiletine dose of 739 mg was maintained throughout the treatment. At the end of titration and after 3 months of treatment, patients with a baseline LVEF less than or equal to 40% (group 2) responded with a median reduction of the hourly VPC rate by 90 and 81%, respectively, compared with 79 and 72% in those with a baseline LVEF greater than 40% (group 1). Couplets and runs of ventricular tachycardia were almost completely suppressed in nearly all patients. A single patient had a proarrhythmic increase in VPCs during treatment. Compared with baseline, there were no significant changes in resting or exercise LVEF after 1 or 3 months of treatment in either of the 2 groups of patients. No correlation was found between treatment-induced changes in arrhythmia frequency and in resting EF. No symptoms of congestive heart failure developed. The study confirms that long-term use of mexiletine is efficacious and relatively free of cardiac depressant effects even in patients with diminished LV function.

Poisoning due to class IA antiarrhythmic drugs. Quinidine, procainamide and disopyramide

Quinidine, procainamide and disopyramide are antiarrhythmic drugs in the class 1A category. These drugs have a low toxic to therapeutic ratio, and their use is associated with a number of serious adverse effects during long term therapy and life-threatening sequelae following acute overdose. Class 1A agents inhibit the fast inward sodium current and decrease the maximum rate of rise and amplitude of the cardiac action potential. Prolonged Q-T interval and, to a lesser extent, QRS duration may be observed at therapeutic concentrations of quinidine. With increasing plasma concentrations, progressive depression of automaticity and conduction velocity occur. 'Quinidine syncope' (a transient loss of consciousness due to paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia, frequently of the torsade de pointes type) occurs with therapeutic dosing, often in the first few days of therapy. Extracardiac adverse effects of quinidine include potentially intolerable gastrointestinal effects and hypersensitivity reactions such as fever, rash, blood dyscrasias and hepatitis. Procainamide produces electrophysiological changes that are similar to those of quinidine, although Q-T interval prolongation with the former is less pronounced at therapeutic concentrations. Hypersensitivity reactions including fever, rash and (more seriously) agranulocytosis are associated with procainamide, and a frequent adverse effect requiring cessation of therapy is the development of systemic lupus erythematosus. Of the 3 drugs, disopyramide has the most pronounced negative inotropic effects, which are especially significant in patients with pre-existing left ventricular dysfunction. As with quinidine, unexpected 'disopyramide syncope' at therapeutic concentrations has been described. Anticholinergic side effects are common with this drug and may require cessation of therapy. Disopyramide therapy may unpredictably induce severe hypoglycaemia. Severe intoxication with the class 1A agents may result from acute accidental or intentional overdose, or from accumulation of the drugs during long term therapy. Acute overdose can result in severe disturbances of cardiac conduction and hypotension, frequently accompanied by central nervous system toxicity. Decreased renal function can cause significant accumulation of procainamide and its active metabolite acecainide (N-acetyl-procainamide), resulting in severe intoxication. Mild to moderate renal dysfunction is less likely to lead to quinidine or disopyramide intoxication, unless renal failure is severe or concurrent hepatic dysfunction is present. Management of acute intoxication with class 1A drugs includes gut decontamination with provision of respiratory support and treatment of seizures as needed. Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate, by antagonising the inhibitory effect of quinidine on sodium conductance, may reverse many or all manifestations of cardiovascular toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)