Management strategies for surgical treatment of dysrhythmias in infants and children

Radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia in young patients

Radiofrequency ablation therapy was conducted in 86 consecutive children and young patients with a mean age of 14 +/- 3 years (range = 3-18). Fifty-two patients had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, one had re-entry tachycardia incorporating a nodoventricular fiber, 22 had atrioventricular node re-entry tachycardia, two had atrial tachycardia and nine had idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Radiofrequency ablation was successful in 50 of the 52 patients (96%) with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and the one with nodoventricular fiber. Radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular node using the inferior approach was successful in eliminating atrioventricular node re-entry tachycardia in 20 of the 22 patients (91%). Radiofrequency ablation in the two patients with atrial tachycardia was unsuccessful. Of the nine patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, eight from the left ventricle and one from the right ventricular outflow tract, eight were successfully ablated (88%). Follow-up over a period ranging from 1 to 46 months (21 +/- 13) revealed a recurrence of tachycardia in seven patients; a late electrophysiological study in 38 patients revealed the induction of tachycardia in 11 patients (seven with accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia, three with atrioventricular node re-entry tachycardia and one with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia). All 11 patients were successfully ablated by a second trial. In conclusion, radiofrequency ablation therapy is effective and safe in pediatric patients with supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia and should be considered as the therapy of choice in this group of patients.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of incessant, medically resistant supraventricular tachycardia in infants and small children

OBJECTIVES

This study retrospectively evaluates initial experience with radiofrequency catheter ablation in a group of seven infants and small children with a history of incessant, medically resistant supraventricular tachycardia.

METHODS

Before attempted catheter ablation, all patients had had unsuccessful conventional medical therapy (with digoxin or propranolol, or both) and, in addition, each continued to have daily episodes of supraventricular tachycardia while taking amiodarone or a class IC antiarrhythmic agent alone or in combination. The average patient age was 10 months (range 1 to 27) and the average patient weight was 6 kg (range 3 to 13). Electrophysiologic diagnosis included reentrant supraventricular tachycardia in six patients and atrial ectopic tachycardia in one patient.

RESULTS

These seven patients underwent a total of nine catheter ablation procedures. The atrial approach to ablation was employed in eight of the nine procedures. Overall, radiofrequency catheter ablation was totally successful in five of the seven patients, partially successful in one patient and unsuccessful in the remaining patient. The combination of radiofrequency catheter ablation and surgical ablation was successful in controlling tachycardia in all patients; with at least 5 months of follow-up study, no patient has had a recurrence of supraventricular tachycardia or reappearance of a delta wave.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical ablation of arrhythmogenic substrates in the pediatric age group, although rarely indicated, has been found in the past to be safe and effective. Our initial experience with radiofrequency catheter ablation in infants and small children demonstrates that this procedure is a promising nonpharmacologic therapeutic alternative to surgical ablation.

Electrophysiological findings and long-term follow-up of patients with the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia treated by catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

The permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) commonly presents as recurrent drug-refractory, narrow-complex tachycardia. We studied the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in treating these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Six patients with the diagnosis of PJRT were treated at our institution with direct-current catheter ablation. The study cohort comprised three men and three women with a mean age of 33.8 +/- 4.5 years. The mean time from onset of symptoms to ablation was 129 +/- 44.7 months. All failed multiple drug therapy (mean number of drugs failed was 5.3 +/- 0.5). The left ventricular ejection fractions were calculated by echocardiography and were greater than 60% in all except two patients, whose ejection fractions were 25% and 32%. Symptom duration was significantly longer in those with depressed ejection fraction compared with normal patients (258 versus 64.5 months, p less than 0.01). Electrophysiological findings revealed evidence of an atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia involving retrograde decremental conduction over an accessory pathway localized to the posteroseptal area. Five patients received two direct-current shocks (250 +/- 16.7 J per shock) via paired electrodes from a catheter positioned just outside the coronary sinus os to a patch placed between the scapulae or on the anterior chest wall. One patient received a single direct-current shock of 300 J. The only complication was the development of complete atrioventricular block in one patient. This patient had previously undergone permanent pacemaker insertion for the sick sinus syndrome. The mean hospital stay after ablation was 2.2 days. Mean peak creatinine phosphokinase after ablation was 352 +/- 58.1 units/l and the MB fraction was 12 +/- 2%. Follow-up echocardiograms or gated nuclear studies showed improvement of ejection fraction in the two patients who presented with depressed ejection fractions. After a mean follow-up of 35.8 +/- 10.3 months, all patients remained free of tachycardia without antiarrhythmic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that catheter ablation by using direct current energy appears to be an effective treatment in patients with PJRT.