Comparative acute blood pressure reduction from intravenous fenoldopam mesylate versus sodium nitroprusside in severe systemic hypertension

Perioperative hypertension management

Perioperative hypertension is commonly encountered in patients that undergo surgery. While attempts have been made to standardize the method to characterize the intraoperative hemodynamics, these methods still vary widely. In addition, there is a lack of consensus concerning treatment thresholds and appropriate therapeutic targets, making absolute recommendations about treatment difficult. Nevertheless, perioperative hypertension requires careful management. When treatment is necessary, therapy should be individualized for the patient. This paper reviews the pharmacologic agents and strategies commonly used in the management of perioperative hypertension.

Fenoldopam Versus Nitroprusside for the Treatment of Hypertensive Emergency

BACKGROUND

While sodium nitroprusside remains first-line therapy for hypertensive emergency (HEM), fenoldopam is increasingly being used because of its benign safety profile and potential renal protective effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of sodium nitroprusside versus fenoldopam for the treatment of HEM.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with HEM admitted to a university-affiliated, level 1 trauma center from 1999 to 2001 and treated with either nitroprusside (n = 21) or fenoldopam (n = 22) for >30 minutes. Time to reach mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal, change in MAP over time, time to initiation of oral antihypertensive therapy, change in renal function, incidence of cyanide toxicity, and cost of therapy were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Demographic parameters were similar between groups, except renal failure, which was more prevalent in the fenoldopam group (10% vs 46%; p = 0.009). Neither the mean ± SD pretreatment MAP (nitroprusside 168 ± 19; fenoldopam 163 ± 19; p = 0.45), time to reach MAP goal (3.6 [0.4–30] vs 4 [1–22] h; p = 0.51), nor infusion duration (18 [0.7–113] vs 18 [3–74] h; p = 0.45) differed between the patient groups. Time to initiation of oral antihypertensive therapy was similar between nitroprusside- (4.5 h [0.5–22] and fenoldopam- (6.5 h [1–100] treated patients; p = 0.65). Additional intravenous antihypertensives were administered to 16 patients in each group (p = 0.80). Change in creatinine clearance and incidence of tachycardia did not differ between groups. No symptoms of cyanide toxicity were detected. Cost of drug therapy was greater with fenoldopam ($597.60, $199.20–6675.20); than nitroprusside ($2.66, $1.68–3.48; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of HEM with fenoldopam appears to result in patient outcomes equivalent to those with nitroprusside but at a substantially higher cost. Further study is required to delineate the exact role of fenoldopam for treatment of HEM.

Fenoldopam for controlled hypotension during spinal fusion in children and adolescents

Fenoldopam is a dopamine1 agonist whose pharmacological effects include vasodilation of the vascular beds of the kidney, mesentery, skeletal muscle, and coronary systems, resulting in a decrease in systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure. The current retrospective review outlines the use of fenoldopam for controlled hypotension during anterior or posterior spinal fusion in 10 children and adolescents, aged 8-14 years and weighing 22-61 kg. Fenoldopam was infused at a starting dose of 0.3-0.5 microg.kg-1. min-1 and increased incrementally to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 50-65 mmHg. The desired MAP was achieved in 4-11 min (7+/-2.5 min). The fenoldopam infusion was administered for 135-225 min (160+/-25 min) in doses ranging from 0.2 to 2.5 microg. kg-1.min-1. The mean fenoldopam infusion rate for the 10 cases varied from 0.5 to 1.4 microg.kg-1.min-1 (1.0+/-0.3 microg.kg-1. min-1). No excessive hypotension or clinically significant adverse effects were noted. Statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, increases in heart rate and decreases in PaO2 were noted during the fenoldopam infusion. The baseline heart rate increased from 87+/-13 b.min-1 to a maximum of 114+/-16 b.min-1 (P < 0.0001) during the fenoldopam infusion. In the six patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion, the baseline PaO2 decreased from 232+/-7 mmHg to a low of 199+/-11 mmHg (P=0.0004) during the fenoldopam infusion. Fenoldopam can be used to provide controlled hypotension during spinal surgery in children and adolescents. Future studies, with direct comparison to other commonly used agents, are needed to better define its advantages and disadvantages as well as its effects on estimated blood loss.

Treatment of hypertension in the perioperative patient

OBJECTIVE

To review studies and drug therapy relating to the treatment of hypertension in perioperative patients.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were selected from a MEDLINE search (1966-August 1998), and several textbooks on hypertension and surgery were reviewed. In addition, bibliographies of all articles and textbook chapters were studied for articles not found in the computerized searches.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical studies involving hypertension in the perioperative setting were included. The initial search was limited to studies conducted in humans and published in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information regarding drug therapy was reviewed and guidelines were constructed for managing surgical patients with acute blood pressure elevations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although nitroprusside and nitroglycerin, with their short onset of action and duration of effect, are indicated for hypertensive emergencies, a variety of agents are available for hypertensive urgencies. An algorithm that can be used as a template for the development of intrainstitutional guidelines is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the scarcity of comparative trials, decisions involving agents for the treatment of perioperative hypertension must often be made based on combined efficacy, toxicity, cost, and convenience considerations.

Fenoldopam: a new dopamine agonist for the treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies

Fenoldopam is a selective dopamine agonist that is being considered for the parenteral treatment of systemic hypertension. In both an oral and parenteral form, the drug causes peripheral vasodilation by stimulating dopamine-1 adrenergic receptors. Its pharmaco-dynamics are reviewed in this article, along with the clinical experiences in patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. Intravenous fenoldopam may provide advantages over sodium nitroprusside because it can induce both a diuresis and natriuresis, is not light sensitive, and is not associated with cyanide toxicity. There is no evidence for rebound hypertension after discontinuation of fenoldopam influsion.

Fenoldopam: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and intravenous clinical potential in the management of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies

Fenoldopam is a dopamine agonist that causes peripheral vasodilation via stimulation of dopamine 1 (D1) receptors. The efficacy of an intravenous infusion of fenoldopam in decreasing blood pressure in patients with a hypertensive urgency, including patients who developed hypertension after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and in a small number of patients with hypertensive emergency, is similar to that of sodium nitroprusside. However, unlike sodium nitroprusside, fenoldopam also increases renal blood flow and causes diuresis and natriuresis. There is no evidence of rebound hypertension after stopping the infusion. As the tolerability profile of fenoldopam is generally similar to that of sodium nitroprusside, fenoldopam appears to be an effective alternative to sodium nitroprusside in the immediate treatment of patients who develop severe hypertension and in whom oral treatment is not practical. Fenoldopam may be particularly useful in patients who develop hypertension after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, but further studies are required to confirm its role in hypertensive emergency.

Randomized, prospective trial of fenoldopam vs sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of acute severe hypertension. Fenoldopam Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safeties and efficacies of IV fenoldopam (FNP) vs sodium nitroprusside (NTP) in severe acute hypertension.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter international trial, at 24 academic medical centers, was conducted. The participants were adult patients (21-80 years of age) who had supine diastolic blood pressures (DBPs) > or = 120 mm Hg, were capable of written informed consent, and did not have selected exclusion criteria. The subjects were randomized to either FNP or NTP therapy; DBP was titrated to 95-110 mm Hg, or a maximum reduction of 40 mm Hg for very high pressures. Infusions were maintained for at least six hours, then the patients were weaned off the IV therapy and oral medication was started. Measurements included BP, heart rate, and duration of study drug infusion and frequency of side effects or complications.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients (90 FNP, 93 NTP) were enrolled. Fifteen patients from each arm were excluded from efficacy analysis due to protocol violation. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. The two antihypertensive agents were equivalent in controlling and maintaining DBP. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced to a slightly greater degree for the NTP-treated patients during the initial (0.5-1-hr) study period, and both SBP and DBP were reduced more for the FNP-treated patients in the subset receiving infusions during the 12-24-hour period. The adverse effect profiles of the drugs were similar, as were the times to achieve target pressure, with no clinically relevant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who had acute severe hypertension, FNP and NTP were equivalent in terms of efficacy and acute adverse events. Because of a unique mechanism of action, FNP may have advantages in selected subsets of patients. Further studies may be indicated in patient populations with pure "hypertensive emergencies."

Hemodynamic profile of intravenous fenoldopam in patients with hypertensive crisis

Fenoldopam, a newly developed intravenous dopaminergic DA1 receptor agonist, was used in an open, prospective study for blood pressure control in 12 patients presenting with hypertensive crisis. At a dose of 0.2-0.5 microgram kg-1 min-1 fenoldopam decreased systolic blood pressure from 209 +/- 13 to 151 +/- 17 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure from 114 +/- 10 to 78 +/- 10 mmHg. Blood pressure was controlled in all 12 patients within 5-50 min. In none of the patients did rebound hypertension occur upon termination of the study medication, nor was any adverse event reported. Major hemodynamic changes induced by fenoldopam were a decrease in total peripheral resistance from 1853 +/- 611 to 1193 +/- 368 and in pulmonary vascular resistance from 252 +/- 170 to 180 +/- 74 dyne s-1 cm-5. In patients with high left ventricular filling pressure at study pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased while the stroke volume index and mixed venous oxygen saturation increased under fenoldopam. Thus, fenoldopam appears to be a rapid-acting, well-tolerated, and highly effective intravenous substance for the treatment of severe hypertension.

Fenoldopam mesylate versus sodium nitroprusside in the acute management of severe systemic hypertension

Thirty-three patients with severe systemic hypertension defined as a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 120 mm Hg were randomized in a single-blind fashion to be treated with either intravenous fenoldopam mesylate (FNP) or sodium nitroprusside (NTP). Fenoldopam mesylate and NTP infusion rates began at 0.1 microgram/kg/minute and 0.5 microgram/kg/minute, respectively and were titrated to achieve a goal DBP of between 95 and 110 mm Hg; or a reduction of at least 40 mm Hg if the baseline DBP was > 150 mm Hg. Fenoldopam mesylate (n = 15) reduced blood pressure from 217/145 +/- 6/5 to 187/112 +/- 6/3 mm Hg (P < .001) at an average infusion rate of 0.5 +/- 0.1 microgram/kg/minute. The average time to achieve goal DBP with FNP was 1.5 +/- 1.4 hours. Nitroprusside (n = 18) reduced blood pressure from 210/136 +/- 5/2 to 172/103 +/- 6/2 mm Hg (P < .001) at an average infusion rate of 1.2 +/- .24 micrograms/kg/minute. Nitroprusside response time averaged 2 +/- 2.5 hours. There was no significant difference between the magnitude of effect seen with either FNP or NTP; nor was there any difference observed in the adverse effect rates of the two agents. Fenoldopam mesylate and NTP demonstrate similar overall efficacy in the treatment of severe systemic hypertension.

Comparative effects of fenoldopam mesylate and nitroprusside on left ventricular performance in severe systemic hypertension

To compare the effects of fenoldopam (n = 15), a selective dopamine-1 agonist, and nitroprusside (n = 14) on left ventricular (LV) function in severely hypertensive subjects (diastolic blood pressure (BP) greater than 120 mm Hg), both agents were infused to reduce diastolic BP by 40 mm Hg (or less than 110 mm Hg). Indexes of LV systolic and diastolic functions were obtained using gated radionuclide angiography before the initiation of treatment and after targeted BP was achieved. Both fenoldopam and nitroprusside effectively reduced systolic and diastolic BP to target levels. Changes in heart rate, peak filling rate and relative end-diastolic volume were similar with both agents. Baseline ejection fraction increased after infusion of both drugs. The magnitude of the increase in ejection fraction was far greater with fenoldopam than with nitroprusside (+22% vs +8%; p = 0.04), despite a lesser reduction in systolic BP (-12 vs -22%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the reduction in relative end-systolic volume (-35 vs -20%; p = 0.04), and increase in the ratio of peak systolic pressure to relative end-systolic volume (+43 vs +6%; p = 0.007) were greater after fenoldopam than after nitroprusside. The greater increment in parameters of LV systolic function produced by fenoldopam than by nitroprusside suggests an effect on LV performance that is independent of afterload reduction.

Cardiovascular pharmacology of adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors: therapeutic significance in congestive heart failure

This review discusses the localization of adrenergic- and dopaminergic-adrenoceptors within the cardiovascular system and describes the cardiovascular and renal changes produced following the activation of these receptors by appropriate agonists. Whereas the role of alpha- and beta-adrenergic agents in the treatment of heart failure is well recognized, recent studies with dopamine (DA)-receptor agonists indicate that they offer a novel approach in the therapy of congestive heart failure. DA-adrenoceptor agonists reduce afterload by causing vasodilation and promote sodium excretion via direct activation of DA1-adrenoceptors located on renal tubules. Fenoldopam is a selective DA1-adrenoceptor agonist found to be effective in heart failure. It reduces afterload by causing peripheral vasodilation and produces natriuresis and diuresis. Dopexamine is a DA1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, and its efficacy in heart failure is due to its ability to provide mild inotropic support and cause a reduction in afterload. Ibopamine is a prodrug that is converted into its active metabolite, epinine. This compound activates primarily DA1- and DA2-adrenoceptors. It is effective in heart failure, and the mechanism progresses via DA1- and DA2-adrenoceptor-mediated reduction in afterload. Agonists of DA2-adrenoceptors reduce afterload by decreasing the release of norepinephrine and by reducing the levels of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Since both of these systems are active in heart failure, ibopamine offers a rational approach for therapy. The present review addresses the concept of pharmacologic intervention in adrenergic and dopaminergic influence in the cardiovascular and renal systems to produce changes that are desirable for the pharmacotherapy of congestive heart failure.

Renal and hemodynamic effects of intravenous fenoldopam versus nitroprusside in severe hypertension

The renal and hemodynamic effects of intravenously administered fenoldopam mesylate, a novel dopamine-1 receptor agonist, were compared with those of sodium nitroprusside in 28 patients (18 male; 26 black, two white; average age, 49 +/- 3 years) with an average blood pressure of 219/137 mm Hg, most of whom presented with acute target organ damage. Fenoldopam and nitroprusside lowered blood pressure safely to an average pressure of 176/105 mm Hg; highly significant dose-response relations were found for the 13 patients receiving fenoldopam and the 15 receiving nitroprusside. Volume and sodium, potassium, and creatinine concentrations were measured in freely voided urine specimens both before and during intravenous therapy. In the fenoldopam-treated patients, there were significant increases in urinary flow (92 +/- 21 to 168 +/- 37 ml/hr, p less than 0.003), sodium excretion (227 +/- 73 to 335 +/- 90 mu eq/min, p less than 0.001), and creatinine clearance (70 +/- 11 to 93 +/- 13 ml/hr, p less than 0.003). In the nitroprusside-treated group, however, all these parameters decreased, but not significantly. For direct comparison of the two agents, the increments in urinary flow rate (+76 +/- 20 vs. -16 +/- 15 ml/hr, fenoldopam vs. nitroprusside), sodium excretion (+109 +/- 28 vs. -39 +/- 28 mu eq/min), and creatinine clearance (+23 +/- 6 vs. -11 +/- 7 ml/min) were significantly greater (p less than 0.001 for each) in the fenoldopam-treated group. Significant differences were also obtained when these parameters were calculated as percentage increase over baseline. Fenoldopam and nitroprusside are effective therapies for severe, accelerated, or malignant hypertension, but fenoldopam had additional salutary renal effects in these patients.