Hemodynamic effects of intravenous and oral sotalol

The Arrhythmogenicity of Sotalol and its Role in Heart Failure: A Literature Review

ABSTRACT

According to the American Heart Association, approximately 6 million adults have been afflicted with heart failure in the United States in 2020 and are more likely to have sudden cardiac death accounting for approximately 50% of the cause of mortality. Sotalol is a nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonist with class III antiarrhythmic properties that has been mostly used for atrial fibrillation treatment and suppressing recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The use of sotalol in patients with left ventricular dysfunction is not recommended by the American College of Cardiology or American Heart Association because studies are inconclusive with conflicting results regarding safety. This article aims to review the mechanism of action of sotalol, the β-blocking effects on heart failure, and provide an overview of clinical trials on sotalol use and its effects in patients with heart failure. Small- and large-scale clinical trials have been controversial and inconclusive about the use of sotalol in heart failure. Sotalol has been shown to reduce defibrillation energy requirements and reduce shocks from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Torsades de Pointes is the most life-threatening arrhythmia that has been documented with sotalol use and occurs more commonly in women and heart failure patients. Thus far, mortality benefits have not been demonstrated with sotalol use and larger multicenter studies are required going forward.

Early experience with intravenous sotalol in children with and without congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmias are common in the pediatric population. In patients unable to take oral medications or in need of acute therapy, options of intravenous (IV) antiarrhythmic medications are limited. Recently IV sotalol has become readily available, but experience in children is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience with the use of IV sotalol in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all pediatric patients receiving IV sotalol was performed. Patient demographic characteristics, presence of congenital heart disease, arrhythmia type, efficacy of IV sotalol use, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (26 (55%) male and 24 (51%) with congenital heart disease) received IV sotalol at a median age of 2.05 years (interquartile range 0.07-10.03 years) and a median weight of 12.8 kg (interquartile range 3.8-34.2 kg), and 13 (28%) received IV sotalol in the acute postoperative setting. Supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in 40 patients (85%) and ventricular tachycardia in 7 (15%). Among 24 patients receiving IV sotalol for an active arrhythmia, acute termination was achieved in 21 (88%). Twenty-three patients received IV sotalol as maintenance therapy for recurrent arrhythmias owing to inability to take oral antiarrhythmic medications; 19 (83%) were controlled with sotalol monotherapy. No patient required discontinuation of IV sotalol secondary to adverse effects, proarrhythmia, or QT prolongation.

CONCLUSION

IV sotalol is an effective antiarrhythmic option for pediatric patients and may be an excellent agent for acute termination of active arrhythmias. It was well tolerated, with no patient requiring discontinuation secondary to adverse effects.

Intravenous Sotalol - Reintroducing a Forgotten Agent to the Electrophysiology Therapeutic Arsenal

Sotalol is a racemic mixture possessing beta-blocker and class III anti arrhythmic properties. Approved by US food and drug administration (FDA) since 2009 based on its bioequivalence with oral sotalol, clinicians are less familiar with the potential uses of the intravenous form despite its re-launch in United States in 2015. Available literature suggests that intravenous sotalol in recommended doses can be safely administered in adult and pediatric population achieving rapid reliable therapeutic plasma concentration and without additional proarrhythmic effects when compared to its oral form as well as other antiarrhythmic medications. Intravenous sotalol may have potential uses as an alternative agent for highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation post cardiac surgery as well as in life threatening ventricular arrhythmias. As with its oral form, judicious use with close attention to QTc and renal function is warranted. Further studies are needed to better understand the safety, efficacy and different dosing regimens of parenteral sotalol in adults and children.

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

This article describes the pharmacology of antiarrhythmic medications. Although these medications are broadly considered in terms of their blockade of either sodium or potassium channels, they act by a variety of pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Elimination may be via hepatic metabolism or renal mechanisms, or a combination. In particular, interactions between antiarrhythmic medications and other drugs that interfere with hepatic metabolism by P450 enzymes is a source for toxicity.

Sotalol: An important new antiarrhythmic

Sotalol, the most recently approved oral antiarrhythmic drug, has a unique pharmacologic profile. Its electrophysiology is explained by nonselective beta-blocking action as well as class III antiarrhythmic activity (including fast-activating cardiac membrane-delayed rectifier current blockade), which leads to increases in action potential duration and refractory period throughout the heart and in QT interval on the surface electrocardiogram. Its better hemodynamic tolerance than other beta-blockers may be a result of enhanced inotropy associated with class III activity. Sotalol's ability to suppress ventricular ectopy is similar to that of class I agents and better than that of standard beta-blockers. Unlike class I agents, its use in a postinfarction trial was not associated with increased mortality rate. Therapeutically, it has shown superior efficacy for prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, which was the basis for its approval. In a randomized study, the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, sotalol was associated with an increased in-hospital efficacy prediction rate (by Holter monitor or electrophysiologic study), reduced long-term arrhythmic recurrence rate with superior tolerance, and lower mortality rate than class I ("standard") antiarrhythmic drugs. Sotalol was 1 of 2 drugs selected for comparison with implantable defibrillators in the recent National Institutes of Health Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) study. Sotalol appears to be a preferred drug for use with implantable defibrillators; unlike some other agents (eg, amiodarone) it does not elevate and, indeed, may lower defibrillation threshold. Although unapproved for this use, sotalol is active against atrial arrhythmias. It has shown efficacy equivalent to propafenone and quinidine in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence, but it is better tolerated than quinidine and provides excellent rate control during recurrence. Sotalol's major side effects are related to beta-blockade and the risk of torsades de pointes (acceptably small if appropriate precautions are taken). Unlike several other antiarrhythmics (eg, amiodarone), it has no pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, is not metabolized, and is entirely renally excreted. Initial dose is 80 mg twice daily, with gradual titration to 240 to 360 mg/day as needed. The daily dose must be reduced in renal failure. On the basis of favorable clinical trials and practice experience, sotalol has shown a steadily growing impact on the treatment of arrhythmias during its 5 years of market availability, a trend that is likely to continue.

Oxygen uptake kinetics and cardiopulmonary performance in lone atrial fibrillation and the effects of sotalol

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with impaired exercise capacity. Oxygen uptake (VO2) kinetics determines cardiopulmonary performance during submaximal exercise, which may be impaired in patients with AF.

AIM

To study oxygen kinetics and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with AF without structural heart disease and the effects of oral sotalol on these parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients (mean age, 56+/-8 years) with chronic AF were recruited. The protocol design was a randomized, single-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial. Patients received either sotalol or placebo for an 8-week study period, and the alternative treatment in the subsequent period. Cardiopulmonary function tests using constant workload and incremental workload protocols were performed at the end of each phase. Sixteen age-matched normal subjects were included as control subjects.

RESULTS

During constant submaximal exercise, patients with AF had a larger oxygen deficit (425+/-140 mL vs 289+/-80 mL in normal subjects; p<0.05) and the time for achieving 63% of VO2 (mean response time) was also delayed (46+/-15 s vs 33+/-10 s; p<0.05). Compared with normal subjects, patients with chronic AF had a higher maximal exercise heart rate (180+/-34 beats/min vs 153+/-22 beats/min; p<0.05), but a lower maximal VO2 (20+/-4 mL/kg/min vs 26+/-6 mL/kg/min; p<0.05). Oral sotalol lowered the resting (72+/-15 beats/min vs 93+/-22 beats/min; p<0.05) and exercise heart rate compared with placebo (125+/-27 beats/min vs 180+/-34 beats/min; p<0.05, respectively), and normalized oxygen pulse and the heart rate to minute ventilation ratio during maximal exercise. There was no significant difference between those receiving sotalol and those receiving placebo in oxygen deficit (502+/-150 mL vs 425+/-140 mL; p=0.38), maximal VO2 (17.2+/-4.9 mL/kg/min vs 20.4+/-4.7 mL/kg/min; p=0.17), and other gas exchange variables. In patients with AF, oxygen deficit has a fair correlation with VO2 at the anaerobic threshold (r2=0.43; p<0.05) and at maximal exercise (r2=0.45; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In addition to maximal exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary performance, patients with chronic AF without significant structural heart disease had impaired submaximal exercise performance as assessed by VO2 kinetics. These parameters were not significantly affected by sotalol used for rate control.

Efficacy and proarrhythmia of oral sotalol in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the efficacy of oral sotalol for various arrhythmias in pediatric patients and to evaluate the incidence of proarrhythmia and systemic side effects.

BACKGROUND

Sotalol is a beta-adrenergic blocking agent with additional class III antiarrhythmic properties. Experience in pediatric patients is limited. Data concerning the incidence of proarrhythmia in children are lacking.

METHODS

Seventy-one pediatric patients (mean age 7.3 years) with various supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias were treated with oral sotalol. All the patients were admitted to the hospital for initiation of sotalol therapy. Antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects of sotalol were assessed by daily surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) during the in-hospital phase and by serial Holter monitoring.

RESULTS

Sotalol was either completely (27 [66%] of 41 patients) or partially effective (11 [27%] of 41) in 38 (93%) of 41 patients with supraventricular reentrant tachycardias. In patients with atrial flutter predominantly after operation for congenital heart disease, sotalol was effective in 84% of patients (completely in 9 of 19 and partially in 7 of 19). Ventricular tachycardia was completely (3 of 11) or partially (4 of 11) controlled in 64% of children. Proarrhythmia occurred in seven patients (10%) and consisted of symptomatic bradycardia from sinoatrial block and high grade atrioventricular (AV) block, respectively, in two children; asymptomatic high grade AV block in one; torsade de pointes in one; and relevant increased ventricular ectopic activity in three. Proarrhythmia required drug discontinuation in four patients. Mean duration of treatment for all patients was 18 months (range 1 to 40).

CONCLUSIONS

Sotalol was an effective antiarrhythmic drug for a wide range of pediatric tachyarrhythmias. The considerable number of patients with proarrhythmic effects indicates the need for initiation of treatment on an inpatient basis and close monitoring by serial Holter electrocardiography.

Sotalol: from "just another beta blocker" to "the prototype of class III antidysrhythmic compound"

Sotalol is a beta-blocking drug devoid of membrane stabilizing properties, as well as intrinsic sympathomimetic actions, or cardioselectivity. In addition, sotalol prolongs atrial and ventricular repolarization (Class III antiarrhythmic activity). It appears to have less myocardial depressant effect than other beta-blocking agents. Given orally, bioavailability of the drug reaches 100%. Sotalol's plasma half-life is 15 hours (range 7-18) and is dependent only on renal function. In clinical practice, it has been found effective in the suppression of nearly all supraventricular and ventricular dysrhythmias except those related to prolonged ventricular repolarization. Most common adverse effects are dyspnea, bradycardia, and fatigue, which results in drug termination in 16% of the cases. Torsades de pointes usually associated with bradycardia and drug induced QTc prolongation has been reported in 1.9%-3.5% of the patients receiving sotalol. This complication may be reduced by limiting the dose (< 640 mg/day) especially in patients with impaired renal function. In addition hypokalemia must be avoided. To sum up, the combination of Class II and Class III effects may carry additional benefits. However, further studies are required to test such hypotheses.

Aggravation of postcardioversion atrial dysfunction by sotalol

OBJECTIVES

This study determined the effect of sotalol on atrial function after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND

After electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, the Doppler mitral A wave is often diminished, representing impaired atrial contractile function. Sotalol is an effective atrial antiarrhythmic drug with class III and beta-adrenergic blocking properties. Although the negative inotropic effect of sotalol on the ventricle is minimal in patients with normal ventricular function, it may manifest negative inotropy when ventricular function is impaired. We postulated that after cardioversion, when intrinsic atrial function is impaired, sotalol may have an adverse effect on the atrium.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients enrolled in a randomized, double-blind study of sotalol for maintenance of sinus rhythm were studied by quantitative Doppler echocardiography within 24 h of electrical cardioversion and, for those still in sinus rhythm, again at 1 month. Doppler variables (E and A wave velocities and integrals) in patients receiving sotalol were compared with those in patients receiving placebo.

RESULTS

After electrical cardioversion, peak A wave velocity and A wave time-velocity integral in the 20 patients receiving placebo were reduced compared with normal values. In the 17 patients receiving sotalol (median dose 320 mg twice daily) these variables were further reduced (mean [+/- SD] peak A wave velocity 19.4 +/- 5.5 vs. 38.4 +/- 14.7 cm/s, p < 0.001 and mean A wave time-velocity integral 1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.4 cm, p < 0.001, in sotalol- vs. placebo-treated patients, respectively). Early diastolic filling (E wave variables) did not differ between sotalol- and placebo-treated groups. At 1 month, five sotalol- and six placebo-treated patients remained in sinus rhythm, and A wave variables had increased for the whole group, with a greater increase in sotalol-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After electrical cardioversion, when atrial stunning is prominent, sotalol has a negative atrial inotropic effect. This effect may be temporary, as suggested by resolution at 1 month. Negative inotropic effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on the atrium should be considered in assessing Doppler variables of left ventricular filling.

Sotalol: a new agent for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

Sotalol was developed as a nonselective beta-blocker in the 1960s for the treatment of hypertension and later for cardiac risk management after myocardial infarction. Extensive research has since well described class III type electrophysiologic effects on the repolarization of myocardial fibers. Sotalol prolongs and homogenizes ventricular refractoriness, resulting in good antifibrillatory/antitachycardia protection. The unique combination of beta-blockade and antiarrhythmic effects probably will promote sotalol's use in postmyocardial infarction patients with ventricular tachycardia and sudden death. This article summarizes the pharmacologic and cardiovascular effects of this new drug, outlining its clinical use.

Sotalol. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Sotalol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which prolongs cardiac repolarisation independently of its antiadrenergic action (class III antiarrhythmic properties). The antiarrhythmic action of sotalol appears to arise predominantly from its class III properties, and the drug exhibits a broader antiarrhythmic profile than the conventional beta-blockers. Sotalol is effective in controlling paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation/flutter in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and in preventing initiation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias following coronary artery bypass surgery. Sotalol shows promise in the control of nonmalignant and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, particularly those associated with ischaemic heart disease. It is effective in suppressing complex forms of ventricular ectopy, displaying superior antiectopic activity to propranolol and metoprolol. The acute efficacy of sotalol in preventing reinduction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and suppressing spontaneous episodes of these arrhythmias on Holter monitoring is translated into long term prophylactic efficacy against arrhythmia recurrence in approximately 55 to 85% of patients with refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In addition, sotalol offers the advantage over the class I agents of reducing cardiac and all-cause mortality in the high risk population with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The adverse effects of sotalol are primarily related to its beta-blocking activity and its class III property of prolonging cardiac repolarisation. Sotalol is devoid of overt cardiodepressant activity in patients with mild or moderate left ventricular dysfunction. The overall arrhythmogenic potential is moderately low, but torsade de pointes may develop in conjunction with excessive prolongation of the QT interval due to bradycardia, hypokalaemia or high plasma concentrations of the drug. In summary, sotalol displays a broad spectrum of antiarrhythmic activity, is haemodynamically well tolerated, and confers a relatively low proarrhythmic risk. It is likely to prove particularly appropriate in the treatment and prophylaxis of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Practical considerations in the use of sotalol for ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation

Sotalol is a unique antiarrhythmic drug that combines beta-blocking effects with actions to prolong action potential duration. The net effect is a drug that is efficacious in the management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Although sotalol has effects on both heart rate and QT interval, these effects do not help predict the antiarrhythmic efficacy of the agent. Changes in QT dispersion may, however, prove to be relevant to both the antiarrhythmic effects and the arrhythmogenic effects of sotalol. Thus, although sotalol may occasionally cause torsades de pointes, this complication may be predictable and clinically controllable. Sotalol is well tolerated, and it may be used, with caution, in some patients with impaired myocardial contractile performance, despite its beta-blocking action. Sotalol has an important indication for the management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Comparative hemodynamic effects of amiodarone, sotalol, and d-sotalol

The effects of intravenous boluses of amiodarone (5 mg/kg), racemic sotalol (enantiomeric ratio d/l-sotalol 1:1;1.5 mg/kg), and d-sotalol (0.75 mg/kg) on mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and peak rate of change of left ventricular pressure (LV dp/dt) were assessed in conscious rabbits. Amiodarone and sotalol had a modest negative inotropic effect: amiodarone reduced peak LV dp/dt by 8 +/ 2% (mean +/- SEM) (p < 0.05) and sotalol by 6 +/- 2% (p < 0.05). These two drugs had quite different effects on CO as a result of differences in their actions on peripheral blood vessels: amiodarone caused a 13 +/- 3% (p < 0.05) increase in CO associated with a substantial vasodilatory effect (TPR reduced 25 +/- 3%; p < 0.01); sotalol did not produce any substantial change in either CO or TPR. Bolus intravenous injection of amiodarone was associated with a significant increase in HR (12 +/- 3%; p < 0.01), whereas sotalol reduced HR by 7 +/- 1% (p < 0.05). In contrast, administration of the dextro-rotatory optical isomer, d-sotalol, produced no significant change in peak LV dp/dt, LVEDP, CO, TPR, or HR. These results confirm that amiodarone and racemic sotalol have a comparatively weak cardiodepressant action. The experiments also show that the reduction in cardiac performance associated with racemic sotalol is mediated predominantly through the beta-adrenoreceptor blocking action of the levo-rotatory isomer (l-sotalol) rather than any substantial cardiodepressant effect of the dextro-rotatory isomer.

Sotalol: a novel beta-blocker with class III anti-arrhythmic activity

Initially synthesized in 1960, sotalol is a novel beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agent that also possesses class III anti-arrhythmic properties. The drug's ability to lengthen repolarization and prolong effective refractory periods in all cardiac tissues in addition to its beta-blocking effects make sotalol an attractive agent for use in a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.

Dual chamber rate responsive pacing to allow sotalol therapy for ventricular tachycardia

In order to allow the use of sotalol to control ventricular tachycardia (VT), dual chamber rate responsive (DDDR) pacemakers were implanted in ten patients aged 6 to 73 years (mean 50 years). Nine presented with monomorphic VT (seven inducible at baseline electrophysiological study [EPS]) and one with syncope (monomorphic VT at EPS). On sotalol, VT was initiated in only one. This patient received sotalol in the absence of an effective alternative agent. The mean dose was 468 +/- 269 mg/day. Indications for pacing were symptomatic sotalol induced bradycardia (7), sinus node dysfunction (1), postoperative complete heart block (1), and infra-His block at baseline EPS (1). At least five of these patients would have been candidates for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator had sotalol required discontinuation. Initially, nine patients were paced in DDDR mode and one, with normal AV conduction on sotalol, in AAIR. One patient was unable to tolerate sotalol despite pacing. One patient died suddenly after 35 months of symptom-free follow-up. There was a significant improvement in symptomatic status (P = 0.03) after pacing among the other eight patients with no recurrence of VT. The implantation of a DDDR pacemaker may be indicated in selected patients with serious cardiac arrhythmias. With such a device programmed to an appropriate mode, sotalol can be used successfully where otherwise contraindicated by bradycardia or preexisting conduction disease. For some patients this may obviate the expense, inconvenience, and attendant risks of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.

Hemodynamic effects of d-sotalol in acute ischemic heart failure in dogs

This study was designed to determine the hemodynamic effects of the class III antiarrhythmic agent d-sotalol in acute ischemic heart failure at concentrations that prolong ventricular repolarization. In pentobarbital-anesthetized open-chest dogs, heart failure was induced by microembolization of the area supplied by the main left coronary artery until a stable left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure of 25 +/- 2 mm Hg was achieved. Embolization shortened the QT interval by 30 +/- 11 msec, while 1 and 2 mg/kg d-sotalol intravenously after embolization lengthened the QT interval by 23 +/- 7 and 39 +/- 7 msec, respectively (n = 7). Heart rate increased after embolization by 19 +/- 7 beats/min, while it decreased by 12 +/- 6 beats/min and by 21 +/- 5 beats/min after d-sotalol. The depressed LV function after embolization assessed by LV pressures, stroke volume, cardiac output, ultrasonometrically estimated LV volume, the pressure-volume relationship, and the time for isovolumic relaxation was not changed following infusion of 1 or 2 mg/kg d-sotalol. Plasma concentrations of d-sotalol were 1.55 +/- 0.33 and 2.58 +/- 0.50 micrograms/ml, respectively. In conclusion, d-sotalol at concentrations prolonging repolarization was devoid of cardiodepressive effects in acute ischemic heart failure in dogs.