Sotalol for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias

Sotalol in treatment of pediatric cardiac arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

There is limited experience on sotalol use in the management of childhood arrhythmias. This study reviews the results of our experience with oral sotalol for treatment and prevention of tachyarrhythmias in children.

METHODS

The records of 62 patients (27 female, 35 male, mean age: 8.5+/-5.3 years) treated with sotalol for supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias from 1994 to 1999 at our institution were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic (ECG), ambulatory ECG and electrophysiologic variables were collected.

RESULTS

Forty-two (63.6%) patients had re-entrant supraventricular tachycardia, eight patients (12.9%) had atrial tachycardia, one patient (1.6%) had junctional ectopic tachycardia, four patients (6.5%) had ventricular tachycardia, and seven patients (11.3%) had complex ventricular arrhythmias, as evidenced by surface or ambulatory ECG records; or revealed during the electrophysiological study. The mean sotalol dose was 3.9+/-1.2 mg/kg per day. In 15.5+/-13.9 months of sotalol use 50% (n=31) had complete relief of symptoms and/or arrhythmia and 29% (n=18) had partial relief. Sotalol was ineffective in 20% (n=13). Sotalol was more effective in re-entrant type supraventricular tachycardias (P=0.012). Sotalol was the first choice in 35.5% of patients. The sotalol therapy was initiated in inpatient settings in 40.3% (25 patients). Complications due to sotalol were seen in six patients (five patients developed bradycardia/pauses, and one patient had torsades de pointes) for which the sotalol dose was modified. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, a pacemaker was implanted and in another patient sotalol was stopped.

CONCLUSION

Sotalol, being an effective and safe drug particularly in children, is a good therapeutic alternative for the preventive treatment of childhood tachyarrhythmias.

Sotalol: An important new antiarrhythmic

Sotalol, the most recently approved oral antiarrhythmic drug, has a unique pharmacologic profile. Its electrophysiology is explained by nonselective beta-blocking action as well as class III antiarrhythmic activity (including fast-activating cardiac membrane-delayed rectifier current blockade), which leads to increases in action potential duration and refractory period throughout the heart and in QT interval on the surface electrocardiogram. Its better hemodynamic tolerance than other beta-blockers may be a result of enhanced inotropy associated with class III activity. Sotalol's ability to suppress ventricular ectopy is similar to that of class I agents and better than that of standard beta-blockers. Unlike class I agents, its use in a postinfarction trial was not associated with increased mortality rate. Therapeutically, it has shown superior efficacy for prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, which was the basis for its approval. In a randomized study, the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, sotalol was associated with an increased in-hospital efficacy prediction rate (by Holter monitor or electrophysiologic study), reduced long-term arrhythmic recurrence rate with superior tolerance, and lower mortality rate than class I ("standard") antiarrhythmic drugs. Sotalol was 1 of 2 drugs selected for comparison with implantable defibrillators in the recent National Institutes of Health Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) study. Sotalol appears to be a preferred drug for use with implantable defibrillators; unlike some other agents (eg, amiodarone) it does not elevate and, indeed, may lower defibrillation threshold. Although unapproved for this use, sotalol is active against atrial arrhythmias. It has shown efficacy equivalent to propafenone and quinidine in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence, but it is better tolerated than quinidine and provides excellent rate control during recurrence. Sotalol's major side effects are related to beta-blockade and the risk of torsades de pointes (acceptably small if appropriate precautions are taken). Unlike several other antiarrhythmics (eg, amiodarone), it has no pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, is not metabolized, and is entirely renally excreted. Initial dose is 80 mg twice daily, with gradual titration to 240 to 360 mg/day as needed. The daily dose must be reduced in renal failure. On the basis of favorable clinical trials and practice experience, sotalol has shown a steadily growing impact on the treatment of arrhythmias during its 5 years of market availability, a trend that is likely to continue.

Treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia observed in clinical practice, occurring in 0.4% of the general population and in up to 4% of people greater than 60 years old. It is often associated with other cardiovascular disorders, such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathy. Critical evaluation and management of patients with atrial fibrillation requires knowledge of etiology, prognosis, and treatment options of this arrhythmia. On initial presentation, emergency electrical cardioversion should be performed if the patient is hemodynamically unstable. If the patient is stable, initial rate control is recommended, using atrioventricular nodal blocking agents. Further treatment mainly depends upon the duration of the episode. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation <48 hours can be safely cardioverted. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation for >48 hours are commonly anticoagulated for 3 to 4 weeks before and after cardioversion because of the risk of thromboembolism formation in the left atrial appendage. An alternate strategy, which is especially attractive when immediate cardioversion is desired, is transesophageal echocardiography to exclude left atrial thrombus followed by prompt cardioversion. After cardioversion, sinus rhythm can be maintained with class I and III drugs, such as flecainide and propafenone or amiodarone and sotalol. New treatment options, such as atrial defibrillation, atrioventricular junctional ablation, or modification of atrial pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation, are currently under investigation. Although atrial fibrillation is so common in clinical practice, it still remains difficult to treat. Conversion and maintenance to sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drug therapy has not shown any improvement in mortality, and some patients may benefit more from ventricular rate control. This review article discusses different treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Proarrhythmic effects of DL- and D-sotalol on the "border zone" between normal and ischemic regions of isolated ventricular myocardium and antiarrhythmic effects on reperfusion

Considering the Survival With ORal D-sotalol (SWORD) study results, in which mortality was higher in patients treated by the pure class III agent D-sotalol, we tested DL- and D-sotalol (5 and 10 microM) in an in vitro model of "border zone" arrhythmias. Isolated guinea-pig ventricular strips were partly exposed to normoxia ("Normal Zone," NZ) and partly to modified Tyrode's solution ("Ischemic Zone," IZ) for 15 or 30 min ("ischemia"), followed by return to normoxia for 30 min ("reperfusion"). Resting membrane potential, action potential (AP) amplitude, and maximal upstroke velocity of AP were not significantly modified. DL- And D-sotalol, 5 and 10 microM, lengthened AP duration 90% (APD90) in NZ (p < 0.05), whereas these drugs were unable to prevent ischemia-induced APD shortening. By using the accelerated failure time Weibull's model, and a large number of reference experiments to control random variability of analyzed covariates, DL- and D-sotalol increased significantly the incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias during ischemia (chi2 = 24.79; p = 0.0367): 83 (5 microM D- and DL-sotalol), 86, and 62% (10 microM D- and DL-sotalol, respectively) versus 32% of controls. During reperfusion, 10 microM DL-sotalol prevented the occurrence of spontaneous arrhythmias (chi2 = 46.74; p = 0.0001) similar to what seen with the beta-blocking agent propranolol (10 microM). These data, providing evidence for proarrhythmic effects of DL- and D-sotalol on border-zone arrhythmias, concomitant with differential class III actions on NZ versus IZ, might be considered for understanding the SWORD study results.

The side effect profile of class III antiarrhythmic drugs: focus on d,l-sotalol

Class III antiarrhythmic drugs have been under extensive clinical investigation as safer, more effective alternatives to class I drugs, which have recognized risks in selected populations. Class III drugs prolong the action potential duration of myocardial cells, resulting in a lengthening of the effective refractory period. This pharmacologic activity has antiarrhythmic properties, but it may induce a distinctive form of proarrhythmia known as torsades de pointes. Amiodarone and d,l-sotolol are class III drugs that have been available for many years. In addition to their ability to prolong refractoriness, these drugs have other pharmacodynamic properties. Recent antiarrhythmic drug discovery has focused on the identification and development of selective or so-called pure class III drugs that are devoid of additional actions. Investigators have hoped that these drugs would be as effective as sotalol and amiodarone but have fewer adverse effects. Accumulating data, however, indicate that complex compounds exhibiting antiadrenergic and other electrophysiologic properties may be superior to pure class III agents.

Sotalol for atrial tachycardias after surgery for congenital heart disease

Atrial tachycardias, in particular atrial flutter after surgery for congenital heart disease, is associated with a high mortality. Treatment with various antiarrhythmic drugs and/or antitachycardia pacemakers is not very successful. Sotalol, a Class III drug, has shown to be a promising drug in adults with atrial tachycardias. However, the experience with sotalol in children after surgery for congenital heart disease is limited. Therefore, we describe our results here. Between December 1990 and February 1997, 26 children with atrial tachycardias, most of them with atrial flutter or fibrillation (n = 20), after surgery for congenital heart disease were treated with sotalol orally. The age of the children at the start of treatment was 7.5 +/- 5.8 years (mean +/- SD). The time interval between surgery and the start of atrial tachycardia ranged from 1 day to 14.3 years (3.8 +/- 3.8 years). Conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 16 out of 22 hemodynamically stable children with a dosage of 4.0 +/- 1.6 mg/kg per day. The six children without sinus rhythm on sotalol and four hemodynamically unstable patients were treated prophylactically with sotalol after DC cardioversion for their tachycardias. Two children complained of mild transient fatigue. Heart rate decreased during therapy (95 +/- 33 vs 81 +/- 21 beats/min; P = 0.01). QTc-intervals did not change. Proarrhythmias such as torsades de pointes were not encountered. Two children with a preexistent sick sinus syndrome showed aggravation of bradycardia and needed pacemaker implantation. The percentage of children with a recurrence-free interval of 1 and 2 years was 96% and 81%, respectively, for all atrial tachycardias, and 92% and 66% for atrial flutter. The recurrences of atrial tachycardias during the follow-up period, which ranged from 0.1-6.1 years (2.5 +/- 1.8 years) could be treated with only an increase of the dosage of sotalol in all but one patient. We conclude that sotalol is an effective drug for the treatment and prevention of atrial tachycardia in children after surgery for congenital heart disease.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Treatment of atrial fibrillation is often unsatisfactory because no available drug has been shown to be clearly superior for maintaining patients in sinus rhythm, and all agents have significant potential for toxicity. Selection of an antiarrhythmic drug is more likely to be based on the drug's potential for toxicity, rather than its demonstrated superior efficacy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Careful assessment of each patient for contraindications to individual agents and the likelihood of treatment success needs to be done before initiating antiarrhythmic therapy.

Efficacy and proarrhythmia of oral sotalol in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the efficacy of oral sotalol for various arrhythmias in pediatric patients and to evaluate the incidence of proarrhythmia and systemic side effects.

BACKGROUND

Sotalol is a beta-adrenergic blocking agent with additional class III antiarrhythmic properties. Experience in pediatric patients is limited. Data concerning the incidence of proarrhythmia in children are lacking.

METHODS

Seventy-one pediatric patients (mean age 7.3 years) with various supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias were treated with oral sotalol. All the patients were admitted to the hospital for initiation of sotalol therapy. Antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects of sotalol were assessed by daily surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) during the in-hospital phase and by serial Holter monitoring.

RESULTS

Sotalol was either completely (27 [66%] of 41 patients) or partially effective (11 [27%] of 41) in 38 (93%) of 41 patients with supraventricular reentrant tachycardias. In patients with atrial flutter predominantly after operation for congenital heart disease, sotalol was effective in 84% of patients (completely in 9 of 19 and partially in 7 of 19). Ventricular tachycardia was completely (3 of 11) or partially (4 of 11) controlled in 64% of children. Proarrhythmia occurred in seven patients (10%) and consisted of symptomatic bradycardia from sinoatrial block and high grade atrioventricular (AV) block, respectively, in two children; asymptomatic high grade AV block in one; torsade de pointes in one; and relevant increased ventricular ectopic activity in three. Proarrhythmia required drug discontinuation in four patients. Mean duration of treatment for all patients was 18 months (range 1 to 40).

CONCLUSIONS

Sotalol was an effective antiarrhythmic drug for a wide range of pediatric tachyarrhythmias. The considerable number of patients with proarrhythmic effects indicates the need for initiation of treatment on an inpatient basis and close monitoring by serial Holter electrocardiography.

Efficacy and safety of d-sotalol, a pure class III antiarrhythmic compound, in patients with symptomatic complex ventricular ectopy. Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding study. The d-Sotalol PVC Study Group

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in pure class III antiarrhythmic compounds, ie, drugs in which the electrophysiological effect is confined to the propensity for producing an isolated lengthening of action potential duration. d-Sotalol represents the prototype of such pure class III agents. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized dose-finding study evaluated the antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of d-sotalol in patients with symptomatic chronic ventricular ectopy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 233 patients presenting with > or = 30 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) per hour during drug-free Holter monitoring randomly received placebo or d-sotalol at dosages of 50, 100, or 200 mg BID. Drug efficacy was assessed by repeat Holter monitoring at the end of double-blind therapy. There was a dose-dependent increase in QT and QTc duration, indicating class III activity. A dose-related decrease in hourly PVC counts was observed, reaching statistical significance for patients receiving 200 mg d-sotalol BID (311 PVCs/h during baseline compared with 135 PVCs/h during active treatment, P < .05). Analysis of the primary efficacy criterion (ie, > or = 75% reduction in total PVCs/h) revealed a significant treatment effect only for the highest d-sotalol dose, with 8 patients (14%) meeting this criterion. Eighteen patients reported side effects, which led to drug discontinuation in 5. One sudden death and one nonfatal cardiac arrest occurred in patients with dilative cardiomyopathy receiving 200 mg d-sotalol BID. No incidence of torsade de pointes was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

d-Sotalol exerts dose-dependent class III activity in patients with symptomatic ventricular ectopy. Its PVC-suppressing activity is modest and becomes evident predominantly at dosages of 200 mg administered BID. The observation of drug-associated serious adverse arrhythmic events emphasizes the need for individualized careful dose titration, particularly in patients with advanced organic heart disease.

Sotalol: a new beta-adrenergic blocker for ventricular arrhythmias

Sotalol is a water-soluble, nonselective, beta-adrenergic blocker that was recently approved in oral form in the United States for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias that are judged to be life-threatening. As a beta-blocker, sotalol is unique in having additional class-III antiarrhythmic activity. It is still not resolved whether sotalol is more effective than other beta-blockers in managing arrhythmias, but there are suggestions that it might possess greater antiarrhythmic and life-protecting activities than other types of antiarrhythmic drugs. The drug is well tolerated, but, because of its electrophysiologic activity, there is a small risk of proarrhythmia, specifically the development of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and torsade de pointes.

Sotalol

Sotalol is a novel antiarrhythmic agent combining beta-adrenergic-antagonist actions with the ability to increase cardiac repolarization and refractoriness. The drug's electrophysiologic and clinical profile is different from that of conventional beta-receptor antagonists. As compared with other antiarrhythmic agents, sotalol prevents recurrences of arrhythmia in a higher proportion of patients, particularly among those presenting with ventricular tachycardia and aborted sudden cardiac death. The net hemodynamic effect of sotalol is the result of a balance between the depressant effects due to beta-receptor blockade and an action that tends to increase contractility. Although initially marketed in the United States for treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, sotalol also has demonstrated efficacy in many patients with supraventricular arrhythmias. As with all drugs that prolong the QT interval, the syndrome of torsade de pointes is a serious potential adverse effect.

A consensus report on antiarrhythmic drug use

During the past few years, a number of new antiarrhythmic agents have become available for use in the United States, encainide has been withdrawn from use, and others have had indications for use modified. Therefore, a meeting of arrhythmia specialists was convened in an attempt to develop guidelines for antiarrhythmic therapy. The resultant discussions and guidelines presented in this article address general issues such as the most important antiarrhythmic drug attributes, as well as therapy for particular arrhythmias such as premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular ectopy, and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Sotalol: a new agent for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

Sotalol was developed as a nonselective beta-blocker in the 1960s for the treatment of hypertension and later for cardiac risk management after myocardial infarction. Extensive research has since well described class III type electrophysiologic effects on the repolarization of myocardial fibers. Sotalol prolongs and homogenizes ventricular refractoriness, resulting in good antifibrillatory/antitachycardia protection. The unique combination of beta-blockade and antiarrhythmic effects probably will promote sotalol's use in postmyocardial infarction patients with ventricular tachycardia and sudden death. This article summarizes the pharmacologic and cardiovascular effects of this new drug, outlining its clinical use.

Sotalol. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Sotalol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which prolongs cardiac repolarisation independently of its antiadrenergic action (class III antiarrhythmic properties). The antiarrhythmic action of sotalol appears to arise predominantly from its class III properties, and the drug exhibits a broader antiarrhythmic profile than the conventional beta-blockers. Sotalol is effective in controlling paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation/flutter in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and in preventing initiation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias following coronary artery bypass surgery. Sotalol shows promise in the control of nonmalignant and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, particularly those associated with ischaemic heart disease. It is effective in suppressing complex forms of ventricular ectopy, displaying superior antiectopic activity to propranolol and metoprolol. The acute efficacy of sotalol in preventing reinduction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and suppressing spontaneous episodes of these arrhythmias on Holter monitoring is translated into long term prophylactic efficacy against arrhythmia recurrence in approximately 55 to 85% of patients with refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In addition, sotalol offers the advantage over the class I agents of reducing cardiac and all-cause mortality in the high risk population with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The adverse effects of sotalol are primarily related to its beta-blocking activity and its class III property of prolonging cardiac repolarisation. Sotalol is devoid of overt cardiodepressant activity in patients with mild or moderate left ventricular dysfunction. The overall arrhythmogenic potential is moderately low, but torsade de pointes may develop in conjunction with excessive prolongation of the QT interval due to bradycardia, hypokalaemia or high plasma concentrations of the drug. In summary, sotalol displays a broad spectrum of antiarrhythmic activity, is haemodynamically well tolerated, and confers a relatively low proarrhythmic risk. It is likely to prove particularly appropriate in the treatment and prophylaxis of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Effect of sotalol on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation in humans

Antiarrhythmic drugs are frequently administered to patients receiving implanted cardioverter defibrillators. Some of these drugs may decrease the efficacy of defibrillation shocks from the defibrillator. Sotalol, a drug with beta-blocking and class III antiarrhythmic properties, lowers defibrillation energy requirements in experimental animals and may do so in humans. Oral sotalol 171 +/- 58 mg was administered before and after device implantation in 25 patients receiving implanted defibrillators. During sotalol therapy, the lowest energy required for successful defibrillation was 5.9 +/- 3.4 J (range 2-15J). In a concurrent nonrandomized comparison group of 23 patients, including 18 treated with amiodarone, the lowest successful energy was 16 +/- 10 J (p < 0.01). In 5 sotalol patients, ventricular fibrillation (VF) could not be induced at all (1 patient) or more than 2 or 3 times (4 patients) despite repeated 60 Hz stimulation. The induced VF had a pronounced tendency to terminate spontaneously, with the termination occurring at up to 23 seconds after the offset of 60 Hz stimulation. The cycle length of the VF was 236 +/- 34 msec, significantly greater than in patients not given drug therapy (191 +/- 21 msec, p < 0.01). In 10 patients, but none of the controls, intracardiac electrograms during surface electrocardiographic VF were regular, monoform, and without low-amplitude diastolic activity. In addition, monophasic action potentials during apparent VF showed maintenance of distinct and normal morphology. The ventricular effective refractory period increased after sotalol (249.4 +/- 19 to 278.4 +/- 24 msec; p < 0.03) and the maximum heart rate response to exercise was limited to 120 +/- 28 beats/min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sotalol: a novel beta-blocker with class III anti-arrhythmic activity

Initially synthesized in 1960, sotalol is a novel beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agent that also possesses class III anti-arrhythmic properties. The drug's ability to lengthen repolarization and prolong effective refractory periods in all cardiac tissues in addition to its beta-blocking effects make sotalol an attractive agent for use in a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.

Efficacy of flecainide for the reversion of acute onset atrial fibrillation

The efficacy and safety of intravenous flecainide to convert recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (present for greater than or equal to 30 minutes and less than or equal to 72 hours and a ventricular response greater than or equal to 120 beats/min) was investigated. A total of 102 patients without severe heart or circulatory failure were randomized to receive either intravenous flecainide (2 mg/kg, maximum dose 150 mg; 51 patients) or placebo (51 patients) in a double-blind trial. Digoxin (500 micrograms intravenously) was administered to all patients who had not previously been receiving digoxin. The electrocardiogram was monitored continuously during the study. In 29 (57%) patients stable sinus rhythm was restored within 1 hour after flecainide and in only 7 (14%) given placebo (chi square 18.9; p = 0.000013; odds ratio 8.3; 95% confidence interval 2.9-24.8). Reversion to sinus rhythm within 1 hour after starting the trial medication was considered a pretrial end point and likely to be due to a drug effect. At the end of the 6-hour monitoring period, 34 patients (67%) in the flecainide group were in sinus rhythm whereas only 18 (35%) in the placebo group had reverted (chi square 8.83, p = 0.003; odds ratio 3.67; 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.1). Significant hypotension, although short lived, was more common in the flecainide group. One patient given flecainide developed torsades de pointes and was successfully electrically cardioverted. Flecainide is useful for the management of recent-onset AF both for control of the ventricular response and conversion to sinus rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Short- and long-term antiarrhythmic and hemodynamic effects of d,l-sotalol in patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic and hemodynamic effects of sotalol (160 to 480 mg/day), a beta-blocking agent that prolongs ventricular repolarization, were examined in 38 patients with complex symptomatic ventricular ectopic activity. During ambulatory monitoring, 24 patients (63%) exhibited a reduction of greater than 75% in single ventricular premature beats (VPBs) and greater than 90% reduction in repetitive arrhythmia. In contrast to the effects of other agents, left ventricular ejection fraction as determined by radionuclide angiography was not impaired, increasing slightly from 45 +/- 14% to 47 +/- 14% during therapy (p less than 0.05). Antiarrhythmic drug efficacy did not correlate with baseline ejection fraction or sotalol-induced changes in ventricular function. Late follow-up studies disclosed that antiarrhythmic efficacy and tolerance were maintained in the majority of patients. Repeat radionuclide angiography at 6 months revealed no late drug-induced depression of left ventricular function. Sotalol appears to be an effective and well tolerated agent for treatment of complex ventricular ectopic activity, even in the setting of compromised cardiac function.

Effectiveness of oral sotalol for treatment of pediatric arrhythmias

Sotalol is a beta blocker with class III activity. Few investigators have reported its use in pediatric patients. From August 1985 to May 1990, 66 patients (mean age 8.7 years; range 9 days to 24 years), including 14 infants aged less than 3 months, were treated with oral sotalol alone (n = 46) or in association with digoxin (n = 20). Supraventricular reentrant tachycardia was present in 38 patients (20 with documented preexcitation), atrial flutter in 10 and atrial ectopic tachycardia in 7. Three patients had other types of supraventricular tachycardia. Tachycardia was of ventricular origin in 6 patients and both of supraventricular and ventricular origin in the remaining 2. Mean dose of oral sotalol was 135 mg/m2/day given in 2 doses. Congenital heart disease was present in 28 patients, 14 with previous cardiac surgery, mostly at the atrial level. Prior treatment with 1 or more antiarrhythmic agent had been unsuccessful in 83% of patients. Mean duration of treatment was 13.3 months (range 2 months to 5 years). Overall, treatment was successful in 79% of cases. Highest rate of success was observed in patients with supraventricular reentrant tachycardia with or without preexcitation (89%) and in those with atrial ectopic tachycardia (85.5%). Atrial flutter could be controlled in 60% of cases. Sotalol seemed less effective in ventricular tachycardia with a complete control of the arrhythmia being achieved in only 17%; however, it decreased the number of runs of ventricular tachycardia and the number of ventricular premature complexes in 50% of patients. There were no adverse effects in 89% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of intravenous sotalol for suppressing inducibility of supraventricular tachycardias at rest and during isometric exercise

The efficacy of intravenous sotalol (1 mg/kg) for suppressing inducibility of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) with different electrophysiologic mechanisms was studied in 30 consecutive patients referred for an electrophysiologic study because of paroxysmal SVT. Orthodromic SVT using accessory atrioventricular (AV) connection was inducible in 14 patients, AV nodal reentrant SVT in 8, and intraatrial SVT in 8 before administration of sotalol, Isometric handgrip exercise facilitated the inducibility of SVT in 8 patients who were noninducible at rest. After intravenous sotalol, 7 of 14 patients (50%) with orthodromic SVT, 8 of 8 (100%) with AV nodal reentrant SVT, and 8 of 8 (100%) with intraatrial reentrant SVT became noninducible into sustained SVT, Isometric exercise facilitated the inducibility of only 3 nonsustained SVT runs after sotalol infusion, and exercise did not reverse the prolongation of refractory periods of the atrium, AV node, accessory pathway and ventricle caused by sotalol. During a mean follow-up period of 18 +/- 7 months, none of the 14 patients who remained noninducible into sustained SVT during the stress test after intravenous sotalol and tolerated long-term oral sotalol therapy had recurrence of symptomatic SVT. Thus, sotalol is efficacious for suppressing SVT with AV nodal or intraatrial reentrant mechanism, but less efficacious in patients with accessory AV pathway. The beta-blocking and cellular antiarrhythmic effects of sotalol are not significantly reversed by exercise.

Efficacy and electrophysiologic effects of oral sotalol in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia caused by coronary artery disease

The efficacy of oral sotalol in preventing sustained ventricular tachycardia induction by invasive electrophysiological testing was assessed in 22 patients (60 +/- 9 years) with prior myocardial infarction. Programmed stimulation consisted of two basic drives followed by up to three extrastimuli at two right ventricular sites. At baseline, sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was inducible in all patients. With sotalol (360 +/- 172 mg/day), it was no longer inducible in 10 patients; in 12 others, it remained inducible and its cycle length was only minimally prolonged (322 +/- 42 to 345 +/- 44 msec, p less than 0.05). Sotalol markedly prolonged sinus cycle length, uncorrected QT interval, and right ventricular effective and functional refractory periods, but had little effect on ventricular conduction time either in sinus rhythm or with right ventricular pacing. There was no significant difference in drug dose or in electrophysiologic effect of drug that related to efficacy, nor was there any correlation between drug-induced prolongation of ventricular tachycardia cycle length and its effects. Six patients received oral sotalol over the long term without spontaneous recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (follow-up: 23 +/- 18 months). These results demonstrate that sotalol is effective (45%) against sustained ventricular tachycardia induction at moderate doses and is well tolerated over a long term in the setting of remote myocardial infarction. However, its electrophysiologic effects as measured at invasive testing are not predictive of efficacy against ventricular tachycardia induction.

Usefulness of d, I sotalol for suppression of chronic ventricular arrhythmias

Sotalol is a unique beta-blocking drug, possessing significant class III antiarrhythmic activity. The efficacy and safety of 2 doses of sotalol (320 and 640 mg/day, divided in 2 doses) were compared to placebo in a 6-week randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 114 patients with chronic ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) at frequencies of greater than or equal to 30/hour. Sotalol significantly reduced VPCs in patients receiving both low (n = 38) and high (n = 39) doses, compared with patients (n = 37) receiving placebo (by 75 and 88%, respectively, vs 10%; p less than 0.001, sotalol vs placebo; p less than 0.05, high vs low dose). The individual efficacy criterion (greater than or equal to 75% VPC reduction) was achieved in 34% of low-dose and 71% of high-dose sotalol versus 6% of placebo-treated patients (p less than 0.003, sotalol vs placebo; p = 0.007, high vs low dose). Repetitive beats were suppressed 25% by placebo (difference not significant), 80% by low-dose (p less than 0.003) and 78% by high-dose sotalol (p less than 0.005). Sotalol decreased heart rate (by 24 to 25%, p less than 0.001) and increased PR (by 4 to 6%, p less than 0.001) and corrected JT intervals (by 12 to 13%, p less than 0.001), but did not change ejection fraction. Proarrhythmia (nonfatal) occurred in 3 sotalol and in 2 placebo patients. Nine discontinued therapy because of adverse effects (1 low dose and 8 high dose, p less than 0.02). In summary, sotalol is an efficacious antiarrhythmic drug for VPC suppression; in lower doses, it is somewhat less effective but better tolerated.