Possible survival benefit from concomitant beta-but not calcium-antagonist therapy during reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction

Effects of prior beta-blocker therapy on clinical outcomes after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

We hypothesized that pretreatment with beta blockers may improve clinical outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. We pooled clinical, angiographic, and outcomes data on 2,537 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI), PAMI-2, and Stent PAMI trials. We classified patients into a beta group (n = 1,132) if they received beta-blocker therapy before primary angioplasty or a no-beta group (n = 1,405) if they did not. We evaluated procedural complications and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes (death and major adverse cardiac events [death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, or stroke]) between groups. Beta patients were younger, had higher systolic blood pressure and heart rate, and were more likely to be in Killip class I at admission. They had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, greater door-to-balloon time, greater likelihood of having a left anterior descending artery culprit lesion, but a similar incidence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow after angioplasty (92.6% vs 92.7%, p = 0.91). The beta group had less procedural complications (23% vs 34%, p <0.0001) and a lower incidence of death (1.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.0035) and major adverse cardiac events (5.5% vs 7.8%, p = 0.027) during hospitalization. At 1 year, mortality remained lower in beta patients (4.9% vs 6.7%, log-rank p = 0.055). After adjustment for baseline differences, beta patients had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.84; p <0.0148) and nonsignificantly lower 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.08; p = 0.11). Thus, pretreatment with beta blockers has an independent beneficial effect on short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Intravenous diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction. Diltiazem as adjunctive therapy to activase (DATA) trial

OBJECTIVES

This study was defined as a pilot investigation of the usefulness and safety of intravenous diltiazem as adjunctive therapy to tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction, followed by oral therapy for 4 weeks.

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies have documented that calcium antagonists protect the myocardial cell against the damage caused by coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion, yet no benefits have been conclusively demonstrated in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in humans.

METHODS

In this pilot study, 59 patients with an AMI treated with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) were randomized, double blinded, to intravenous diltiazem or placebo for 48 h, followed by oral therapy for 4 weeks. The primary objective was to detect an effect on indices of regional left ventricular function and perfusion. Patients were also closely monitored for clinical events, coronary artery patency and indices of infarct size and of left ventricular function.

RESULTS

Creatine kinase elevation, Q wave score, global and regional left ventricular function and coronary artery patency at 48 h were not significantly different between the diltiazem and placebo groups. A greater improvement observed in regional perfusion and function with diltiazem was likely explained by initial larger defects. Diltiazem, compared to placebo, reduced the rate of death, reinfarction or recurrent ischemia at 35 days from 41% to 13% (p=0.027) and prevented the need for an urgent intervention. The rate of death or myocardial infarction was reduced by 65% (p=0.15). These benefits could not be explained by differences in baseline characteristics such as age, site and extent of infarction, time of inclusion or concomitant therapy. Heart rate and blood pressure were reduced throughout the study with active diltiazem treatment. Side effects of diltiazem were bradycardia and hypotension that required transient or permanent discontinuation of the study drug in 27% of patients, vs. 17% of patients with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

A protective effect for clinical events related to early postinfarction ischemia and reinfarction was suggested in this study, with diltiazem administered intravenously with t-PA followed by oral therapy for 1 month, with no effect on coronary artery patency and left ventricular function and perfusion.

Early intravenous beta blockade and thrombolytics in acute myocardial infarction

This article discusses therapy with beta blockade and thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction. In large and well-controlled studies both treatment strategies have been shown to increase survival. Both therapies have also been demonstrated to be safe in acute myocardial infarction. Historically, the 2 different treatment strategies have been tested during different time periods, resulting in few studies with the main objective to study the combined effects of the 2 agents. From the data that are presently available, however, there is a clear suggestion of additive beneficial effect and the 2 treatments given in combination are well tolerated.