What is an antiarrhythmic drug? From clinical trials to fundamental concepts

The value of basic research insights into atrial fibrillation mechanisms as a guide to therapeutic innovation: a critical analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an extremely common clinical problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Current antiarrhythmic options include pharmacological, ablation, and surgical therapies, and have significantly improved clinical outcomes. However, their efficacy remains suboptimal, and their use is limited by a variety of potentially serious adverse effects. There is a clear need for improved therapeutic options. Several decades of research have substantially expanded our understanding of the basic mechanisms of AF. Ectopic firing and re-entrant activity have been identified as the predominant mechanisms for arrhythmia initiation and maintenance. However, it has become clear that the clinical factors predisposing to AF and the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved are extremely complex. Moreover, all AF-promoting and maintaining mechanisms are dynamically regulated and subject to remodelling caused by both AF and cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, the initial presentation and clinical progression of AF patients are enormously heterogeneous. An understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms is widely assumed to be the basis of therapeutic innovation, but while this assumption seems self-evident, we are not aware of any papers that have critically examined the practical contributions of basic research into AF mechanisms to arrhythmia management. Here, we review recent insights into the basic mechanisms of AF, critically analyse the role of basic research insights in the development of presently used anti-AF therapeutic options and assess the potential value of contemporary experimental discoveries for future therapeutic innovation. Finally, we highlight some of the important challenges to the translation of basic science findings to clinical application.

Innovative approaches to anti-arrhythmic drug therapy

Normal cardiac function requires an appropriate and regular beating rate (cardiac rhythm). When the heart rhythm is too fast or too slow, cardiac function can be impaired, with derangements that vary from mild symptoms to life-threatening complications. Irregularities, particularly those involving excessively fast or slow rates, constitute cardiac 'arrhythmias'. In the past, drug treatment of cardiac arrhythmias has proven difficult, both because of inadequate effectiveness and a risk of serious complications. However, a variety of recent advances have opened up exciting possibilities for the development of novel and superior approaches to arrhythmia therapy. This article will review recent progress and future prospects for treating two particularly important cardiac arrhythmias: atrial fibrillation and ventricular fibrillation.

Evolution, mechanisms, and classification of antiarrhythmic drugs: focus on class III actions

Since the use of cinchona bark to treat heart palpitations in the 1700s, antiarrhythmic drug therapy has developed with the discovery of new compounds and the identification of ionic, cellular, and tissue mechanisms of action. Classifications have been developed that organize the large amount of information available about antiarrhythmic drugs around groups of compounds with common mechanisms of action. Despite important and well-recognized limitations, antiarrhythmic drug classification is still widely used. In particularly broad use is the system developed by Singh and Vaughan Williams in the early 1970s and subsequently modified by Singh and Hauswirth and by Harrison. This classification divides drug actions into class I for sodium-channel blockade (with subclasses IA, IB and IC), class II for adrenergic antagonism, class III for action-potential prolongation, and class IV for calcium-channel blockade. The development of class I drugs was curtailed when studies showed that potent sodium-channel blockers (particularly IC agents) can increase mortality in patients with active coronary artery disease. The emphasis in drug development shifted to class III agents, but their use has been limited by the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction associated with QT prolongation. Current research focuses on the development of new class III drugs that may have improved safety by virtue of greater selectivity of action at faster rates (like those of arrhythmia) or for atrial tissue. Alternative approaches include the modification of existing molecules (like amiodarone) to maintain positive properties while removing undesirable ones, and treatments that target development of the arrhythmia substrate instead of the final electrical product.

Mechanism of flecainide's antiarrhythmic action in experimental atrial fibrillation

Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs are effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, but their mechanism of action is unknown. In previous work, we have found that flecainide causes tachycardia-dependent increases in atrial action potential duration (APD) and effective refractory period (ERP) by reducing APD accommodation to heart rate. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of action of flecainide in an experimental model of sustained atrial fibrillation (AF). AF was produced by a brief burst of atrial pacing in the presence of vagal stimulation and persisted spontaneously until vagal stimulation was stopped. The actions of flecainide at two dose levels were compared with those of isotonic glucose placebo in each dog, with a randomized order of blinded drug administration. Flecainide terminated AF in all 16 dogs, while glucose was effective in none (p less than 0.0001). Flecainide increased atrial ERP and reduced conduction velocity in a tachycardia-dependent manner. Doses of flecainide that converted AF resulted in larger changes in ERP than in conduction velocity, increasing the minimum path-length capable of supporting reentry (wavelength). In addition, flecainide reduced regional heterogeneity in ERP and wavelength, an action opposite that of vagal stimulation. Atrial epicardial mapping with a 112-electrode atrial array was used to study the mechanism of flecainide action on AF. Under control conditions, multiple small zones of reentry coexisted. Flecainide progressively increased the size of reentry circuits, decreased their number, and slowed the frequency of atrial activation until the arrhythmia finally terminated; all changes were compatible with an increase in wavelength. We conclude that flecainide terminates atrial fibrillation in this experimental model by causing tachycardia-dependent increases in atrial ERP, which increase the wavelength at the rapid rates characteristic of AF to the point that the arrhythmia can no longer sustain itself.