False-positive treadmill exercise tests due to computer signal averaging

Statistical methods to improve the precision of the treadmill exercise test

OBJECTIVES

The study systematically compared different measures of ST segment depression from the treadmill exercise test.

BACKGROUND

The value of the treadmill exercise test for objectively measuring treatment effects is limited by random error in the measurement of ST depression and may be biased by regression to the mean or by the decision to terminate the test.

METHODS

Treadmill exercise was performed in 21 subjects with ischemic heart disease 1 h after isosorbide dinitrate 10 mg or placebo in a double-blind randomized crossover study. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded every 30 s during and at peak exercise. The relative sample size needed to detect the nitrate effect was compared for different summary measures of ST depression.

RESULTS

The ST depression measured from a single unmatched lead at longest equivalent sub-maximal exercise needed the lowest sample size to detect the nitrate effect in paired comparisons (p = 0.000006). Averaging over multiple leads or times did not improve detection of the nitrate effect. The rate of increase in ST depression (in mm/min) calculated by linear regression needed a similar sample size (x1.32, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.58). A larger sample size was needed for ST depression at peak exercise (x2.9, CI 1.3, 11.1) and exercise duration (x4.5, CI 1.5, 38). Time to 1-mm ST depression was the least efficient measurement (relative sample size x15.5, CI 1.6, >1,000). Comparison of matched leads resulted in >2-fold differences in estimates of the nitrate effect because of bias from regression to the mean.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal ST depression at longest equivalent sub-maximal exercise and the maximal rate of increase in ST depression had less bias and random variation than did other commonly used measures. The rate of increase in ST depression is preferred because it can be calculated in either paired or unpaired studies.

Exercise stress testing. An overview of current guidelines

Exercise stress testing (ET) is an inexpensive noninvasive tool that provides valuable cardiopulmonary information in healthy and diseased populations. It is most commonly used for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) and developing appropriate exercise prescriptions (EP). With its widespread use and application, it is imperative that safe and appropriate guidelines and procedures are used, as there are a number of risks associated with testing in a population with or suspected of having CAD. The focus should be on the patient's safety: personnel must be properly trained and aware of all emergency procedures, contra-indications for ET and indications for test termination must be strictly adhered to. Three main types of testing are prevalent: submaximal, maximal and maximal utilising gas exchange. The maximal test is most commonly used, and the submaximal is appropriate for hospitalised patients. Gas exchange data is essential when assessing congestive heart failure and timing for heart transplantation. ET is commonly performed using a treadmill or a bicycle ergometer. The treadmill provides a more familiar exercise modality and has been shown to have greater diagnostic sensitivity than the bicycle ergometer; it is, however, more expensive and requires more space in the testing room. The bicycle ergometer is more appropriate for those individuals who are severely obese or have problems with extended periods of walking. Regardless of the modality used, an appropriate exercise protocol should be used. In North America, the Bruce protocol is the most common. However, the Bruce protocol, and others that estimate exercise capacity based on equations, tend to overestimate exercise capacity. They may be too demanding for those with limited exercise capacity, and too long for those with high exercise capacity. For these people, an exercise protocol that reaches maximal capacity in 8 to 12 minutes using smaller increments in workload should be considered. Once completed, the results of ET needs to be correctly interpreted. This includes reviewing the test results while considering the patient's history, medications and indication for the test. ET can also be used to develop an EP for the participant. An EP should take into account the intensity, modality of exercise, frequency and duration, as well as being realistic for the individual and the goals to be achieved. All the information from the test results and the pre-test examination should be presented in a report that also includes the advised EP.

Impact of echocardiographic left ventricular mass on mechanistic implications of exercise testing parameters

Electrocardiographic left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy has long been known to be associated with an abnormal ST-segment response to exercise; this association has been considered to represent a false-positive finding. There is a paucity of data relating echocardiographic LV mass to exercise ST-segment responses and other exercise parameters. As part of a routine evaluation, 1,408 men and 1,618 women from the Framingham Heart Study who were free of clinical cardiac disease underwent echocardiography and exercise treadmill testing according to the Bruce protocol at the same clinic visit. Abnormal ST-segment responses were defined both by standard criteria and the delta ST/heart rate index. LV mass was calculated from M-mode echocardiography. Echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was associated with an abnormal delta ST/heart rate index (in men, odds ratio [OR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 3.01, p = 0.03; in women, OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.44, p = 0.002) but not with an abnormal response according to standard criteria. Echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was also associated with a lower likelihood of achieving an age-predicted target heart rate (in men, OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.65, p < 0.001; in women, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.76, p < 0.001) and with a lower exercise capacity. Despite these associations, echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was associated with a higher peak heart rate-systolic blood pressure double product. In conclusion, echocardiographic LV hypertrophy is associated with an abnormal ST-segment response, a lower likelihood of achieving target heart rate, decreased exercise capacity, and an increased double product, which is a reflection of myocardial oxygen demand.