Impairment of left ventricular function during coronary angioplastic occlusion evaluated with a nonimaging scintillation probe

Simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function during transient coronary occlusion

OBJECTIVES

We used technetium-99m sestamibi imaging to evaluate the magnitude of changes in left ventricular function and perfusion and to investigate their interdependence during transient coronary occlusion.

BACKGROUND

Transient coronary occlusion during coronary angioplasty provides a unique opportunity for examining the effects of acute myocardial ischemia on left ventricular function and perfusion.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with normal left ventricular function underwent first-pass radionuclide angiography with technetium-99m sestamibi using a multicrystal gamma camera during balloon occlusion of a coronary artery. Single-photon tomography was performed 2.1 +/- 1.7 h later. Subsequently, all scans were repeated at rest.

RESULTS

The mean size +/- SD of the perfusion defect during coronary occlusion was 23 +/- 18%, with significantly larger defects observed for occlusions of the left anterior descending coronary artery (39 +/- 20%) than for occlusions of the left circumflex (15 +/- 11%) or right (15 +/- 9%) coronary artery (p < 0.05). The mean change in ejection fraction from recovery to occlusion was -17 +/- 17% and was significantly larger for left anterior descending (-26 +/- 21%) and left circumflex (-15 +/- 11%) than for right (-8 +/- 10%) coronary artery occlusions (p < 0.05). For the entire group, ejection fraction during occlusion correlated significantly with perfusion defect size (r = 0.63, p = 0.0004), whereas the extent of ischemic myocardium correlated with the decrease in ejection fraction (r = 0.69, p = 0.0001). The defects present during occlusion reversed within a few hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in left ventricular function and perfusion develop pari passu during coronary occlusion and are more severe when the left anterior descending artery is occluded. Although a significant correlation exists between the extent of the perfusion defect and the severity of the decrease in ejection fraction, there is a substantial individual variation with respect to changes in both myocardial perfusion and ventricular function during acute coronary occlusion.

Rate of change of left ventricular ejection fraction during exercise is superior to the peak ejection fraction for predicting functionally significant coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To detect and characterise rapid temporal changes in the left ventricular response to exercise in patients with ischaemic heart disease and to relate these changes to the functional severity of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

The gamma camera does not allow the detection of rapid changes in cardiac function during exercise radionuclide ventriculography, the monitoring of which may improve the assessment of patients with ischaemic heart disease.

METHODS

A miniature nuclear probe (Cardioscint) was used to monitor continuously left ventricular function during exercise in 31 patients who had coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease. A coronary angiographic jeopardy score was calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

The coronary jeopardy score ranged from 0 to 12 (median 4). Ejection fraction fell significantly during exercise from 46% to 34%. Patients were divided into two groups based on the response of their ejection fraction to exercise. In 14 patients (group I), the peak change in ejection fraction coincided with the end of exercise, whereas in the other 17 patients (group II) the peak change in ejection fraction occurred before the end of exercise, resulting in a brief plateau. The peak change in ejection fraction and the time to its occurrence were independent predictors of coronary jeopardy (r = -0.59, p < 0.001 for peak change and r = -0.69, p < 0.001 for time to that change). The rate of change in ejection fraction was the strongest predictor of coronary jeopardy (r = -0.81, p < 0.001). In group I the peak change in ejection fraction was a poor predictor severity of coronary disease (r = -0.28, NS), whereas the time to peak and the rate of change in ejection fraction were good predictors (r = -0.65 and r = -0.73, p < 0.01). In group II the peak, the time to the peak, and the rate of change in ejection fraction were good predictors of coronary jeopardy (r = -0.75, r = -0.61, and r = -0.83, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The rate of change of ejection fraction during exercise can be assessed by continuous monitoring of left ventricular function with the nuclear probe, and is the best predictor of functionally significant coronary artery disease.