Usefulness of heavy isometric exercise echocardiography for assessing left ventricular wall motion patterns late (> or = 6 months) after acute myocardial infarction

Left Ventricular Function During Strength Testing and Resistance Exercise in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction

PURPOSE

Deterioration in left ventricular function is a more sensitive marker of myocardial ischemia during exercise than ST segment depression. The current study was designed to evaluate left ventricular function during one-repetition-maximum (1-RM) strength testing and resistance exercise in cardiac patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS

Using echocardiographic methods, left ventricular function was evaluated in 15 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (age, 65 +/- 6.5 years; ejection fraction, 42.1 +/- 5.8). Measurements were performed during 1-RM testing and resistance exercise (20%, 40%, and 60% of 1-RM using 10 to 15 repetitions) on the one-arm biceps curl (BIC) and bilateral knee extension exercises and compared with measurements of left ventricular function during the symptom-limited graded exercise test (SL-GXT).

RESULTS

During the knee extension exercise, there was a slight but significant reduction (P< or =.05) in ejection fraction values at the end of 60% 1-RM, as compared with rest and previous workloads. Significant increases in systolic blood pressure and left ventricular end-systolic volume ratio values (P< or =.05) from rest to exercise were observed across test modes and for all workloads. The prevalence of new wall motion abnormalities during knee extension and BIC 1-RM strength testing was comparable with that observed during SL-GXT. The greatest increase in new wall motion abnormalities was seen during 60% 1-RM of knee extension exercise, as compared with prior workloads, BIC exercises, and SL-GXT.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in occurrence of ischemic changes during the highest resistance exercise workloads and with larger muscle mass, the findings are small in magnitude and do not suggest reduced cardiac performance.

Comparison of bicycle, heavy isometric, dipyridamole-atropine and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia

Several stress echocardiography (SE) modalities have been introduced for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). Exercise and dobutamine SE are considered to have better diagnostic accuracy than vasodilator or isometric SE, but there are no studies in a single group of patients comparing these 3 tests with heavy 2-arm isometric SE. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic characteristics of 4 SE methods in patients with chest pain. Altogether, 60 patients (age +/- SD 55.1 +/- 2.1 years) were tested with bicycle, heavy 2-arm isometric, dipyridamole-atropine and dobutamine SE. CAD (>50% stenosis) was present in 44 patients; 26 patients had 1-vessel disease. During bicycle SE, the double product at peak stress was higher than during dobutamine and dipyridamole-atropine SE (26.5 x 10(3), p <0.005 vs dobutamine and dipyridamole-atropine SE), and peak wall motion score index (1.40) was higher than during dipyridamole-atropine and isometric SE (1.26 and 1.07, respectively, p <0.05 vs bicycle SE). Bicycle, dipyridamole-atropine, and dobutamine SE had higher sensitivity than isometric SE (90%, 93%, 95%, and 30%, respectively, p <0.05 isometric SE vs others). There were no statistically significant differences with regard to specificity. Similarly, bicycle, dipyridamole-atropine, and dobutamine SE had a higher diagnostic accuracy than isometric SE (78%, 88%, 87% and 47%, respectively, p <0.05 isometric SE vs others). We conclude that bicycle, dipyridamole-atropine, and dobutamine SE have an equal diagnostic accuracy in detecting CAD despite higher double product and ischemic burden at peak stress during bicycle and dobutamine SE over dipyridamole-atropine SE. Heavy isometric SE is inaccurate.

Comparison of left ventricular function using isometric exercise Doppler echocardiography in competitive runners and weightlifters versus sedentary individuals

It is unclear whether cardiovascular responses to heavy isometric exercise are changed by intensive training. We evaluated the effects of this type of exercise on left ventricular (LV) function in athletes engaged in static and dynamic sport, compared with sedentary persons, and looked for peculiarities in static athletes' responses that might reflect adaptive mechanisms to their specific activity. The study population comprised 45 men (age 24 +/- 5 years): 29 dynamic and 16 static athletes (runners and weightlifters, respectively). The control group consisted of 20 age and gender-matched healthy sedentary persons. All performed 50% of maximal voluntary contraction on a whole-body isometric exercise device for 2 minutes. Echocardiographic calculations were determined at rest and exercise. Upon exercise, stroke volume, cardiac output, end-diastolic volume, and ejection fraction increased significantly in athletes, while end-systolic volume and systemic vascular resistance decreased. In sedentary persons, stroke volume and resistance remained unchanged, cardiac output and LV volumes increased, and ejection fraction decreased from 67 +/- 5% to 60 +/- 5% (p <0.01 compared with rest; p <0.0001 compared with athletes). Whereas peak flow velocity decreased from 103 +/- 10 to 81 +/- 6 cm/s in sedentary persons, it increased from 112 +/- 9 to 126 +/- 8 cm/s in the static group and from 120 +/-3 to 126 +/- 9 cm/s in the dynamic athletes (p <0.0001 compared with the sedentary group). Mean acceleration decreased in the sedentary group, remained unchanged among the dynamic athletes, and increased among the static athletes. We conclude that cardiovascular responses to heavy isometric exercise are modified by intensive training. Athletes, taken as a group, react differently and adapt better than sedentary individuals. Moreover, among them, those involved in static sport show an improved cardiovascular adaptation to this type of exercise.