Effects of acute and chronic ibopamine administration on resting and exercise hemodynamics, plasma catecholamines and functional capacity of patients with chronic congestive heart failure

Developments in Exercise Capacity Assessment in Heart Failure Clinical Trials and the Rationale for the Design of METEORIC-HF

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a highly morbid condition for which exercise intolerance is a major manifestation. However, methods to assess exercise capacity in HFrEF vary widely in clinical practice and in trials. We describe advances in exercise capacity assessment in HFrEF and a comparative analysis of how various therapies available for HFrEF impact exercise capacity. Current guideline-directed medical therapy has indirect effects on cardiac performance with minimal impact on measured functional capacity. Omecamtiv mecarbil is a novel selective cardiac myosin activator that directly increases cardiac contractility and in a phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes study significantly reduced the primary composite end point of time to first heart failure event or cardiovascular death in patients with HFrEF. The objective of the METEORIC-HF trial (Multicenter Exercise Tolerance Evaluation of Omecamtiv Mecarbil Related to Increased Contractility in Heart Failure) is to assess the effect of omecamtiv mecarbil versus placebo on multiple components of functional capacity in HFrEF. The primary end point is to test the effect of omecamtiv mecarbil compared with placebo on peak oxygen uptake as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing after 20 weeks of treatment. METEORIC-HF will provide state-of-the-art assessment of functional capacity by measuring ventilatory efficiency, circulatory power, ventilatory anaerobic threshold, oxygen uptake recovery kinetics, daily activity, and quality-of-life assessment. Thus, the METEORIC-HF trial will evaluate the potential impact of increased myocardial contractility with omecamtiv mecarbil on multiple important measures of functional capacity in ambulatory patients with symptomatic HFrEF. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03759392.

Drug and Device Effects on Peak Oxygen Consumption, 6-Minute Walk Distance, and Natriuretic Peptides as Predictors of Therapeutic Effects on Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background—

Although peak oxygen consumption (peak V o 2 ), 6-minute walk distance (6MW), and natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) are predictors of mortality in heart failure (HF) patients, it is not known whether therapy-induced changes in these measures can predict therapeutic effect on mortality. The objective of this analysis is to quantitatively assess the relationship between therapeutic effects on commonly proposed short-term markers in HF trials and therapeutic effects on long-term outcome in patients with HF and left ventricular dysfunction.

Methods and Results—

We identified drug or device therapies for which there exists at least 1 randomized, controlled trial (RCT) assessing mortality over at least 6 months in at least 500 patients. For each of these therapies, we identified RCTs assessing the short-term changes in V o 2 , 6MW, BNP, and NT-proBNP (few of the mortality RCTs assessed the short-term changes in markers). For each intervention, we calculated the odds ratio for mortality (using random effect meta-analysis when necessary), as well as the trial level average drug- or device-induced change in the markers. We assessed the correlation between the odds ratio for death with the placebo-corrected change in the functional parameter or biomarker across the interventions. We identified mortality RCTs of 27 distinct therapies (n=73 267 patients) with a median follow-up of 19 months, that directed the search for RCTs of the effect of those interventions on the functional markers and biomarkers. There were 54 peak V o 2 trials (n=4646 patients), 34 6MW trials (n=6995 patients), 15 BNP trials (n=7233), and 6 NT-proBNP trials (n=1946) included in this analysis. There was no significant correlation between the average therapy-induced placebo-corrected change in peak V o 2 and the odds ratio for mortality ( r =0.158, P =0.26). Increased drug or device-induced average change in 6MW was correlated with increased odds ratio for mortality ( r =0.373, P =0.036). There was no significant correlation between the average therapy-induced, placebo-corrected change in the natriuretic peptides and the odds ratio for mortality (BNP: r =−0.065, P =0.82, NT-proBNP: r =−0.667, P =0.15). There was no apparent relation between change in the functional parameter or biomarker and categorical effect on mortality.

Conclusions—

This analysis, limited to trial level data from different therapeutic eras, suggests that drug- or device-induced effects on peak V o 2 , 6MW, and natriuretic peptides found in short-term trials do not predict the corresponding average long-term therapeutic effects on mortality for patients with HF and left ventricular dysfunction.

Maximal and submaximal exercise testing in heart failure

Although reduced exercise capacity is the main complaint of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), the best method to measure it remains controversial. Peak VO2, obtained using maximal exercise testing, is the most accurate measure of maximal functional capacity. It is related to peak exercise cardiac output and is one of the most important independent variables for the prognostic assessment of patients with CHF. It has, however, a low sensitivity for measurement of changes induced by therapy and is poorly related to everyday physical activity, patient symptoms, and quality of life. The anerobic threshold may also be regarded as a parameter of maximal functional capacity. Its value is mainly indirect, because it shows that the patient is performing a maximal effort limited by the cardiovascular system. The VO2 kinetics at the start and at the end of exercise are probably more related to patient symptoms, but it is unresolved which protocols and parameters might best be used to study this aspect of exercise performance. Duration of a submaximal exercise at a constant work rate and the distance walked during a 6-min walking test are gaining wide popularity as parameters of submaximal performance. However, when these exams are carried out up to exhaustion in patients with severe functional limitation, they may involve attainment of the anerobic threshold and therefore their clinical meaning may be similar to the one of a maximal exercise test. Moreover, tests based on the assessment of submaximal exercise capacity have been useful for assessment of therapy in single-center trials but have been often inadequate in multicenter trials.

Comparison of Quality of Well-Being scale and NYHA functional status classification in patients with atrial fibrillation. New York Heart Association

BACKGROUND

There is an increased need to provide appropriate outcomes evaluations. Although designed as a clinical assessment tool, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification is often used as an outcome measure. In this study the performance of the NYHA classification is compared with that of the Quality of Well-being scale (QWB), a standard outcome instrument.

METHODS

Subjects from a clinical trial were administered both the NYHA classification and the QWB. Scores for patients with NYHA classification I, II, and III were compared by use of an ordinal regression model.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in mean QWB score by NYHA classification (p < 0.0001). However, each NYHA classification score was associated with a wide range of QWB scores, limiting the potential usefulness of the NYHA classification as an outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The NYHA classification is not a sensitive measure of health-related quality of life, and its use as an outcome measure, although providing some insights, may result in misleading findings. The NYHA classification should not be used as the sole outcome measure.

Early pharmacologic intervention may prevent the deterioration in endothelial function after experimental myocardial infarction in rats: effects of ibopamine and captopril

BACKGROUND

Endothelial function is progressively disturbed after myocardial infarction (MI), which may be related to both neurohumoral activation and hemodynamic alterations. Consequently, it may be suggested that drugs that favorably affect these factors may also have a positive effect on endothelial function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Rats underwent coronary ligation (n = 24) or remained unoperated (n = 21), and were randomized to captopril (25 mg/kg/d) or ibopamine (10 mg/kg/d) or remained untreated. Treatment was started following MI and lasted 8 weeks, after which rats were sacrificed for in vitro studies. Left ventricular end-systolic pressure was higher in rats treated with captopril (83 +/- 6 mmHg) and ibopamine (80 +/- 3 mmHg), as compared with untreated MI rats (48 +/- 6 mmHg, P < .01 for both). Increased plasma norepinephrine levels in MI rats were reduced by captopril and ibopamine (both P < .05). Infarct size was smaller in rats treated with captopril (26.7 +/- 3.6%, P < .05) and ibopamine (31.4 +/- 4.3%, P = NS), as compared with untreated rats (41.7 +/- 2.4%). Maximal endothelium-dependent relaxation (Emax; % precontraction) and the concentration of methacholine causing 50% Emax, expressed as negative log(pIC50) were significantly reduced in aortic rings from MI control subjects (pIC50 = 6.15 +/- 0.06 mol/L, Emax = 32.0 +/- 4.2%), as compared with normal control subjects (pIC50 = 6.57 +/- 0.07 mol/L, P < .001; Emax = 50.0 +/- 4.9%, P = .022). Captopril (pIC50 = 6.30 +/- 0.08 mol/L, Emax = 45.1 +/- 7.0%) and ibopamine (pIC50 = 6.60 +/- 0.08 mol/L, Emax = 43.8 +/- 5.2%) improved these parameters in MI rats.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate preservation of endothelial function by early pharmacologic intervention after experimental MI in rats in the setting of concomitant reduction in infarct size.

Selective and nonselective dopamine receptor agonists: an innovative approach to cardiovascular disease treatment

Dopamine and a new group of selective and nonselective peripheral dopaminergic receptor effectors are being evaluated for the treatment of various cardiovascular disorders, including shock, CHF, and systemic hypertension. Dopamine, in relatively low intravenous doses, will stimulate both peripheral DA1 receptors, which mediate arterial vasodilation of different vascular beds, and the DA2 receptors, which mediate the inhibition of norepinephrine release. Ibopamine is a new oral, nonspecific peripheral dopaminergic agonist with an active metabolite (epinine) that is being evaluated in patients with CHF. Fenoldopam is a selective peripheral DA1 agonist now being developed as a parenteral treatment for hypertensive emergencies. Dopexamine is a parenteral agent that selectively activates both DA1 and beta 2 adrenergic receptors and is being evaluated in patients with CHF and in individuals with postoperative left ventricular dysfunction. A group of selective DA2 receptor agonists is being evaluated as long-term treatment for systemic hypertension.

Clinical and autonomic effects of ibopamine as adjunct to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the additive value of ibopamine in heart failure patients who are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Ibopamine exerts hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects, and is beneficial in mild heart failure; however, its additive value in more advanced disease in unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study was a stand-alone, double-blind, randomized parallel group comparison of ibopamine (100 mg 3 times daily) and placebo in 59 patients with New York Heart Association functional class III-IV heart failure. Patients were clinically stable on drug treatment, including an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and they were randomized to ibopamine (n = 29) or placebo (n = 30). Assessments were performed at baseline and after 3 months of treatment, and included measurement of peak oxygen consumption, plasma neurohormones, ambulatory arrhythmias, and heart rate variability. At baseline, the two groups were well matched, including age (mean, 63 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (0.23), and peak oxygen consumption (15.4 mL/min/kg). After 3 months, four patients had dropped out of the study because of progressive heart failure (ibopamine, n = 1; placebo, n = 3; not significant) and two because of side effects (n = 1/1). Exercise time and peak oxygen consumption were not significantly affected (exercise time: ibopamine, +54 [95% confidence interval, -12, 120] seconds; placebo, +19 [-42, 81] seconds; peak oxygen consumption: ibopamine, +0.3 [-0.5, 1,2] mL/min/kg; placebo, +0.2 [-0.7, 1.0] mL/min/kg). Plasma neurohormones and ventricular arrhythmias during ambulatory monitoring were also unaffected. In contrast, heart rate variability parameters, in particular those associated with vagal tone (rMMSD, high-frequency power), significantly increased after 3 months on ibopamine (P = .01 vs placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of patients with clinically stable moderate to severe chronic heart failure, only a marginal and statistically nonsignificant effect on clinical parameters was observed after 3 months of treatment with ibopamine. Heart rate variability parameters, however, were significantly affected by ibopamine, despite the absence of an effect on plasma neurohormones.

Heart rate variability in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: effects of neurohormonal modulation by digoxin and ibopamine. The Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial (DIMT) Study Group

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the effects of digoxin and ibopamine on variables of heart rate variability in relation to neurohormonal activation.

BACKGROUND

Analysis of heart rate variability can be used to study the autonomic dysfunction that characterizes chronic heart failure. In the Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial, patients with heart failure were found to have increased neurohormonal activation with placebo therapy but not with digoxin and ibopamine therapy.

METHODS

We studied 59 patients with mild to moderate heart failure (mean [+/- SEM] age 60 +/- 1 years, mean ejection fraction 0.30 +/- 0.01). Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with digoxin (0.25 mg [n = 22]), ibopamine (100 mg three times a day [n = 19]) or placebo (n = 18); background therapy consisted of furosemide (up to 80 mg).

RESULTS

After 3 months, plasma norepinephrine levels had increased with placebo, whereas they decreased with digoxin (+31 vs. -60 pg/ml, respectively, p < 0.01). With ibopamine, nonsignificant decrease was observed (-27 pg/ml, p = 0.10). All variables of heart rate variability showed a deterioration in the placebo group. With digoxin, the percent differences between successive RR intervals > 50 ms (pNN50) increased (+ 1.7 +/- 0.9%, p < 0.01), along with absolute and normalized high frequency power (+ 40 +/- 33 ms2, p < 0.05 and + 2.4 +/- 1.7%, p < 0.01, respectively). These changes were observed during daytime hours only and were most pronounced in patients with the most impaired baseline heart rate variability. With ibopamine, nonsignificant trends similar to the changes with digoxin were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early stages of heart failure, digoxin may prevent a progressive deterioration in heart rate variability, whereas ibopamine does not show statistically significant effects. The changes in heart rate variability with digoxin parallel an observed decrease in neurohormonal activation. Digoxin apparently enhances cardiac vagal tone in the setting of neuroendocrine activation.

Clinical efficacy of ibopamine in patients with chronic heart failure

Ibopamine, the most widely studied dopaminergic drug for the treatment of chronic heart failure, appears to have beneficial hemodynamic, renal, and neurohormonal effects in this setting. Angiotension-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have become the recommended standard treatment for chronic heart failure; however, some patients may benefit from additional drugs to improve their symptoms and functional capacity. Ibopamine may be effective as an additive drug for patients with chronic heart failure. It is also possible that ibopamine will improve survival in these patients. Large-scale trials are needed to assess the effects on morbidity and mortality when ibopamine is added to ACE inhibitors, diuretics, and possibly digitalis.

Pharmacotherapy of congestive heart failure. Currently used and experimental drugs

A survey is given of the currently used therapeutics in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. Symptomatic treatment is usually performed along the following lines: rest, sodium and fluid restriction to unload the decompensating heart, loop diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or other vasodilators; inotropic agents to improve the heart's mechanical performance; attempts to counteract the neuro-endocrine compensatory mechanisms, that is the activated sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems, as well as the rise in vasopressine levels. New insights have been obtained in the effects of cardiac glycosides, which are probably rather based on counteracting the elevated sympathetic neuronal activity than on their weak and uncertain inotropic action. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are probably more effective than classical vasodilators owing to their additional interaction with the neuro-endocrine compensatory mechanisms. Ibopamine, a prodrug of epinine, appears to be rather a vasodilator and antagonist of the neuro-endocrine compensatory mechanisms than an inotropic agent. The most important clinical trials addressing the efficacy and adverse reactions to the various aforementioned therapeutics are discussed. New, experimental approaches in the drug treatment of chronic congestive heart failure include beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, vasopressin antagonists and inhibitors of atrial natriuretic peptide degradation.

Acute effect of ibopamine and isosorbide mononitrate on blood volume distribution in congestive heart failure

In order to compare ibopamine (IBO), a dopamine congener, with isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) and to study their interaction in effects on the capacitance vasculature in congestive heart failure (CHF), a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was performed in 32 patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV CHF, randomly assigned to receive single oral doses of placebo, 200 mg IBO, 20 mg ISMN, or both IBO and ISMN. After labelling of red cells with 99mTc, changes in regional radioactivity, indicative of changes in blood volume, were recorded using a gamma-camera before and at 30, 60 and 120 min after drug administration. At 30 and 60 min, arterial systolic and pulse pressures were higher with IBO than with ISMN and placebo (for pulse pressure by mean 13.7 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 4.5-23.0 mmHg, at 30 min), probably reflecting an IBO-induced rise in stroke volume at unchanged heart rate and mean arterial pressure. IBO did not change regional radioactivity except for a transient increase of 4.4% (0.5-7.6%) in the thorax at 30 min. This was attenuated by concomitant ISMN treatment since, starting at 30 min, the drug increased radioactivity in the legs, compared with patients not receiving the drug, by 8.0% (95% confidence interval 0.2-15.8%), leading to a fall in thoracic and left ventricular radioactivity at 30 min of 3.4% (0.3-7.0%) and 6.4% (0.8-11.9%), respectively, and a fall of 5.5% (0.5-10.5%) in hepatic radioactivity at 60 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Double-blind placebo-controlled study of ibopamine and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: results of the Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial (DIMT)

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the orally active dopamine agonist ibopamine in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure and to compare the results with those of treatment with digoxin and placebo.

BACKGROUND

Ibopamine and digoxin are drugs that exert hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects. Because there is accumulating evidence that progression of disease in chronic heart failure is related not only to hemodynamic but also to neurohumoral factors, both drugs might be expected to have a favorable long-term effect.

METHODS

We studied 161 patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure (80% in New York Heart Association functional class II and 20% in class III), who were treated with ibopamine (n = 53), digoxin (n = 55) or placebo (n = 53) for 6 months. Background therapy consisted of furosemide (0 to 80 mg); all other drugs for heart failure were excluded. Clinical assessments were made at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Of the 161 patients, 128 (80%) completed the study. Compared with placebo, digoxin but not ibopamine significantly increased exercise time after 6 months (p = 0.008 by intention to treat analysis). Ibopamine was only effective in patients with relatively preserved left ventricular function, as it significantly increased exercise time in this subgroup (for patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction > 0.30; p = 0.018 vs. placebo). No patient receiving digoxin withdrew from the study because of progression of heart failure, compared with six patients receiving ibopamine and two receiving placebo. At 6 months, plasma norepinephrine was decreased with digoxin and ibopamine therapy (-106 and -13 pg/ml, respectively) but increased with placebo administration (+62 pg/ml) (both p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Plasma aldosterone was unaffected, but renin was decreased by both agents after 6 months (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Total mortality and ambulatory arrhythmias were not significantly affected by the two drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibopamine and digoxin both inhibit neurohumoral activation in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. However, the clinical effects of these drugs are different and appear to be related to the degree of left ventricular dysfunction.

Ibopamine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in congestive heart failure

Ibopamine is an orally administered dopamine agonist which is rapidly converted to its active metabolite epinine by esterase hydrolysis. Ibopamine acts predominantly as a vasodilator and inhibitor of neuroendocrine activation in congestive heart failure, but also has mild positive inotropic effects at higher doses. The beneficial effects on cardiac and systemic haemodynamic parameters seen in short term studies have been maintained in predominantly noncomparative trials for up to 1 year, and improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and clinical symptoms have been observed in patients with congestive heart failure of varying severity. In double-blind studies conducted in small numbers of patients, the efficacy of ibopamine was comparable to that of digoxin, captopril, enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide. Ibopamine can successfully replace treatment with intravenous dopamine in patients with severe heart failure, and is effective and well tolerated when administered in combination with digoxin, diuretics and/or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Ibopamine has shown no detrimental effects on renal function, few adverse effects on neurohormonal parameters and has demonstrated no significant proarrhythmic properties at therapeutic doses in patients with congestive heart failure. No adverse metabolic effects were observed during ibopamine therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus, nor did ibopamine have detrimental effects in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. While reliable evidence is required concerning effects on mortality before the role of ibopamine can be clearly defined, the drug appears to be a useful agent for combination with conventional therapies in treating patients with mild to severe congestive heart failure.