Comparison of the effectiveness of lovastatin therapy for hypercholesterolemia after heart transplantation between patients with and without pretransplant atherosclerotic coronary artery disease

Contemporary Management of Concomitant Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction

Cardiogenic shock (CS) and cardiac arrest (CA) are the most life-threatening complications of acute myocardial infarction. Although there is a significant overlap in the pathophysiology with approximately half the patients with CS experiencing a CA and approximately two-thirds of patients with CA developing CS, comprehensive guideline recommendations for management of CA + CS are lacking. This paper summarizes the current evidence on the incidence, pathophysiology, and short- and long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by concomitant CA + CS. We discuss the hemodynamic factors and unique challenges that need to be accounted for while developing treatment strategies for these patients. A summary of expert-based step-by-step recommendations to the approach and treatment of these patients, both in the field before admission and in-hospital management, are presented.

In vitro susceptibility of cultured human methanogens to lovastatin

Lovastatin is a prodrug that is hydrolysed in vivo to β-hydroxy acid lovastatin, which inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-Co-A) reductase (HMGR), thereby lowering cholesterol in humans. A side effect of lovastatin is inhibition of isoprenoid synthesis and cell membrane formation in methanogenic Archaea, which are members of the human digestive tract microbiota and are emerging pathogens. In this study, the in vitro susceptibility of the human-associated methanogens Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanobrevibacter oralis, Methanobrevibacter massiliense, Methanobrevibacter arboriphilus and Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis to lovastatin (1-4 µg/mL) was tested in the presence of five gut anaerobes aiming to metabolise lovastatin into β-hydroxy acid lovastatin as confirmed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Five days of incubation with lovastatin had no measurable effect on the growth of the five gut anaerobes but significantly reduced CH₄ production and methanogen growth as measured by quantitative PCR (P <0.01). Quantitative PCR analyses indicated that compared with controls, β-hydroxy acid lovastatin significantly increased the expression of the genes mta and mcrA implicated in methanogenesis and significantly decreased the expression of the fno gene implicated in methanogenesis. Expression of the HMGR gene (hmg) implicated in cell wall synthesis was significantly increased by β-hydroxy acid lovastatin (P <0.01). These results strongly suggest that in the presence of gut anaerobes, lovastatin yields β-hydroxy acid lovastatin, which inhibits methane production and growth of methanogens by affecting their cell membrane biosynthesis. Lovastatin is the first licensed drug to exclusively affect the growth of methanogens whilst protecting the bacterial microbiota.

Treatment of allograft vasculopathy in heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation, although its impact is becoming somewhat smaller as prophylactic measures are implemented. Advances in the understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the genesis and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy are opening ways for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Successful prophylaxis of the early stages of the disease has been demonstrated with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus and everolimus, that will probably be included in future protocols. For most patients with established cardiac allograft vasculopathy, currently available revascularisation methods and retransplantation are not appropriate options. Antiproliferative agents could provide significant improvement in terms of symptom relief and prognosis, but their definite value must be proven in well-designed trials.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: pathology, prevention and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac transplantation is a recognized therapy for end-stage heart failure. Graft coronary artery disease is a chief determinant of long-term survival following cardiac transplantation. There are multiple purported etiologies for graft coronary artery disease including both immunologic and nonimmunologic factors. Immunologic factors include human leukocyte antigen mismatching, cytokine production, and activation of the cellular immune system. Nonimmunologic factors include diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and cytomegalovirus infection, just to name a few. There are also donor and recipient factors including age, prior coronary artery disease in the donor heart, and mode of donor brain death.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of graft coronary artery disease is especially difficult, partially due to the de-innervated allograft, as well as to its inherent predilection to affect the medium-sized and smaller arteries in a concentric and diffuse nature. Conventional angiography can overlook this condition because of the lack of eccentric plaques in larger epicardial arteries. Intravascular ultrasonography, by contrast, is more sensitive in detecting graft coronary artery disease but is unable to visualize the entire arterial system. Treatment is challenging and often unrewarding, leading to re-transplantation. Prevention is therefore ideal and involves protection against endothelial injury before and during transplantation as well as after transplantation, with decreased ischemic time, aggressive attention to early rejection, risk factor modification, and close follow-up.

SUMMARY

This review will look at the pathophysiology of graft coronary artery disease, current diagnostic and therapeutic choices, as well as existing and future directions.

Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Pravastatin and simvastatin prolong survival and reduce transplant-related coronary vasculopathy, although low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering with these agents is only modest. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of moderate dose atorvastatin and its efficacy when prior treatment with another statin had failed to lower LDL to < 100 mg/dl.

METHODS

Data from 185 patients were retrospectively evaluated for adverse events, duration of exposure (person-days), and the mean atorvastatin dose exposure. Changes in lipid parameters, and prednisone and cyclosporine doses were determined.

RESULTS

SAFETY

48 patients received atorvastatin for 24,240 person-days at a mean dose exposure of 21 +/- 10 mg. Rhabdomyolysis, myositis, myalgias, and hepatotoxicity occurred in 0, 2, 2, and 0 patients, respectively. All events occurred at the 10-mg dose, within the first 3 months, and were rapidly reversible with atorvastatin discontinuation.

EFFICACY

Thirty-four patients evaluable for efficacy analyses had a pre-atorvastatin LDL of 145 +/- 38 mg/dl on the following statins: pravastatin (n = 30, 40 +/- 0mg), fluvastatin (n = 3, 33 +/- 12 mg), simvastatin (n = 1, 40 mg). After atorvastatin (21 +/- 9 mg/day) for 133 +/- 67 days, LDL was reduced to 97 +/- 24 mg/dl (relative reduction 31 +/- 20%, p < 0.0001). At the end of the observation period (418 +/- 229 days, atorvastatin final dose 24 +/- 14 mg/day), LDL was further decreased to 88 +/- 23 mg (relative reduction 37 +/- 17%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin, when used at moderate doses and with close biochemical and clinical monitoring, appears to be safe and is effective in aggressively lowering LDL in heart transplant recipients when treatment with other statins has failed to achieve LDL goals.

Heart allograft vascular disease: an obliterative vascular disease in transplanted hearts

More than 30 years have passed since the first human heart transplantation was performed. Since then, short-term survival after heart transplantation has been markedly improved, but this development has not been paralleled with a similar improvement in long-term survival. One of the major reasons for this is the subsequent development of heart allograft vascular disease, an obliterative disease in the coronary arteries of the transplanted heart. The dubious effect of re-vascularization in this disease, the less favorable outcome after repeat heart transplantation, and the low donor supply have called for intensified research for new and efficient prophylactic therapies against heart allograft vascular disease. This research has lead to improved knowledge about diagnosis, etiology, pathogenesis, prophylaxis, and treatment possibilities. The most important among these seem to be: (i) the introduction of intravascular ultrasound for early detection of the disease; (ii) evidence to suggest that hyperlipidemia, insufficient immunosuppressive therapy, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatch, and infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) all may promote allografts vascular disease; and (iii) the introduction of at least two promising prophylactic therapies in humans namely 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors and calcium entry blockers, and others potentially promising e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors, angiopeptin, mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin. This review summarizes present knowledge on the possibilities of inhibiting or treating heart allograft vascular disease incorporating evidence from both human and experimental studies.

Metabolism and drug interactions of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in transplant patients: are the statins mechanistically similar?

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (EC 1.1.1.88) inhibitors are the most effective drugs to lower cholesterol in transplant patients. However, immunosuppressants and several other drugs used after organ transplantation are cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A, EC 1.14.14.1) substrates. Pharmacokinetic interaction with some of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, specifically lovastatin and simvastatin, leads to an increased incidence of muscle skeletal toxicity in transplant patients. It is our objective to review the role of drug metabolism and drug interactions of lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and cerivastatin. In the treatment of transplant patients, from a drug interaction perspective, pravastatin, which is not significantly metabolized by CYP enzymes, and fluvastatin, presumably a CYP2C9 substrate, compare favorably with the other statins for which the major metabolic pathways are catalyzed by CYP3A.

The use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to prevent accelerated graft atherosclerosis in heart transplant patients

Initial trials hint that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may have a role in preventing or retarding the progression of AGAS. Whether the potential of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to prevent AGAS is due to their lipid-lowering effect, immunomodulating properties, or a combination of both is also not completely known at present. Further study is needed to fully identify their mode of preventing AGAS and, more important, to determine their usefulness and role in preventing AGAS, especially since concurrent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use with cyclosporine is not innocuous. Potential for a pharmacokinetic drug interaction, which results in an elevation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor concentrations, exists when these two agents are used together, thus increasing the potential for the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor to cause musculoskeletal complications. When such combination therapy is used, the likelihood of this interaction can be reduced by prescribing the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor conservatively--using the smallest effective dose and increasing the daily dosage slowly. Although the risk of musculoskeletal toxicity exists at any HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor dosage, most patients should be able to tolerate daily dosages of up to 20 mg of lovastatin, 10 mg of simvastatin, and 40 mg of pravastatin. Patients also need to be made aware of and monitored for musculoskeletal symptoms suggestive of myositis and/or myalgias. In addition, the avoidance of elevated cyclosporine concentrations and when practical, monitoring of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor concentrations are recommended.

Treatment of hyperlipidemia after heart transplantation and rationale for the Heart Transplant Lipid Registry

Hyperlipidemia occurs frequently after heart transplantation, and accelerated coronary artery disease remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who survive more than 1 year after heart transplantation. However, the risks and benefits of lipid-lowering therapy after heart transplantation remain poorly defined, and national guidelines for lipid-lowering drug therapy do not specifically address treatment of dyslipidemia in transplant recipients. Since the initial reports in the 1980s of rhabdomyolysis in heart transplant patients receiving high-dosage lovastatin, results of 11 post-transplantation series that used lovastatin, simvastatin, or pravastatin at lower dosages as drug monotherapy have been published. These studies have shown an overall 1% incidence of rhabdomyolysis, defined as creatine kinase > 10 times the upper limit of normal plus muscle symptoms. One randomized, controlled prospective trial has investigated the effects of lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy on patient outcome in cardiac transplant recipients. At 1-year follow-up in this nonblinded, single-center trial, patients treated with pravastatin (20 or 40 mg/day) initiated within 2 weeks of transplantation had a significant reduction in mortality rate and a significantly lower incidence of transplant arteriopathy. A number of important issues remain unanswered regarding treatment guidelines in patients with hyperlipidemia after heart transplantation. In January 1995 we began the Heart Transplant Lipid Registry, with 12 participant centers, to gather data prospectively on the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering drugs in the treatment of dyslipidemia after heart transplantation.