Results of coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic or mitral valve operation in patients > or = 90 years of age

Modern Cardiac Surgical Outcomes in Nonagenarians: A Multicentre Retrospective Observational Study

Background

There have been multiple recent advancements in the selection, optimisation and management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, there is limited data regarding the outcomes in nonagenarians, despite this cohort being increasingly referred for these interventions. The objective of this study was to describe the patient characteristics, management and outcomes of a cohort of nonagenarians undergoing cardiac surgery receiving contemporary peri-operative care.

Methods

After receiving ethics approval, we conducted a retrospective observational study of nonagenarians who had undergone cardiac surgery requiring a classic median sternotomy. All operative indications were included. We excluded patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and surgery on the thoracic aorta via an endovascular approach (TEVAR). Patients undergoing TEVAR often have the procedure done under sedation and regional blocks with local anesthetic solution. There is no open incision and these patients do not require cardiopulmonary bypass. We also excluded patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via a videoscope assisted approach. These patients do not have a median sternotomy, have the procedure done via erector spinae block, and often are extubated on table. Data were collected from four hospitals in Victoria, Australia, over an 8-year period (January 2012–December 2019). The primary objective was to assess 6-month mortality in nonagenarian patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to provide a detailed overview of postoperative complications. We hypothesized that cardiac surgery in nonagenarian patients would be associated with a 6-month postoperative mortality <10%. As a secondary outcome, we hypothesized that significant postoperative complications (i.e., Clavien Dindo Grade IIIb or greater) would occur in > 30% of patients.

Results

A total of 12,358 adult cardiac surgery patients underwent surgery during the study period, of whom 18 nonagenarians (0.15%) fulfilled inclusion criteria. The median (IQR) [min-max] age was 91.0 years (90.0:91.8) [90–94] and the median body mass index was 25.0 (kg/m²) (22.3:27.0). Comorbidities, polypharmacy, and frailty were common. The median predicted mortality as per EuroSCORE-II was 6.1% (4.1:14.5). There were no cases of intra-operative, in-hospital, or 6-month mortality. One (5.6%) patient experienced two Grade IIIa complications. Three (16.7%) patients experienced Grade IIIb complications. Three (16.7%) patients had an unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. The median value for postoperative length of stay was 11.6 days (9.8:17.6). One patient was discharged home and all others were discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

Conclusion

In this selected, contemporary cohort of nonagenarian patients undergoing cardiac surgery, postoperative 6-month mortality was zero. These findings support carefully selected nonagenarian patients being offered cardiac surgery (Trials Registry: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000058774.aspx).

Unoperated severe aortic stenosis: decision making in an adult UK-based population

INTRODUCTION

Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis is associated with a poor prognosis, with most patients dying 2–3 years after diagnosis. We analysed the proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis not referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in a UK-based population and the clinical factors contributing to this.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with echocardiographic evidence of severe aortic stenosis was performed at a university teaching hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 178 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AVA: <1cm², mean pressure gradient: ≥40mmHg, or visually severe on echocardiography) were included in the study. Eighty-three patients did not have AVR (95% confidence interval: 39–54%). The cohort included 146 symptomatic patients (82%) and 32 (18%) who were asymptomatic. The most common reason for non-referral in symptomatic patients was ‘high operative risk’ and in asymptomatic patients ‘no symptoms’. Of the patients who did not have AVR, only 19% (n=16) were referred for a surgical opinion. None of the patients in the asymptomatic group underwent echocardiographic stress imaging. The thirty-day operative mortality rate in the AVR group was 2.3%. Symptomatic patients who underwent AVR had superior survival, even after adjusting for co-morbidities (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis are not referred for surgery although they have a clear indication for AVR. Patients are often estimated as being too high risk or having prohibitive co-morbidities. Among asymptomatic patients, stress imaging was rarely used despite its useful role prognostically and in deciding the best time for intervention.

Is there any indication for aortic valvuloplasty in the elderly?

Elderly patients with severe symptomatic calcific aortic stenosis do poorly with medical management. The optimal treatment for this group of patients is surgical valve replacement. Balloon valvuloplasty may be useful as a bridge to aortic valve replacement in hemodynamically unstable patients, in patients undergoing emergent noncardiac surgery, and in patients with severe comorbidities who are too ill to undergo cardiac surgery. Balloon valvuloplasty often results in symptomatic improvement; however, the postvalvuloplasty valve area is usually <1.0 cm2, the major periprocedural complication rate is roughly 5%, and the 6-month restenosis rate is quite high. There is no evidence that balloon valvuloplasty alters the natural history of aortic stenosis, although no randomized study has been performed.

Outcomes in nonagenarians after heart valve replacement operation

BACKGROUND

Changes in the age profile of the United Kingdom population and improvements in preoperative and postoperative care have resulted in increasing numbers of very elderly patients undergoing heart valve replacement (HVR) operations. Although HVR operations in nonagenarians are relatively uncommon, the demand for cardiac operations in this age group may increase over time. Outcomes after HVR operations in nonagenarians have not been well described yet. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine outcomes in terms of early mortality and long-term survival in 35 nonagenarians after HVR operation.

METHODS

Data from the United Kingdom Heart Valve Registry were analyzed and nonagenarian patients were identified. Additional analyzed data include gender, valve position, valve type, valve size, operative priority, follow-up time, and date and cause of death. Kaplan-Meier actuarial curves were calculated to determine accurate 30-day mortality and long-term survival.

RESULTS

On average five HVR operations are performed annually in the United Kingdom in nonagenarians with equal numbers of males and females. Aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve was the most common operation and 86% were elective admissions. Fourteen patients died within the review period; mean time to death was 402 days. Overall 30-day mortality was 17%, which was higher for males compared with females; females also displayed better long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

HVR operations in nonagenarians carry a significantly higher risk of early mortality and reduced long-term survival. Despite increases in the age profile of the population, elective HVR operation with patients aged 90 years or older is likely to remain an infrequent surgical procedure reserved for very carefully selected patients.

Late outcomes of open heart surgery in patients 70 years or older

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to examine the long-term survival and quality of life, including the influence of comorbidities, in patients 70 years of age and over after open heart surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 401 consecutive patients, who were 70 years of age or older at the time of surgery. Survival and quality of life of these patients were measured at 6- to 8-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was 85%, and was comparable with the age- and gender-matched West Virginia population. Survival declined with increasing preexisting comorbidities. Of the 176 respondents completing the quality of life (SF-36) survey, most scores were similar to or substantially better than the US population normative scores for individuals 70 years of age or older.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rates vary by presence or absence of specific comorbid conditions. Quality of life in the appropriately selected elderly after open heart surgery appears to be similar to the US population normative scores.

Cardiac reoperations in octogenarians: analysis of outcomes

BACKGROUND

With the rapid growth of the elderly segment of the population, more octogenarians are referred for complex cardiac interventions, including reoperations. Data regarding the outcomes, quality of life, and long-term results after reoperative open-heart surgical procedures in octogenarians are scarce.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 113 consecutive octogenarians (mean age, 83+/-2.6 years) who underwent reoperative cardiac procedures within a 13-year period. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed in 49 patients (CABG group), valvular procedures (aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve, alone or in combination) in 35 (valve group), and combined CABG and valve intervention in 29 (combined CABG and valve group).

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 8% (4 of 49) for the CABG group, 9% (3 of 35) for the valve group, and 17% (5 of 29) for the combined CABG and valve group. One- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were, respectively, 85%+/-5% and 58%+/-10% for the CABG group, 78%+/-7% and 53%+/-12% for the valve group, and 69%+/-9% and 63%+/-10% for the combined CABG and valve group. Sixty-one percent of patients in the CABG group, 40% in the valve group, and 38% in the combined CABG and valve group were in New York Heart Association class I or II postoperatively at a mean follow-up time of 2.1+/-2.4 years. Similarly, 91%, 85%, and 80%, respectively, thought that they had an improved quality of life and were satisfied with their functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac reoperations can be performed successfully in most octogenarians, although with an increased risk, particularly in the combined CABG and valve group. Long-term survival is acceptable with improved quality of life and functional status. However, it is possible that these results could be improved in this high-risk group of patients with earlier referral and surgical intervention, for the effective use of health care resources.

Cardiac operations in patients 90 years of age and older

BACKGROUND

Growth of the elderly population worldwide, and specifically in the United States, will continue to accelerate and will have a profound impact on the cost and delivery of health care resources in the future. A medical strategy that allows the elderly to live independently is essential to most cost-effective use of our resources. The question remains as to what will be the future of surgical therapy for this increasing population.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the cases of 30 consecutive nonagenarians (mean age, 92.3 +/- 1.8 years) who underwent a cardiac operation within a 9-year period. All patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV and underwent operation urgently or emergently.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 10%, and the actuarial survival rates were 81% +/- 8% and 75% +/- 9% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of survivors were in New York Heart Association class I or II within 2 years after operation and had an improved quality of life. The cost of providing care in this age group was 24% higher than in octogenarians.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age in and of itself (>90 years) should not be a contraindication to an open-heart operation, although morbidity, mortality, and cost may be higher. However, selective criteria identifying risks and benefits for individual patients should be applied. The aging of our population will have a profound impact on the cost and delivery of health care resources in the future. This issue must be addressed in the current debate on the provision of expensive procedures under a realigned national health-care system.

Heart transplantation in patients 70 years of age and older: initial experience

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation has become a highly successful therapeutic option for patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy. Consequently, the criteria for patient selection, particularly regarding recipients' upper age limits, have been expanded, with an increasing number of people older than 60 years of age now undergoing transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 6 patients 70 years of age and older who underwent heart transplantation was done; their clinical courses and outcomes were compared with those of younger patients, with a special emphasis on their posttransplantation quality of life.

RESULTS

All 6 patients are alive and clinically well at a mean follow-up of 12 months. No age-related complications have been observed, and their quality of life is excellent. There has been a very low incidence of rejection, as well as few episodes of rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart transplantation in selected people 70 years of age and older can be performed successfully with a morbidity comparable to that seen in younger patients and excellent short-term survival. This initial experience is encouraging, but further studies and long-term follow-up are needed to validate the more routine application of this therapy.