"Syndrome X" as a consequence of acute myocardial infarction

High prevalence of (99m)tc-tetrofosmin reverse perfusion pattern in patients with myocardial infarction and angiographically smooth coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

There are no published data in the literature on the scintigraphic perfusion pattern in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and normal coronary arteries (NCA).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate myocardial perfusion imaging in a series of patients with MI and NCA.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients who had developed a MI and had NCA were studied. As a control group we included 27 patients with a recent MI and coronary artery disease (CAD). All patients underwent stress/rest tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT within 6 months from MI.

RESULTS

In patients with NCA tetrofosmin stress images revealed 41 hypoperfused segments in 17 patients (63%). On rest images, 13 segments remained unchanged, 4 showed partial reperfusion, 10 normalized and 14 worsened. Additionally, there were 18 new hypoperfused segments in nine patients. Therefore, perfusion worsened at rest in 18 patients (67%) (32 segments). Overall, at rest there were 49 hypoperfused segments in 22 patients (81%). In patients with CAD, stress images revealed 71 hypoperfused segments. On rest images, 39 segments remained unchanged, 16 showed partial reperfusion and 12 normalized. Four segments worsened at rest and only four patients (15%) showed new perfusion defects at rest.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial perfusion with tetrofosmin might appear considerably worse at rest than at stress in patients with MI and NCA. Specifically, a reverse perfusion pattern in the infarct area is a frequent finding and is likely to be due to residual tissue viability. We postulate that in these patients the hyperemic response to exercise may mask resting underperfusion areas.

Differential plasma endothelin levels in subgroups of patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Coronary Artery Disease Research Group

BACKGROUND

Raised plasma endothelin concentrations have previously been reported in patients with cardiac syndrome X, but it is not known whether these levels vary between clinically distinct subgroups in this heterogeneous condition.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared plasma immunoreactive endothelin levels in 54 patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms and 21 healthy control subjects. The patient group was divided into 4 clinically distinct subgroups: 7 with left bundle branch block (group A); 7 with previous myocardial infarction (group B); 24 with positive exercise electrocardiography (group C); and 16 with negative exercise electrocardiography (group D). The plasma endothelin concentration was significantly higher in patients compared with control subjects (3.7 [2.9 to 4.3] vs 2.96 [2.4 to 3.4] pg/mL, respectively, median [interquartile range]; P=0.002). Endothelin concentrations were most significantly elevated in group A and group B (4.5 [3.6 to 5.2] pg/mL; P=0.005 and 4.1 [3.9 to 4.5] pg/mL; P=0.001, respectively). Plasma endothelin concentrations were also significantly elevated in group C (3.7 [2.8 to 4.1] pg/mL; P=0.02) but not in group D (3.0 [2.5 to 3.8] pg/mL; P=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma endothelin concentration is elevated in patients with angina pectoris and angiographically normal coronary arteries, particularly those with left bundle branch block or previous myocardial infarction.