Acute interstitial nephritis due to methicillin

[Acute interstitial nephritis and hantavirus infection]

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a cause of acute kidney injury and characterized by an inflammation of the tubulointerstitial space, leading to a decline in kidney function. Multiple etiologies can cause AIN including medications, autoimmune diseases and infections. A multiplicity of drugs is associated with AIN, while antibiotics (especially beta-lactams), proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) are the most common. The pathognomonic triad of exanthema, fever and eosinophilia is rarely present in AIN patients. Treatment of medication-associated AIN is based upon the discontinuation of the provoking drug. Glucocorticoids can be considered in severe cases.Nephropathia epidemica (NE) is a disease caused by an infection with the Puumula-virus (PUUV) in northern and central Europe. Small rodents (mostly mice) are the host of the virus accountable for a rising number of infections during spring and summer. It is causing a syndrome consisting of AIN, fever and often thrombocytopenia. There is a good chance of complete recovery of kidney function following NE.

Facing the Challenge of Drug-Induced Acute Interstitial Nephritis

BACKGROUND

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is one of the chief causes of acute kidney injury (AKI). AIN might be produced by drugs, infections, autoimmune diseases, or can be idiopathic. Among these etiologies, drug-induced AIN (DI-AIN) is the dominant one in many countries. Even when DI-AIN is suspected, identification of the putative drug is challenging.

SUMMARY

DI-AIN is an increasingly common cause of AKI. Diagnosis continues to pose a challenge for physicians due to nonspecific clinical symptoms, and the fact that it can be triggered by a wide variety of medications. Furthermore, the gold standard for the diagnosis is kidney biopsy. All these aspects render the diagnosis more difficult. The withdrawal of the causative drug of DI-AIN is the centerpiece of the treatment, and if early restoration of original kidney function is not obtained, several studies support the treatment with steroids especially when they are started quickly.

KEY MESSAGES

Almost all drugs have the potential to produce drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (DI-AIN); however, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and proton pump inhibitors account for the majority of the reported cases. DI-AIN is produced by an idiosyncratic delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction, but the precise pathophysiological mechanism remains to be elucidated. DI-AIN symptoms are nonspecific, and most of the patients will present mild symptoms including malaise, nausea, and vomiting. The classical triad, associating fever, rash, and eosinophilia, is seldom present. Nonoliguric acute kidney injury is the main renal manifestation of DI-AIN. Tubular nonnephrotic range proteinuria is usually present. Diagnosis of DI-AIN relies on maintaining a high index of suspicion in those patients at greater risk, but kidney biopsy is required to confirm diagnosis. Histologically, AIN is characterized by the presence of an extensive interstitial infiltrate, mainly composed of lymphocytes and monocytes, but eosinophils, plasma cells, histiocytes, and polymorphonuclear cells can also be found. The withdrawal of the presumed causative drug of DI-AIN is the mainstay of the treatment. When there is no evidence of kidney function recovery after an interval of 5-7 days since interrupting the treatment with the suspected drug, several studies support the treatment with steroids, especially when they are promptly started. Early corticosteroids would decrease the inflammatory infiltrates of the kidney interstitium, thus preventing the risk of subsequent fibrosis.

Bland Urine Sediment in a Child with Acute Kidney Injury

Tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) or acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a renal lesion characterized by inflammatory infiltrate limited to the renal interstitium and tubules. Three-fourths of the cases are drug induced, other causes being systemic and autoimmune diseases, and infections. Various drugs have been implicated, the most common being antibiotics such as β-lactams. Cephalosporins causing AIN have been reported uncommonly, particularly in children. Although renal biopsy confirms the diagnosis, urinalysis provides pertinent diagnostic clues against the backdrop of the clinico-laboratory profile. The presence of white blood cells, white cell casts, and red blood cells in urine sediment have been described in literature. However, a relatively normal urinalysis may be present in some cases and may pose a diagnostic challenge. We present a case of ceftriaxone-induced AIN in a child with bland urine sediment at initial presentation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of ceftriaxone-induced AIN in the pediatric age group.

Dismal Prognosis of Acute Allergic Tubulointerstitial Nephritis in Patients with AA Amyloidosis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with AA amyloidosis may present with acute kidney injury that progresses to end-stage kidney disease in a short period of time. Acute allergic tubulointerstitial nephritis (aTIN) is a frequent cause of acute kidney injury in patients with AA amyloidosis. Although aTIN has a favorable prognosis in the general population, the course of aTIN in patients with AA amyloidosis was not previously reported. In this retrospective study, we determined the prognosis of aTIN superimposed on AA amyloidosis.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with combined pathological diagnosis of AA amyloidosis + aTIN and 32 patients with isolated aTIN were compared in terms of 1-year renal functions after the biopsies were performed with an indication of acute kidney injury. Baseline renal functions and number of patients requiring hemodialysis at the time of biopsy was similar in both groups.

RESULTS

At the end of the 12-month follow-up period, 29 of 32 patients in the amyloidosis + aTIN group and 1 of 32 patients in the isolated aTIN group required dialysis. Most of these patients with AA amyloidosis had completely normal renal function before the episode of acute kidney injury and had clear exposures to drugs associated with aTIN.

CONCLUSION

In contrary to the patients without AA amyloidosis, patients with AA amyloidosis have extremely high risk of permanent renal failure in case of development of aTIN. Great caution should be exercised in prescribing drugs that are associated with aTIN, in patients with AA amyloidosis.

Atypical presentation of allergic interstitial nephritis likely induced by ciprofloxacin

Though the prevalence of drug induced allergic interstitial nephritis (AIN) appears to be increasing, the diagnostic and treatment strategies still remain vague. We present a 56-year-old man with a history of hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage IIIa, recent exposure to ciprofloxacin who presented with acute kidney injury. Though the suspicion of AIN was high, his urinary sediment was bland, that is, no leucocytes or leucocyte casts. A renal biopsy subsequently showed features of AIN correlating with a resolving phase of inflammation. Given the resolving nature of the pathology, we chose not to complete a course of corticosteroids despite his need for temporary haemodialysis. He was able to fully recover his renal function. In this report, we emphasise the unreliable nature of the urinary sediment in the diagnosis of AIN, the utility of a renal biopsy in helping to guide treatment, and the controversial data in corticosteroid treatment.

Aetiology, course and treatment of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in paediatric patients: a cross-sectional web-based survey

BACKGROUND

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) is a significant cause of acute renal failure in paediatric and adult patients. There are no large paediatric series focusing on the aetiology, treatment and courses of acute TIN.

PATIENTS, DESIGN AND SETTING

We collected retrospective clinical data from paediatric patients with acute biopsy-proven TIN by means of an online survey. Members of four professional societies were invited to participate.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine physicians from 18 countries responded. 171 patients with acute TIN were included (54% female, median age 12 years). The most frequent causes were tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome in 31% and drug-induced TIN in 30% (the majority of these caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). In 28% of patients, no initiating noxae were identified (idiopathic TIN). Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rose significantly from 31 at time of renal biopsy to 86 mL/min/1.73 m² 3-6 months later (p<0.001). After 3-6 months, eGFR normalised in 41% of patients (eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²), with only 3% having severe or end-stage impairment of renal function (<30 mL/min/1.73 m²). 80% of patients received corticosteroid therapy. Median eGFR after 3-6 months did not differ between steroid-treated and steroid-untreated patients. Other immunosuppressants were used in 18% (n=31) of patients, 21 of whom received mycophenolate mofetil.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite different aetiologies, acute paediatric TIN had a favourable outcome overall with 88% of patients showing no or mild impairment of eGFR after 3-6 months. Prospective randomised controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of glucocorticoid treatment in paediatric patients with acute TIN.

Prednisolone treatment in acute interstitial nephritis (PRAISE) - protocol for the randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is an important and common cause of acute renal failure. There are no generally accepted guidelines for the treatment of AIN, due to the lack of prospective randomized trials. Since AIN is characterized by an enhanced immune response, immunosuppressive treatment could potentially improve prognosis by attenuating inflammation and subsequent fibrosis. Despite the limited evidence of effects of steroids and potential adverse effects, prednisolone is frequently used in the treatment of AIN and there is a strong need for clinical trials on the effects of immunosuppression, including steroids, in the treatment of AIN. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prednisolone treatment in AIN, and hypothesized a positive effect of prednisolone treatment on renal function in AIN.

METHODS

The study is a randomized, controlled, prospective, open label multicenter study, including incident adult patients with biopsy proven AIN. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of 2 treatment regimens: A. No prednisolone treatment (control group) and B. B) Oral prednisolone treatment staring with 60 mg daily tapered over 8 weeks. One hundred ten patients (55 in each group) are planned to be included and followed for 1 year. Primary outcome is renal function estimated by eGFR 3 months after inclusion. Secondary outcomes are renal function after 12 months and need for renal replacement therapy and quality of life after 3 and 12 months. In addition, with-in prednisolone group analysis are performed to estimate the importance of treatment delay. Exploratory analyses include analysis of biomarkers in urine and plasma and the evaluation of these biomarkers in relation to renal prognosis and re-evaluation of renal biopsies to identify possible renal prognostic factors.

DISCUSSION

Strengths and possible limitations in the design are evaluated. The study will provide important information on the effects of prednisolone treatment in AIN and as well as prognostic information relevant for future use of biomarkers and histology. Ultimately, this would lead to improved and evidence based clinical guidelines for the treatment of AIN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04376216 (Retrospectively registered on May 6, 2020).

Hematuria Is Associated with More Severe Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) is a common cause of acute kidney injury. Although haematuria is a risk factor for the development of renal disease, no previous study has analyzed the significance of haematuria in ATIN. Retrospective, observational analysis of 110 patients with biopsy-proven ATIN was conducted. Results: Haematuria was present in 66 (60%) ATIN patients. A higher percentage of ATIN patients with haematuria had proteinuria than patients without haematuria (89.4% vs. 59.1%, p = 0.001) with significantly higher levels of proteinuria (median (interquartile range) protein:creatinine ratio 902.70 (513–1492) vs. 341.00 (177–734) mg/g, p <0.001). Moreover, those patients with more haematuria intensity had a higher urinary protein:creatinine ratio (1352.65 (665–2292) vs. 849.60 (562–1155) mg/g, p = 0.02). Those patients with higher proteinuria were more likely to need renal replacement therapy (22.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.03) and to suffer relapse (4 vs. 0%, p = 0.03). At the end of follow up, haematuric ATIN patients had higher serum creatinine levels (3.19 ± 2.91 vs. 1.91 ± 1.17 mg/dL, p = 0.007), and a trend towards a higher need for acute dialysis (7 vs. 1%, p = 0.09) and renal replacement therapy (12.1 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.12). Haematuria is common in ATIN and it is associated with worse renal function outcomes.

Nefritis tubulointersticial aguda. Revisión bibliográfica

La nefritis tubulointersticial aguda hace referencia a un tipo de daño renal que afecta principalmente el intersticio y ocasiona la lesión renal aguda, potencialmente reversible. Su curso puede ser subclínico, con deterioro progresivo hasta evolucionar hacia la insuficiencia renal crónica. La nefritis tubulointersticial aguda tiene múltiples etiologías, las más frecuentes son los medicamentos, productos herbales, las infecciones y las enfermedades autoinmunes. Las principales manifestaciones clínicas son la poliuria, polaquiuria, nocturia, dolor lumbar, microhematuria y leucocituria, aunque puede ser totalmente asintomática. El tratamiento depende de la causa de base y los esteroides juegan un papel importante cuando la condición es de origen medicamentoso o autoinmune. El pronóstico generalmente es bueno, si el problema se identifica de forma oportuna y se trata adecuadamente.

A case of acetaminophen-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in adult

We report a case of allergic acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) induced by acetaminophen in a 48-year-old Japanese man with no past medical history. Two days after receiving the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) loxoprofen for left shoulder pain, he developed cold symptoms such as fever and sore throat. He then took a 300 mg dose of acetaminophen three times a day and a 100 mg dose of minocycline hydrochloride twice a day for 7 days. Because there was no improvement in his symptoms, he consulted a local clinic again, where blood tests revealed renal insufficiency, and he was, then, referred to our hospital for evaluation of kidney function. Renal biopsy revealed acute TIN, and Ga-67 scintigraphy showed diffuse uptake in bilateral kidneys. A drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) was positive for acetaminophen and negative for loxoprofen and minocycline. Based on these findings, we made a diagnosis of acetaminophen-induced TIN. We treated the patient with three courses of semi-pulse steroid therapy, after which his fever went down, and his serum creatinine level recovered from 2.09 to 1.43 mg/dL. Although we medical doctors think that therapeutic dose of acetaminophen retains high safety, it is important to keep in mind that acetaminophen can cause allergic acute TIN.

Acute interstitial nephritis in the south of Iran; an observational study

Background

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is an emerging cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) during the recent years.

Objectives:

There is no data about prevalence, causes, clinical manifestation and outcomes of AIN in our region. Hence, in this study we aimed to find the prevalence of AIN and describe the causes, clinical presentation, and the outcome of AIN in the native kidney biopsies.

Patients and Methods:

We reviewed 934 native kidney biopsies from 2006 to 2014 and collected the data of patients with the diagnosis of AIN including medical history, clinical findings, para-clinical data, pathologic findings, treatment and outcomes.

Results:

Prevalence of AIN in our center during 2006 to 2014 was 2.5% of all renal biopsies. The common cause of AIN in our study was drugs. Of those patients admitted to hospital due to AIN, 17 patients (70.8%) received corticosteroid, five of them (29.4%) received pulse of corticosteroid, and 12 patients (70.6%) received oral drug. Around, 54.2% of the patients had hemodialysis during admission. Eight patients had received both dialysis and corticosteroid. Two of them (8.3%) remained on dialysis and 8 (33.3%) developed chronic kidney disease, but 14 (58.3%) patients recovered.

Conclusions:

The prevalence of AIN in our study is comparable to other studies and we found the great impact of medications on development of AIN.

Clinical Approach to Diagnosing Acute and Chronic Tubulointerstitial Disease

Tubulointerstitial diseases are a relatively common cause of acute and/or chronic kidney disease. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) most commonly develops in patients exposed to various medications; however, it can occur from infections, autoimmune and systemic diseases, environmental exposures, and some idiopathic causes. Chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis may develop in patients with previous ATIN or may be the initial manifestation of an autoimmune, systemic, environmental, or metabolic process. It can be challenging for clinicians to differentiate the various causes of acute and chronic kidney disease. In particular, distinguishing ATIN from other causes of acute kidney injury, such as acute tubular necrosis or a rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, is important as treatment and prognosis are often quite different. To this end, clinicians use clinical assessment, certain laboratory data, and various imaging tests to make a diagnosis. Unfortunately, most of these tests are insufficient for this purpose. As a result, kidney biopsy is often required to accurately diagnose ATIN and guide management. For chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis, kidney biopsy is needed less often as available therapies for this entity, with a few exceptions, are limited and primarily supportive.

Long-term outcome in biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis treated with steroids

Background: There are no prospective randomized controlled trials describing the outcome of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) treated with steroids, and retrospective studies are limited.

Methods: We identified adult patients with a diagnosis of AIN without glomerular pathology over a 14-year period. Treated patients all received oral prednisolone and three also recieved IV methylprednisolone. Data were collected retrospectively on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), change in eGFR from time of biopsy, dependence on renal replacement therapy (RRT) and mortality, and outcomes were analysed according to the treatment prescribed.

Results: A total of 187 eligible patients with AIN were identified and 158 were treated with steroids. There was no difference in median eGFR or dependence on RRT at the time of biopsy. Steroid-treated patients had significantly higher eGFR at all time points post-biopsy up to 24 months, when median eGFR was 43 mL/min in the steroid-treated group and 24 mL/min in the untreated group (P  =  0.01). Fewer patients in the steroid-treated group were dialysis dependent by 6 months (3.2% versus 20.6%, P  =  0.0022) and 24 months (5.1% versus 24.1%, P  =  0.0019).

Conclusions: This large retrospective study suggests a benefit of steroids in treatment of AIN with greater improvement in eGFR and fewer patients progressing to end-stage renal disease.

Chemical-Induced Nephropathy: A Review of the Renal Tubulointerstitial Lesions in Humans

It is almost ironic that one of the major organs that serves to maintain the “internal milieux” by secretion of various toxic agents, can itself become injured in the process. The pattern of morphologic renal injury is nonspecific and can involve any of the components of the kidney, although the injury and subsequent morphologic changes are most commonly noted in the tubules and/or interstitium. Of course, unless the drug/toxin is commonly or regularly noted to be associated with tubular and/or interstitial injury, the association of the drug with the renal changes may be missed and the correlation may not necessarily identify causation. For example, if a drug is associated with a renal injury in a given individual, it may be quite difficult to prove that the drug is the cause of the injury. This scenario is somewhat reminiscent of the test question—is it “true-true-related,” or “true-true-unrelated”? Sometimes it is only by the accrual of a great many examples or correlations, and or dissection of the pathophysiology, can it be shown that the drug is directly related to the observed morphologic (and subsequent clinical) injury. Renal changes induced by chemicals can affect the tubules, interstitium or both. This review of chemically induced nephropathy in humans considers acute tubular necrosis, interstitial nephritis , and tubulointerstitial nephritis or nephropathy. Because the tubules and the interstitium are so intimately related, injury to 1 of these 2 components may eventually lead to injury of the other, resulting in tubulointerstitial disease.

Infection associated acute interstitial nephritis; a case report

Background

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a clinico-pathological syndrome associated with a variety of infections, drugs, and sometimes with unknown causes. It is a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) and subsequent renal impairment, which often times is under-diagnosed. Infection-associated AIN occurs as a consequence of many systemic bacterial, viral, and parasitic infec-tions; however, its incidence has decreased significantly after the advent of antimicrobials. Infection-associated AIN presents with both oliguric or non-oliguric renal insufficiency, without the classical clinical triad of AIN (fever, rash, and arthralgia). In this scenario the renal function is usually reversible after the infection is treated. In most cases, patients with acute renal failure present with extra-renal manifestations typically detected in underlying infections. Renal biopsy serves as the most definitive test for both the diagnosis and prognosis of AIN.

Case Presentation

In this paper, we will address one such case of biopsy-proven AIN. In this case, the patient presented with severe AKI induced by anaerobic streptococcus, leading to a periodontal abscess, which was successfully treated with corticosteroids and requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT).

Conclusions

AIN should be considered in the differential for unexplained AKI. Initial management should include conservative therapy by withdrawing any suspected causative agent. Renal biopsy is needed for confirmation in cases where kidney function fails to improve within 5–7 days on conservative therapy. Risk of immunosuppression is very important to consider when giving steroids in patients with infection induced AIN, and steroids may have to be delayed until the active infection is completely controlled.

Adverse Events Lead to Drug Discontinuation More Commonly among Patients Who Receive Nafcillin than among Those Who Receive Oxacillin

Nafcillin and oxacillin are used interchangeably in clinical practice, yet few studies have evaluated the safety of these two agents. Our objective was to compare the differential tolerabilities of nafcillin and oxacillin among hospitalized patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who received 12 g/day of nafcillin or oxacillin for at least 24 h. Two hundred twenty-four patients were included. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities were similar among patients receiving nafcillin (n = 160) and those receiving oxacillin (n = 64). Hypokalemia, defined as a potassium level of ≤3.3 mmol/liter or ≤2.9 mmol/liter or as a ≥0.5-mmol/liter decrease from the baseline level, occurred more frequently among patients who received nafcillin (51%, 20%, and 56%, respectively) than among those who received oxacillin (17%, 3%, and 34%, respectively; P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008, and P = 0.005, respectively). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, receipt of nafcillin was an independent predictor of severe hypokalemia (odds ratio [OR] = 6.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 31.2; P = 0.02). Rates of hepatotoxicity did not differ between groups; however, acute kidney injury occurred more commonly with nafcillin than with oxacillin (18% versus 6%; P = 0.03). Overall, 18% of patients who received nafcillin discontinued therapy prematurely due to adverse events, compared to 2% of patients who received oxacillin (P = 0.0004). Nafcillin treatment is associated with higher rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuation than oxacillin among hospitalized adult patients. These findings have important implications for patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings, particularly patients who require long-term therapy and cannot be monitored routinely. Future randomized controlled studies evaluating the efficacy, costs, and tolerability of nafcillin versus oxacillin are warranted.

Diagnosing drug-induced AIN in the hospitalized patient: a challenge for the clinician

Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a relatively common cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (AKI). While prerenal AKI and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are the most common forms of AKI in the hospital, AIN is likely the next most common. Clinicians must differentiate the various causes of hospital-induced AKI; however, it is often difficult to distinguish AIN from ATN in such patients. While standardized criteria are now used to classify AKI into stages of severity, they do not permit differentiation of the various types of AKI. This is not a minor point, as these different AKI types often require different therapeutic interventions. Clinicians assess and differentiate AIN from these other AKI causes by utilizing clinical assessment, various imaging tests, and certain laboratory data. Gallium scintigraphy has been employed with mixed results. While a few serum tests, such as eosinophilia may be helpful, examination of the urine with tests such as dipstick urinalysis, urine chemistries, urine eosinophils, and urine microscopy are primarily utilized. Unfortunately, these tools are not always sufficient to definitively clinch the diagnosis, making it a challenging task for the clinician. As a result, kidney biopsy is often required to accurately diagnose AIN and guide management.

Acute Interstitial Nephritis: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is an important and common cause of acute kidney injury, particularly in hospitalized patients. The classic presentation of AIN includes fever, rash, arthralgias, eosinophilia, and acute kidney injury. While renal biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, the clinical presentation of fever and rash along with laboratory evidence of peripheral blood eosinophilia, eosinophiluria, and low-grade proteinuria strongly suggest the diagnosis. Histologically, interstitial inflammation with interstitial edema and tubulitis is the hallmark of interstitial nephritis. The most common causative factors are drugs, infections, and certain immune-mediated disorders. Discontinuation of the offending agent is considered the mainstay of therapy while the use of corticosteroids to hasten renal recovery may be beneficial. The role of interstitial nephritis in the pathogenesis of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease is increasingly recognized, further emphasizing the importance of its early diagnosis and timely treatment.

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis, treatment with steroid and impact on renal outcomes

BACKGROUND

The use and timing of steroids in the management of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) remains debatable.

AIMS

To determine the incidence and aetiology of ATIN in our unit, and to examine trends in the use of steroids and their impact on renal outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with a histological diagnosis of ATIN over a 9-year period were identified and divided into steroid-treated (StG) and steroid-naïve groups (SnG). Mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients had ATIN as their main diagnosis, 67% of cases were drug-induced, and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were the second commonest implicated drug category. Majority (75%) of patients received steroids, and eGFR improved to a significantly greater degree in these steroid-treated patients (3.4-fold improvement vs 2.0-fold in SnG; P < 0.05, unpaired t-test). Despite comparable eGFR at presentation (StG: 11.7; SnG: 15.4), steroid-treated patients were less likely to receive dialysis, although not significantly so (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.06-1.15, P = 0.066, chi-squared test). However, there was no significant relation between the degree of eGFR improvement and delay in starting steroids (Pearson r = -0.25, P > 0.45), and no difference in eGFR at the time of last follow-up (StG: 33 ± 3; SnG: 32 ± 7; P > 0.9, unpaired t-test).

CONCLUSION

StG patients had a greater degree of improvement in renal function, but with no correlation between degree of improvement in eGFR and delay in starting steroids, and similar eGFR values at final follow-up. PPI were the second commonest drug category among drug-induced cases.

Possible case of nafcillin-induced acute interstitial nephritis

PURPOSE

To report a case of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) secondary to nafcillin.

SUMMARY

A 55-year-old Hispanic man (height, 63 in.; weight, 61.2 kg) with a history of deep vein thrombosis in the right lower extremity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hepatitis C infection was admitted to the hospital with right-sided chest pain that radiated down his right arm and leg. The patient was diagnosed with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. A renal ultrasound was performed on hospital day 9 after the patient developed acute renal failure and showed diffusely increasing echogenicity of the renal parenchymal bilaterally with an interpolar cyst in the left kidney. A urine analysis, serum chemistry panels, and complete blood counts were consistent with AIN. The patient received a total of seven days of nafcillin, and cefazolin was initiated. A renal ultrasound and renal biopsy were performed, which confirmed the diagnosis of AIN. The patient received short-term hemodialysis, after which his renal function slowly returned to baseline. He then underwent an aortic valve replacement and tricuspid valve repair. His antibiotics were changed to rifampin and vancomycin after methicillin-resistant S. aureus was found in an aortic valve culture on hospital day 26. Cefazolin was discontinued 3 days after rifampin and vancomycin were added. The patient received 18 more days of antibiotics and was discharged on the last day of therapy (hospital day 45).

CONCLUSION

A 55-year-old, critically ill man developed a possible case of nafcillin-induced AIN after receiving a 7-day course of treatment with the drug.

Acute kidney injury due to acyclovir

Acyclovir is an antiviral agent widely used in herpetic infections in children. Although acyclovir is generally well tolerated, severe nephrotoxicity has been reported in some cases. In this report, we present a 16-year-old girl who developed acute renal failure due to acyclovir treatment and who needed repetitive hemodialysis. Renal biopsy was performed in order to confirm the diagnosis. A diagnosis of drug-related acute tubulointerstitial nephritis with focal tubular necrosis was made.

Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) result in major health problems in the United States in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. ADRs are broadly categorized into predictable (type A and unpredictable (type B) reactions. Predictable reactions are usually dose dependent, are related to the known pharmacologic actions of the drug, and occur in otherwise healthy individuals, They are estimated to comprise approximately 80% of all ADRs. Unpredictable are generally dose independent, are unrelated to the pharmacologic actions of the drug, and occur only in susceptible individuals. Unpredictable reactions are subdivided into drug intolerance, drug idiosyncrasy, drug allergy, and pseudoallergic reactions. Both type A and B reactions may be influenced by genetic predisposition of the patient

Acute kidney injury in the elderly

The aging kidney undergoes several important anatomic and physiologic changes that increase the risk of acute kidney injury (formerly acute renal failure) in the elderly. This article reviews these changes and discusses the diagnoses frequently encountered in the elderly patient with acute kidney injury. The incidence, staging, evaluation, management, and prognosis of acute kidney injury are also examined with special focus given to older adults.

[Interstitial nephritis]

Drugs such as antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and proton pump inhibitors, infections and systemic diseases can trigger interstitial nephritis. The clinical outcome varies from asymptomatic progression to acute kidney injury. Interstitial nephritis often leads to characteristic and detectable partial tubular disorders such as tubular proteinuria (alpha(1)-microglobulin), phosphaturia with hypophosphatemia, aminoaciduria, diminished H(+) secretion with metabolic acidosis with inadequate high urinary pH, glucosuria and salt loss. The main principle of treatment is avoidance of the inducing agent. In addition corticosteroids have been proven usable after exclusion of an infection so that a good prognosis can be expected for acute nephritis in the majority of cases. In chronic forms the interstitial nephritis involves the glomeruli as well as potentially resulting in end-stage renal failure in the long run. Supportive therapies are then required in the sense of chronic renal failure in order to prevent further functional loss up to end-stage renal disease.

Drug-induced Kidney Disease – Pathology and Current Concepts

The kidneys can be damaged by a large number of therapeutic agents. The aim of this article is to discuss the pathological features of drug-induced renal disease as diagnosed by kidney biopsy. The literature is reviewed and cases seen by the authors that have a known drug association are analysed. Mechanisms of injury are varied and all renal structures may be affected. The tubulointerstitial compartment is most frequently involved, but glomerular and vascular lesions are seen in a significant proportion of cases. Key words: Drug, Kidney, Nephrotoxicity, Pathology

Management of acute renal failure in the elderly patient: a clinician's guide

Numerous anatomical and functional changes occurring in the aging kidney lead to reduced glomerular filtration rate, lower renal blood flow and impaired renal autoregulation. The elderly are especially vulnerable to the development of renal dysfunction and in this population acute renal failure (ARF) is a common problem. ARF is often iatrogenic and multifactorial; common iatrogenic combinations include pre-existing renal dysfunction and exposure to nephrotoxins such as radiocontrast agents or aminoglycosides, use of NSAIDs in patients with congestive cardiac failure and use of ACE inhibitors and diuretics in patients with underlying atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. The aetiology of ARF is classically grouped into three categories: prerenal, intrinsic and postrenal. Prerenal ARF is the second most common cause of ARF in the elderly, accounting for nearly one-third of all hospitalized cases. Common causes can be grouped into true volume depletion (e.g. decreased fluid intake), decreased effective blood volume (e.g. systemic vasodilation) and haemodynamic (e.g. renal artery stenosis, NSAID use). Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is the most common cause of intrinsic ARF and is responsible for over 50% of ARF in hospitalized patients, and up to 76% of cases in patients in intensive care units. ATN usually occurs after an acute ischaemic or toxic event. The pathogenesis of ATN involves an interplay of processes that include endothelial injury, microvascular flow disruption, tubular hypoxia, dysfunction and apoptosis, tubular obstruction and trans-tubular back-leak. Vasculitis causing ARF should not be missed as this condition is potentially life threatening. The likelihood of a postrenal cause for ARF increases with age. Benign prostatic hypertrophy, prostatic carcinoma and pelvic malignancies are all important causes. Early identification of ARF secondary to obstruction with renal imaging is essential, and complete or partial renal recovery usually ensues following relief of the obstruction.A comprehensive medical and drug history and physical examination are all invaluable. Particular attention should be paid to the fluid status of the patient (skin turgor, jugular venous pressure, lying and standing blood pressure, urine output). Urinalysis should be performed to detect evidence of proteinuria and haematuria, which will aid diagnosis. Fractional excretion of sodium and urine osmolality may be measured but the widespread use of diuretics in the elderly gives rise to unreliable results. Renal imaging, usually ultrasound scanning, is routinely performed for assessment of renal size and to exclude urinary obstruction. In some cases, renal biopsy is necessary to provide specific diagnostic information. The general principles of managing ARF include treatment of life-threatening features such as shock, respiratory failure, hyperkalaemia, pulmonary oedema, metabolic acidosis and sepsis; stopping and avoiding administration of nephrotoxins; optimization of haemodynamic and fluid status; adjustment of drug dosage appropriate to glomerular filtration rate; early nutritional support; and early referral to nephrologists for diagnosis of ARF cause, timely initiation of dialysis and initiation of specific treatment. The treatment of prerenal and ATN ARF is largely supportive with little evidence of benefit from current pharmacological therapies. Despite advances in critical care medicine and renal replacement therapy, the mortality of ARF has not changed significantly over the last 40 years, with current mortality rates being up to 75%.

Renal disease in patients with HIV infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis and management

With the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy, we have witnessed prolonged survival with the potential for normal life expectancy in HIV-infected individuals. With improved survival and increasing age, HIV-infected patients are increasingly likely to experience co-morbidities that affect the general population, including kidney disease. Although HIV-associated nephropathy, the most ominous kidney disease related to the direct effects of HIV, may be prevented and treated with antiretrovirals, kidney disease remains an important issue in this population. In addition to the common risk factors for kidney disease of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, HIV-infected individuals have a high prevalence of other risk factors, including hepatitis C, cigarette smoking and injection drug use. Furthermore, they have exposures unique to this population, including antiretrovirals and other medications. Therefore, the differential diagnosis is vast. Early identification (through efficient screening) and definitive diagnosis (by kidney biopsy when indicated) of kidney disease in HIV-infected individuals are critical to optimal management. Earlier interventions with disease-specific therapy, often with the help of a nephrologist, are likely to lead to better outcomes. In those with chronic kidney disease, interventions, such as aggressive blood pressure control with the use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists where tolerated, tight blood glucose control in those with diabetes, and avoidance of potentially nephrotoxic medications, can slow progression and prevent end-stage renal disease. Only with greater awareness of kidney-disease manifestations and their implications in this particularly vulnerable population will we be able to achieve success in confronting this growing problem.

Early steroid treatment improves the recovery of renal function in patients with drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis

The role of steroid treatment in drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (DI-AIN) is controversial. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to determine the influence of steroids in 61 patients with biopsy-proven DI-AIN, 52 of whom were treated with steroids. The responsible drugs were antibiotics (56%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (37%) or other drugs. The final serum creatinine was significantly lower in treated patients while almost half of untreated patients remained on chronic dialysis. Among treated patients, over half showed a complete recovery of baseline renal function, whereas the rest remained in renal failure. There were no significant initial differences between these two subgroups in terms of duration or dosage of steroids. After withdrawal of the presumed causative drug, we found that when steroid treatment was delayed (by an average of 34 days) renal function did not return to baseline levels compared to those who received steroid treatment within the first 2 weeks after withdrawal of the offending agent. We found a significant correlation between the delay in steroid treatment and the final serum creatinine. Renal biopsies, including three patients who underwent a second biopsy, showed a progression of interstitial fibrosis related to the delay in steroid treatment. Our study shows that steroids should be started promptly after diagnosis of DI-AIN to avoid subsequent interstitial fibrosis and an incomplete recovery of renal function.

Role of oxidative stress in celecoxib-induced renal damage in wistar rats

Celecoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitor, prevents the formation of prostaglandins, responsible for maintenance of renal function. Celecoxib administration may lead to renal damage. Since free radicals and antioxidant mechanisms play a significant role in renal injury; this study was designed to evaluate the role of oxidative stress in celecoxib-induced renal damage. The administration of celecoxib resulted in moderate and mild tubulointerstitial nephritis in chronic and acute group. The renal function tests were significantly altered only in the chronic group. The results in both the acute and the chronic group showed (1) a significant increase in the lipid peroxidation and in the activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione-S-transferase and (2) a decrease in nitrite, reactive thiols and glutathione. In conclusion, our study suggests that chronic administration of celecoxib may have a damaging effect on kidney, as evident through altered histopathology and renal functions. This damage may be mediated by oxidative stress.

Acute Interstitial Nephritis Associated with Coadministration of Vancomycin and Ceftriaxone: Case Series and Review of the Literature

We report what we believe to be the first two cases of acute interstitial nephritis associated with vancomycin and ceftriaxone therapy in adults. A 40-year-old man with a medical history of traumatic brain injury and tonic-clonic seizure disorder was admitted to the hospital with a seizure episode and temperature of 103 degrees F. He was administered ceftriaxone, vancomycin, and acyclovir for suspected bacterial and/or viral meningitis. On day 4, the patient was noted to have diffuse erythematous plaques on the neck, chest, arms, abdomen, and back, as well as an elevated serum creatinine level of 3.1 mg/dl (baseline 0.9 mg/dl) and an elevated eosinophil count (6%). Dermatology and renal consultations were obtained, and a diagnosis of suspected acute interstitial nephritis was made. After a 3-day course of antibiotic treatment (day 4 of hospitalization), all antibiotics were discontinued and topical triamcinolone 0.1% ointment and hydrocortisone 2.5% cream were begun for the rash. The patient was discharged 5 days later with improvement in the rash, serum creatinine level (1.0 mg/dl), and eosinophil count (0.9%). A 59-year-old woman with a medical history of diabetes mellitus was admitted to the hospital with a serum creatinine level of 3.7 mg/dl, eosinophil count of 8.4%, and fractional excretion of sodium of 2.94%. The patient had been receiving treatment with vancomycin and ceftriaxone for osteomyelitis for 28 days before this hospital admission. Her baseline serum creatinine level (before antibiotic therapy) was 1.0 mg/dl. Renal consultation was obtained, and a diagnosis of probable acute interstitial nephritis was made. Ceftriaxone and vancomycin were discontinued, and her serum creatinine level gradually decreased to 3.3 mg/dl and then further to 1.5 mg/dl over the next 3 months. Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale revealed that the adverse reaction was possible in the first case and probable in the second case. Health care professionals need to be cognizant that drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis can be associated with concomitant administration of ceftriaxone and vancomycin therapy. Early detection of this rare adverse reaction is paramount in order to prevent acute renal insufficiency.

Recurrent acute interstitial nephritis induced by azithromycin

A 14-year-old girl is reported with recurrent, azithromycin-induced, acute interstitial nephritis. The second episode was more severe than the first; and although both were treated with intensive corticosteroid therapy, renal function remained impaired. Although most cases of antibiotic induced acute interstitial nephritis are benign and self-limited, some patients are at risk for permanent renal injury.

Antibacterial agents in pediatrics

Antibiotics are among the most widely prescribed therapeutic agents in children. Several new trends in antibiotic usage for pediatric care have emerged. New mechanisms of antibacterial resistance have required a broader repertoire of antibiotic usage, including new agents directed at multidrug resistance. After promotion of judicious antibiotic use, there has been a decline in the number of pediatric prescriptions for antibiotics. Recent legislation addresses the necessity for pediatric clinical drug trials, ensuring development of further antibacterial agents for use in pediatric patients.

Acute interstitial nephritis due to cefoperazone

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of cefoperazone-induced acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) in which the diagnosis was supported by renal biopsy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 35-year-old woman presented to our hospital with decreased urine output and no past history of renal problems. Fifteen days prior to presentation, she had started treatment with intramuscular cefoperazone 1 g/day for a scalp infection. On day 12 of therapy, the patient noted decreased urine output, anorexia, and weakness, but she continued taking cefoperazone for 3 more days. Hemodialysis and oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg (30 mg twice daily) were started. Renal function returned to normal after 2 months of prednisolone treatment.

DISCUSSION

Although AIN has been linked with other cephalosporins, as of June 18, 2004, to our knowledge, this is the first report of a cefoperazone-induced case. We based our diagnosis on the features of acute-onset renal failure, abnormal urinalysis findings, eosinophilia, inflammatory infiltrate in the interstitium, and recovery from renal failure after initiation of corticosteroid treatment. Application of the Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between the acute renal failure secondary to the possible AIN and cefoperazone therapy in this patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This case indicates that cefoperazone, like other cephalosporins, can cause AIN. We recommend close monitoring of renal function in patients who are prescribed this drug.

Drug-induced tubulo-interstitial nephritis secondary to proton pump inhibitors: experience from a single UK renal unit

BACKGROUND

Acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis (TIN) is an important cause of acute renal failure, and is often caused by hypersensitivity to drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the aetiology of interstitial nephritis among an unselected cohort of patients, and to identify those drugs commonly implicated.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective analysis was carried out of renal biopsy results from 296 consecutive patients between 1995 and 1999.

RESULTS

Acute TIN was identified in 24 (8.1%) biopsies. Eight out of 14 cases with presumed drug-related TIN could be attributed to the proton pump inhibitors omeprazole and lansoprazole. The two cases of lansoprazole-associated TIN are the first to be reported with this drug. The presentation and favourable response to treatment of these patients are described.

CONCLUSION

Drugs are the most common cause of interstitial nephritis in the population studied. Those drugs most commonly associated with interstitial nephritis were the proton pump inhibitors omeprazole and lansoprazole.

Acute Interstitial Nephritis Due to Pantoprazole

OBJECTIVE:

To describe what is believed, as of November 4, 2003, to be the first case published in the literature of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) due to pantoprazole.

CASE SUMMARY:

A 77-year-old white woman presented to the hospital with elevated serum creatinine, oliguria for the past 24 hours, arthralgia, fatigue, fever, and bilateral flank pain. The patient had initiated treatment with oral pantoprazole 40 mg/d for gastroesophageal reflux 2 months prior to admission. After 5 weeks of therapy, she stopped taking pantoprazole due to general malaise. Upon admission, all home medications, including pantoprazole, were reinitiated based on the patient's medication list. Serum creatinine increased to 6.1 mg/dL on day 4 of admission from a baseline of 1.0 mg/dL. Pantoprazole therapy was promptly discontinued, and prednisone 40 mg/d was initiated. Urinalysis revealed eosinophils, and a subsequent renal biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of AIN. The serum creatinine level gradually declined over 2 weeks, and the patient was discharged home with a serum creatinine level of 1.6 mg/dL. The Naranjo probability scale suggests a highly probable relationship between AIN and pantoprazole therapy in this patient.

DISCUSSION:

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are the most common cause of AIN. There have been several reported cases of omeprazole-induced AIN. Although there are very few prospective data on the efficacy of treatment of drug-induced AIN, corticosteroids may have a role in recovery of renal function. Prednisone doses of 1 mg/kg/d have been suggested.

CONCLUSIONS:

Physicians should be aware that drug-induced AIN can be associated with proton-pump inhibitors. Early detection of this rare adverse reaction may prevent acute renal insufficiency.