Effects of fenbufen, indomethacin, naproxen, and placebo on gastric mucosa of normal volunteers. A comparative endoscopic and photographic evaluation

Frequency and Types of Pathological Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Findings in Clinically Healthy Individuals

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Beyond its application for diagnostics in patients, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is used to assess gastrointestinal drug effects in clinical trials, where the interpretation of any pathological findings depends on the respective background variability. The objective of this analysis was to characterize the occurrence of pathological findings in the upper gastrointestinal tract in symptom-free healthy individuals.

METHODS

A baseline EGD was performed in clinically healthy individuals in three clinical trials aimed to assess gastrointestinal tolerability of drugs. Pathological findings were described by type (redness, erosion, ulcer or other), number, size and location, and by clinical relevance as assessed by the endoscopist. Characteristics of volunteers were tested as potential covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 294 EGDs were assessed. Characteristics of individuals were as follows: 257 (87.4%) males, age (mean ± SD) 32.0 ± 8.1 years, body weight 76.0 ± 10.6 kg, body mass index (BMI) 24.0 ± 2.5 kg/m2, 200 consumed alcohol, 250 (of 290 where this information was available) consumed caffeine and 39 (of 152) were smokers, 30 (of 151) tested positive for H. pylori. Any pathological finding was present in 79.6%. Clinically relevant findings occurred in 44.2%, mainly erosions (39.1%). Nine stomach ulcers were observed. Only age and BMI had a statistically significant relationship to overall pathological findings [age 3.4 years higher (p = 0.027), and BMI 1.6 kg/m2 higher (p < 0.001); for clinically relevant vs no findings].

CONCLUSION

Upper gastrointestinal tract mucosal lesions, including those assessed as clinically relevant, are frequent in clinically healthy individuals, impeding the assessment of causality for both disease and drug effects on gastrointestinal health.

Meta-analysis: incidence of endoscopic gastric and duodenal ulcers in placebo arms of randomized placebo-controlled NSAID trials

BACKGROUND

The safety of NSAIDs is often evaluated by comparison with placebo in clinical trials.

AIM

To investigate the incidence of gastric and duodenal ulcers (GDU) in placebo arms in NSAID trials over the last three decades.

METHODS

Randomized placebo-controlled trials of oral NSAIDs from 1975 to 2006 were systematically reviewed. The pooled incidence of GDU in placebo arms was calculated and compared. Meta-regression was used to identify risk factors related to the incidence of the placebo ulcer at the study level.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies met inclusion criteria (duration of 6.5 days to 24 weeks). In total, 3.29% GDUs were reported in 36 placebo arms. The incidence of GDU in placebo arms was 0, 4.20% and 3.03% in the studies from 1975-1989, 1990-1999 and 2000-2006 respectively (P > 0.05). Eligible subjects with previous GI events and eligible subjects on co-therapy with low-lose aspirin/corticosteroids were associated with the increase in placebo ulcer incidence after adjusting for other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of GDU in placebo arms has not changed significantly over the last three decades, although has decreased in the past 10 years. Studies show that previous GI events and co-therapy with low-dose aspirin/corticosteroids were associated with increasing GDU in placebo arms.

Pathophysiology of cyclooxygenase inhibition in animal models

Cyclooxygenase (COX) catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid into prostaglandins (PGs), which play a significant role in health and disease in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) and in the renal, skeletal, and ocular systems. COX-1 is constitutively expressed and found in most normal tissues, whereas COX-2 can be expressed at low levels in normal tissues and is highly induced by pro-inflammatory mediators. Inhibitors of COX activity include: (1) conventional nonselective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs) and (2) COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (COX-2 s-NSAIDs). Inhibition of COX-1 often elicits GI toxicity in animals and humans. Therefore, COX-2 s-NSAIDs were developed to provide a selective COX-2 agent, while minimizing the attendant COX-1-mediated GI toxicities. Rats and dogs overpredict COX inhibition for renal effects such as renal handling of electrolytes in humans. COX inhibitors are shown to have both beneficial and detrimental effects, such as on healing of ligament or tendon tears, on the skeletal system in animal models. Certain ophthalmic conditions such as glaucoma and keratitis are associated with increased COX-2 expression, suggesting a potential role in their pathophysiology.

Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on the gastrointestinal tract

Cyclooxygenase (COX) is a rate-limiting enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid, an essential fatty acid present in cell membrane phospholipids and liberated by phospholipase, into prostaglandins (PGs) and prostanoids. COX has two distinct membrane-anchored isoenzymes; COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is a constitutively expressed and found in most normal body tissues; COX-2 is expressed in normal tissues at low levels and is highly induced by pro-inflammatory mediators in the setting of inflammation, injury, and pain. Inhibitors of COX activity include: (1) conventional non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs); (2) selective COX-2 inhibitors (COXIBs); and (3) COX-1 inhibitors. Non-selective NSAIDs, at therapeutic doses, inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2. The anti-inflammatory benefits of these drugs are primarily derived from COX-2 inhibition, while inhibition of COX-1 often elicits gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Therefore, COXIBs were developed to provide a selective COX-2 agent, i.e., one, that at fully therapeutic doses demonstrated comparable therapeutic benefit to non-selective NSAIDs, without the attendant COX-1-mediated GI toxicities. In this review, we evaluate available literature describing the pathophysiologic role of cyclooxygenases and the effects of their inhibition in GI system in experimental and domestic animal species.

The effect of dosing interval on the efficacy of misoprostol in the prevention of aspirin-induced gastric injury

The effect of twice-daily administration of misoprostol on aspirin-induced gastric injury was evaluated. Twenty-four random-source dogs were divided into groups that received aspirin and misoprostol as follows: group I, aspirin 25 mg/kg PO q8h and placebo PO q8h; group II, aspirin 25 mg/kg PO q8h and misoprostol 3 microg/kg PO q8h; group III, aspirin 25 mg/kg PO q8h, misoprostol 3 microg/kg PO q12h, and placebo PO q24h; and group IV, aspirin 25 mg/kg PO q8h, misoprostol 3 microg/kg PO q24h, and placebo PO q12h for 28 days. Gastroscopy was performed on days -9, 5, 14, and 28. Visible lesions were scored on a scale of 1 (mucosal hemorrhage) to 11 (perforating ulcer). No difference in total score was identified between groups I and IV on any day. Median total scores for groups II and III were significantly (P < or = .05) lower compared to groups I and IV on day 5. Group III had a significantly lower score (P < or = .05) than groups I, II, and IV on day 28. This study suggests that misoprostol 3 microg/kg PO q12h is as effective as misoprostol 3 microg/kg PO q8h in preventing aspirin-induced gastric injury in this model. However, misoprostol 3 microg/ kg PO q8h was less effective in preventing aspirin-induced gastric injury on days 14 and 28 than in previous studies. No difference among numbers of dog-days of vomiting, diarrhea, or anorexia was detected among groups.

Gastrointestinal safety of an extended-release, nondeformable, oral dosage form (OROS: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The OROS osmotic (OSM) dosage form optimises extended-release oral administration by controlling the rate of drug release for a predetermined time, providing constant, patterned, or pulsed delivery profiles. OSM products include prescription medications for urology, CNS, and cardiovascular indications, as well as over-the-counter nasal/sinus congestion medications.

METHODS

This retrospective study examines US gastrointestinal (GI) safety data for the OROS dosage form following nearly two decades of use. Although GI injury and obstruction are known effects of oral medications, some reports have suggested that extended-release products pose a greater risk of GI injury and obstruction than other oral dosage forms. Products incorporating OROS technology are being prescribed to an expanding range of patients; a review of the GI safety data for this dosage form thus seemed timely and appropriate. US safety information was obtained from three sources: English language literature published from 1982 until June 1, 2000 from five major biomedical databases;postmarketing safety reports from January 1, 1983 until June 1, 2000 available through the Freedom of Information Act; andcommercial safety information obtained directly from ALZA Corporation's in-house safety database for those OSM products for which ALZA has reporting responsibility. US distribution data from IMS National Prescription Audit trade mark Plus data were used to estimate cumulative product distribution totals. These totals were combined with numbers of unique GI events to determine the estimated frequency of events.

RESULTS

Nearly 13 billion OSM tablets are estimated to have been distributed in the US. The incidence of all clinically significant GI adverse events for OSM products (including intestinal, gastric, and oesophageal irritation, injury, and obstruction) reported in the US was approximately one case in >76 million tablets distributed. The majority (78%; estimated incidence: one case in 29 million tablets) of cases were reported in patients taking Procardia XL (nifedipine). Oesophageal and lower GI obstruction were reported primarily in patients with pre-existing abnormalities or disease of the GI tract. Among paediatric patients, one obstruction was reported in an estimated 37.7 million tablets distributed. Reports of GI irritation associated with OSM products were consistent with known effects of the same drug substances in other dosage forms.

CONCLUSION

A review of long-term safety experience with products using OSM controlled-release technology yields a low incidence of clinically significant GI events. Properly prescribed, extended-release products provide substantial therapeutic and convenience benefits without additional risk.

Recent considerations in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy

Conservative calculations estimate that approximately 107,000 patients are hospitalized annually for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications and at least 16,500 NSAID-related deaths occur each year among arthritis patients alone. The figures for all NSAID users would be overwhelming, yet the scope of this problem is generally under-appreciated. The Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information System (ARAMIS) Post-Marketing Surveillance Program (PMS) has prospectively followed patient status and outcomes, drug side effects, and the economic impact of illness for >11,000 arthritis patients at 8 participating institutions in the United States and Canada. Analysis of these data indicates that: (1) osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are 2.5-5.5 times more likely than the general population to be hospitalized for NSAID-related GI events; (2) the absolute risk for serious NSAID-related GI toxicity remains constant and the cumulative risk increases over time; (3) there are no reliable warning signals- >80% of patients with serious GI complications had no prior GI symptoms; (4) independent risk factors for serious GI events were age, prednisone use, NSAID dose, disability level, and previous NSAID-induced GI symptoms; and (5) antacids and H2 antagonists do not prevent NSAID-induced gastric ulcers, and high-risk NSAID users who take gastro-protective drugs are more likely to have serious GI complications than patients not taking such medications. Currently, limiting NSAID use is the only way to decrease the risk of NSAID-related GI events. Ongoing ARAMIS research is aimed at developing a simple point-score system for estimating individual risks of developing serious NSAID-related GI complications.

Gastric microbleeding following single and repeated dosing with naproxen

BACKGROUND

Adaptation to gastric damage from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) has been observed during ongoing dosage in rats and humans. However, this does not always occur, and our previous data suggest that NSAID half-life may be a determining factor.

AIM

To investigate whether adaptation occurs during 1 week of naproxen administration in humans.

SUBJECTS

Thirteen healthy volunteers were studied at baseline, and after one or seven daily doses of naproxen 750 mg. Gastric microbleeding was measured 4 h after naproxen in gastric washings collected during a 30-min period. Serum thromboxane B concentrations were also assayed, as a marker of cyclo-oxygenase inhibition.

RESULTS

Mean blood loss after placebo was 0.60 microL/10 min (95% CI: 0.21-0.98). This rose to 2.15 (0.73-3.57) and 1.75 (0.74-2.76) microL/10 min after one and seven daily doses of naproxen, respectively (P < 0.05 vs. baseline; day 1 vs. 7 not significant). Thromboxane B concentrations were < 10% of control at both day 1 and 7 of dosing.

CONCLUSION

In accord with our findings in rats, adaptation to this moderately long acting NSAID in humans was not apparent. We conclude that any adaptation to naproxen is unlikely to be clinically important.

Comparative toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents

Comparative toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was assessed using the Stanford Toxicity Index consisting of weighted symptoms, laboratory abnormalities and hospitalizations in 2976 consecutively enrolled rheumatoid arthritis patients from eight data bank centers with 27,936 patient-years of observation. Scores ranged from 1.77 (SE 0.20) for aspirin to 5.94 (SE 0.92) for meclofenamate, with many differences between drugs being 2- to 3-fold and highly statistically significant. Results are consistent with our prior data, persist when assessed by several different scoring algorithms, are consistent across data bank centers and are consistent with data of others. There are major and reproducible differences in the overall toxicity of different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Lornoxicam, indomethacin and placebo: comparison of effects on faecal blood loss and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic appearances in healthy men

Forty-five healthy men aged 21-34 years took part in a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of the effects of 28 days' treatment with lornoxicam 4 mg twice daily or indomethacin 50 mg twice daily on faecal blood loss and the endoscopic appearances of gastric and duodenal mucosa. After an initial endoscopic examination, subjects received, intravenously, on day 0, autologous erythrocytes labelled with 51Cr. Complete daily faecal collections were then made from days 6-12, 20-26 and 34-40. The drug treatments or placebo were given from days 13-41. Faecal blood loss was calculated from 51Cr-specific activity of blood and faeces. Endoscopy was repeated 4-8 hours after the last dose of medication; mucosal appearance was graded on a 5-point scale. Lornoxicam caused no more adverse events than placebo; indomethacin caused more indigestion and central nervous system effects, and one subject in this group was withdrawn from the study. Median total blood losses during the pre-treatment and the second and fourth weeks of treatment were respectively 3.33, 3.95 and 5.71 ml for lornoxicam, 2.87, 7.04 and 7.75 ml for indomethacin, and 4.55, 3.64 and 4.13 ml for placebo. Differences between treatments were not statistically significant (P = 0.081 for second week of treatment, P = 0.383 for fourth week of treatment; Kruskal-Wallis test). The effect of chlortenoxicam on faecal blood loss in this study was thus intermediate between placebo and indomethacin, but within- and between-subject variability was such that the differences were not statistically significant. Endoscopic findings were normal in most subjects before and after all treatments, but indomethacin was associated with a slightly greater deterioration in endoscopic score and was the only treatment associated with Grade 3 appearance (in a single patient) in post-treatment endoscopy.

A review of gastric ulcer and gastroduodenal injury in normal volunteers receiving aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Studies in normal volunteers from our laboratory and by other investigators have demonstrated that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) can significantly damage the gastroduodenal mucosa. This damage is maximal with plain and buffered aspirin products. The injury produced by non-aspirin NSAIDs in anti-inflammatory doses is less than with aspirin but depends primarily on the dosages used. Pro-drugs and enteric-coated aspirin tend to produce less injury. The incidence of gastric ulcer in 1064 normal volunteers studied in our laboratory over a period of 7 years is reviewed. Seventy-two (6.7%) normal subjects developed a gastric ulcer after 7 days of therapy with anti-inflammatory doses of these drugs. The largest number of ulcers were seen with plain and buffered aspirin, and the lowest number with the lower anti-inflammatory doses of the non-aspirin NSAIDs.

Ulcerogenic drugs and upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Aspirin and other NSAIDs are drugs for which the causal association with major gastrointestinal bleeding has not been adequately or conclusively demonstrated, although a certain degree of correlation is very likely. For aspirin ingestion in particular the increased risk is confined to patients taking the drug at heavy and regular dosages (less than 1% of users), and can be reduced further by the use of enteric-coated formulations. For non-aspirin NSAIDs, the relative risk of GI bleeding after repeated and prolonged exposure (in comparison to controls) has been quantified between 1.5 and 2.7, which is a small but significant figure, and it is increased by the age of the patients, by the duration of treatment and by the dose of drug. No consistent causal relationship can be found between major GI bleeding (or other major peptic ulcer complications) and steroids or other 'ulcerogenic' drugs. The therapy of drug-induced (or drug-associated) GI bleeding is probably not different from the usual treatment of upper GI haemorrhage. As far as the treatment of drug-associated gastroduodenal mucosal damage is concerned, it appears that with mucoprotective agents or H2 antagonists the healing rates of peptic ulcers is slower than observed in non-drug-associated disease. Prophylactic treatment with prostaglandins has only been proposed; and prophylactic treatment with H2 antagonists has been disappointing.

Clinical spectrum of the upper gastrointestinal effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Natural history, symptomatology, and significance

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) relieve rheumatic pain and are in extensive use. Symptomatic complications of NSAIDs requiring the discontinuation of their use occur in 2 to 10 percent of patients with rheumatic diseases in sharp contrast to the common asymptomatic problems of gastroduodenal erosions, ulcerations, and bleeding, with resulting anemia in more than 40 percent of these patients. Opinions concerning the clinical significance of these complications are not uniform. The natural history of the effects of NSAIDs on the gastroduodenal mucosa reveals a sequence of initial subepithelial hemorrhage over a 24-hour period followed by gastroduodenal erosions and ulcerations in the next two weeks. From one week to three months, gastroduodenal erosions and ulcerations disappear in about half of the patients as an adaptation to continuing NSAID ingestion occurs. Hemorrhage may occur at any time in most patients and in a small minority (1 percent) it is massive. Non-aspirin NSAIDs (NANSAIDs) exhibit significantly fewer complications than do aspirin. These complications, however, demand considerable clinical attention and are ordered in a constant hierarchy, suggesting variable risks of complications among agents. NSAIDs are a blessing for those who have chronic pain, but that blessing does not prevent significant asymptomatic complications in the same patients. Prophylaxis for high-risk groups, such as women over the age of 65 years, should be subjected to study.

A review of selected investigational nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs of the 1980s

We reviewed the literature on 7 investigational nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): fenbufen, flurbiprofen, tiaprofenic acid, diclofenac, fenclofenac, etodolac and proquazone. These drugs all appear to be at least as effective as currently marketed NSAIDs. Toxicity reported with these newer agents is similar to that seen with other drugs in this class, with gastrointestinal complaints being most commonly reported. The frequency of gastritis and the extent of gastrointestinal microbleeding are less than what occur with aspirin therapy. Fenclofenac may affect thyroid function tests, an effect not noted with other NSAIDs. Proquazone and fenclofenac may have some effect on immunologic function similar to those of slow-acting antirheumatic drugs. These drugs decrease immunoglobulins, rheumatoid factor and C-reactive protein. The place for these drugs in the management of rheumatic diseases has yet to be defined. They may prove to be more beneficial than currently marketed drugs for some patients.