Advances in cephalosporin therapy

Safety of cefepime: a new extended-spectrum parenteral cephalosporin

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety profile of cefepime, a new extended-spectrum, fourth-generation cephalosporin used to treat mild-to-severe bacterial infections, with that of ceftazidime. A total of 2,032 patients enrolled in North American and European cefepime trials were analyzed. The study population spanned adolescence to the elderly (15-100 years); the median age was 62 years. Cefepime was compared with ceftazidime (1,456 patients), a third-generation cephalosporin. Cefepime dosing was 1-4 g/day (0.5-2.0 g twice daily) for adults; ceftazidime dosing was 1-6 g/day (0.5 g every 12 hours to 2.0 g every 8 hours). A limited number of cefepime-treated patients received 2 g every 8 hours. The median length of dosing for both cefepime and ceftazidime was 7 days. In randomized trials in which cefepime (2,032 patients) was compared with ceftazidime (1,456 patients), analysis of comparative data indicated that adverse events of probable or unknown relation to study drugs were observed in 13.8% of cefepime patients and 15.6% of ceftazidime patients. The most commonly observed adverse event for cefepime was headache (2.4%), followed by nausea (1.8%), rash (1.8%), and diarrhea (1.7%). For ceftazidime, the most commonly observed adverse event was diarrhea (3.2%), followed by headache (2.5%), nausea (2.1%), rash (1.9%), and constipation (1.5%). The incidence of positive Coombs' test was higher in high-dose cefepime recipients than in ceftazidime recipients (14.5% vs 8.7%; p = 0.043), although there was no evidence of hemolysis in either treatment group. Coadministration of analgesics, diuretics, and anticoagulants did not increase incidence of adverse events associated with study-drug therapy. Adverse renal and hematologic events, as well as anaphylaxis and death, were rare in both groups. In the comparative trials with cefepime, anaphylaxis was reported in no patients receiving cefepime and in one patient receiving ceftazidime. None of the three seizures reported in patients receiving cefepime and one of six seizures in patients receiving ceftazidime were of probable or possible relationship to the study drugs. None of the 12 cases of gastrointestinal hemorrhage reported in cefepime patients or five cases reported in ceftazidime patients were judged to be related to treatment drug. Tolerance for intravenous administration in both treatment groups was similar. Cefepime did not effect any significant or unusual allergic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, neurologic, or renal toxicity when administered to patients with mild-to-severe infections, including those receiving concomitant medications. The safety profile of cefepime is excellent and comparable to that of ceftazidime and those reported for other cephalosporins.

Pathophysiologic basis for the use of third-generation cephalosporins

After 10 years of use, the third-generation cephalosporins remain excellent antibiotics. They have superior activity against selected streptococcal species compared with other cephalosporins, and superior activity against Haemophilus, Neisseria, Branhamella, and other less common oral gram-negative aerobic species. Despite a very broad spectrum of activity, the third-generation cephalosporins, like all other cephalosporins, have only poor activity against enterococci, Listeria, Corynebacterium jekeium, and methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Over the past 10 years, the activity of the third-generation cephalosporins against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Providencia, Serratia, Haemophilus, and Neisseria has remained excellent. Equally as important, though perhaps less well recognized, is the activity of some of these agents against mouth anaerobic species and the anaerobic Bacteroides and Clostridium spp. of the pelvic area. At present, there are two main threats to the continued use of the third-generation cephalosporins. These are the increasing number of infections due to Enterobacter spp., which constitutively produce large amounts of a beta-lactamase that hydrolyzes cephalosporins, and the recent appearance of Klebsiella spp. in many parts of the world that possess new plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases that destroy cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and related third-generation parenteral cephalosporins. Correlation of pharmacologic properties with in vitro activity provides information as to reasonable dosage regimens for the third-generation cephalosporins. For most serious infections cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, and ceftazidime should be given three times a day provided that the patient has relatively normal renal function. Ceftriaxone can be administered once daily in less severe infections. The use of lower doses or less frequent dosing with cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, or ceftazidime is recommended in aged patients whose renal function is impaired. The unique interaction of cefotaxime with its active metabolite, desacetylcefotaxime, allows cefotaxime to be administered less frequently than three times a day in selected anaerobic infections. Correlation of the antibacterial activity and pharmacology of cephalosporins will help us to tailor their use more appropriately, so that the third-generation cephalosporins will remain useful antimicrobial agents for a further decade.