Pathogenetic factors in erosive gastritis

Stress Ulcer Syndrome

Stress ulcer syndrome refers to gastroduodenal erosions or ulcers that develop acutely in relation to major physi ological stress, usually manifested clinically as upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. These lesions occur most often in the gastric fundus. Endoscopy has shown gastroduodenal mucosal lesions in 75 to 100% of inten sive care unit (ICU) patients within 72 hours of admis sion. Patients at high risk for stress ulcer include those with large body surface area burns, intracranial lesions associated with coma, fulminant hepatic failure, sepsis, and trauma and abdominal, cardiovascular, and thoracic surgery patients. Also considered high risk are ICU pa tients with superimposed complications such as shock, mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days, coagulopa thy, jaundice, and sepsis. Approximately 15% of ICU pa tients will experience UGI bleeding from stress ulcer. Patients bleeding from stress ulcer have an overall mor tality rate approaching 65% compared with 9 to 22% mortality in patients without stress ulcer. When strati fied according to occult blood loss versus clinically significant bleeding, mortality can be as high as 90% in patients overtly bleeding; 30% of deaths are directly related to bleeding. Both antacids and H2 receptor an tagonists are effective in prophylaxis for stress ulcer bleeding.

Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Complications in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation

There exists a complex, dynamic interaction between mechanical ventilation and the splanchnic vasculature that contributes to a myriad of gastrointestinal tract complications that arise during critical illness. Positive pressure-induced splanchnic hypoperfusion appears to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of these complications, the most prevalent of which are stress-related mucosal damage, gastrointestinal hypomotility and diarrhea. Furthermore, characteristics of the splanchnic vasculature make the gastrointestinal tract vulnerable to adverse effects related to positive pressure ventilation. While most of these complications seen in mechanically ventilated patients are reflections of altered gastrointestinal physiology, some may be attributed to medical interventions instituted to treat critical illness. Since maintenance of normal hemodynamics cannot always be achieved, pharmacologic prophylactic therapy has become a mainstay in the prevention of gastrointestinal complications in the intensive care unit. Improved understanding of the systemic effects of mechanical ventilation and greater application of lung-protective ventilatory strategies may potentially minimize positive pressure-induced reductions in splanchnic perfusion, systemic cytokine release and, consequently, reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal complications associated with mechanical ventilation. Herein, we discuss the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal complications associated with mechanical ventilation, summarize the most prevalent complications and focus on preventive strategies and available treatment options for these complications. The most common causes of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in mechanically ventilated patients are bleeding from stress-related mucosal damage and erosive esophagitis. In general, histamine H(2) receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors prevent stress-related mucosal disease by raising the gastric fluid pH. Proton pump inhibitors tend to provide more consistent pH control than histamine H(2) receptor antagonists. There is no consensus on the drug of choice for stress ulcer prophylaxis with several meta-analyses providing conflicting results on the superiority of any medication. Prevention of erosive esophagitis include careful use of nasogastric tubes and institution of strategies that improve gastric emptying. Many mechanically ventilated patients have gastrointestinal hypomotility and diarrhea. Treatment options for gastrointestinal motility are limited, thus, preventive measures such as correction of electrolyte abnormalities and avoidance of medications that impair gastrointestinal motility are crucial. Treatment of diarrhea depends on the underlying cause. When associated with Clostridium difficile infection antibacterial therapy should be discontinued, if possible, and treatment with oral metronidazole should be initiated.More studies are warranted to better understand the systemic effects of mechanical ventilation on the gastrointestinal tract and to investigate the impact of lung protective ventilatory strategies on gastrointestinal complications.

GI complications in patients receiving mechanical ventilation

Mechanical ventilation (MV) can be lifesaving by maintaining gas exchange until the underlying disorders are corrected, but it is associated with numerous organ-system complications, which can significantly affect the outcome of critically ill patients. Like other organ systems, GI complications may be directly attributable to MV, but most are a reflection of the severity of the underlying disease that required intensive care. The interactions of the underlying critical illness and MV with the GI tract are complex and can manifest in a variety of clinical pictures. Incorporated in this review are discussions of the most prevalent GI complications associated with MV, and current diagnosis and management of these problems.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding in the intensive care unit. The gastroenterologist's perspective

Although SRES-associated hemorrhage previously constituted a significant cause of bleeding in the ICU, improvements in ICU management and the institution of prophylactic measures in high-risk patients have significantly reduced SRES-associated hemorrhage since the 1980s. Antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, and sucralfate have been shown to be effective in preventing clinically significant bleeding resulting from SRES, particularly when the intragastric pH is maintained at greater than 4. A selective approach should be adopted in SRES prophylaxis: Patients on mechanical ventilation, with coagulopathy, or with two of the other known risk factors should receive prophylaxis. Although the drug of choice depends to some extent on local preferences, an H2-receptor antagonist by continuous intravenous infusion may represent the best option. No pharmacologic therapy is of proven value once hemorrhage begins, but the current interventional techniques are effective in controlling hemorrhage. Gastrointestinal bleeding from NOMV has become less common with improvements in the hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients, but this disease must always be considered when lower gastrointestinal bleeding occurs in the context of relative hypoperfusion. For SRES and NOMV, treatment of the underlying disease or diseases is the optimal route to prevention.

Clinical utility of pH paper versus pH meter in the measurement of critical gastric pH in stress ulcer prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical utility of measuring gastric pH with a pH meter vs. pH paper in critical care patients.

DESIGN

Prospective comparison of gastric pH measurements, using both pH meter and pH paper.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at a rural Midwestern university medical center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-one patients who received therapy for prophylaxis of stress ulcers in the surgical ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

Therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis was monitored.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The pH of 985 gastric samples, taken from 51 patients, was measured with both pH meter and pH paper. The pH meter and pH paper measures demonstrated a concordance correlation coefficient of .896. The mean difference between the two measures (pH paper - pH meter) was estimated to be between -0.4 and 1.4, suggesting a positive bias for the paper. The prevalence of events representing clinically relevant differences between the pH meter and pH paper in the measurement of the same gastric sample was calculated. The frequency with which each of the events occurred consecutively (or, in one case, two nearly consecutive events on the same day) was also calculated. Bias in a clinically relevant range was estimated. A set of "probability profiles" was constructed.

CONCLUSIONS

A hand-held pH meter and pH paper are not interchangeable measures of gastric pH. The pH paper exhibits an appreciable positive bias compared with a hand-held pH meter in the clinically relevant range of 2 to 6. More research is needed to determine if that bias affects treatment outcomes. We recommend the use of a pH meter for patients who demonstrate pH readings of < or = 4, consecutive with readings of < or = 5.

The value of early enteral nutrition in the prophylaxis of stress ulceration in the severely burned patient

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed to compare the frequency of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in seriously burned patients treated with either cimetidine and antacids or enteral nutrition for ulcer prophylaxis. Five hundred and twenty-six seriously burned patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit of the BG Trauma Centre Ludwigshafen during a 4-year period were included into the study. All patients admitted to the burn unit from 1989 to 1991 received i.v. cimetidine (400 mg q4) for ulcer prophylaxis. If the intragastric pH dropped below 3.5, gastric pH was titrated with antacids up to > or = 4 via nasogastric tube. During the second 2-year period (1992-1993) early enteral nutrition alone was regarded to be ulcer protective and no further interventions for ulcer prophylaxis were routinely performed. Signs of overt upper GIB were monitored and documented through the entire study period. The overall occurrence rate of upper GIB in the cimetidine/antacids (C/A) group (n = 253) was 8.3 per cent with six cases of serious bleeding in five patients (1.98 per cent). In the enteral nutrition (EN) group (n = 273) the overall incidence of GIB was 3.3 per cent with two cases of serious bleeding (0.73 per cent). There were no deaths directly related to ulcer haemorrhage. The difference in the overall frequency of overt GIB between the groups studied was statistically significant (< 0.05). In our experience, early enteral nutrition is effective in the prevention of stress haemorrhage in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Additional medicinal prophylaxis is not required in burn patients.

Septic shock

PURPOSE

Many patients with sepsis require surgery for their management, often on an urgent or emergency basis. Anaesthetists are commonly required to manage patients with sepsis and septic shock in the operating room, past anaesthesia recovery area, and the intensive care unit. Since little has been written in the Anaesthesia literature on sepsis and septic shock, a review of this topic was considered appropriate.

SOURCE

References were obtained from computerized searches on the National Library of Medicine (English language), recent review articles and personal files. PRINCIPLES FINDINGS: Septic shock is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Its presentation may be subtle or catastrophic. Successful management depends on an understanding of the pathophysiology of the syndrome, allowing rapid, appropriate resuscitation. This often requires aggressive correction of volume deficit, maintenance of adequate perfusion pressure with inotropic and vasopressor therapy, mechanical ventilation and correction of coagulopathy. Appropriate cultures must be taken and antibiotic therapy started, often empirically. Anaesthetic management should include careful haemodynamic monitoring. Anaesthesia induction and maintenance must be tailored to the haemodynamically unstable patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of the septic patient in the perioperative period presents a challenge for the anaesthetist. Haemodynamic and respiratory instability should be anticipated. Management requires multisystem intervention and careful anesthetic management.

Changing perspectives of stress gastritis prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

To present recent advances in stress gastritis prophylaxis in the critically ill and review considerations in selection of a prophylactic agent.

DATA SOURCES

Information was obtained from MEDLINE search, reference lists from articles identified in search, and from review articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Emphasis was placed on controlled trials conducted within the last 5 years.

DATA EXTRACTION

All literature was assessed for methodology, results, and conclusions. Results of prospective, randomized trials, and meta-analyses are summarized.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Histamine2-receptor antagonists, antacids, and sucralfate appear equally effective in preventing stress gastritis in the critically ill. A definitive cause-effect relationship between histamine2-receptor antagonists and increased incidence of nosocomial pneumonia has not yet been established. The indications for using a prophylactic agent and consideration in selecting an agent should include an evaluation of the following: risk factors for gastritis including the type of intensive care patient, comparative efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, cost, and ease of administration. The least expensive, safest agent requiring minimal monitoring is sucralfate. Prevention of stress gastritis has never been shown to reduce morbidity or mortality significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Controversies still exist regarding the need to provide prophylaxis, the choice of an agent, and the relative importance of previously identified risk factors. Further well-designed studies are needed before consensus can be reached.

Luminal perfusion of isolated gastric glands

We have extended to rabbit gastric glands the technique for perfusing single isolated renal tubules. We isolated glands by hand dissection and used concentric glass pipettes to hold them and perfuse their lumina. Parietal cells (PCs), which tended to be located toward the gland opening, were identified by their pyramidal shape, large size, and autofluorescence. Chief cells (CCs) were identified by their round shape and smaller size. In some experiments, we perfused the lumen with hydroxypyrenetrisulfonate, a pH-sensitive fluorophore, at pH 7.4 and used digital image processing to monitor luminal pH (pH1). Solutions were buffered with N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid to pH 7.4 at 37 degrees C. With fast perfusion, we found no evidence of decreased pH1, even with stimulation by 10 microM carbachol. With slow perfusion, pH1 often fell below the dye's sensitive range (pH < 5), especially at low perfusate buffering power. In other experiments, we loaded cells with the pH-sensitive dye 2',7'-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein and monitored intracellular pH (pHi) in multiple individual PCs and CCs in a single gland. Mean pHi was 7.21 +/- 0.02 (n = 136 cells) for PCs and 7.27 +/- 0.03 (n = 103) for CCs. To examine the response to decreased pH1 and basolateral pH (pHb), we lowered pHb to 6.4 or lowered pH1 to 3.4 or 1.4. Lowering pHb to 6.4 for approximately 1 min caused pHi to fall reversibly by 0.39 +/- 0.05 (n = 53) in PCs and 0.58 +/- 0.03 (n = 50) in CCs. Lowering pH1 to 3.4 or 1.4 caused no significant pHi changes in PCs (n = 38 and 82) or in CCs (n = 44 and 77). Carbachol did not affect the response to changes in pH1 or pHb. We conclude that the apical surfaces of PCs and CCs are unusually resistant to extreme pH gradients.

Unusual permeability properties of gastric gland cells

Physiologists have long pondered the riddle of why the stomach is itself not digested by the very juice it secretes. One explanation is that a mucus-bicarbonate barrier, coating the stomach lumen as well as superficial portions of gastric glands, prevents autodigestion. However, this leaves unanswered the question of what protects cells deeper in the glands, which seem to lack a mucus barrier. These are the parietal and chief cells, which secrete acid and pepsin. Using perfused single gastric glands from rabbit, we recently found that intracellular pH is uniquely resistant to extreme degrees of luminal acidification, suggesting that the apical (luminal) barrier might also exclude ammonia and carbon dioxide, to which cell membranes are generally highly permeable. We now show that this is indeed the case. There are three reports of membranes with very low permeabilities to NH3 (refs 5-7), and none of membranes impermeable to CO2.

Medical consultation in the patient with multiple trauma

Medical consultation is frequently requested to assist the trauma team in the management of the patient with multiple traumatic injuries. Four areas are commonly encountered as problems for management in this patient population. In this article, myocardial contusion, stress ulceration, seizure prophylaxis, and deep vein thrombosis prevention are addressed with respect to incidence, assessment, and management.

Stress gastritis revisited

In current ICU populations, overt bleeding from stress gastritis occurs in 10% to 20% of patients. Bleeding rates may be reduced to about 3% in patients receiving prophylactic therapy. Although patients with bleeding have higher mortality rates than other critically ill patients, it is not clear that the mortality rate is improved with prophylactic therapy, as most patients die from their underlying disease. As new complications of prophylactic therapy are identified, better definitions of the population at risk to develop complications of stress gastritis will be necessary to select those patients who will benefit most from prophylactic therapy.

[Digestive stress hemorrhage. Physiopathology and prevention]

Lesions of the gastroduodenal mucosa are seen very early on in virtually 100% of patients suffering from organ failure. Bleeding, even if it is only occult, defines acute stress-induced gastrointestinal tract bleeding (SGIB). The rates of SGIB vary according to the inclusion criteria: 13 to 100% microscopic SGIB, 2.3 to 9.5% haemorrhage with blood transfusion and/or shock. Gastrointestinal bleeding does not really influence the death rate of patients with SGIB (0 to 5% increase). Damage to the gastric mucosa may be due to an intraluminal aggression, and/or decreased mucosal and mural defence mechanisms. H+ ions and bile salts are mostly responsible for the former. Physiological quantities of H+ ions may be sufficient, as their abnormal diffusion into the gastric mucosa will reduce the mucosal pH (pHm), which is itself sensitive to microcirculatory modifications and systemic acidosis. There is a good correlation between bleeding and pHm. Bile salts are involved because of the usual increase in frequency and volume of gastric biliary reflux due to stress. Surfactant, mucosal alkaline layer and the microcirculation are all involved in gastric protection. The PGE2 synthetized by the gastric mucosa have a favourable influence on these 3 mechanisms. Changes in microcirculation and hypoxia are the predominant factors involved in stress-induced mucosal damage. The prevention of SGIB relies on the treatment of risk factors, a reduction of intraluminal aggression, and the support and/or stimulation of gastric defence mechanisms. Antacids and anti-H2 drugs aim to neutralize most of the H+ ions, being more efficient than placebo in increasing gastric pH greater than 4, although anti-H2 agents are responsible of a greater number of failures. The non-homogenous character of the patient groups studied and the diagnostic methods, as well as the increasing lack of placebo groups in the published studies make the interpretation of the results rather risky. Antacids and anti-H2 drugs are more efficient than placebo, and equally efficient, in preventing overt SGIB. Efficiency is increased by giving anti-H2 drugs continuously, and antacids hourly. Other agents are thought to protect mucosal cells, probably increasing mucosal defences. Amongst them are the prostaglandins, the most interesting of which are still being investigated, and sucralfate. The latter molecule is as efficient as antacids and anti-H2 drugs, and does not alter gastric pH, so reducing the number of nosocomial pneumonias. Its reduced cost and easy administration make it, at the present time, the treatment of choice of SGIB. The few rare contraindications of sucralfate will justify the infusion of anti-H2 drugs in those patients at risk.

Stress ulcers: current understanding of pathogenesis and prophylaxis

Stress-related gastrointestinal bleeding is known to occur in approximately 25 percent of untreated seriously ill patients, but with appropriate prophylaxis is largely preventable. Since the treatment of stress bleeding is generally unsatisfactory and has a high mortality, routine prophylaxis should be instituted for susceptible patients. Multiple mechanisms contribute to stress ulcer formation, the most important of which appear to be mucosal ischemia and the inability to control back-diffused hydrogen. Antacids and histamine2-blocking agents are presently the cornerstone of effective prophylaxis, but because they have been implicated as contributors to nosocomial pneumonias due to bacterial overgrowth in the stomach, investigation is ongoing into such alternative prophylactic agents as sucralfate and prostaglandins that do not alter the normal gastric acidity. This article presents a review of the literature on the development and prevention of stress ulcer disease.