Comparison of the safety and efficacy of nabumetone and aspirin in the treatment of osteoarthritis in adults

Evolution of a supergene that regulates a trans-species social polymorphism

Supergenes are clusters of linked genetic loci that jointly affect the expression of complex phenotypes, such as social organization. Little is known about the origin and evolution of these intriguing genomic elements. Here we analyse whole-genome sequences of males from native populations of six fire ant species and show that variation in social organization is under the control of a novel supergene haplotype (termed Sb), which evolved by sequential incorporation of three inversions spanning half of a 'social chromosome'. Two of the inversions interrupt protein-coding genes, resulting in the increased expression of one gene and modest truncation in the primary protein structure of another. All six socially polymorphic species studied harbour the same three inversions, with the single origin of the supergene in their common ancestor inferred by phylogenomic analyses to have occurred half a million years ago. The persistence of Sb along with the ancestral SB haplotype through multiple speciation events provides a striking example of a functionally important trans-species social polymorphism presumably maintained by balancing selection. We found that while recombination between the Sb and SB haplotypes is severely restricted in all species, a low level of gene flux between the haplotypes has occurred following the appearance of the inversions, potentially mitigating the evolutionary degeneration expected at genomic regions that cannot freely recombine. These results provide a detailed picture of the structural genomic innovations involved in the formation of a supergene controlling a complex social phenotype.

Nabumetone: therapeutic use and safety profile in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Nabumetone is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory prodrug, which exerts its pharmacological effects via the metabolite 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid (6-MNA). Nabumetone itself is non-acidic and, following absorption, it undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism to form the main circulating active metabolite (6-MNA) which is a much more potent inhibitor of preferentially cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2. The three major metabolic pathways of nabumetone are O-demethylation, reduction of the ketone to an alcohol, and an oxidative cleavage of the side-chain occurs to yield acetic acid derivatives. Essentially no unchanged nabumetone and < 1% of the major 6-MNA metabolite are excreted unchanged in the urine from which 80% of the dose can be recovered and another 10% in faeces. Nabumetone is clinically used mainly for the management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to reduce pain and inflammation. The clinical efficacy of nabumetone has also been evaluated in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, soft tissue injuries and juvenile RA. The optimum oral dosage of nabumetone for OA patients is 1 g once daily, which is well tolerated. The therapeutic response is superior to placebo and similar to nonselective COX inhibitors. In RA patients, nabumetone 1 g at bedtime is optimal, but an additional 0.5-1 g can be administered in the morning for patients with persistent symptoms. In RA, nabumetone has shown a comparable clinical efficacy to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), diclofenac, piroxicam, ibuprofen and naproxen. Clinical trials and a decade of worldwide safety data and long-term postmarketing surveillance studies show that nabumetone is generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse effects are those commonly seen with COX inhibitors, which include diarrhoea, dyspepsia, headache, abdominal pain and nausea. In common with other COX inhibitors, nabumetone may increase the risk of GI perforations, ulcerations and bleedings (PUBs). However, several studies show a low incidence of PUBs, and on a par with the numbers reported from studies with COX-2 selective inhibitors and considerably lower than for nonselective COX inhibitors. This has been attributed mainly to the non-acidic chemical properties of nabumetone but also to its COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor profile. Through its metabolite 6-MNA, nabumetone has a dose-related effect on platelet aggregation, but no effect on bleeding time in clinical studies. Furthermore, several short-term studies have shown little to no effect on renal function. Compared with COX-2 selective inhibitors, nabumetone exhibits similar anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties in patients with arthritis and there is no evidence of excess GI or other forms of complications to date.

Health-related quality-of-life effects of oxaprozin and nabumetone in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly prescribed for the treatment of signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA). Nabumetone and oxaprozin are 2 of the newer NSAIDs and have been shown to have similar safety and efficacy profiles. Nabumetone 1000 mg to 1500 mg once a day (QD) and oxaprozin 1200 mg QD are commonly recommended doses. This study compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients receiving oxaprozin 1200 mg QD with that of patients receiving nabumetone 1000 mg QD or nabumetone 1500 mg QD for the treatment of signs and symptoms of OA of the knee. Two similarly designed, independent, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials were conducted. In trial 1, patients were randomized to receive oxaprozin 1200 mg QD (n = 109), nabumetone 1000 mg QD (n = 110), or placebo (n = 109); in trial 2, patients received oxaprozin 1200 mg QD (n = 116), nabumetone 1500 mg QD (n = 115), or placebo (n = 116). HRQOL was measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form-36 Health Survey (1-week recall period) at baseline and weeks 2 and 6. Data from the 2 trials were combined to assess differences across the 4 groups in 8 domains and 2 summary scores at baseline, and changes in HRQOL scores at weeks 2 and 6. At week 2, the oxaprozin group showed significantly greater improvement than the placebo group in role physical, vitality, and mental component summary (MCS) scores (P < 0.05), and in physical functioning, bodily pain, social functioning, and physical component summary (PCS) scores (P < 0.01). The nabumetone 1500-mg group showed significantly greater improvement than the placebo group in bodily pain and social functioning (P < 0.05), and in vitality and MCS score (P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between the nabumetone 1000-mg and placebo groups. At week 2, the oxaprozin group showed a greater change than the nabumetone 1000-mg group in PCS score (P < 0.05). At week 6, oxaprozin treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement than placebo in physical functioning, role physical, and bodily pain (P < 0.05); social functioning, role emotional, and mental health (P < 0.01); and vitality and MCS score (P < 0.001). The nabumetone 1500-mg group showed significantly greater responses than the placebo group in vitality (P < 0.05), mental health (P < 0.01), and MCS score (P < 0.001). The oxaprozin group had significantly better scores than the nabumetone 1500-mg group in the PCS (P < 0.05), and it showed significantly greater improvement than the nabumetone 1000 mg group in role physical and PCS score (P < 0.01) and in role emotional (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between placebo and nabumetone 1000 mg at week 6. Results of this study suggest that oxaprozin 1200 mg QD has a significant positive impact on the HRQOL of patients with OA of the knee compared with nabumetone 1000 mg QD and placebo.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin and nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

This multicenter, 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin 1200 mg once daily with that of nabumetone 1000 mg once daily in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. To be eligible, patients had to experience a flare of OA within 2 weeks of discontinuing their usual OA medication (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or analgesic). Eligible patients were assessed at baseline and then randomized to receive oxaprozin (n = 109), nabumetone (n = 110), or placebo (n = 109). Efficacy assessments were performed at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. Primary efficacy variables included knee pain on weight bearing, knee pain on motion, and patient's and physician's global assessments of OA. Secondary efficacy variables included pain intensity, time to walk 50 feet, and duration of morning stiffness. Safety was evaluated by use of routine laboratory analyses; physical examination at screening, baseline, and week 6 (or study termination); assessment of symptoms at baseline and at each visit; and testing stools for occult blood at screening and between week 4 and the final visit. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Between-group differences in efficacy variables were evident by week 1. The mean change in improvement from baseline with oxaprozin compared with placebo was statistically significant in favor of oxaprozin at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 for all primary efficacy variables. The mean change in improvement from baseline with nabumetone compared with placebo, however, was statistically significant only at week 1 for knee pain on motion, patient's global assessment, and physician's global assessment. The mean change in improvement from baseline was statistically significant (P < or = 0.035) in favor of oxaprozin versus nabumetone at weeks 2 and 6 for all four primary efficacy variables and also at week 4 for knee pain on motion. The incidence of adverse clinical events between treatment groups was not statistically significant. However, nine oxaprozin-treated patients had asymptomatic liver enzyme elevations reported as adverse events. Four of these patients had reversible elevations of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase greater than three times the upper limit of normal range (P < 0.05); two of these patients were taking other medications known to induce liver enzyme abnormalities. The study showed that oxaprozin 1200 mg once daily was statistically significantly more efficacious than nabumetone 1000 mg once daily for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the knee. Both drugs were clinically well tolerated.

Nabumetone: a clinical appraisal

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have long been used as therapy for arthritis patients. However, in some patients these drugs can cause gastrointestinal hemorrhage, perforation, or ulcer through direct topical effects, enterohepatic recirculation, and systemic effects. In an effort to address this problem, new NSAIDs have been developed. Nabumetone, which belongs to a new class of NSAID, is a nonacidic agent that has been associated with a low incidence of peptic ulcer. This article examines available clinical data on nabumetone, including studies on gastrointestinal safety and effectiveness in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients, and data that may provide an explanation for nabumetone's low incidence of ulceration.

Efficacy and safety of nabumetone versus diclofenac, naproxen, ibuprofen, and piroxicam in the elderly

In a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter, 12-week study, the efficacy and safety of nabumetone (1,000-2,000 mg/day) versus diclofenac (100-200 mg/day), naproxen (500-1,500 mg/day), ibuprofen (1,200-3,200 mg/day), or piroxicam (10-20 mg/day) were evaluated in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The results in elderly patients (> or = 65 years of age) are presented. Nabumetone was as effective as the comparator nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of elderly OA and RA patients. Ibuprofen and diclofenac caused significantly (p < 0.05) more abdominal pain than nabumetone (8.5%, 13.1%, and 4.1%, respectively). The frequency of abdominal pain was dose related for all NSAIDs except nabumetone. Diarrhea was reported by significantly (p < 0.02) more nabumetone-treated (6.6%) than ibuprofen-treated (0.9%) elderly patients, but the incidence of diarrhea was not dose related. There were no clinically significant changes in renal function with nabumetone or the comparator NSAIDs. A significant change in hepatic enzymes occurred in elderly patients treated with diclofenac (3.3%), which was different than for patients treated with nabumetone (p < 0.04), naproxen (p < 0.06), or ibuprofen (p < 0.06). With regard to withdrawals for adverse events, more (p < 0.04) piroxicam-treated patients (4.9%) withdrew than nabumetone-treated patients (1%). In addition, doubling the dose of nabumetone from 1,000 mg/day to 2,000 mg/day did not result in a proportional increase in adverse events. However, with the comparator NSAIDs, proportional increases in adverse events occurred with increased dose. Finally, the efficacy and safety of nabumetone in elderly patients were similar to the efficacy and safety observed in nonelderly patients.

Efficacy of nabumetone versus diclofenac, naproxen, ibuprofen, and piroxicam in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

The efficacy of nabumetone was compared with that of diclofenac, naproxen, ibuprofen, and piroxicam in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial. Patients > or = 18 years with clinical and radiographic evidence of OA or RA (functional class I, II, or III), who provided written informed consent, were eligible. To mimic real-life therapy, no washout phase preceded randomization. Eligible patients were assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive nabumetone or a comparator NSAID for 12 weeks. Thus a total of 4,411 eligible patients were randomized to receive nabumetone (N = 3,315) or one of the comparator NSAIDs (N = 1,096). Initial daily doses were: nabumetone, 1,000 mg; diclofenac, 100 mg; naproxen, 500 mg; ibuprofen, 1,200 mg; piroxicam, 10 mg. Dosage increases were permitted after a 2-week trial period. All patients were evaluated at baseline, and at 4 and 12 weeks. Of all patients randomized, approximately 46% had RA and approximately 54% had OA. Demographic characteristics were similar for the nabumetone and comparator NSAID treatment groups. In OA, nabumetone was as effective as the comparator NSAIDs in the physician and patient global assessments of disease activity, in improving the Activities and Lifestyle Index, and in decreasing the degree of pain. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients withdrawn for lack of efficacy when treated with nabumetone or one of the comparator NSAIDs. In contrast, nabumetone was significantly (p < or = 0.02) more effective than the comparator NSAIDs in RA patients for the global assessments of disease activity, pain relief, and improving the Activities and Lifestyle Index, primarily due to the poor response in the ibuprofen and piroxicam treatment groups. Furthermore, fewer nabumetone-treated RA patients (8.8%) withdrew for lack of efficacy than those treated with diclofenac (10.3%), naproxen (11%), piroxicam (13.5%), or ibuprofen (13.2%). In conclusion, in a large, randomized, open-label trial that mimicked real-life therapy, nabumetone was as effective as diclofenac, naproxen, piroxicam, and ibuprofen for the treatment of patients with OA. However, in RA, nabumetone was significantly more effective than the comparator NSAIDs, and fewer patients were withdrawn because of lack of efficacy.

Nabumetone: a "nonacidic" nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic disposition, dosage recommendations, adverse effects, drug interactions, and efficacy of nabumetone in patients with selected rheumatic disorders and soft-tissue injuries.

DATA SOURCES

Data from scientific literature were extracted, evaluated, and summarized for presentation. A MEDLINE search was conducted using the following indexing terms: antiinflammatory agents, nonsteroidal, nabumetone, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and osteoarthritis (OA). Studies evaluating nabumetone reported in articles, abstracts, or proceedings involving human subjects were considered for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION

Special consideration was given to clinical studies using double-blind, randomized, parallel, controlled designs. Studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of nabumetone with placebo and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from human studies published in the English language were evaluated. Trials were assessed according to study design, sample size, and description of outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nabumetone is a nonacidic prodrug that is metabolized to an active nonsteroidal antiinflammatory moiety, 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid (6-MNA). 6-MNA is a structural analog of naproxen. Like naproxen and other NSAIDs, 6-MNA possesses analgesic, antipyretic, and antiinflammatory activity, 6-MNA has a prolonged elimination half-life, ranging from 17 to 74 hours, which allows for once-daily dosing. The efficacy of nabumetone for treating symptoms of RA and OA has been established in controlled clinical trials. Nabumetone also has been studied in ankylosing spondylitis and soft-tissue injuries. Adverse effects associated with nabumetone are similar to those associated with other NSAIDs. Gastrointestinal reactions occur most frequently in the form of abdominal pain or indigestion, nausea, or vomiting. Central nervous system adverse effects occur less frequently, and are followed in order of occurrence by rashes.

CONCLUSIONS

Nabumetone is a prodrug metabolized to an active metabolite structurally related to naproxen. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nabumetone, but no advantages over the many other NSAIDs now available.

Penetration of the active metabolite of nabumetone into synovial fluid and adherent tissue of patients undergoing knee joint surgery

The concentration of 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid (6-MNA) in plasma, synovial fluid, synovial tissue and fibrous capsule tissue was determined in an open study with 20 patients scheduled for knee joint surgery after oral treatment with nabumetone under steady-state conditions. 6-MNA is the principle metabolite of the prodrug nabumetone arising from an extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver. Patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (n = 12) or osteoarthritis stage III or IV (n = 8) received a daily dose of nabumetone 1 g in the evening starting 4 days prior to surgery. On day 1 an additional loading dose of nabumetone 1 g was given in the morning. At the time of surgery (day 5), blood, synovial tissue and fibrous capsule tissue were taken simultaneously. The samples were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography. After 4 days of treatment mean 6-MNA concentration in plasma was 40.76 mg/L, in synovial fluid 34.79 mg/L, in synovial tissue 19.33 mg/g and in fibrous capsule tissue 11.43 mg/g. Under steady-state conditions mean synovial fluid levels of 6-MNA were higher than after administration of a single dose and, in common with levels in synovial tissue, persist in a range sufficient for in vitro cyclo-oxygenase inhibition.

Nabumetone. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in rheumatic diseases

Nabumetone is a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug advocated for use in the symptomatic treatment of rheumatic and inflammatory conditions. Unlike most other drugs of its class it is non-acidic and a prodrug, which after absorption forms an active metabolite. Published data suggest that nabumetone 1 to 2g daily is comparable with therapeutic dosages of aspirin, diclofenac, ibuprofen, indomethacin, naproxen and sulindac for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and acute soft tissue injuries. While nabumetone produced fewer side effects than aspirin, results have generally shown tolerability to be similar to that of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. If further definition of its efficacy and tolerability relative to other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs confirms these initially favourable results, then nabumetone would appear to offer a useful alternative in the treatment of painful rheumatic and inflammatory conditions.