General considerations in selecting antihypertensive agents in patients with type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension

Beta-blocker therapy and prognosis of heart failure patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The influence of beta-blocker therapy (bisoprolol or carvedilol) (bB) on the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is uncertain.

AIMS

To assess the effect of bB on the prognosis of HF patients with new-onset DM treated with a contemporary medical regime.

METHODS

Prospective study of 5314 HF patients with previously unknown DM. Mean age was 71.8±7.9 years, 53.0% were women, and 50.2% had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). During a median follow-up of 56.9±18.2 months, 68.9% of the patients died, 88.6% were hospitalised for HF, and 1519 (27.3%) developed DM (62.3% of them received bB, 947 patients). We propensity-matched 572 HF patients with DM on bB, with 572 HF patients with DM non-treated with bB.

RESULTS

Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a decreased hazard risk (HR) of all-cause death [HR: 0.68, CI 95% (0.61-0.75)], mainly because of a reduced risk of death from cardiovascular causes [HR: 0.70 (0.64-0.77)] (p<0.001). Similarly, bB was associated with a decreased HR of hospitalisation [HR: 0.82 (0.72-0.92)] (p<0.001). Nevertheless, the 30-day re-admission rate and the number of visits were not significantly associated with bB. These relationships of bB with prognosis were maintained, independently of the gender, the type of HF (HFpEF ot HFdEF), the comorbidities and the medication used (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Therapy with bB, bisoprolol or carvedilol, is associated with a reduced mortality and morbidity of HF patients with new-onset DM, not only in men but also in women, as well as in patients with HFpEF or HFdEF.

Educational needs for improving self-care in heart failure patients with diabetes

PURPOSE

To explore the need for self-monitoring and self-care education in heart failure patients with diabetes (HF- DM patients) by describing cognitive and affective factors to provide guidance in developing effective self-management education.

METHODS

A cross-sectional correlation design was employed using baseline patient data from a study testing a 12-week patient and family dyad intervention to improve dietary and medication-taking self-management behaviors in HF patients. Data from 116 participants recruited from metropolitan Atlanta area were used. Demographic and comorbidities, physical function, psychological distress, relationship with health care provider, self-efficacy (medication taking and low sodium diet), and behavioral outcomes (medications, dietary habits) were assessed. Descriptive statistics and a series of chi-square tests, t tests, or Mann-Whitney tests were performed to compare HF patients with and without DM.

RESULTS

HF-DM patients were older and heavier, had more comorbidities, and took more daily medications than HF patients. High self-efficacy on medication and low-sodium diet was reported in both groups with no significant difference. Although HF-DM patients took more daily medications than HF, both groups exhibited high HF medication-taking behaviors. The HF-DM patients consumed significantly lower total sugar than HF patients but clinically higher levels of sodium.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes educators need to be aware of potential conflicts of treatment regimens to manage 2 chronic diseases. Special and integrated diabetes self-management education programs that incorporate principles of HF self-management should be developed to improve self-management behavior in HF-DM patients.

Impact of new-onset diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the prognosis of heart failure patients: a propensity-matched study in the community

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with heart failure (HF), and to evaluate the effect of new-onset DM and glycemic control on the prognosis of HF patients treated with a contemporary medical regimen.

METHODS

Prospective study of 5314 HF patients and previously unknown DM during 9 years. Their mean age was 71.8 ± 7.9 years, 53.0% were women, and 50.2% had non-systolic HF. During a median follow-up of 56.9 ± 18.2 months, 68.9% of the patients died, 88.6% were hospitalized for HF, and 1519 (27.3%) developed new-onset DM. We propensity-matched those 1519 HF patients with DM, with 1519 HF patients non-diagnosed with DM.

RESULTS

The age- and sex-adjusted incidence (per 100 HF patients/years) of DM in HF patients was 3.20, higher in women and in patients with non-systolic HF (p<0.01). Patients with HF and DM and those with a mean HbA1c>7.0% presented an increased mortality (HR of death [CI 95%]: 2.44 [1.68-3.19] and, HR: 2.56 [1.77-3.35], respectively), mainly due to an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR ≥ 2.40 [1.46-3.34]) (P<0.001). The rate of hospitalization, of 30-day readmissions, and the number of visits were higher among HF patients with DM or with HbA1c>7.0% (p<0.001). These relationships of DM and its poor metabolic control with prognosis were maintained, independently of the gender, the type of HF (systolic or, non-systolic), the comorbidities, and the medication used (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

New-onset diabetes mellitus and its poor metabolic control (HbA1c>7.0%) are associated with a increased mortality and morbidity of patients with heart failure.

Metformin therapy and prognosis of patients with heart failure and new-onset diabetes mellitus. A propensity-matched study in the community

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of the commencement of metformin therapy (CMet) on the prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with a contemporary medical regimen.

METHODS

Prospective study of 1519 HF patients with DM during 9 years. Mean age was 71.7+/-7.8 years, 817 (53.8%) were women, and 780 (51.3%) had preserved systolic function. During a median follow-up of 56.9+/-18.2 months, 1045 patients (68.8%) died, 1344 (88.5%) were hospitalized for worsening HF, 593 (39.0%) did not CMet, and 391 of the patients CMet (42.2%) had a mean HbA1c=<7.0%. No case of lactic acidosis due to metformin was observed. We propensity-score matched 592 patients who CMet with another 592 patients non-CMet.

RESULTS

CMet was associated with a decreased mortality (HR [CI 95%]: .85 [.82-.88]), mainly due to a reduced cardiovascular mortality (HR: .78 [.74-.82]), and with a lower hospitalization rate (HR: .81 [.79-.84]). Nevertheless, CMet was not associated with an improved prognosis of HF patients with a mean HbA1c=<7.0%. These relationships of CMet with prognosis were maintained, independently of the gender, the type of HF (systolic or, non-systolic), the comorbidities, and the medication used (P<.01).

CONCLUSION

Metformin therapy is associated with a reduced mortality of heart failure patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus, mainly due to a decreased cardiovascular mortality, and with a lower hospitalization rate. Nevertheless, CMet was not associated with an improved prognosis of HF patients with a mean HbA1c=<7.0%.

Comparative metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide and indapamide in hypertensive diabetic patients receiving ACE inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

ACE inhibitors, when used as monotherapy, are frequently unable to adequately control blood pressure in diabetic patients. A diuretic may be added; however, thiazide diuretics, but not indapamide, have been associated with adverse metabolic effects. Whether these effects also apply to thiazides when administered in the currently used lower doses, and whether they differ from indapamide in their metabolic effects, particularly when used in combination with an ACE inhibitor in diabetic patients, has not been previously studied.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint crossover study comparing the metabolic responses to the addition of either hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or indapamide, in 18 diabetic hypertensive patients receiving ACE inhibitor monotherapy for hypertension. Patients stabilized on fosinopril 20 mg/day were randomized to receive either HCTZ 12.5 mg od or indapamide 2.5 mg od for 8 weeks, then crossed over to the alternate therapy for a further 8-week period. Blood pressure, heart rate and metabolic assessments were performed at the end of each 8-week treatment period.

RESULTS

Seated and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not different between HCTZ or indapamide when added to fosinopril, nor was the fasting lipid profile or urinary albumin : creatinine ratio. Plasma potassium was lower with indapamide compared with HCTZ treatment (indapamide 4.3+/-0.1 mmol/l; HCTZ 4.5+/-0.1 mmol/l, P<0.01) and HbA1c was higher with indapamide than with HCTZ therapy (indapamide 7.8+/-0.4%; HCTZ 7.2+/-0.3%, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day, when added to background ACE inhibitor therapy with fosinopril in hypertensive diabetic patients, resulted in a metabolic profile that was similar, if not superior on certain parameters, in comparison with indapamide 2.5 mg/day.

Diabetic nephropathy in type II diabetes

The incidence of end-stage renal failure in patients with type II diabetes has dramatically increased in recent years, both in the United States and, with some delay, in some European countries. These epidemiologic observations have thoroughly dispelled the mistaken belief that renal prognosis was benign in type II diabetes. Recent interest has focused on the early stages of nephropathy in type II diabetes. With respect to renal hemodynamics, renal morphology, and progression of established diabetic nephropathy, there are no substantial differences between types I and type II diabetes. There is good evidence that preventive measures are effective, ie, glycemic control, blood pressure control, protein restriction, and discontinuation of smoking. The high prevalence of the disease (which in principle is preventable) calls for intense efforts to (1) educate the medical community, (2) substantially improve patient education and medical care, and (3) intensify research in this field.