Desensitization to allopurinol in patients with gout and cutaneous reactions

Poorly controlled gout: who is doing poorly?

Gout, an inflammatory arthritis caused by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals, is commonly seen in primary care and specialist clinics. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in gout due to advances in therapies and the understanding of pathophysiology, with new guidelines being published by international bodies. However, there is still a gap between the goals of treatment and actual day-to-day practice. Barriers that result in poorly controlled gout include patient factors such as lack of understanding of the disease, stigma and nonadherence to treatment, as well as physician factors such as knowledge gaps, inadequate use of allopurinol and lack of ownership of the disease. The medical profession needs to do more to bridge the gap through physician and patient education, identification of treatment targets with appropriate use of drugs, and dissemination of guidelines.

Desensitization in delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions -- an EAACI position paper of the Drug Allergy Interest Group

Drug hypersensitivity may deprive patients of drug therapy, and occasionally no effective alternative treatment is available. Successful desensitization has been well documented in delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. In certain situations, such as sulfonamide hypersensitivity in HIV-positive patients or hypersensitivity to antibiotics in patients with cystic fibrosis, published success rates reach 80%, and this procedure appears helpful for the patient management. A state of clinical tolerance may be achieved by the administration of increasing doses of the previously offending drug. However, in most cases, a pre-existent sensitization has not been proven by positive skin tests. Successful re-administration may have occurred in nonsensitized patients. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of desensitization is needed. Currently, desensitization in delayed hypersensitivity reactions is restricted to mild, uncomplicated exanthems and fixed drug eruptions. The published success rates vary depending on clinical manifestations, drugs, and applied protocols. Slower protocols tend to be more effective than rush protocols; however, underreporting of unsuccessful procedures is very probable. The decision to desensitize a patient must always be made on an individual basis, balancing risks and benefits. This paper reviews the literature and presents the expert experience of the Drug Hypersensitivity Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Extemporaneous compounding of oral liquid dosage formulations and alternative drug delivery methods for anticancer drugs

Oncology pharmacists face a constant challenge with patients who cannot swallow oral anticancer drugs, making extemporaneous oral liquid preparation a requirement. Improper extemporaneous preparation of these agents, especially with the traditional chemotherapy with a narrow therapeutic index, may increase the risk of over- or underdosing. In community pharmacies, multiple barriers exist that prevent these pharmacies from preparing extemporaneous oral anticancer drug formulations for a patient's use at home. In a home setting, patients or caregivers without proper counseling and education on how to safely handle chemotherapy are at increased risk for exposure to these drugs. Based on a review of the literature, compounding recipes are available for 46% of oral anticancer agents. A paucity of data exists on dose uniformity, bioequivalence, and stability of extemporaneous oral liquid formulations of anticancer drugs. Pharmacists must have an understanding of the basic scientific principles that are an essential foundation for the proper preparation of extemporaneous oral anticancer liquid formulations. The collaborative effort of a multidisciplinary team can also help identify different barriers in the community setting, especially in areas where community pharmacies may lack resources for the extemporaneous compounding of oral chemotherapy, and to find ways to coordinate better pharmaceutical care. There are great opportunities for oncology pharmacists, as well as community pharmacists, as a resource for educating and monitoring patients receiving oral chemotherapy to ensure dosing accuracy, safe administration, and proper disposal of hazardous drugs. Development of national guidelines to promote standards of practice in the community and/or home setting is urgently needed to help improve the safety of dispensing and handling oral chemotherapeutic agents, including extemporaneously compounded oral liquid formulations of these drugs.

Clinical applications of drug desensitization in the Asia-Pacific region

Drug desensitization is the induction, within hours to days, of a temporary state of tolerance to a drug which the patient has developed a hypersensitivity reaction to. It may be used for IgE and non-IgE mediated allergic reactions, and certain non-allergic reactions. The indication for desensitization is where no alternative medications are available for the treatment of that condition, and where the benefits of desensitization outweigh the risks. Desensitization is a therapeutic modality for drug allergy (similar to allergen specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and insect venom anaphylaxis). In contrast, the drug provocation test is a diagnostic modality used to confirm or refute the diagnosis of drug allergy. This review discusses the clinical applications of desensitization for the treatment of common infectious, metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, and oncological conditions in the Asia-Pacific region.

New and improved strategies for the treatment of gout

The Western world appears to be in the midst of the third great gout epidemic of all time. In this century, gout is increasing in prevalence despite an increased understanding of its risk factors and pathophysiology, and the availability of reasonably effective treatment. The main cultural factors responsible for this appear to be diet, obesity, ethanol use and medications. Excess fructose consumption is a newly recognized modifiable risk factor. The debate has been renewed concerning hyperuricemia as an independent risk factor for renal insufficiency and cardiovascular disease. Prevention is still rooted in lifestyle choices. Existing treatments have proven to be unsatisfactory in many patients with comorbidities. New treatments are available today and on the horizon for tomorrow, which offer a better quality of life for gout sufferers. These include febuxostat, a nonpurine inhibitor of xanthine oxidase with a potentially better combination of efficacy and safety than allopurinol, and investigational inhibitors of URAT-1, an anion exchanger in the proximal tubule that is critical for uric acid homeostasis. New abortive treatments include interleukin-1 antagonists that can cut short the acute attack in 1 to 2 days in persons who cannot take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine or corticosteroids. Lastly, newer formulations of uricase have the ability to dissolve destructive tophi over weeks or months in patients who cannot use currently available hypouricemic agents. Diagnostically, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging offer advanced ways to diagnose gout noninvasively, and just as importantly, a way to follow the progress of tophus dissolution. The close association of hyperuricemia with metabolic syndrome, hypertension and renal insufficiency ensures that nephrologists will see increasing numbers of gout-afflicted patients.

Therapeutic advances in gout

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent developments in the management of gout.

RECENT FINDINGS

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gout from EULAR, quality of care indicators, and outcome measures for clinical trials have been published. The standards of gout diagnosis and management are very low. Allopurinol remains the mainstay for serum uric acid lowering therapy. In an important percentage of patients receiving allopurinol, serum uric acid levels are insufficient to promote crystal dissolution. Febuxostat, a new serum uric acid lowering drug, has shown good results. Information on uricase continues to appear. For treatment of gouty inflammation, etoricoxib (a new cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor) has been shown to be as effective as indomethacin. Finally, the association of gout with the metabolic syndrome and its comorbidities, and the newly described association of gout with myocardial infarction, bring lifestyle and dietary modifications to the front in the management of gout.

SUMMARY

Proper gout management requires changes to the physician's attitude towards the disease; essentially: (1) an unequivocal diagnosis based in urate crystal identification, (2) a clearly settled aim of the treatment: crystal elimination from the joints and elsewhere, and (3) proper use of the available therapeutic alternatives. Promoting a proper lifestyle appears to be especially important.

EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence based recommendations for the management of gout.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary guideline development group comprised 19 rheumatologists and one evidence based medicine expert representing 13 European countries. Key propositions on management were generated using a Delphi consensus approach. Research evidence was searched systematically for each proposition. Where possible, effect size (ES), number needed to treat, relative risk, odds ratio, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated. The quality of evidence was categorised according to the level of evidence. The strength of recommendation (SOR) was assessed using the EULAR visual analogue and ordinal scales.

RESULTS

12 key propositions were generated after three Delphi rounds. Propositions included both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments and addressed symptomatic control of acute gout, urate lowering therapy (ULT), and prophylaxis of acute attacks. The importance of patient education, modification of adverse lifestyle (weight loss if obese; reduced alcohol consumption; low animal purine diet) and treatment of associated comorbidity and risk factors were emphasised. Recommended drugs for acute attacks were oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral colchicine (ES = 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 1.50)), or joint aspiration and injection of corticosteroid. ULT is indicated in patients with recurrent acute attacks, arthropathy, tophi, or radiographic changes of gout. Allopurinol was confirmed as effective long term ULT (ES = 1.39 (0.78 to 2.01)). If allopurinol toxicity occurs, options include other xanthine oxidase inhibitors, allopurinol desensitisation, or a uricosuric. The uricosuric benzbromarone is more effective than allopurinol (ES = 1.50 (0.76 to 2.24)) and can be used in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency but may be hepatotoxic. When gout is associated with the use of diuretics, the diuretic should be stopped if possible. For prophylaxis against acute attacks, either colchicine 0.5-1 mg daily or an NSAID (with gastroprotection if indicated) are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

12 key recommendations for management of gout were developed, using a combination of research based evidence and expert consensus. The evidence was evaluated and the SOR provided for each proposition.

Successful induction of tolerance to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease and prior severe infusion reactions

AIM

To appraise the tolerance and efficacy of an induction of tolerance protocol to infliximab permitting the re-administration of the drug to patients with Crohn's disease having had infusion reactions requiring suspension of treatment.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were included in the induction of tolerance protocol. Each infusion of infliximab (5 mg/kg) was divided into 11 escalating 15 min increments over a 3-h time period. The induction of tolerance procedure was repeated for subsequent infusions.

RESULTS

Ten patients (71.4%) received all the three infusions for the induction treatment. Nine (64.3%) had a significant response and six (48.8%) still benefited from infliximab infusions. Seven patients (50%) achieved a complete remission, after a mean of 2.5 (two to three) infusions. Four patients (28.6%) had no response and the protocol was stopped. Three patients (21.4%) experienced mild immediate hypersensitivity reactions, which were controlled, two patients (14.2%) experienced severe immediate hypersensitivity reactions, leading to interruption of the treatment and one patient developed a delayed hypersensitivity reaction.

CONCLUSION

Our induction of tolerance protocol allows some patients who have experienced severe or repetitive infusion reactions to infliximab to be safely retreated with the drug in a hospitalized setting, with a clinical response achieved in a majority of these patients.

Diagnosis and management of gout: a rational approach

Gout is one of the best understood among the rheumatological disorders and one of the most satisfying to treat. Even non-specialists should be able to diagnose and treat most patients provided some important principles are appreciated. Management of a minority of patients, including those with renal impairment is difficult and often unsatisfactory, because of restricted treatment options. In this paper, the basic principles underlying the diagnosis and management of gout are discussed first, followed by practical approaches.

Clopidogrel (Plavix) desensitization: a case series

Clopidogrel (Plavix) is a thiopyridine that inhibits the ADP-dependent pathway for platelet activation and has been shown in numerous trials to be effective for a wide variety of patients with cardiovascular disease, particularly those who have undergone coronary stent implantation and who present with acute coronary syndromes. Allergic rashes are one of the common side effects of clopidogrel, which leads to its discontinuation. Type I (Gell and Combs classification) allergic reactions to drugs may be amenable to drug desensitization, allowing safe and prolonged use of the drug. This case series describes a protocol for clopidogrel desensitization over an 8-hr period using 15 doubling doses of clopidogrel given by mouth to achieve a maintenance dose of 75 mg a day. This case series suggests that patients who have had type I drug allergy to clopidogrel may be rapidly desensitized using this protocol. Further studies enrolling a larger number of patients are indicated to confirm the safety and efficacy of this regimen.

Febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase: a twenty-eight-day, multicenter, phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response clinical trial examining safety and efficacy in patients with gout

OBJECTIVE

Gout affects approximately 1-2% of the American population. Current options for treating hyperuricemia in chronic gout are limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of febuxostat, a nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, in establishing normal serum urate (sUA) concentrations in gout patients with hyperuricemia (>or=8.0 mg/dl).

METHODS

We conducted a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients (ages 23-80 years). Subjects received febuxostat (40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg) or placebo once daily for 28 days and colchicine prophylaxis for 14 days prior to and 14 days after randomization. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects with sUA levels <6.0 mg/dl on day 28.

RESULTS

Greater proportions of febuxostat-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved an sUA level <6.0 mg/dl at each visit (P < 0.001 for each comparison). The targeted sUA level was attained on day 28 in 0% of those taking placebo and in 56% of those taking 40 mg, 76% taking 80 mg, and 94% taking 120 mg of febuxostat. The mean sUA reduction from baseline to day 28 was 2% in the placebo group and 37% in the 40-mg, 44% in the 80-mg, and 59% in the 120-mg febuxostat groups. Gout flares occurred with similar frequency in the placebo (37%) and 40-mg febuxostat (35%) groups and with increased frequency in the higher dosage febuxostat groups (43% taking 80 mg; 55% taking 120 mg). During colchicine prophylaxis, gout flares occurred less frequently (8-13%). Incidences of treatment-related adverse events were similar in the febuxostat and placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with febuxostat resulted in a significant reduction of sUA levels at all dosages. Febuxostat therapy was safe and well tolerated.

Allopurinol-induced Severe Hypersensitivity with Acute Renal Failure

A 62-year-old male was sent to the emergency room due to a high fever and generalized skin rash after taking allopurinol for 9 days. Physical examination was normal except for the generalized skin rash presenting with erythematous macules. Complete blood count showed leukocytosis with eosinophilia. Blood biochemistry showed impaired renal and hepatic function. Pathologic examination concluded that the skin rash was erythema multiforme. These findings met the diagnostic criteria for allopurinol-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS). Our patient not only had the most common skin lesion but soon developed acute renal failure that required intermittent hemodialysis, despite rapid discontinuation of allopurinol and adequate hydration and steroid therapy. No other causes of acute renal failure were found. Renal impairment was the worst part of the patient's condition and he never completely recovered. AHS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute renal and hepatic failure in patients with evidence of allergy and recent use of allopurinol.

Current management of gout in patients unresponsive or allergic to allopurinol

The manifestations of gout can be abolished permanently by lifelong urate-lowering therapy maintaining serum urate levels under 360 mmol/l, as this ensures dissolution of pathogenic crystals of monosodium urate monohydrate. Benzbromarone has been withdrawn from the market, leaving allopurinol as the only urate-lowering drug readily available in France. Allopurinol may induce unacceptable side effects, and in patients with dose-limiting renal failure it may not be sufficiently effective. Because allopurinol can induce serious side effects when given concomitantly with purine antimetabolites, it is contraindicated in organ transplant recipients. In patients who cannot tolerate allopurinol, dietary treatment, discontinuation of diuretic agents, and use of losartan or fenofibrate to treat concomitant hypertension or dyslipidemia, respectively, may ensure adequate control of serum urate levels. Desensitization to allopurinol can be attempted in patients with mild cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions but is difficult to perform and rarely used. Uricosuric agents may be helpful in patients with normal or diminished urate excretion. Probenecid is available in France from hospital pharmacies, and benzbromarone can be prescribed via a time-limited authorization procedure. Rasburicase, an Aspergillus urate oxidase produced by genetic engineering, is indicated to prevent acute hyperuricemia induced by chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. Factors that limit the use of rasburicase include the absence of a marketing authorization, the need for parenteral administration, and the absence of validated treatment schedules. Patients with renal failure precluding the use of effective allopurinol dosages are good candidates for benzbromarone therapy. Organ transplant recipients can be given benzbromarone, within the current restrictions to its use; alternatively, mycophenolate mofetil can be substituted for calcineurin inhibitors, which elevate serum urate levels, or for azathioprine, which contraindicates the use of allopurinol.

Intravenous desensitization to allopurinol in a heart transplant patient with gout

BACKGROUND

Oral desensitization with allopurinol presents a problem for patients with allopurinol hypersensitivity and gout that needs to be controlled rapidly. To our knowledge, only 1 case report of intravenous (i.v.) desensitization has been previously published.

OBJECTIVE

To present a case report of a patient with cutaneous reactions to allopurinol who underwent i.v. allopurinol desensitization.

METHODS

Intravenous infusion of allopurinol was performed using an escalating, 19-dose protocol.

RESULTS

No adverse reactions were precipitated by 2 i.v., escalating dose procedures, allowing continuation of effective treatment of the patient's hyperuricemia.

CONCLUSIONS

This case of safe and effective desensitization with allopurinol by the i.v. route should emphasize the need for a trial of this protocol in additional patients in whom rapid desensitization would be advantageous.

Renal Microtophi in a Patient with Lupus Nephritis and Tophaceous Gout

This case describes a 58-year-old female with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and coexistent chronic tophaceous gout. A renal biopsy showed concurrent lupus nephritis and renal medullary microtophi, confirmed by electron and polarizing microscopy, respectively. Whereas clinical SLE and gout have already been shown to be rarely associated, this case further illustrates the presentation of these two diseases in a single renal specimen. In this patient the gout began shortly after menopause without known risk factors and before any overt renal disease or signs of SLE. The tophaceous gout antedating the SLE, as well as the apparently benign course of illness, suggest that the pathologic effects of SLE and gout on the kidneys are based on independent mechanisms and may not necessarily aggravate each other. Treatment of the gout with allopurinol may have contributed to improved renal function.

Difficult gout and new approaches for control of hyperuricemia in the allopurinol-allergic patient

A major obstacle to the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients allergic to allopurinol is the limited availability of suitable, equally effective, alternative, urate-lowering drugs. Conventional uricosuric drugs, including probenecid and sulfinpyrazone, are recommended for allopurinol- intolerant patients with gout and "underexcretion" hyperuricemia who have normal renal function and no history of nephrolithiasis. Therapeutic options in those in whom traditional uricosuric drugs are contraindicated, ineffective, or poorly tolerated include slow oral desensitization to allopurinol and cautious administration of oxipurinol. Allopurinol desensitization is useful particularly in those who have failed other treatment modalities. If available (as in Europe, South Africa, and Japan), benzbromarone may be tried in patients with gout and mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency. Recombinant urate oxidase can be used in the short-term prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy- associated hyperuricemia in patients with lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative disorders. Hyperuricemia and gout occur with increased frequency in cyclosporine-treated allograft transplant recipients. The management of gout in these patients is complicated by two main factors: cyclosporine-induced renal impairment, and interactions with medications used to preserve the allograft.

Efficacy and safety of desensitization to allopurinol following cutaneous reactions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of slow oral desensitization in the management of patients with hyperuricemia and allopurinol-induced maculopapular eruptions.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of an oral desensitization regimen using gradual dosage-escalation of allopurinol in 32 patients (30 with gout and 2 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia) whose therapy was interrupted because of a pruritic cutaneous reaction to the drug.

RESULTS

Twenty-one men and 11 women with a mean age of 63 years (range 17-83 years), a mean serum urate level of 618 micromoles/liter (range 495-750) (or, mean 10.4 mg/dl [range 8.3-12.6]), and a mean serum creatinine level of 249 micromoles/liter (range 75-753) (or, mean 2.8 mg/dl [range 0.8-8.5]) were studied. Desensitization failed in 4 patients because of unmanageable recurrent rash. Twenty-eight patients completed the desensitization procedure to a target allopurinol dosage of 50-100 mg/day, 21 without deviation from the protocol for a mean of 30.5 days (range 21-56 days) and 7 requiring dosage adjustments because of a recurrent rash over 53.8 days (range 40-189 days). Seven of these 28 patients developed late cutaneous reactions 1-20 months postdesensitization, 4 responding to dosage modification and 3 discontinuing the drug. Twenty-five of the 32 patients (78%) continued to take allopurinol; their mean duration of followup was 32.6 months (range 3-92 months) and the mean postdesensitization serum urate level was 318 micromoles/liter (range 187-452) (or, mean 5.3 mg/dl [range 3.0-7.5]).

CONCLUSION

The study confirms the long-term efficacy and safety of slow oral desensitization to allopurinol in patients with maculopapular eruptions, particularly in those with gout, who cannot be treated with uricosurics or other urate-lowering drugs. Although pruritic skin eruptions may recur both during and after desensitization, most of these cutaneous reactions can be managed by temporary withdrawal of allopurinol and dosage adjustment.

Gout and other crystal-associated arthropathies

Intra-articular crystals (monosodium urate monohydrate, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate, basic calcium phosphates) can cause acute and chronic inflammation and joint damage. Identification of the crystals by polarized microscopy is the key step in diagnosis but improved reliability of synovial examination is required. Treatment of disorders associated with gout or calcium pyrophosphate deposition may reduce non-joint morbidity and assist treatment of the arthritis. Various forms of anti-inflammatory therapy work for acute crystal-induced arthritis; prompt commencement is usually more important than which option is used. In gout, recurrent attacks are usual, but hypouricaemic therapy is almost never urgent, is life-long, and is too often negated by poor compliance. In most patients, allopurinol or any of the potent uricosuric drugs will allow maintenance of normouricaemia but renal failure, renal calculi, transplantation, and allopurinol allergy narrow the options and complicate management.

Desensitization to allopurinol in a patient with previous failed desensitization

OBJECTIVE

To describe an allopurinol desensitization that failed on the first attempt but was successful on the second attempt, resulting in the management of crippling tophaceous gout.

CASE SUMMARY

A 64-year-old white man with a history of gouty nephropathy requiring hemodialysis developed a severe cutaneous reaction from exposure to allopurinol. The first desensitization attempt was unsuccessful, and the gouty nephropathy caused chronic cellulitus and urate microcrystal deposition on the patient's hands and feet. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis were used to treat the patient's severe symptoms and increase uric acid clearance. This method, however, was ineffective. Severe tissue ischemia, requiring bilateral below-the-knee amputations, prompted the second desensitization attempt four years later. The second attempt, administered differently and with more caution, was successful and did not cause further complications.

DISCUSSION

Allopurinol is the only agent available to effectively reduce uric acid concentrations in those who are over-producers. Hypersensitivity-type reactions have been reported with its use, and desensitization is the only viable therapeutic option. Few cases of desensitization to allopurinol have been reported in the literature. This article describes a failure and a subsequent success in desensitization to allopurinol.

CONCLUSIONS

Although desensitization to allopurinol poses potential risks, the benefits can outweigh the risks of therapy. Desensitization requires close monitoring; if failure does occur, subsequent attempts can be successful, as this case report demonstrates.

The management of gout

We now have sufficient knowledge to be able to identify the factors contributing to hyperuricemia in most patients with gout. Some of these factors, such as obesity, a high-purine diet, regular alcohol consumption, and diuretic therapy, may be correctable. In patients with persistent hyperuricemia, regular medication should lower the serum urate concentration to an optimal level. The continuing challenge is to educate patients about correctable factors and the importance of regular medication and ensure their compliance so that attacks of gout do not recur.

Risks and benefits of drugs used in the management and prevention of gout

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are now commonly used for the treatment of acute gout, but caution is required in view of their adverse effects, especially in the elderly. Colchicine is still an effective acute agent, but care must be taken to monitor toxicity. Intra-articular glucocorticosteroid therapy is useful and very safe; oral steroids and corticotrophin (adrenocorticotrophic hormone) may have a small role in acute therapy and seem safe when used over short time spans. Low dose colchicine may have a cost and toxicity advantage over NSAIDs in the prophylaxis of gout when commencing therapy aimed at reducing elevated plasma urate concentrations. Allopurinol is more frequently used than uricosuric agents such as probenecid, and toxicity may be largely avoided by tailoring dosage schedules according to renal function.