Relationship between circulating antisperm antibodies in women and autoantibodies on the ejaculated sperm of their partners

Anti-sperm antibodies detection by a modified MAR test: Towards a better definition of its indications

RESEARCH QUESTION

Anti-sperm antibodies (ASA) have been shown to reduce male fertility but consensus about the precise situations in which tests should be carried out are lacking. In infertility investigations, should the mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) test be a first-line test? Should it be carried out systematically before assisted reproductive technology (ART)? What are the risk factors for ASA?

DESIGN

All infertile patients (n = 1364) were tested with SpermMar (modified MAR test) between July 2013 and June 2017. Intra-patient variability of the MAR test was also assesed by comparing two tests within the same year in selected patients (n = 101).

RESULTS

The main factor that influenced the percentage of ASA was the presence or absence of sperm agglutination. In the presence of agglutinations, 27 out of 72 (37.5%) patients were positive for ASA compared with 33 out of 1292 (2.6%) in the absence of agglutinations (P < 0.0001). When one risk factor was present (spontaneous sperm agglutination, history of scrotal trauma or inguinal surgery), 33 out of 179 (18.44%) tests were positive for ASA (≥50% coated spermatozoa), whereas only 27 out of 1242 (2.2%) were positive when no risk factor was present (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ASA detection should not be systematically recommended in investigations of fertility status and before ART but reserved for when sperm agglutination is found during conventional sperm examination, or if the patient has a history of scrotal trauma or has undergone inguinal surgery.

Antisperm antibodies: invaluable tools toward the identification of sperm proteins involved in fertilization

The identification of sperm proteins involved in fertilization has been the subject of numerous investigations. Much interest has been dedicated to naturally occurring antisperm antibodies (ASA) and their impact in fertility. Their presence in men and women has been associated with 2-50% of infertility cases. ASA may impair pre- and post-fertilization steps. Experimental models have been developed using sperm proteins as immunogens to evaluate their involvement in sperm function. Our team has pursued investigations to assess ASA presence in biological fluids from patients consulting for infertility and their effect on fertilization. We found ASA in follicular fluids with ability of inducing the acrosome reaction and blocking sperm-zona pellucida interaction and used them to identify sperm entities involved in these events. We generated and utilized antibodies against proacrosin/acrosin to characterize the sperm protease system. We implemented an ELISA to detect proacrosin/acrosin antibodies in human sera and evaluated their impact upon fertility by developing in vitro assays and a gene immunization model. This review presents a summary of ASA history, etiology, current approaches for detection and effects upon fertility. ASA (naturally occurring, generated by animal immunization and/or of commercial origin) are invaluable tools to understand the molecular basis of fertilization, better diagnose/treat immunoinfertility and develop immunocontraceptive methods.

Value of serum antisperm antibodies in diagnosing obstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE

The requisite presence of active spermatogenesis for antisperm antibody production may be useful in identifying obstructive azoospermia. The diagnostic performance of serum antisperm antibody was evaluated as a test for obstructive azoospermia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 484 men with male infertility who had undergone antisperm antibody testing were evaluated. Demographic data, patient history, and followup were recorded. Obstruction was confirmed by surgical exploration. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated to quantify diagnostic performance. ROC curves were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Of 484 men 272 possessed documented obstruction of the vas or epididymis and 212 had documented infertility without azoospermia. The obstructed group had significantly increased antisperm antibody levels compared to the nonobstructed group. IgG, IgA, and IgM were analyzed as diagnostic tests for obstruction. The AUC for IgG, IgA and IgM ROC curves was 0.92, 0.85 and 0.67, respectively. The AUC for serum IgG against sperm tails was 0.92, 0.87 against sperm heads and 0.79 against sperm midpieces. IgG demonstrated the highest sensitivity (85%) with a specificity of 97% (chi-square test p <0.01). IgA possessed the highest specificity (99%), positive predictive value (99%) and positive likelihood ratio (70.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of serum antisperm antibody was highly accurate in predicting obstructive azoospermia, particularly after vasectomy. It can obviate the need for testis biopsy, the current but more invasive and costly gold standard of detection. This allows the surgeon to proceed directly to surgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval after a simple blood test.

Association between sperm autoantibodies and enhanced embryo implantation rates during in vitro fertilization

Previous investigations have demonstrated the propensity of strong IgA-class sperm autoantibodies to impede fertilization. However, because there has not been a general consensus on this issue, the aim of this retrospective analysis was to focus on the effects of different levels of IgA-class antibodies on each stage of the IVF procedure. This study has confirmed that high level IgA class antibodies significantly reduce fertilization rates but, unexpectedly, also has shown a very significant improvement in embryo implantation rates in patients with weak to moderate antibody levels. Interlaboratory prospective collaborative studies are being planned to test this preliminary observation more stringently.

Clinical associations and mechanisms of action of antisperm antibodies

OBJECTIVE

To review and critique the current English literature describing the effects of antisperm antibodies (ASA) on mammalian fertility.

DESIGN

A comprehensive English language literature was searched using Medline and by hand-searching. Emphasis was placed on clinically relevant articles.

RESULT(S)

Results from the studies were extrapolated and the effects of ASA on fertility described.

CONCLUSION(S)

Antisperm antibodies may interfere with fertility. Not all ASA cause infertility. Current tests cannot differentiate the infertility-related ASA from those that do not interfere with infertility, because the antigenic specificities of these ASA are not known. The antigens which the infertility-related ASA must be characterized to allow an accurate detection and proper treatment for couples with ASA.

Characteristics of men and women with circulating antisperm antibodies in a combined infertility clinic in Kuwait

Antisperm antibodies were determined in the sera of 250 infertile couples and 100 puerperal women as controls using the immunofluorescence technique. Couples with significant circulating antisperm antibodies were placed on low-dose prednisolone 5 mg daily for 3-6 months. Initial routine semen analysis and hypoosmotic swelling test were done and repeated after 3 months of therapy. The incidence of antisperm antibodies (ASA) was 18.8 and 17.6% in the men and women, respectively, compared to 4% in the women controls (p < .02). In the men, the main determinants (with incidence) of ASA included smoking (33.9%), past history of sexually transmitted disease (33.3%), surgery to genital tract (28.6%), trauma (27.3%), and unexplained infertility (18.5%). In women whose husbands had antisperm antibodies the incidence of circulating antisperm antibodies was 38.3%, while endometriosis and thyroid dysfunction had incidence of antisperm antibodies of 21.4 and 16.7%, respectively. In the 27 (10.8%) case of unexplained infertility, the incidence of antisperm antibodies was 22.2%. High follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the men and low midluteal-phase progesterone in the women were associated with increased expression of antisperm antibodies. Antisperm antibodies adversely affected quality of sperm. Low-dose prednisolone significantly reduced the titer of antisperm antibodies and improved the sperm parameters and conception rate.

Infertility due to antisperm antibodies

Immunoinfertility is an important problem, involving a significant number of infertile couples. Although the presence of antibodies on sperm has better prognostic value than those in serum or seminal plasma, it may not be the sole authentic evidence of immunoinfertility. Infertility from antisperm antibodies is likely only when they bind to a relevant sperm antigen involved in a specific fertility function. The variance in functional deficits seen in immunologic infertility is most likely related to antibodies directed at different sperm antigens or different class, subclass, or isotypes. Antibodies to FA-1 seem to be of significant importance in human immunoinfertility. In approaching couples with infertility, a high index of suspicion for antibodies is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis. In the optimal situation, all semen analyses should be screened for sperm-bound antibodies, but if this is impractical, testing should be performed on high-risk individuals (Table I). In couples in which the man has sperm-bound antibodies, and in whom there is no identifiable female factor, treatment should be instituted. Most treatments for immunoinfertility have been disappointing because of poor results, adverse effects, or high cost. Corticosteroid therapy has shown some promise in published reports (mostly poorly designed studies), but increase in pregnancy rate is modest and adverse effects may be significant. In our opinion, informed consent should be documented prior to institution of corticosteroid therapy, and subjects should be closely monitored. Advanced reproductive technologies offer a higher safety profile, and, with increasing technology, higher pregnancy rates. We recommend progressing from "low-tech" procedures, such as IUI and reserving the higher level procedures, such as IVF and ICSI, for those couples in whom pregnancy does not occur. The highest level reproductive technologies give the best current prospects for pregnancy in patients with this difficult problem but also are invasive and costly. It is hoped that further work in the laboratory will give rise to newer, safer, and less expensive effective treatments in the very near future.

Immunological factors in infertility

Immune infertility can result from destruction of gametes by antisperm antibodies (ASA) or anti-ovary antibodies, by inhibition of sperm-zona pellucida binding by ASA, or by prevention of embryo cleavage and early development. Condoms, immunosuppressive therapy, sperm processing, and intrauterine insemination have been widely applied, but with controversial results.