Pharmacokinetics of desogestrel

Clinical pharmacology of progestins

INTRODUCTION

In this paper, we report general pharmacological profile and major biological activities of natural progesterone (P) and progestins. The aim of this article consists of synthesizing the principal aspects of pharmacology and metabolism of P and progestins related to the clinical consequences of their use.

METHODS

We review scientific literature on the topic "Progestins", evaluating the most relevant data from original articles, reviews and meta-analyses.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Progestins represent a specific class of synthetic analogues of P clinically employed (alone or associated with estrogens) to manage several gynaecological conditions, for instance multiple abortions, luteal phase defect, premenstrual syndrome, abnormal uterine bleeding, endometriosis and menopause (for hormone replacement therapy). Besides their use in the field of contraception, many non-contraceptive benefits of estroprogestins are mostly due to the activities of progestins. Pharmacological characteristics, dosage and individual metabolism could be listed among the principal aspects influencing their clinical effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of each progestin according to its pharmacological profile is crucial for the appropriate management of any gynaecological condition. An aware knowledge of these compounds is fundamental to hone medical practice.

Pharmacokinetics of oral levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol in women after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Most patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are women in reproductive age. It is not known if bariatric surgery affects the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to evaluate ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) absorption in women undergoing RYGB, compared with nonoperated controls matched by age and body mass index (BMI). A secondary objective was to assess whether the time since surgery and BMI in the postoperative period influenced the absorption parameters.

SETTING

University hospital, Brazil.

METHODS

This study was designed to compare the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the time to the peak plasma level (Tmax), the area under the curve (AUC0-8 and AUC0-∞) after a single dose of a combined oral contraceptive with 0.03 mg EE and 0.15 mg LNG among 20 women after RYGB and 20 controls. Blood samples were obtained for 8 hours.

RESULTS

The mean LNG AUC0-8 and LNG AUC0-∞ were higher in RYGB group (P = .048 and P = .004, respectively). We found a positive correlation for LNG AUC0-8 (P = .045) and AUC0-∞ (P = .004) and the time since surgery, and we found a negative correlation for LNG Cmax (P = .018), AUC0-8 (P = .003), and AUC0-∞ (P = .001) and BMI.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in oral EE pharmacokinetics. The operated group showed higher mean LNG AUC0-8 and AUC0-∞ but it was not considered clinically significant. The present study suggests that RYGB may not affect EE and LNG absorption.

Drug-Drug Interaction Studies With Oral Contraceptives: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic and Study Design Considerations

Oral contraceptives (OCs) are the most widely used form of birth control among women of childbearing potential. Knowledge of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with OCs becomes imperative to provide information on the medication to women of childbearing potential and enable their inclusion in clinical trials, especially if the new molecular entity is a teratogen. Although a number of DDI guidance documents are available, they do not provide recommendations for the design and conduct of OC DDI studies. The evaluation of DDI potential of a new molecular entity and OCs is particularly challenging because of the availability of a wide variety of combinations of hormonal contraceptives, different doses of the ethinyl estradiol, and different metabolic profiles of the progestin component. The aim of this review is to comprehensively discuss factors to be considered such as pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), choice of OC, and study population for the conduct of in vivo OC DDI studies. In this context, metabolic pathways of OCs, the effect of enzyme inhibitors and inducers, the role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the PK of progestins, current evidence on OC DDIs, and the interpretation of PD end points are reviewed. With the emergence of new tools like physiologically based PK modeling, the decision to conduct an in vivo study can be made with much more confidence. This review provides a comprehensive overview of various factors that need to be considered in designing OC DDI studies and recommends PK-based DDI studies with PK end points as adequate measures to establish clinical drug interaction and measurement of PD end points when there is basis for PD interaction.

Are the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Contraceptives on Bone Formation in Young Women Mediated via the Growth Hormone-IGF-I Axis?

Purpose: Combined hormonal contraceptive therapy has been associated with negative bone mineral density outcomes that may be route-dependent [i.e., combined oral contraception (COC) vs. contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR)] and involve the hepatic growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis. The objective of the pilot study was to assess the impact of route of contraceptive administration on IGF-I and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) responses to an IGF-I Generation Test. We hypothesized that the peak rise in IGF-I and PINP concentration and area under the curve (AUC) would be attenuated following COC, but not CVR, use. Methods: Healthy, premenopausal women not taking hormonal contraception were recruited. Women were enrolled in the control group (n = 8) or randomly assigned to COC (n = 8) or CVR (n = 8) for two contraceptive cycles. IGF-I Generation Tests were used as a probe to stimulate IGF-I release and were completed during the pre-intervention and intervention phases. Serum IGF-I and PINP were measured during both IGF-I Generation Tests. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02367833). Results: Compared to the pre-intervention phase, peak IGF-I concentration in response to the IGF-I Generation Test in the intervention phase was suppressed in the COC group (p < 0.001), but not the CVR or Control groups (p > 0.090). Additionally, compared to the pre-intervention phase, PINP AUC during the intervention phase was suppressed in both COC and CVR groups (p < 0.001), while no difference was observed in the control group (p = 0.980). Conclusion: These data suggest that changes in recombinant human GH-stimulated hepatic IGF-I synthesis in response to combined hormonal contraception (CHC) use are dependent on route of CHC administration, while the influence on PINP is route-independent. Future research is needed to expand these results with larger randomized control trials in all age ranges of women who utilize hormonal contraception. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02367833.

High Variability of Hormonal Levels and No Clinically Relevant Interaction Between Ethinyl Estradiol, Desogestrel and Lopinavir/Ritonavir in a Small Sample of HIV-positive Adolescents

BACKGROUND

We report the pharmacokinetic interactions of combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing ethinyl estradiol (EE2)/desogestrel (DSG) with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in 16 HIV-positive adolescents.

METHODS

We measured Ctrough of EE2 and etonogestrel (ENG), the active metabolite of DSG, in HIV-positives on LPV/r-based ART; Ctrough of LPV/r with and without COC; endogenous progesterone. EE2/ENG levels were compared with our own historical data of HIV-negative controls.

RESULTS

Ctrough of EE2 and ENG varied from 3 to 57 pg/mL and from 1051 to 5000 pg/mL, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) of Ctrough in HIV-positives on LPV/r with COC versus HIV-negative controls with COC only were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.42 to 1.08) or 32% decreased (P = 0.10) for EE2; and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.60) or 8% increased (P = 0.68) for ENG. Endogenous progesterone was <1.0 ng/mL in all participants, consistent with anovulation. Ctrough of LPV decreased statistically insignificantly with COC and remained above the desired therapeutic minimum of 1.0 mg/L in all.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found no clinically relevant interaction between EE2/DSG and LPV/r. This was supported by suppressed ovulation, assessed by low endogenous progesterone levels in all participants; and preserved antiretroviral activity, assessed by LPV/r levels above the desired therapeutic minimum in all participants. However, the high variability of hormonal levels warrants individual monitoring and further investigation. Condom use should always be encouraged for infection prevention.

Characteristics and metabolic effects of estrogen and progestins contained in oral contraceptive pills

Estrogen and progestins have been used by millions of women as effective combined oral contraceptives. Oral contraceptives (OCs) modify surrogate markers such as lipoproteins, insulin response to glucose, and coagulation factors, that have been associated with cardiovascular and venous risk. Ethinyl-Estradiol (EE) exerts a stronger effect that natural estradiol (E2) on hepatic metabolism. New progestins with high specificity have been designed to avoid interaction with other receptors and prevent androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid related side-effects. The risks and benefits of new progestins used in contraception depend upon their molecular structure, the type and dose of associated estrogen, and the delivery route. The lower impact of E2-based combinations on metabolic surrogate markers may result in an improved safety profile, but only clinical outcomes are relevant to assess the risk. Large surveillance studies are warranted to confirm this hypothesis.

Effect of second- and third-generation oral contraceptives on the protein C system in the absence or presence of the factor VLeiden mutation: a randomized trial

A plausible mechanism to explain thrombotic risk differences associated with the use of second- and third-generation oral contraceptives (OCs), particularly in carriers of factor V(Leiden), is still lacking. In a double-blind trial, 51 women without and 35 women with factor V(Leiden) were randomized to either a second- (30 microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg levonorgestrel) or third- (30 microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg desogestrel) generation OC. After 2 cycles of use and a wash-out of 2 cycles, the participants continued with the corresponding progestagen-only preparation. Hemostatic variables that probe the activity of the anticoagulant protein C system were determined. Compared with levonorgestrel, desogestrel-containing OCs significantly decreased protein S and increased activated protein C (APC) resistance in both groups. OCs with desogestrel had the most pronounced effects in carriers of factor V(Leiden). Progestagen-only preparations caused changes of anticoagulant parameters opposite to those of combined OCs, which in a number of cases were more pronounced with levonorgestrel. Our data show that progestagens in combined OCs counteract the thrombotic effect of the estrogen component. The higher thrombotic risk associated with third-generation OCs compared with second-generation OCs may be explained by the fact that desogestrel appeared less antithrombotic than levonorgestrel, especially in women with factor V(Leiden).

Synthesis and biological activity of a new progestogen, 16-methylene-17alpha-hydroxy-18-methyl-19-norpregn-4-ene-3, 20-dione acetate

The progestational activity of second- and third-generation progestins in oral contraceptives were markedly increased by addition of an 18-methyl group. A new progestin, the 18-methyl analog of Nestorone, 16-methylene-17alpha-hydroxy-18-methyl-19-norpregn-4-ene-3,2 0-dione acetate (10), was synthesized. The relative binding affinity and biologic activity of 10 was compared with Nestorone, levonorgestrel, and progesterone using a binding assay for rat progesterone receptors, the Clauberg assay in the rabbit, and by assessing pregnancy maintenance in the rat. These studies, as summarized in Table 4, show that 10 is three to ten times more potent than Nestorone. The addition of the 18-methyl group to Nestorone markedly increased its potency as noted above, but is unlikely to change its rate of delivery from sustained release systems. 10 should be ideally suited for administration by implants or small skin patches.

Desogestrel, norgestimate, and gestodene: the newer progestins

OBJECTIVE

To review and compare the newer progestins desogestrel, norgestimate, and gestodene with regard to chemistry, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature on desogestrel, norgestimate, and gestodene was identified from a comprehensive MEDLINE English-literature search from 1984 through 1994, with additional studies selected by review of the references. Indexing terms included progestins, desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate, levonorgestrel, and norgestrel.

STUDY SELECTION

Only human clinical and pharmacokinetic trials performed in Europe, Canada, and the US were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

All available data from human studies were reviewed; both comparative and noncomparative studies were included because of the paucity of direct comparative information available.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The newer progestins were designed to minimize the adverse effects (e.g., acne, hirsuitism, nausea, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism changes) observed with older oral contraceptives (OCs) while maintaining efficacy and good menstrual cycle control. Desogestrel, norgestimate, and gestodene have minimal amounts of androgenicity and antiestrogenic potential. All of these agents are pharmacokinetically similar to older agents: they are highly bioavailable when administered orally, hepatically metabolized, and obtain steady-state concentrations after 8-10 days of continuous administration. The newer agents have similar Pearl Indexes and slightly better cycle control. Furthermore, the new progestins appear to cause fewer adverse effects, such as acne and hirsuitism, and similar rates of weight gain, blood pressure changes, and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Desogestrel, norgestimate, and gestodene appear to offer clinical advantages because of their decreased androgenicity. Women whose cycles are currently well controlled with other OCs should not be switched to a newer progestin. However, any of the combination OC products that contain these progestins may be prescribed for women intolerant of older agents or to first-time users of OCs. The newer progestins appear to be efficacious and offer similar cycle control, improved safety and tolerability profiles, and comparable price with the older agents.

Clinical and metabolic features of desogestrel: a new oral contraceptive preparation

Desogestrel is a highly selective gonane progestin. A monophasic formulation containing 150 micrograms of desogestrel and 30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol has recently been approved as an oral contraceptive (OC) in the United States. Although desogestrel-containing formulations are new to the United States, they have been the most widely prescribed OCs in Europe for almost 10 years. An extensive literature demonstrates that desogestrel-containing preparations are safe, effective, and well tolerated by most women. In light of desogestrel's high selectivity, low affinity for androgen receptors, and lack of interference with the increase in sex hormone-binding globulin, desogestrel-containing OCs may be particularly appropriate for women with androgen-induced skin disorders because of their high selectivity. Several European studies have found significant improvement or almost complete resolution of previously existing acne. Desogestrel provides excellent cycle control, no major impact on weight, minimal or no adverse effects on blood pressure, statistically significant increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol usually unchanged or reduced, and little effect on glucose tolerance or insulin resistance.