A randomized multicenter trial assessing a home uterine activity monitoring device used in the absence of daily nursing contact

Midwives', Obstetricians', and Recently Delivered Mothers' Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

BACKGROUND

The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions and experiences of remote monitoring among mothers, midwives, and obstetricians who participated in the PREMOM study.

METHODS

We developed specific questionnaires for the mothers, midwives, and obstetricians addressing 5 domains: (1) prior knowledge and experience of remote monitoring, (2) reactions to abnormal values, (3) privacy, (4) quality and patient safety, and (5) financial aspects. We also questioned the health care providers about which issues they considered important when implementing remote monitoring. We used a 5-point Likert scale to provide objective scores. It was possible to add free-text feedback at every question.

RESULTS

A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaires. The mothers, midwives, and obstetricians reported positive experiences and perceptions of remote monitoring, although most of them had no or little prior experience with this technology. They supported a further rollout of remote monitoring in Belgium. Nearly three-quarters of the mothers (34/47, 72%) did not report any problems with taking the measurements at the required times. Almost half of the mothers (19/47, 40%) wanted to be contacted within 3 to 12 hours after abnormal measurement values, preferably by telephone.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most of midwives and obstetricians had no or very little experience with remote monitoring before enrolling in the PREMOM study, they reported, based on their one-year experience, that remote monitoring was an important component in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies and would recommend it to their colleagues and pregnant patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03246737; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246737 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76KVnHSYY).

Cervical cerclage for singleton pregnant patients on vaginal progesterone with progressive cervical shortening

BACKGROUND

Premature cervical ripening plays a significant role in spontaneous preterm birth. Vaginal progesterone is the recommended treatment in singleton pregnancy with incidental short cervix. There is lack of evidence on whether it is beneficial to reinforce the cervix with cerclage when the cervical length becomes progressively shortened <10 mm while on vaginal progesterone.

OBJECTIVE

Our aims are to determine whether cerclage with vaginal progesterone will: (1) reduce the overall spontaneous preterm birth rate, (2) prolong pregnancy latency, and (3) improve neonatal outcomes compared to vaginal progesterone alone.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study at the University of Illinois at Chicago of all women with singleton pregnancy on vaginal progesterone for incidental short cervix, cervical length <20 mm. Only those with progressive cervical length shortening <10 mm who delivered at the University of Illinois at Chicago from January 2013 through December 2016 were included. The decision to perform cerclage was based on individual physician preference. Demographic data; information on serial cervical length status; medical, obstetric, and social history; cerclage vs no cerclage; and neonatal outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 310 women with incidental short cervix on vaginal progesterone were identified, and of these, 75 had progressive shortening cervical length <10 mm and met inclusion criteria. Among the women with extremely shortened cervical length <10 mm, 36 women (48%) had cervical cerclage plus vaginal progesterone, and 39 women (52%) continued on vaginal progesterone alone. The baseline characteristics, mean cervical length (5.06 vs 5.52 mm), and mean gestational age at diagnosis of extreme short cervix (21.5 vs 21.3 weeks) were similar between women who received cerclage vs those who did not, respectively. The mean gestational age at delivery was significantly greater for those with cerclage (34 weeks and 3 days vs 27 weeks and 2 days; P < .001). The rate of spontaneous preterm birth at <37, 35, 32, 28, and 24 weeks were significantly lower in the cerclage group: 44.1% vs 84.2%, 38.2% vs 81.6%, 23.5% vs 78.9%, 14.7% vs 63.2%, and 11.8% vs 39.5%, respectively. The rate of spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks remained significant after controlling for confounders (relative risk, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.41; P < .001). The average pregnancy latency was 14 weeks in the cerclage combined with vaginal progesterone group compared to vaginal progesterone alone group. Neonatal intensive care unit admission and development of respiratory distress syndrome were significantly lower in the cerclage group compared to vaginal progesterone alone group: 13 (36.1%) vs 23 (65.7%) (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.90; P = .018) and 8 (22.2%) vs 17 (43.6%) (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.90; P = .027), respectively. Neonates of women with cerclage were also significantly less likely to develop necrotizing enterocolitis or experience neonatal death.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that cerclage plus vaginal progesterone in women with extremely shortened cervix significantly decreased overall spontaneous preterm birth rates, prolonged pregnancy latency by 2-fold, and decreased the overall neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Prenatal Remote Monitoring of Women With Gestational Hypertensive Diseases: Cost Analysis

Background

Remote monitoring in obstetrics is relatively new; some studies have shown its effectiveness for both mother and child. However, few studies have evaluated the economic impact compared to conventional care, and no cost analysis of a remote monitoring prenatal follow-up program for women diagnosed with gestational hypertensive diseases (GHD) has been published.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the costs of remote monitoring versus conventional care relative to reported benefits.

Methods

Patient data from the Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study were used. Health care costs were calculated from patient-specific hospital bills of Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (Genk, Belgium) in 2015. Cost comparison was made from three perspectives: the Belgian national health care system (HCS), the National Institution for Insurance of Disease and Disability (RIZIV), and costs for individual patients. The calculations were made for four major domains: prenatal follow-up, prenatal admission to the hospital, maternal and neonatal care at and after delivery, and total amount of costs. A simulation exercise was made in which it was calculated how much could be demanded of RIZIV for funding the remote monitoring service.

Results

A total of 140 pregnancies were included, of which 43 received remote monitoring (30.7%) and 97 received conventional care (69.2%). From the three perspectives, there were no differences in costs for prenatal follow-up. Compared to conventional care, remote monitoring patients had 34.51% less HCS and 41.72% less RIZIV costs for laboratory test results (HCS: mean €0.00 [SD €55.34] vs mean €38.28 [SD € 44.08], P<.001; RIZIV: mean €21.09 [SD €27.94] vs mean €36.19 [SD €41.36], P<.001) and a reduction of 47.16% in HCS and 48.19% in RIZIV costs for neonatal care (HCS: mean €989.66 [SD €3020.22] vs mean €1872.92 [SD €5058.31], P<.001; RIZIV: mean €872.97 [SD €2761.64] vs mean €1684.86 [SD €4702.20], P<.001). HCS costs for medication were 1.92% lower in remote monitoring than conventional care (mean €209.22 [SD €213.32] vs mean €231.32 [SD 67.09], P=.02), but were 0.69% higher for RIZIV (mean €122.60 [SD €92.02] vs mean €121.78 [SD €20.77], P<.001). Overall HCS costs for remote monitoring were mean €4233.31 (SD €3463.31) per person and mean €4973.69 (SD €5219.00) per person for conventional care (P=.82), a reduction of €740.38 (14.89%) per person, with savings mainly for RIZIV of €848.97 per person (23.18%; mean €2797.42 [SD €2905.18] vs mean €3646.39 [SD €4878.47], P=.19). When an additional fee of €525.07 per month per pregnant woman for funding remote monitoring costs is demanded, remote monitoring is acceptable in their costs for HCS, RIZIV, and individual patients.

Conclusions

In the current organization of Belgian health care, a remote monitoring prenatal follow-up of women with GHD is cost saving for the global health care system, mainly via savings for the insurance institution RIZIV.

Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Despite reported positive results of telemonitoring effectiveness in various health care domains, this new technology is rarely used in prenatal care. A few isolated investigations were performed in the past years but with conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to (1) assess whether telemonitoring adds any substantial benefit to this patient population and (2) identify research gaps in this area to suggest goals for future research.

METHODS

This review includes studies exploring the effectiveness of telemonitoring interventions for pregnant women reported in the English language. Due to the paucity of research in this area, all reports including uncontrolled nonrandomized and randomized controlled studies were selected.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, which performed their data collection from 1988 to 2010, met the inclusion criteria and were published from 1995 to present; four of the 14 published papers were multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five papers were single-center RCTs, three papers were retrospective studies, one paper was an observational study, and one paper was a qualitative study. Of the 14 papers, nine were available for a risk of bias assessment: three papers were classified as low risk, one as medium risk, and five as high risk. Furthermore, of those 14 papers, 13 focused on telemonitoring for maternal outcomes, and nine of the 14 papers focused on telemonitoring for fetal or neonatal outcomes. The studies reviewed report that telemonitoring can contribute to significant reductions in health care costs, (unscheduled) face-to-face visits, low neonatal birth weight, and admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), as well as prolonged gestational age and improved feelings of maternal satisfaction when compared with a control group. When only studies with low risk of bias were taken into account, the added value of telemonitoring became less pronounced: the only added value of telemonitoring is for pregnant women who transmitted their uterine activity by telecommunication. They had significant prolonged pregnancy survivals, and the newborns were less likely to be of low birth weight or to be admitted to the NICU. Following these results, telemonitoring can only be recommended by pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery. It is however important to consider that these studies were published in the mid-90s, which limits their direct applicability given the current technologies and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that telemonitoring can be tentatively recommended for pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery. More recent RCTs with a blinded protocol are needed to strengthen the level of evidence around this topic and to have an insight in the added value of the technologies that are available nowadays. In addition, studies investigating patient satisfaction and economic effects in relation to telemonitoring are suggested for future research.

Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour

BACKGROUND

To reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with preterm birth, home uterine activity monitoring aims for early detection of increased contraction frequency, and early intervention with tocolytic drugs to inhibit labour and prolong pregnancy. However, the effectiveness of such monitoring is disputed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether home uterine activity monitoring is effective in improving the outcomes for women and their infants considered to be at high risk of preterm birth, when compared with care that does not include home uterine activity monitoring.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2016), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1966 to 28 June 2016), Embase (1974 to 28 June 2016), CINAHL (1982 to 28 June 2016), and scanned reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised control trials of home uterine activity monitoring, with or without patient education programmes, for women at risk of preterm birth, compared with care that does not include home uterine activity monitoring.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risks of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We did not attempt to contact authors to resolve queries. We assessed the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 15 included studies (6008 enrolled participants); 13 studies contributed data. Women using home uterine monitoring were less likely to experience preterm birth at less than 34 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.99; three studies, 1596 women; fixed-effect analysis) (GRADE high). This difference was not evident when we carried out a sensitivity analysis, restricting the analysis to studies at low risk of bias based on study quality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.00; one study, 1292 women). There was no difference in the rate of perinatal mortality (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.72; two studies, 2589 babies) (GRADE low).There was no difference in the number of preterm births at less than 37 weeks (average RR 0.85, CI 0.72 to 1.01; eight studies, 4834 women; random-effects, Tau2 = 0.03, I2 = 68%) (GRADE very low). Infants born to women using home uterine monitoring were less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (average RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.96; five studies, 2367 babies; random-effects, Tau2 = 0.02, I2 = 32%) (GRADE moderate). This difference was not maintained when we restricted the analysis to studies at low risk of bias (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.01; one study, 1292 babies). Women using home uterine monitoring made more unscheduled antenatal visits (mean difference (MD) 0.48, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.64; two studies, 1994 women) (GRADE moderate). Women using home uterine monitoring were also more likely to have prophylactic tocolytic drug therapy (average RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.45; seven studies, 4316 women; random-effects, Tau2 = 0.03, I2 = 62%), but this difference was no longer evident when we restricted the analysis to studies at low risk of bias (average RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.65; three studies, 3749 women; random-effects, Tau2 = 0.05, I2 = 76%) (GRADE low). The number of antenatal hospital admissions did not differ between home groups (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11; three studies, 1494 women (GRADE low)). We found no data on maternal anxiety or acceptability.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Home uterine monitoring may result in fewer admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit but in more unscheduled antenatal visits and tocolytic treatment; the level of evidence is generally low to moderate. Important group differences were not evident when we undertook sensitivity analysis using only trials at low risk of bias. There is no impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes such as perinatal mortality or incidence of preterm birth.

Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour

BACKGROUND

To reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with preterm birth, home uterine activity monitoring aims for early detection of increased contraction frequency, and early intervention with tocolytic drugs to inhibit labour and prolong pregnancy. However, the effectiveness of such monitoring is disputed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether home uterine activity monitoring is effective in improving the outcomes for women and their infants considered to be at high risk of preterm birth, when compared with conventional or other care packages that do not include home uterine monitoring.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 October 2014), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 August 2014), EMBASE (1974 to 31 August 2014), CINAHL (1982 to 31 August 2014) and scanned reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised control trials of home uterine activity monitoring, with or without patient education programmes, for women at risk for preterm birth, in comparison to the same care package without home uterine activity monitoring.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We did not attempt to contact authors to resolve queries.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 15 included studies (total number of enrolled participants 6008); 13 studies contributed data. Women using home uterine monitoring were less likely to experience preterm birth at less than 34 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.99; three studies, n = 1596; fixed-effect analysis) (GRADE high). The significant difference was not evident when we carried out a sensitivity analysis, restricting the analysis to studies at low risk of bias based on study quality (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.00, one study, 1292 women). There was no significant difference in the rate of perinatal mortality (RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.72; two studies, n = 2589) (GRADE low)There was no significant difference in the number of preterm births at less than 37 weeks (average RR 0.85; CI 0.72 to 1.01; eight studies, n = 4834; random-effects, T² = 0.03, I² = 68%) (GRADE very low). Infants born to women using home uterine monitoring were less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (average RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.96; five studies, n = 2367; random-effects, T² = 0.02, I² = 32%) (GRADE moderate). The difference was not statistically significant when only high quality studies were included (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.01; one study, n = 1292). Women using home uterine monitoring made more unscheduled antenatal visits (mean difference (MD) 0.49; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.62; two studies, n = 3707) (GRADE moderate). Women using home uterine monitoring were also more likely to have prophylactic tocolytic drug therapy (average RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.45; seven studies, n = 4316; random-effects. T² = 0.03, I² = 62%) but this difference was no longer significant when the analysis was restricted to higher quality studies (average RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.65, three studies, n = 3749,random-effects, T² = 0.05, I² = 76%) (GRADE low). One small study reported that the home uterine monitoring group spent fewer days in hospital antenatally. No data on maternal anxiety or acceptability were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Home uterine monitoring may result in fewer admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit but more unscheduled antenatal visits and tocolytic treatment, but the level of evidence is generally low to moderate. Important group differences were not evident when sensitivity analysis was undertaken using only high quality trials. There is no impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes such as perinatal mortality or incidence of preterm birth.

Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

No randomized controlled trial has compared vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage directly for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix in the mid trimester, singleton gestation, and previous spontaneous preterm birth. We performed an indirect comparison of vaginal progesterone vs cerclage using placebo/no cerclage as the common comparator.

STUDY DESIGN

Adjusted indirect metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Four studies that evaluated vaginal progesterone vs placebo (158 patients) and 5 studies that evaluated cerclage vs no cerclage (504 patients) were included. Both interventions were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation and composite perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with placebo/no cerclage. Adjusted indirect metaanalyses did not show statistically significant differences between vaginal progesterone and cerclage in the reduction of preterm birth or adverse perinatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Based on state-of-the-art methods for indirect comparisons, either vaginal progesterone or cerclage are equally efficacious in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix in the mid trimester, singleton gestation, and previous preterm birth. Selection of the optimal treatment needs to consider adverse events, cost and patient/clinician preferences.

Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour

BACKGROUND

To reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with preterm birth, home uterine activity monitoring aims for early detection of increased contraction frequency, and early intervention with tocolytic drugs to inhibit labour and prolong pregnancy. However, the effectiveness of such monitoring is disputed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether home uterine activity monitoring is effective in improving the outcomes for women and their infants considered to be at high risk of preterm birth, when compared with conventional or other care packages that do not include home uterine monitoring.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 November 2011), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4 of 4), MEDLINE (1966 to 30 November 2011), EMBASE (1974 to 30 November 2011), CINAHL (1982 to 30 November 2011) and scanned reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised control trials of home uterine activity monitoring, with or without patient education programmes, for women at risk for preterm birth, in comparison to the same care package without home uterine activity monitoring.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were checked for accuracy. We did not attempt to contact authors to resolve queries.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 15 included studies (total number of enrolled participants 6008); 13 studies contributed data. Women using home uterine monitoring were less likely to experience preterm birth at less than 34 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.99; three studies, n = 1596; fixed-effect analysis). However, this significant difference was not evident when we carried out a sensitivity analysis, restricting the analysis to studies at low risk of bias based on study quality (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.00, one study, 1292 women). There was no significant difference in the rate of perinatal mortality (RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.72; two studies, n = 2589).There was no significant difference in the number of preterm births at less than 37 weeks (average RR 0.85; CI 0.72 to 1.01; eight studies, n = 4834; random effects, T(2) = 0.03, I(2) = 68%). Infants born to women using home uterine monitoring were less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (average RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.96; five studies, n = 2367; random-effects, T(2) = 0.02, I(2) = 32%). Although this difference was not statistically significant when only high quality studies were included (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.01; one study, n = 1292). Women using home uterine monitoring made more unscheduled antenatal visits (mean difference (MD) 0.49; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.62; two studies, n = 2807). Women using home uterine monitoring were also more likely to have prophylactic tocolytic drug therapy (average RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.45; seven studies, n = 4316; random-effects. T(2) = 0.03, I(2) = 62%) but this difference was no longer significant when the analysis was restricted to high quality studies (average RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.65, three studies, n = 3749,random effects, T(2) = 0.05, I(2) = 76%). One small study reported that the home uterine monitoring group spent fewer days in hospital antenatally. No data on maternal anxiety or acceptability were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Home uterine monitoring may result in fewer admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit but more unscheduled antenatal visits and tocolytic treatment. There is no impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes such as perinatal mortality or incidence of preterm birth.

Home uterine monitoring: a case of telemedicine failure?

The aim of the article is to explore and explain some of the controversies around home uterine monitoring, using a socio-technical interaction networks (STIN) approach. A Cochrane systematic review identified 15 included studies. A critique of these studies, using the eight components of the STIN framework, illustrated very clearly the different assumptions made about the purpose of home uterine monitoring, and helped to explain the different outcomes. The final mapping stage suggested that systems architecture choices included that of the role of monitoring support, to complement patient education or to enhance education for provider and patient. A similar choice concerned the type and extent of patient-care-provider contacts to be used. Using the STIN framework provided a useful perspective on the telemedicine aspects of home uterine monitoring, providing value beyond the systematic review conclusions alone.

Home uterine activity monitoring: the role of medical evidence

The current paradigm in obstetrics has shifted toward evidence-based medicine, and yet in clinical practice physicians continue to use interventions for which there exists no credible evidence. This article examines the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) status of home uterine activity monitoring (HUAM) and the published clinical trials examining HUAM for the management of current preterm labor. The use of HUAM was introduced into clinical practice and heavily marketed without benefit of scientific rigor. Gradually, HUAM use migrated primarily for patients diagnosed (or misdiagnosed) with preterm labor in the current pregnancy who are stabilized and sent home with or without a tocolytic. This clinical intervention has not been cleared by the FDA, has virtually no scientific support, and constitutes a gross deviation from evidence-based medicine. As obstetricians accept the role of medical evidence steering clinical practice, HUAM clearly has no clinical value and therefore should not be used to manage patients outside of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Predictors of preterm birth

OBJECTIVE

This is a systematic review to assess published scientific evidence on preterm birth predictors.

METHODS

An Internet search for predictors of preterm birth was performed and the evidence level of each method was evaluated.

RESULTS

There is strong evidence that preterm birth can be predicted using vaginal sonography to evaluate cervical characteristics, fetal fibronectin in cervicovaginal secretions and interleukin-6 in amniotic fluid. There is consistent evidence that digital cervical examination is a weak predictor, and controversy regarding home uterine activity monitoring. There is scanty evidence about the predictive ability of maternal history and perceptions of symptoms since the study design fails to provide high evidence level.

CONCLUSION

Cervical evaluation by vaginal sonography, fetal fibronectin and interleukin-6 are the best methods for predicting preterm birth.

Uterine contraction assessment

Few approaches to preterm birth prevention have been as thoroughly studied yet as enigmatic as uterine contraction assessment. Despite multiple randomized clinical trials (level 1 evidence), the effectiveness of home uterine contraction assessment as an adjunct to the clinical management of women at risk for preterm birth remains controversial. This article reviews these trials with particular attention to study design and patient inclusion criteria. The data are absolutely clear that home uterine contraction monitoring with or without frequent perinatal nursing contact can reduce the risk of preterm birth and improve perinatal outcomes and that both are independently superior to standard preterm birth prevention education and care.

Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients

OBJECTIVES

Review the uterine electromyography (EMG) and cervical light-induced fluorescence (LIF) devices and their role in the evaluation of uterine and cervical function in comparison with present methods.

DESIGN

Review of recent studies.

SETTING

University of Texas Medical Branch Labour and Delivery Clinics.

POPULATION

Various groups of pregnant women.

METHODS

We have developed and recently improved non-invasive methods to evaluate quantitatively uterine electrical signals from the abdominal surface and cervical collagen.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Uterine EMG utilised power density spectrum (PDS) peak frequency and total power (P(0)) and cervical LIF utilising LIF ratio.

RESULTS

Human studies indicate that uterine and cervical performance can be successfully monitored during pregnancy using EMG and LIF, respectively, and the assessment of uterine and cervical function can both be used to influence patient management in a variety of conditions associated with labour, more than can currently available methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential benefits of the proposed instrumentation include the following: a reduction in the rate of preterm birth, improved maternal and perinatal outcome, better monitoring of treatment, decreased caesarean section rate and better research methods for understanding uterine and cervical function.

Current status of home uterine activity monitoring

A comprehensive evidence-based review of the clinical data leads to the conclusion that if patients at high risk for preterm birth (eg, prior preterm birth because of preterm labor, twins and higher-order multiple gestation, women who have preterm labor during the current pregnancy tocolyzed effectively) use the comprehensive system of HUAM correctly (ie, daily nursing care and twice-daily monitoring) with appropriate alarm rates and sensitive monitors, the incidence of early diagnosis of preterm labor, effective prolongation of pregnancy with fewer preterm births, and a reduction in neonatal morbidity is always demonstrated when the study group is compared with a control group consisting of women receiving standard care available to obstetricians in the United States. The authors expect that there will always be arguments regarding whether the monitor or the nurse contributes most to preterm birth reduction. Even when the alerts of detected contractions or patient-reported symptoms are sounded, the issue of prompt and effective medical intervention will always be hotly debated. The appropriate research design that tests HUAM while allowing various diagnostic and treatment modalities that physicians employ around the United States must be individualized. Physicians must make the decision, based on the evidence, regarding whether or not this system would benefit their patients. While investigators argue about research designs and statistical analyses, physicians simply want the best outcomes for their patients, which is what women and the whole of society also want. Based on the available evidence, it is clear that when the comprehensive system of HUAM is used appropriately in the right patients, everyone benefits.

The physiology of uterine contractions

Studies in animals and humans indicate that uterine performance can be successfully monitored during pregnancy using uterine electromyography. Uterine electromyography could be used to better define management in a variety of conditions associated with human labor. The potential benefits of the proposed instrumentation and method include: reducing the rate of preterm delivery, improving maternal and perinatal outcome, monitoring treatment, decreasing cesarean-section rate, and providing research methods to better understand uterine function.

Our unrequited love for simple explanation

In the complex and often perplexing field of perinatology, it is often tempting to extrapolate the results of the latest published study to our daily clinical practice, especially when the study appears to provide simple answers to difficult questions. This tendency is further encouraged by sensational media coverage and commentaries that, by necessity, further simplify the issues and hype the speculation. Without a critical appraisal of the study population, methodology, analysis and conclusions stated, globalizing a single study's results to anyone's clinical practice can be well-intentioned but misguided. As an example, approximately 1 year ago the results of an NICHD study involving home uterine activity monitoring (HUAM) were released. The study concluded that, while the likelihood of preterm delivery increased with an increased baseline frequency of uterine contractions, measurement of this contractility was not a clinically efficient predictor of preterm delivery. Through the media and editorials that followed, the study results became translated so as to indicate that HUAM was not effective in preventing preterm delivery or improving perinatal outcomes. In our desire for a simple and definitive conclusion on HUAM, key facts about this study were forgotten. In the NICHD study, uterine contraction data were blinded to both physician and patient, and only intermittent preterm monitoring was used with no provision for emergency monitoring; a study design that guaranteed patient management and outcomes would not be affected by HUAM. Using the NICHD HUAM study as an example to be learned from, we should be more critical and independent in our appraisal of published trials. Evidence-based medicine is only useful when we pay as much attention to the methodology as we do to the results.

Preventing low birth weight: is prenatal care the answer?

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence of effectiveness of prenatal care for preventing low birth weight (LBW).

METHODS

We reviewed original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and commentaries for evidence of effectiveness of the three core components of prenatal care--risk assessment, health promotion and medical and psychosocial interventions--for preventing the two constituents of LBW: preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).

RESULTS

Clinical risk assessment will fail to identify the majority of pregnancies at risk for preterm delivery or IUGR. While biophysical and biochemical modalities appear promising, their cost-effectiveness has not been demonstrated, nor can their routine use be recommended in the absence of effective interventions. Smoking cessation programs appear to be modestly effective. There is insufficient evidence to conclude a benefit for nutrition interventions, work counseling or preterm birth education. Only antenatal corticosteroid therapy has demonstrated a clear benefit in the tertiary prevention of preterm delivery. Interventions for which there is insufficient evidence to conclude a benefit include bed rest, hydration, sedation, cerclage, progesterone supplementation, antibiotic treatment, tocolysis without concomitant use of corticosteroids, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, psychosocial support and home visitation. Additionally, there is a paucity of evidence supporting the effectiveness of prenatal interventions, such as low-dose aspirin, bed rest, maternal hyperoxygenation, plasma volume expansion and antenatal fetal assessment, in preventing IUGR or its associated morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither preterm birth nor IUGR can be effectively prevented by prenatal care in its present form. Preventing LBW will require reconceptualization of prenatal care as part of a longitudinally and contextually integrated strategy to promote optimal development of women's reproductive health not only during pregnancy, but over the life course.

The diagnosis and management of preterm labor

Accurate diagnosis of preterm labor remains a problematic issue. New techniques such as transvaginal cervical sonography and fetal fibronectin are increasingly important in diagnosis and intervention planning. Neither test can, at present, be recommended for screening of the general population since there is no effective intervention for a positive test. Future directions in research include development of new tocolytic agents such as COX-2 inhibitors and clarification of the best use of adjunctive therapies such as betamethasone for lung maturity.

Methods and devices for the management of term and preterm labor

In this review, we outline studies showing that the uterus (myometrium) and cervix pass through a conditioning step in preparation for labor. This step is not easily identifiable with present methods designed to assess the uterus or cervix. In the uterus, this seemingly irreversible step consists of changes in the electrical properties that make muscle more excitable and responsive and produce forceful contractions. In the cervix, the step consists of softening of the connective tissue components. Progesterone and nitric oxide appear to have important roles in these processes. The progress of labor can be assessed noninvasively using electromyographic (EMG) signals from the uterus (the driving force for contractility) recorded from the abdominal surface. Uterine EMG bursts detected in this manner characterize uterine contractile events during human and animal pregnancy. A low uterine EMG activity, measured transabdominally throughout most of pregnancy, rises dramatically during labor. EMG activity also increases substantially during preterm labor in humans and rats and may be predictive of preterm labor. A quantitative method for assessing the cervix is also described. A collascope estimates cervical collagen content from a fluorescent signal generated when collagen crosslinks are illuminated with an excitation light of about 340 nm. The system has proved useful in rats and humans at various stages of pregnancy and indicates that cervical softening occurs progressively in the last one-third of pregnancy. In rats, collascope readings correlate with resistance measurements made in the isolated cervix, which may help to assess cervical function during pregnancy and indicate controls and treatments.

Current concepts on the pathogenesis and markers of preterm births

Preterm births remain a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality despite our efforts over the past several decades. Our improved understanding of the complex mechanisms surrounding preterm labor, however, has resulted in the development of numerous biologic and clinical predictors of spontaneous preterm births. These developments offer the exciting prospect for the creation of specific interventions that are directed toward the various pathways involved with preterm births.

Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine is the use of telecommunications technology for medical diagnosis and patient care. From its beginnings telemedicine has been used in a variety of health care fields, although widespread interest among healthcare providers has only now become apparent with the development of more sophisticated technology.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of telemedicine as an alternative to face-to-face patient care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group's specialised register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966-August 1999), EMBASE (to 1996), Cinahl (to August 1999), Inspec (to August 1996), Healthstar (1983-1996), OCLC, Sigle (to 1999), Assia, SCI (1981-1997), SSCI (1981-1997), DHSS-Data. We hand searched the Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (1995-1999), Telemedicine Journal (1995-1999) and reference lists of articles. We also hand searched conference proceedings and contacted experts in countries identified as having an interest in telemedicine.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series comparing telemedicine with face-to-face patient care. The participants were qualified health professionals and patients receiving care through telemedicine.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials involving more than 800 people were included. One trial was concerned with telemedicine in the emergency department, one with video-consultations between primary health care and the hospital outpatients department, and the remainder were concerned with the provision of home care or patient self-monitoring of chronic disease. The studies appeared to be well conducted, although patient numbers were small in all but one. Although none of the studies showed any detrimental effects from the interventions, neither did they show unequivocal benefits and the findings did not constitute evidence of the safety of telemedicine. None of the studies included formal economic analysis. All the technological aspects of the interventions appear to have been reliable, and to have been well accepted by patients.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Establishing systems for patient care using telecommunications technologies is feasible, but there is little evidence of clinical benefits. The studies provided variable and inconclusive results for other outcomes such as psychological measures, and no analysable data about the cost effectiveness of telemedicine systems. The review demonstrates the need for further research and the fact that it is feasible to carry out randomised trials of telemedicine applications. Policy makers should be cautious about recommending increased use and investment in unevaluated technologies.

Instrumentation for the diagnosis of term and preterm labour

The problems associated with labor during pregnancy are among the most important health issues facing physicians. Understanding the role of the uterus and cervix in labor and developing methods to control their function is essential to solving problems relating to labor. At the moment, only crude, inaccurate and subjective methods are used to assess changes in the uterus and cervix that occur in preparation for or during labor. In the past several years, we have developed noninvasive methods to quantitatively evaluate the uterus and cervix based respectively on recording of uterine electrical signals from the abdominal surface (uterine EMG) and measurement of light-induced cervical collagen fluorescence (LIF) with an optical device (Collascope). The methods are rapid and allow assessment of uterine contractility and cervical ripening. Studies in rats and humans indicate that uterine and cervical function can be successfully monitored during pregnancy using these approaches and that these techniques might be used in a variety of conditions associated with labor to better define management. The potential benefits of the proposed instrumentation and methods include a reducing the rate of preterm delivery, improving maternal and perinatal outcome, monitoring treatment, decreasing cesarean section rate and improving research methods to understand uterine and cervical function.

A randomized comparison of home uterine activity monitoring in the outpatient management of women treated for preterm labor

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate home uterine activity monitoring as an intervention in reducing the rate of preterm birth among women treated for preterm labor.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 186 women were treated in the hospital with magnesium sulfate for preterm labor and were prospectively randomly assigned to study groups; among these, 162 were ultimately eligible for comparison. Eighty-two of these women were assigned to the monitored group and 80 were assigned to an unmonitored control group. Other than monitoring, all women received identical prenatal follow-up, including daily perinatal telephone contact and oral terbutaline therapy. Outcome comparisons were primarily directed toward evaluation of preterm birth at <35 weeks' gestation. Readmissions for recurrent preterm labor and observations lasting <24 hours were evaluated in monitored and unmonitored groups. Compliance with monitoring was also evaluated in the monitored group.

RESULTS

The monitored and control groups were demographically similar. According to a multivariate logistic regression model, women with cervical dilatation of >/=2 cm were 4 times more likely to be delivered at <35 weeks' gestation (P <.05). Gestational ages at delivery were similar in the monitored and control groups. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of preterm delivery at <35 weeks' gestation between the monitored group (10.9%) and the control group (15.0%). The overall rates of delivery at <37 weeks' gestation were high (48.8% and 60.0% for monitored and control groups, respectively), and the difference was not significant. The numbers of women with >/=1 instance of readmission and treatment for recurrent preterm labor were equal in the monitored and control groups. The numbers of women with >/=1 hospital observation lasting <24 hours were not different between the groups. Compliance with monitoring did not significantly differ for women who were delivered at <35 weeks' gestation, women with >/=2 cm cervical dilatation at enrollment, or for African American women.

CONCLUSION

A reduction in the likelihood of preterm delivery at <35 weeks' gestation was not further enhanced by the addition of home uterine monitoring to the outpatient management regimens of women treated for preterm labor.

Monitoring women at risk for preterm labor

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Whether the rate of preterm birth can be reduced by frequent contact between nurses and pregnant women or home monitoring of uterine activity is not known.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 2422 pregnant women with known risk factors for preterm labor (including 844 women who were pregnant with twins) to receive education and to have one of the following: weekly contact with a nurse, daily contact with a nurse, or daily contact with a nurse and home monitoring of uterine activity. The nurses elicited the women's own assessments of their symptoms and signs of preterm labor. The primary end point was the incidence of birth at less than 35 weeks' gestation. Secondary end points included cervical status at the time preterm labor was diagnosed and birth weight.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the groups in the incidence of birth at less than 35 weeks (14 percent in the weekly-contact group, 13 percent in the daily-contact group, and 14 percent in the home-monitoring group), in the mean amount of cervical dilatation at the time preterm labor was diagnosed (1.8 cm, 1.5 cm, and 1.4 cm, respectively), or in such neonatal outcomes as birth weights of less than 1500 g or less than 2500 g. However, daily contact with a nurse increased the mean number of unscheduled visits to obstetricians (1.2 in the weekly-contact group, 1.8 in the daily-contact group, and 2.3 in the home-monitoring group) and the proportion of women who received prophylactic tocolytic drugs (12 percent, 14 percent, and 19 percent, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Women who have daily contact with a nurse, with or without home monitoring of uterine activity, have no better pregnancy outcomes than women who have weekly contact with a nurse.

A validation study of home uterine activity monitoring technology in Western Australia

Home uterine activity monitoring has been developed as an 'early warning' device to detect premature uterine activity, thereby encouraging earlier referral and tocolysis of women at risk of preterm delivery. This ambulatory monitoring system, utilizing a ring-guard tocodynamometer, was piloted in Western Australia to determine if it can reliably record and transmit antenatal uterine activity data in an Australian environment. Pregnant women were readily able to correctly apply and use the ambulatory monitoring device. The information collected was able to be transmitted using standard Australian telecommunications systems within our hospital environment. Validation studies with the ambulatory monitor and current external tocodynamometry hardware were performed. The ring-guard tocodynamometer detected more uterine activity at gestations less than 32 weeks compared with conventional external tocodynamometers. As term approached, however, the sensitivity of the ring-guard tocodynamometer decreased. A cross-sectional profile of antenatal uterine activity was developed for women at low risk of delivering preterm. A gradual increase in the number, duration and amplitude of uterine contractions as pregnancy advanced was observed.

Multicenter randomized clinical trial of home uterine activity monitoring: pregnancy outcomes for all women randomized

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the impact of home uterine activity monitoring on pregnancy outcomes among women at high risk for preterm labor and delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Women at high risk for preterm labor at three centers were randomly assigned to receive high-risk prenatal care alone (not monitored) or to receive the same care with twice-daily home uterine activity monitoring without increased nursing support (monitored). There were 339 women with singleton gestations randomized with caregivers blinded to group assignment. The two groups were medically and demographically similar at entry into the study.

RESULTS

Women in the monitored group had prolonged pregnancy survival (p = 0.02) and were less likely to experience a preterm delivery (relative risk 0.59; p = 0.04). Infants born to monitored women with singleton gestations were less likely to be of low birth weight (< 2500 gm; relative risk 0.47, p = 0.003), and were less likely to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk 0.5, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These data show, among women with singleton gestations at high risk for preterm delivery, that the use of home uterine activity monitoring alone, without additional intensive nursing care, results in improved pregnancy outcomes, including prolonged gestation, decreased risk for preterm delivery, larger-birth-weight infants, and a decreased need for neonatal intensive care.