The seat belt syndrome. The seat belt sign, intestinal and mesenteric injuries

Seat belt injuries and external markings at autopsy in cases of lethal vehicle crashes

A study was undertaken to determine what injuries are associated with the wearing of seat belts and if the presence of cutaneous seat belt markings observed on victims of lethal vehicle crashes increased the likelihood of underlying injury. Autopsy reports from the files at Forensic Science South Australia were reviewed for all fatal motor vehicle crashes from January 2014 to December 2018. A total of 173 cases were included for analysis with 127 occupants wearing seat belts at the time of impact (73.4%) (age range = 18-93; mean = 45 M:F = 81:46). Of these, only 38 had external seat belt markings (29.9%) (age range = 19-83; mean = 49 M:F = 20:18). Logistic regression modelling showed that occupants who were wearing seat belts were more likely to experience closed head injury without skull fractures in addition to mesenteric and gastrointestinal injury. Increasing body mass index increased the incidence of seat belt markings (p < 0.01) and markings were more likely to be found in the presence of bilateral pelvic fractures. Thus, external seat belt markings were observed in only a minority of seatbelt wearers, and more often in individuals with higher BMIs and with bilateral pelvic fractures (possibly associated with greater momentum and impact force).

Bucket-Handle Mesenteric Tears: A Comprehensive Review of Their Presentation and Management

Bucket-handle mesenteric tears remain a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. We aim to review the literature, including a single-surgeon series, to better understand their presentation and management.

Three electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, and PubMed) were searched for original research articles, describing relevant cases, from database inception to October 2021 using the following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms: mesenteric avulsion, mesenteric tear, and blunt abdominal trauma. A retrospective review of cases managed under a single surgeon at our unit was also performed. Data extracted included demographics, mechanism of injury, presenting features, diagnostic imaging, surgical management, and patient outcome.

In total, 19 studies were identified, including 22 patients (median age 34.5 years). The most common cause of injury was seat-belted road traffic accidents (77.3%), and patients commonly presented with abdominal pain (72.7%), tenderness (50%), positive seat-belt sign (54.5%), and haemodynamic compromise (45.5%). Computerised tomography scanning was the main imaging modality (68%), and the most common findings reported were abdominal free fluid (36.4%) and abdominal wall hernia (27.3%). The majority of patients were operated on within 24 hours of injury (68%), had a median length of stay of 14.5 days, and experienced an uncomplicated recovery (68%). There was no association between the development of complications and delayed surgical intervention >24 hours (p = 0.145). Our institution’s experience was similar, with 50% of patients undergoing surgical intervention within 24 hours. The median age was 32.5 years (50% female), and the median length of stay was 11 days.

A high index of suspicion, serial monitoring, including blood tests, and imaging, with a low threshold for early repeat imaging, can provide a useful guide for identifying patients with bucket-handle tears.

Do signs of abdominal wall injury on computed tomography predict intra-abdominal injury in trauma patients with a seatbelt sign?

BACKGROUND

A seatbelt sign in patients with blunt abdominal injury is associated with both abdominal wall and intra-abdominal injuries. This study aimed to assess the association between signs of abdominal wall injury on computed tomography (CT) and rates of intra-abdominal injury in patients with a blunt abdominal injury and a clinical seatbelt sign.

METHODS

This study includes hemodynamically stable trauma patients with blunt abdominal injury and a clinical seatbelt sign who were hospitalized in two regional trauma centers in Israel, during 2014-2019. All data were collected via the medical center's trauma registry in both centers.

RESULTS

We identified 123 stable blunt abdominal trauma patients with a seatbelt sign, of which 101 (82.1%) and 22 (17.9%) had a low-grade and high-grade abdominal wall injury according to CT findings, respectively. Laparotomy rates were significantly higher in patients with signs of high-grade abdominal wall injury (p<0.0001). No differences in the timing of laparotomy between low and high-grade injuries were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma and a clinical seatbelt sign, the severity of abdominal wall injury, as represented by CT findings, may predict a need for surgical treatment.

A radiographic and physical analysis of factors affecting seat belt position in sitting car seat

The characteristic subcutaneous hemorrhage along the seat belt in motor vehicle accidents is called the seat belt sign (SBS). The risk of organ injuries is especially high when abdominal SBS is located above the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The purpose of this study analyzed the physical and radiographic factors of healthy volunteers sit on car seat that affect initial position of abdominal seat belt, namely "lap belt", related to the seat belt injury. This study was examined prospectively relation between physical characteristics of one hundred healthy volunteers and lap belt position sitting the car seat. Physical findings were clarified age, sex, height, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. Radiographical findings were measured lumber lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), and initial lap belt position by marking with lead tape for the center and ASIS of the lap belt installed on the driver's car seat. In the lateral X-ray image, we measured the horizontal distance (X-value) and vertical distance (Z-value) from the ASIS to the central marker. The lap belt angle was determined to measure the angle between the horizontal line and the straight line connecting the upper edges of the markers. Statistical analysis of the relationships between physical characteristics and radiological findings was performed. X-value and Z-value were positively correlated with body weight, BMI, and waist circumference, while the lap belt angle was negatively correlated with body weight, BMI, and waist circumference. The relationship between physical characteristics and the initial position of seat belt was analyzed. Since the lap belt is positioned higher than the ASIS in occupants with a high BMI, it is likely to cause seat belt injury. This analysis can help to develop safer seat belts and to enlighten car occupants.

Botox, Abdominal Wall Transection, and Body Positioning: A Case of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Seat Belt Syndrome

Seat belt syndrome (SBS) represents all injury profiles associated with seat belt injuries and motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). Seat belt syndrome classically presents with a superficial seat belt sign that may signify deeper intra-abdominal and/or spinal involvement. The amount of force transmitted from the restraint to the passenger ultimately dictates the amount and severity of the injury. We present a unique case of a 59-year-old female involved in a motor vehicle crash with multiple traumatic injuries, including seat belt syndrome, abdominal wall transection, and bowel injuries. She later had reconstruction of her traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs). Three unique approaches were used in the management of her traumatic abdominal wall hernias: (1) preoperative Botulinum toxin (Botox) injections, (2) operative use of biologic and bioabsorbable meshes in contaminated fields, and (3) postoperative physical therapy and body positioning. The patient did not experience any recurrence of these hernias after her abdominal wall reconstruction and remains alive at the time this case was written. The diagnostic criteria and surgical management of traumatic abdominal wall hernias have yet to be established, and the case presented here provides approaches that should serve as future areas for study.

Vertebral artery transection: an unusual lethal seat belt injury

An 89-year-old man involved in a vehicle crash was found at autopsy to have a linear seat belt mark on the right side of his neck associated with extensive injuries of the right paraspinal muscles with fracture-dislocation and separation of cervical vertebrae 5 and 6. There was also fracture of the right facet joint between cervical vertebrae 5 and 6 and laceration of the right vertebral artery. Death was due to a cervical seat belt injury with spinal fracture and laceration of the right vertebral artery. The presence of extensive injuries to the right paraspinal muscles and cervical vertebra 5-6 fact joint beneath the seat belt mark would be in keeping with trauma due to the belt webbing, rather than mere hyperextension/flexion of the cervical spine. This report demonstrates a rare form of seat belt injury, transection of the vertebral artery, and suggests that the finding of seat belt markings on the lateral aspect of the neck should prompt examination for this type of lethal vascular injury at autopsy.

A case of seat belt-induced small bowel rupture and Chance fracture accompanied by elevated serum amylase

We report herein our experience with a 10-year-old girl who incurred injuries consistent with seat belt syndrome. The patient was involved in a low-speed motor vehicle accident while restrained in a three-point belt (shoulder and lap belts). She complained of abdominal pain and developed tenderness and abdominal guarding. On admission, enhanced computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a fluid collection in the pelvis and a fractured vertebra in the lumbar spine. The following day, her C-reactive protein and serum amylase levels were elevated and plain CT demonstrated free air in the left side of the abdominal cavity. A ruptured jejunum was detected on laparoscopy. The involved segment of intestine was resected and an end-to-end anastomosis performed. She had an uneventful post-operative course. On post-operative day 14, she was transferred to another facility to undergo therapy for her spinal fracture. After completing conservative therapy, she was discharged 5 weeks after the initial injury.

Traumatic Abdominal Wall Hernia-A Series of 12 Patients and a Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) is strongly associated with blunt abdominal trauma. The importance of the CT scan cannot be underestimated-the diagnosis of TAWH is easy to miss clinically, but simple to spot radiologically. We report a case series of patients managed in a French-level one trauma centre, to contribute our experience in the detection and management of associated injuries, and of the hernia itself.

METHODS

All patients (n = 4238) presenting to a single-level one trauma centre for trauma resuscitation (including systematic full-body computerised tomography) from November 2014 to February 2020 were screened for the presence of TAWH and prospectively added to our database. Particular attention was paid to the late detection of associated intra-abdominal injuries. Finally, the choice of management of the hernia itself was noted. A literature review of all case series and individual case reports until the time of writing was performed and summarised.

RESULTS

We report 12 cases of TAWH amongst 4238 patients presenting to the trauma resuscitation bay between November 2014 and February 2020. All patients underwent a contrast-enhanced CT immediately after stabilisation. No patients had clinically detected TAWH prior to CT. Intra-abdominal injuries were found in 9 patients (75%), and urgent surgery was required in 7 patients (58.3%). Two (28.5%) of these seven patients had a missed diagnosis of intra-abdominal injury at the time of the index CT scan, although the TAWH had been detected. Based on our literature review, 271 patients across 12 case series were identified. In total, 183 (67;5%) of these patients were reported to have ≥ 1 associated intra-abdominal injuries. In total, 127 (46,8%) patients required an urgent laparotomy for management of these injuries. Five (3.9%) of the patients requiring urgent laparotomy had a missed CT diagnosis of intra-abdominal injury but not of TAWH at the time of the baseline CT.

CONCLUSIONS

TAWH is a rare clinical entity that may alert to more significant, associated trauma lesions. The CT scan is the imaging modality of choice, to both diagnose and classify the hernia and to screen for other injuries. The presence of TAWH must lower the threshold to operatively explore or at least closely monitor these patients, in view of the high rate of false-negative findings at index imaging.

Perforated Small Intestine: A Case of a Delayed Presentation of an Intra-Abdominal Injury in a Pediatric Patient With a Seatbelt Sign

With the use of seatbelts comes a unique injury profile that has been called “the seatbelt syndrome.” The classically described “seatbelt sign” has become a pattern of injury, describing potential underlying damage. As a clinician, clues to the underlying damage follow a thorough physical examination including the removal of all clothing to locate abrasions and bruises to the skin that potentially follow a seatbelt pattern. Delayed presentation of an intra-abdominal injury in the setting of a seatbelt sign has been well documented; however, the question is how long to observe these patients. We present the case of a 17-year-old woman involved in a motor vehicle collision who presented to the emergency department (ED) hemodynamically stable with a lower abdominal wall seatbelt sign. Her initial imaging revealed only an abdominal wall contusion. She was admitted for observation. Approximately 12 h later she started developing abdominal pain, and by 14 h abdominal distention, with repeat imaging showing free fluid and free air. She was taken to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy and was ultimately discharged back home on day 7.

Pattern Recognition: A Mechanism-based Approach to Injury Detection after Motor Vehicle Collisions

Motor vehicle collisions cause substantial mortality, morbidity, and expense worldwide. Certain types of injuries are more likely to result from frontal versus side-impact collisions, and knowledge of these specific patterns and why they occur aids in accurate and efficient diagnosis of traumatic injuries. Although the proper use of seat belts decreases crash-related mortality during frontal impact, certain injury patterns to the torso are directly attributed to restraint use. The spectrum of seat belt-related injuries ranges from mild skin and soft-tissue contusions to traumatic bowel injuries and unstable spine injuries that require surgery. Impact with the steering wheel or windshield during a frontal crash can cause characteristic injuries to the head, neck, torso, and distal upper extremity. Steering wheel deformity is an independent predictor of serious thoracic and abdominal injury among front-seat passengers. Impact of a flexed knee with the dashboard during a frontal collision can cause knee, thigh, and hip injuries. Distal lower extremity injuries are encountered frequently when the floorboard is driven into the foot. Lateral impact crashes often result in traumatic brain, thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic injuries, which are more often fatal to occupants on the side of the impact. The specific mechanism-based injury patterns are reviewed to establish a structured systematic search pattern that enables the radiologist to identify traumatic injuries with greater accuracy and speed, thereby improving the care of patients who experience acute trauma. ^©RSNA, 2019 See discussion on this article by Ballard and Mellnick .

Does obesity affect the position of seat belt loading in occupants involved in real-world motor vehicle collisions?

OBJECTIVE

Previous work has shown that the lap belt moves superior and forward compared to the bony pelvis as body mass index (BMI) increases. The goal of this project was to determine whether the location of lap belt loading is related to BMI for occupants who sustained real-world motor vehicle collisions (MVCs).

METHODS

A national MVC database was queried for vehicle occupants over a 10-year period (2003-2012) who were at least 16 years old, restrained by a 3-point seat belt, sitting in the front row, and involved in a front-end collision with a change in velocity of at least 56 km/h. Cases were excluded if there was not an available computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen. CT scans were then analyzed using adipose enhancement of 3-dimensional reconstructions. Scans were assessed for the presence a radiographic seat belt sign (rSBS), or subcutaneous fat stranding due to seat belt loading. In scans in which the rSBS was present, anterior and superior displacement of rSBS from the anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS) was measured bilaterally. This displacement was correlated with BMI and injury severity.

RESULTS

The inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded 151 cases for analysis. An rSBS could definitively be identified in 55 cases. Cases in which occupants were older and had higher BMI were more likely to display an rSBS. There was a correlation between increasing BMI and anterior rSBS displacement (P <.01 and P <.01, right and left, respectively). There was no significant correlation between BMI and superior displacement of the rSBS (P =.46 and P =.33, right and left, respectively). When the data were examined in terms of relating increasing superior displacement of the lap belt with Injury Severity Scale (P =.34) and maximum Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) injury severity (P =.63), there was also no significant correlation.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study demonstrated that anterior displacement of the radiographic seat belt sign but not superior displacement increased with higher BMI. These results suggest that obesity may worsen horizontal position but not the vertical position of the lap belt loading during real-world frontal MVCs.

Gastrointestinal Traumatic Injuries: Gastrointestinal Perforation

The abdomen is a big place even in a small person. Gastrointestinal trauma can result in injury to the stomach, small bowel, colon, or rectum. Traumatic causes include blunt or penetrating trauma, such as gunshot wounds, stabbings, motor vehicle collisions, and crush injuries. Nontraumatic causes include appendicitis, Crohn disease, cancer, diverticulitis, ulcerative colitis, blockage of the bowel, and chemotherapy. The mechanism of injury will affect both the nature and severity of any resulting injuries. Treatment must address the critical and emergent nature of these injuries as well as issues that affect all trauma situations, which include management of hemodynamic instability.

Seat belt sign and its significance

Safety belts are the most important safety system in motor vehicles and when worn intend to prevent serious injuries. However, in unusual circumstances (high velocity motor vehicle collisions) these safety measures (seat belts) can be the source and cause of serious injuries. The seat belt syndrome was first described as early by Garrett and Braunste in but the term “seat belt sign” was discussed by Doersch and Dozier. Medical personnel's involved in emergency care of trauma patients should be aware of seat belt sign and there should a higher index of suspicion to rule out underlying organ injuries.

Blunt abdominal aortic disruption (BAAD) in shear fracture of the adult thoraco-lumbar spine: case report and literature review

To present a rare case of association of abdominal aorta rupture and flexion-distraction fracture of thoracolumbar spine and to review the literature on this condition. In non-penetrating abdominal traumatic injuries with flexion-distraction fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, rupture of the abdominal aorta is an extremely rare occurrence but its outcome is potentially lethal. This association of skeletal and vascular lesions mainly affects young patients and involves the thoraco-lumbar junction and the portion of the aorta that lies in front of it. The authors analyze the pertinent literature and describe a case, operated in two sittings, of a traumatic lesion of the aorta attributable to a fracture of L1, focusing on mechanism of damage, diagnosis and surgical treatment. At 2-year follow-up examination, there were no neurological deficits. A review of the pertinent literature has shown that mortality can be reduced by a meticulous clinical and radiological work-up for a correct diagnosis followed by surgical repair of any damaged vessels. The possibility of performing a rapid diagnosis by means of total-body CT-scan plus CT-angiography allows repair of vascular damage, stabilization of the patient's hemodynamic conditions and, subsequently, surgical treatment of the vertebral fracture.

Low probability of Significant Intra-Abdominal Injury in Stable Patients with Abdominal ''Seat Belt Sign''

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine the diagnostic significance of the association between the abdominal skin bruise from a seat belt and the presence of intraabdominal injury.

METHODS

This was an observational analysis of prospectively collected data on 45 patients who presented with an abdominal seat belt sign to a level 1 trauma center following a motor vehicle accident between July 2004 and December 2007. The patients were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scans or ultrasonography (FAST), depending on their hemodynamic stability. They were then hospitalized for treatment or observation.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients [23 males (51.1%) and 22 females (48.9%)], with a mean age of 32.2 years (range 16-80 years), fulfilled entry criteria and were enrolled. Of these, 44 (97.8%) underwent CT, and one (2.2%) underwent FAST due to hemodynamic instability. two patients (4.4%) had intraabdominal injuries: one required surgery for bowel injury, and the other had a minor liver laceration, which was managed expectantly. Sixteen patients (35.5%) had concomitant injuries. The length of hospital stay ranged from 1-23 days (median 2.2 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the widely accepted view that patients with an abdominal seat belt sign are more likely to have serious intraabdominal injuries, the results of our investigation showed no such association in a group of hemodynamically stable patients.

Total prepyloric transection of stomach and vertebral trauma: case report and review of the literature

A rare injury of stomach associated with vertebral trauma in a 10-year-old girl, a victim of a traffic accident, is presented. Early X-ray and computerized tomography scan revealed no free abdominal air, only signs of pancreas contusion and fracture of the Th 12 and L 1 vertebral body were evident. Transection of stomach was revealed during endoscopy (an attempt to perform retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography) 20 h after the trauma. Primary suture of the rupture was performed. Sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome developed in the postoperative course. The girl subsequently underwent four laparotomies for abdominal infection, bleeding and colonic stricture. After resolution of the abdominal disorders the girl underwent surgical stabilization of spine. Currently, 2 years after trauma, she is doing well without any gastroenterologic dysfunction.

Chance-Type Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Imaging Analysis in 53 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Chance-type fractures are subtle unstable injuries that are often associated with intraabdominal injuries. CT-based observations made during routine interpretations revealed involvement of a burst component to this fracture pattern and a clue on the transaxial images to its presence. The purpose of this review was to determine how often these features occurred in a retrospective study of a large sample because these findings influence diagnosis and management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients identified from the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center trauma registry and IDXRad system diagnosed with flexion-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine over an 8-year period was performed. Three trauma radiologists assessed the admission spinal radiographs, CT studies with multiplanar images, and available MRI examinations. Imaging findings were confirmed by consensus. Abdominopelvic CT studies and surgical reports were reviewed for evidence and type of intraabdominal injury. A literature review of previous similar series was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were identified for inclusion in the study. Associated intraabdominal injury occurred in 40% and most commonly involved the bowel and mesentery. A close examination of the fracture patterns on CT revealed that a burst-type fracture with posterior cortex buckling or retropulsion was a common finding (48%). Also, serial transaxial CT images often (76%) showed a gradual loss of definition of the pedicles that we refer to as the "dissolving pedicle" sign. The study showed that the horizontally oriented fracture planes through the posterior elements can often be recognized radiographically, but these fractures can be very subtle.

CONCLUSION

Intraabdominal injuries occurred in 40% of flexion-distraction thoracolumbar fractures in our study cohort, which is slightly lower than previously reported. About half of the patients with this injury displayed a burst-type component that could have a significant influence on surgical management. The dissolving pedicle sign can assist in recognition of this often subtle injury on transaxial CT.

Traumatic lumbar hernia: report of cases and comprehensive review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Acute lumbar hernia secondary to blunt trauma is an uncommon injury of the abdominal wall and, when encountered, is a difficult challenge for the trauma surgeon.

METHODS

Three cases of lumbar hernia secondary to blunt trauma are described and a review of the literature was conducted for other such cases. Clinical, anatomic, and demographic data were extracted from these reports and analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-three cases of lumbar hernia secondary to blunt trauma were found in the English literature and three cases are described here. Hernias occurred most commonly in the inferior lumbar triangle (70%) and were most frequently a result of a motor vehicle collision (71%). Physical examination findings were variable and reported in only a minority of cases (palpable hernia, 33%; flank hematoma, 27%) and associated intra-abdominal injuries were common (61%). Most traumatic lumbar hernias were diagnosed immediately, and computed tomography was 98% sensitive for diagnosis. Fifty-eight percent of patients were managed initially with exploratory laparotomy. Timing of hernia repair was variable.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic lumbar hernias are associated with a high incidence of intra-abdominal injury and should be considered in all cases of severe blunt abdominal trauma. Computed tomography should be implemented when the diagnosis is suspected in a hemodynamically stable patient. Repair should be performed by mesh patching techniques at a time based on clinical correlation.

Flexion-distraction injury of the thoracolumbar spine

Flexion-distraction injury of the thoracolumbar spine results from a failure of both the posterior and middle columns under tension, and this injury is uncommon. Progressive kyphotic deformity frequently develops after conservative treatments. We report our 10 years' experience with the surgical treatment of flexion-distraction injuries. From January 1991 to December 2000, 30 flexion-distraction thoracolumbar spinal injuries were treated at our hospital. We included 23 patients in this study, and seven patients were excluded. The mean age of the patients was 37.2 years. Six were female and 17 were male. All patients received open reduction, posterior instrumentation, and posterior fusion at the level of injury. Post-operatively, patients were all placed in total contact orthoses for 3 months. Ambulation was allowed immediately after brace application.The mean follow-up period was 84.7 months follow-up. The final average follow-up kyphotic angulation was 5.4 degrees, which is an average improvement of 9.5 degrees. Post-operative back pain ratings indicated that result of surgery was mostly good, and the neurological evaluation was almost normal after long-term follow-up. A satisfactory reduction and good stabilisation with solid fusion was achieved in all cases, without any significant loss of reduction. Surgical treatment of reduction and stabilisation with posterior instrumentation and fusion is suggested in patients with flexion-distraction injury of the thoracolumbar spine.

Pathophysiology and management of bowel and mesenteric injuries due to blunt trauma

Injuries to the bowel and mesentery are uncommon in blunt trauma and rarely occur in isolation. Delay to diagnosis has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. The literature tends to focus on the diagnosis of hollow viscus and mesenteric injury, with little written on its management. Studies are usually retrospective with a paucity of comparative trials. The use of computerized tomography (CT) scanning in blunt abdominal trauma has overshadowed other reports. Early-generation scanners had a relatively poor sensitivity in detecting bowel-related injuries, but the CT scan is now the primary modality for imaging stable patients. However radiological signs can be subtle and should be regarded as complementary to meticulous clinical assessment.

Intra-abdominal free fluid without solid organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma: an indication for laparotomy

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma (BAT), in whom intra-abdominal free fluid but no solid organ injury is found on imaging, remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and significance of this finding.

METHODS

All patients presenting with suspected BAT to a provincial trauma center over a 30-month period were reviewed. A screening focused abdominal sonogram for trauma scan was obtained in every case. Stable patients with positive or indeterminate scans underwent computed tomographic scanning. Those with free fluid but without visible solid organ injury were studied. Radiologic interpretation, clinical management, and operative findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 1,367 patients (2%) met inclusion criteria. Twenty-one patients (75%) underwent exploratory laparotomy, which for 16 (76%) was therapeutic: bowel injuries were found in 10 patients, mesentery injuries in 6, and injuries to solid organs in 3. In five patients, laparotomy was nontherapeutic. Those with more than a trace of free fluid were significantly more likely to have a therapeutic procedure. Seven patients (25%) were observed, of whom two failed nonoperative management and underwent therapeutic laparotomies within 24 hours of admission for missed colon, splenic, and hepatic injuries. The presence of abdominal seat belt bruising or a Chance-type fracture in the study patients was associated with a 90% and 100% therapeutic laparotomy rate, respectively. Computed tomographic scan findings were variable and were not able to predict injury severity or need for surgery.

CONCLUSION

The finding of more than trace amounts of free fluid in the absence of solid organ injury in BAT is often associated with clinically significant visceral injury. Early laparotomy is recommended for these patients.

Seat belt syndrome in children: a case report and review of the literature

Characteristic patterns of injury to children in automobile crashes resulting from lap and lap-shoulder belts have been described for many years. These injuries are known as the "seat belt syndrome." We present a typical case of seat belt syndrome involving a 4-year-old boy and review the current literature on the topic, highlighting proposed mechanisms of intra-abdominal and spine injuries. In addition, recent research findings identifying a new pattern of injuries associated with inappropriate seat belt use in young children are reviewed. Emergency physicians must consider these seat belt-related injuries in the initial evaluation of any child involved in a motor vehicle crash who was restrained with the vehicle seat belt.

Abdominal injuries associated with thoraco-lumbar fractures after motor vehicle collision

PURPOSE

The goal of the current study was to evaluate the risk of intraabdominal injury in children who sustained spinal fractures in a motor vehicle collision (MVC).

METHODS

Between 1980 and 1999, 48 patients, 24 girls and 24 boys, with a mean age of 12.8 years (range, 4 to 17) were reviewed. Twenty-nine were rear seat passengers, 12 front seat, and 7 unknown. Fifty-eight percent wore a seat belt. Thirty fractures involved the lumbar spine, 12 the thoracic, and 6 combined. Computed tomography (CT) scan, abdominal ultrasound, and peritoneal lavage were used to screen for abdominal injuries.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 48 patients had an intraabdominal injury. Eighteen (38%) required an early (<24 hours; n = 12) or delayed (n = 6) therapeutic laparotomy. Fourteen patients were rear seat passengers, 15 wore a seat belt, and 13 had an abdominal wall ecchymoses (AWE). They were 17 lumbar fractures (13 Chance) and one thoracic. The most common findings at laparotomy were hollow viscus injury (n = 12), mesenteric tear (n = 9), and solid organ injury (n = 8). Seventy-two percent of patients presenting with a lumbar fracture and AWE needed a therapeutic laparotomy. The overall survival rate was 98% with only 1 death. The mean hospital stay was 22.4 days. In this study, 38% of patients presenting with a spinal fracture required laparotomy, 68% of whom had simultaneous lumbar fracture and AWE.

CONCLUSION

In light of these results, the authors propose that laparoscopy or laparotomy should be strongly considered in patients sustaining lumbar fracture and AWE after MVC. J Pediatr Surg 36:760-762.

Abdominal injury and the seat-belt sign

OBJECTIVE

To report on: 1. Prevalence of seat-belt sign in motor vehicle accident victims with abdominal injuries; 2. Prevalence of intestinal injuries in patients with seat-belt sign; and 3. Spectrum of abdominal injuries in a population with high usage of three-point restraints.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted in an adult tertiary-referral hospital from January 1992 to August 1998. Patients were identified from International Classification of Disease-9 codes for abdominal wall and intra-abdominal injuries.

RESULTS

The seat-belt sign was present in 60/99. The proportion of intestinal injuries in patients with and without seat-belt sign were 9/60 and 0/39, respectively (P = 0.01). In the 25 patients with intra-abdominal injuries, there were 10 hepatic, 8 splenic, 9 intestinal and 4 retroperitoneal injuries.

CONCLUSION

The seat-belt sign is indicative of an increased risk of intestinal injury, which is difficult to detect with no single test providing reliable diagnosis. Other intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal injuries may also occur, which are more readily diagnosed on computed tomography scan or focused abdominal utlrasound when available, but are no more frequent in patients with the seat-belt sign than those without.

Seat belt aorta: endovascular management with a stent-graft

PURPOSE

To report the endovascular treatment of a relatively uncommon type of deceleration injury to the abdominal aorta.

CASE REPORT

A 21-year-old backseat passenger was wearing a single lap belt without shoulder harness when the car was involved in a collision. He sustained a transverse (Chance) fracture of the third lumbar vertebra and a circumferential dissection of the infrarenal abdominal aorta with pseudoaneurysm. As an interim measure while a stent-graft was obtained, a Wallstent was deployed to tack down the dissection and prevent distal embolization. Thirty-six hours later, an AneuRx endograft was successfully implanted inside the Wallstent to seal the pseudoaneurysm. The patient's recovery was uneventful, and the endograft remains secure and the pseudoaneurysm excluded at 10 months after the accident.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair of "seat belt aorta" is a minimally invasive, straightforward method of management for this type of aortic injury. The potential for infection in a contaminated peritoneal cavity and the long-term outcome of this treatment have not been determined.

Injuries of the thoracolumbar spine associated with restraint use in head-on motor vehicle accidents

Many authors have described spinal and bodily injuries associated with seat belt use. However, most reports have focused primarily on lap seat belts and resultant flexion-distraction injuries. This retrospective chart review studies the relation between the specific type of restraint or air bag and the resultant thoracolumbar spinal injury subtype and associated bodily injuries. The charts of 221 patients who had sustained thoracolumbar fractures in motor vehicle accidents during a 10-year period were reviewed, and 37 patients were identified whose accidents were clearly described as a frontal collision and whose specific form of restraint was recorded. Among the 15 patients who used a shoulder strap and lap belt device (three-point restraint), 12 patients sustained burst fractures (80%) compared with 4 of the 14 patients (28.6%) restrained with lap seat belts alone. Life-threatening intraabdominal injuries occurred in 57.1% of lap-belted victims and in 26.7% of patients who used three-point restraints, and the character of these injuries also differed. No patients in an automobile in which an air bag deployed sustained major associated bodily injuries. Among restrained occupants of head-on motor vehicle accidents who have sustained a thoracolumbar fracture, patients using lap belts are more likely to sustain the classic flexion-distraction injury patterns, whereas patients using three-point restraints may sustain a higher incidence of burst fractures. In addition, three-point restraints are associated with a decreased risk of intraabdominal injury compared with lap seat belts.

Using CT to diagnose traumatic lumbar hernia

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the CT findings of traumatic lumbar hernia in 15 patients and to discuss the mechanism and treatment of injury.

CONCLUSION

CT can reveal traumatic lumbar hernia and show both the anatomy of disrupted muscular layers and the presence of herniated intraabdominal viscera or retroperitoneal fat.

The “Seat Belt Mark” Sign: A Call for Increased Vigilance among Physicians Treating Victims of Motor Vehicle Accidents

The use of seat belts is shown to cause a specific pattern of internal injuries. Skin bruise corresponding to the site of the seat belt is known as the “seat belt mark” (SBM) sign and is associated with a high incidence of significant organ injuries. No study has yet defined the exact incidence of injuries requiring intervention at the presence of this sign. The objective of this study was to find the incidence of surgically correctable injuries in belted car occupants with a SBM sign and to define strategies of early detection and treatment of such injuries. The prospective study included consecutive patients involved in road traffic accidents who were admitted at an academic Level I trauma center. Of 650 car occupants, 410 (63%) were restrained and 77 (12%) had a SBM across the abdomen, chest or neck. The injuries of these 77 patients were compared with the injuries of belted patients without an SBM sign. Of patients with SBMs, 9 per cent had neck bruises, 32 per cent had chest bruises, 40 per cent had abdominal bruises, and 19 per cent had bruises in multiple sites. No significant neck injuries were detected. Three patients were found to have myocardial contusion, and 10 patients had intra-abdominal injuries (predominantly bowel and mesenteric lacerations) requiring laparotomy. There was a near 4-fold increase in thoracic trauma (22.5% versus 6%; P = 0.01) and a near 8-fold increase in intraabdominal trauma (23% versus 3%; P < 0.0001) between the groups of patients with and without SBMs. The presence of the SBM sign should alert the physician to the high likelihood of specific internal injuries. Routine laparotomy or mandatory evaluation by specific diagnostic tests is not justified; rather, a high index of suspicion with a low threshold for appropriate diagnostic evaluation and/or surgical exploration should be maintained for the optimal management of such patients.

Patterns of injury in belted and unbelted individuals presenting to a trauma center after motor vehicle crash: seat belt syndrome revisited

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Investigators have described a "seat belt syndrome" consisting variously of injuries to the lumbar or cervical spine, abdominal contents, or all 3. In this study we sought to identify these and any other patterns of injury associated with seat belt use in patients who presented to a trauma center after a motor vehicle crash.

METHODS

The charts of all patients involved in motor vehicle crashes who presented as trauma alerts to the study institution between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1993, were retrospectively reviewed for data regarding belt use and 35 specific injuries in 7 body regions. We calculated the positive likelihood ratio of injury between belted and unbelted patients, along with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

We identified 1,124 patients involved in motor vehicle crashes. Of these subjects, 376 were belted and 544 unbelted; in 204 belt status was unknown. Belted patients were more likely to have sustained sternal fracture than were unbelted patients (4% versus .7%; positive likelihood ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 3.29) but were less likely to have sustained head injury (30.6% versus 46.0%; positive likelihood ratio, .67; 95% confidence interval, .53 to .83). We noted no statistically significant differences in the rates of other specific injuries, including cervical and lumbar fractures and the need for abdominal surgery.

CONCLUSION

Severe injuries of all types occur in both belted and unbelted individuals involved in motor vehicle crashes who present to a typical trauma center. With the exception of sternal fractures, injuries previously associated with the seat belt syndrome occurred in similar proportions of belted and unbelted patients. Head injuries were less frequent. Seat belt use cannot serve as a discriminator for specific injury. A diligent search of all body regions is indicated in both belted and unbelted patients.

Traumatic gastric transection: a case report

This report documents the first known pediatric survivor of seat-belt-associated gastric transection. An 11-year-old boy presented with abdominal ecchymoses after a motor vehicle accident. Physical and radiological examination determined the need for abdominal exploration. During the operation, a near-complete transection of the stomach was found, which was repaired by primary anastomosis. After an initially unremarkable recovery period, gastric stasis and pyloric obstruction developed. Radiologically and endoscopically, this was determined to be secondary to a traumatic distal vagotomy. Neither gastric transection nor traumatic vagotomy had been reported previously in the pediatric population with abdominal seat-belt injuries. This report demonstrates an exceptionally rare seat-belt-related injury, and its unusual postoperative complication. It also emphasizes the significance of the "seat-belt sign" in the assessment of motor vehicle-related blunt abdominal trauma, and outlines potential problems associated with the wearing of adult-designed lap belts by pediatric passengers.

Traumatic lumbar hernia: a seat belt injury

A motor vehicle passenger sustained an acute traumatic lumbar hernia caused by an improperly positioned seat belt. Diagnosis was confirmed on computed tomographic scan, and the defect repaired primarily.

A review of intestinal injury from blunt abdominal trauma

Eighty-five patients who suffered blunt trauma to the small intestine and/or to the colon were treated at either the Royal Brisbane Hospital (RBH), Brisbane, Queensland or the Flinders Medical Centre (FMC), Adelaide, South Australia, between 1980 and 1991. Data were collected by retrospective review of case notes from the medical records departments of both hospitals and analysed with respect to the cause, the anatomical distribution, the diagnostic methods and the mortality of these injuries. There were 129 intestinal injuries (44 colonic and 85 small bowel). Five (5.9%) deaths were recorded. Seventy-two patients (84.7%) were injured in vehicular accidents. Fifty-three patients (62.4%) underwent laparotomy based on clinical findings alone. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) was used in 24 cases and was positive in 22 (91.7%). The most common small bowel injury was ¿blowout' perforation on the antimesenteric border of the bowel (55.5%). The most common colonic injury was a serosal tear/bruise (62.2%).

Occult abdominal injuries to airbag-protected crash victims: a challenge to trauma systems

A multidisciplinary, automobile crash investigation team at the University of Miami School of Medicine, William Lehman Injury Research Center of Jackson Memorial Hospital/Ryder Trauma Center in Miami, Florida, is conducting a detailed medical and engineering study. The focus is restrained (seatbelts, airbag, or both) occupants involved in frontal crashes who have been severely injured. More than 60 crashes have been included in the study to date. Analysis of the initial data supports the general conclusion that restraint systems are working to reduce many of the head and chest injuries suffered by unrestrained occupants. However, abdominal injuries among airbag-protected occupants still occur. Some are found among occupants who appeared uninjured at the scene. Case examples are provided to illustrate abdominal injuries associated with airbag-protected crashes. The challenges of recognizing injuries to airbag-protected occupants are discussed. To assist in recognizing the extent of injuries to occupants protected by airbags, it is suggested that evidence from the crash scene be used in the triage decision. For the abdominal injury cases observed in this study, deformation of the steering system was the vehicle characteristic most frequently observed. The presence of steering wheel deformation is an indicator of increased likelihood of internal injury. This may justify transporting the victim to a trauma center for a closer examination for abdominal injuries.

Intraperitoneal bladder rupture and the wearing of rear seat-belts--a case report

A case is reported of intraperitoneal bladder rupture which was seen 90 min post-injury and which was associated with a significant rise in serum urea and creatinine.

Flexion distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: a review

Flexion-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine and the "seat belt syndrome" are reviewed. The incidence, pathogenesis, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of these injuries are discussed.

Bilateral vocal cord hematomas associated with shoulder harness use

A case of bilateral vocal cord hematomas caused by a shoulder harness injury is presented. The patient was restrained by a three-point belt system and was involved in a front-end collision. She presented with mild facial and chest injuries and a contusion of the neck. One hour after injury she began to complain of hoarseness without airway compromise. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy showed bilateral true vocal cord hematomas. The patient had an uneventful hospital course and a full recovery. The importance of the mechanism of injury and associated injuries is discussed.

Seat belt aorta

This review of 11 cases of seat-belt associated blunt abdominal aortic trauma, includes nine cases reported in the literature and two new cases. Lap-type seat belts were the cause of this injury in eight of the 11 patients (73%). Clinical presentation was acute in 73% of the cases, with symptoms of acute arterial insufficiency, or an acute abdomen or neurologic deficits. Chronic manifestations, such as, persistent abdominal pain, claudication, abdominal mass with a bruit and decreased distal pulses, presented as late as nine months after the injury occurred. The mechanism producing the injury is discussed and a classification system for the different types of abdominal aortic injuries is put forth. Circumferential intimal disruption was the most common aortic defect. The majority of these were located distal to the inferior mesenteric artery. Diagnosis involves a high degree of suspicion in a victim wearing a seat belt with neurologic deficits, signs of acute arterial insufficiency, or a pulsatile abdominal mass. The mortality rate was 18% (2/11 patients), and occurred in patients wearing lap belts. Overall outcome depends on prompt recognition followed by appropriate surgical intervention.

Transverse disruption of the abdominal wall--a tell-tale sign of seat belt related hollow viscus injury

A pattern of injuries has been observed in five (5) female front seat passengers wearing seat belts. All were involved in high speed frontal impact motor vehicle accidents on country roads. Varying degrees of abdominal wall disruption involving fat, fascia or muscle, were universally associated with hollow viscus injury and right-sided rib fractures. Most patients had mesenteric or omental tears, flail chests and left clavicular injuries. Intimal tears of the distal aorta, right breast injuries and spinal injuries were also observed. The hollow viscus and mesenteric injuries may result from direct crushing, sudden rises of intraluminal pressure, or shearing forces acting at points of mesenteric attachments. At laparotomy it is recommended that necrotic or contused fascia and muscle be excised with primary abdominal closure and contused fat be excised or curetted and suction drainage applied to the subcutaneous tract. Abdominal wall disruption from seat belt trauma reflects the forces involved on impact and should alert the surgeon to the observed pattern of internal injuries.

Traumatic rupture of the stomach due to a seat belt

A case of gastric rupture is described in a patient who was wearing a lap and diagonal inertia reel seat belt at the time of a head-on collision. The literature is reviewed and the mechanism of injury is discussed.