Results of BCG adjuvant immunotherapy in 100 patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck

Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cancers are the sixth most common cancer worldwide, yet the prognosis following a diagnosis of oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers remains poor, with approximately 50% survival at five years. Despite a sharp increase in research into molecularly targeted therapies and a rapid expansion in the number of clinical trials assessing new targeted therapies, their value for treating oral cancers is unclear. Therefore, it is important to summarise the evidence to determine the efficacy and toxicity of targeted therapies and immunotherapies for the treatment of these cancers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies, in addition to standard therapies, for the treatment of oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 3 February 2015), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2015, Issue 1), MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to 3 February 2015) and EMBASE via Ovid (1980 to 3 February 2015). We searched the US National Institutes of Health Trials Register (clinicaltrials.gov), the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference abstracts and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trials protocols for ongoing trials. We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours of the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared targeted therapy or immunotherapy, plus standard therapy, with standard therapy alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the results of the electronic searches, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. We attempted to contact study authors for missing data or clarification where necessary. We combined sufficiently similar studies in meta-analyses using random-effects models when there were at least four studies and fixed-effect models when fewer than four studies. We obtained or calculated a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the primary outcomes where possible. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials (2488 participants) satisfied the inclusion criteria. In the included trials, 12% of participants (298 participants) had tumours of the oral cavity and 59% (1468 participants) had oropharyngeal tumours. The remaining 29% had tumours of the larynx or hypopharynx and less than 1% had tumours at other sites.No included trial was at low risk of bias; seven had an unclear risk of bias, and five had a high risk of bias. We grouped trials by intervention type into three main comparisons: standard therapy plus epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (EGFR mAb) therapy (follow-up period 24 to 70 months); standard therapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (follow-up period 40 to 60 months) and standard therapy plus immunotherapy (follow-up period 24 to 70 months), all versus standard therapy alone.Moderate quality evidence showed that EGFR mAb therapy may result in 18% fewer deaths when added to standard therapy (HR of mortality 0.82; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97; 1421 participants, three studies, 67% oropharyngeal tumours, 2% oral cavity tumours).There was also moderate quality evidence that EGFR mAb may result in 32% fewer locoregional failures when added to radiotherapy (RT) (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.89; 424 participants, one study, 60% oropharyngeal tumours).A subgroup analysis separating studies by type of standard therapy (radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT)) showed some evidence that adding EGFR mAb therapy to RT may result in a 30% reduction in the number of people whose disease progresses (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.91; 424 participants, one study, 60% oropharyngeal tumours, unclear risk of bias). For the subgroup comparing EGFR mAb plus CRT with CRT alone there was insufficient evidence to determine whether adding EGFR mAb therapy to CRT impacts on progression-free survival (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; 891 participants, one study, 70% oropharyngeal tumours, high risk of bias). The high subgroup heterogeneity meant that we were unable to pool these subgroups.There was evidence that adding cetuximab to standard therapy may result in increased skin toxicity and rash (RR 6.56; 95% CI 5.35 to 8.03; 1311 participants, two studies), but insufficient evidence to determine any difference in skin toxicity and rash in the case of nimotuzumab (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.31; 92 participants, one study).There was insufficient evidence to determine whether TKIs added to standard therapy impacts on overall survival (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.57; 271 participants, two studies; very low quality evidence), locoregional control (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.49; 271 participants, two studies; very low quality evidence), disease-free survival (HR 1.51; 95% CI 0.61 to 3.71; 60 participants, one study; very low quality evidence) or progression-free survival (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.28; 271 participants, two studies; very low quality evidence). We did find evidence of an increase in skin rash (erlotinib: RR 6.57; 95% CI 3.60 to 12.00; 191 participants, one study; lapatinib: RR 2.02; 95% CI 1.23 to 3.32; 67 participants, one study) and gastrointestinal complaints (lapatinib: RR 15.53; 95% CI 2.18 to 110.55; 67 participants, one study).We found very low quality evidence from one small trial that adding recombinant interleukin (rIL-2) to surgery may increase overall survival (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.87; 201 participants, 62% oral cavity tumours, 38% oropharyngeal tumours) and there was insufficient evidence to determine whether rIL-2 impacts on adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found some evidence that adding EGFR mAb to standard therapy may increase overall survival, progression-free survival and locoregional control, while resulting in an increase in skin toxicity for some mAb (cetuximab).There is insufficient evidence to determine whether adding TKIs to standard therapies changes any of our primary outcomes.Very low quality evidence from a single study suggests that rIL-2 combined with surgery may increase overall survival compared with surgery alone.

Medical aspects of head and neck cancer

Certain medical aspects of advanced head and neck cancer observed in 191 patients referred to a medical oncology service over a 14-year period are presented in this review. While these tumors constitute an uncommon group of advanced neoplasms, the disability and impairment associated with this disease are great. Infections, folate deficiency, and hypercalcemia are frequent complications and generally detected. The occurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis, cardiovascular and neurologic sequelae were infrequent but may be generally under-recognized. Additionally, head and neck cancer patients were found to develop second malignancies in remote sites with surprising frequency as well as demonstrating the predilection to develop second primary tumors within the same area.

An assessment of neck node immunoreactivity in head and neck cancer

Current conventional forms of cancer treatment represent non-specific modalities that destroy not only cancerous but also non-cancerous tissue in an effort to totally eradicate the neoplasm. It was unknown in head and neck cancer whether a more specific form of treatment, as it relates to neck nodal disease, was advisable. The purpose of this investigation was to study the cervical node immunoreactivity in head and neck cancer patients as a means of determining their immunologic capabilities and thus provide information about the merits of specific vs. non-specific cancer treatment. The results demonstrated that lymphocytes arising from cervical nodes caused alterations in the tumor growth. There appeared to be no particular difference in immunoreactivity of lymphocytes arising from nodes located in different areas of the neck. The regional immune system of neck nodes in the head and neck cancer patient appears to be capable of mounting an immune response irrespective of the patient's tumor status. Usual measures of systemic immunocompetence failed to identify any patients with advanced stage disease and showed little correlation with the regional immunoreactivity. The regional nodal immunoreactivity also did not correlate with the size or the numbers of metastatic neck nodes. The results demonstrate that cervical neck nodes are capable of mounting an immune response to head and neck cancer and are not mere passive filters that are periodically involved with tumor emboli. These results support the need for the development of reliable treatments which are directed at tumor tissue only.

Immunology and oral cancer

This paper summarises the evidence for the involvement of the immune response in the development of neoplasia, discusses the immunological abnormalities found in patients with head and neck carcinoma, and outlines recent attempts at treatment of patients with head and neck carcinoma by modulation of the immune response (immunotherapy).

Improved survival associated with postoperative wound infection in laryngeal cancer: an analysis of its therapeutic implications

A retrospective analysis revealed improved survival rates in laryngeal cancer patients who had postoperative wound infection following total laryngectomy and radical neck resection. The overall five-year survival rates were 44% in the infection group and 31% in the control group. On further analysis, the beneficial effect of infection was most evident in patients with stage III disease. Seventy-three percent of these patients with wound infection were alive at five years, compared with 32% of the control group. The protection from recurrent cancer in these patients afforded by the bacterial contamination may be secondary to activated immune mechanisms. The therapeutic implications of our findings suggest that the immune adjuvant is given at the time of surgical treatment rather than when tumor burden is far advanced. Only a few such protocols are under analysis presently.

Immunobiology of head and neck cancer: basic concepts

Patients with squamous cancer of the head and neck have unique perturbations of the immune system. These patients have marked depression of cellular immunity even in the early stages of disease. The known facts about the immunobiology and the immunodeficiencies that commonly occur are discussed. Also reviewed are the relationships of the immunologic deficits to stage of disease, to prognosis, and to the suspected etiologic factors of smoking, alcoholism, and malnutrition. Highlights are given of current immunotherapeutic trials. To date, most of the successful efforts in both immunologic research and immunotherapy of head and neck cancer have dealt with general, rather than specific, immune reactions. Further development in the area of specific immune responses may permit more meaningful measurements of tumor-specific reactions, thus yielding useful tools for immunodiagnosis as well as providing more effective and precise methods of immunotherapy.