Randomized, prospective trial of topical hydrogen peroxide in appendectomy wound infection. High risk factors

Origin and Use of Hydrogen Peroxide in Neurosurgery

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a chemical with a wide range of applications. This includes its use in the medical field, in which its use has been ubiquitous but is most useful as an antiseptic and in achieving hemostasis. Neurosurgeons have been using H2O2 for well over a century, primarily for its hemostatic and antiseptic effects. This is in spite of the fact that the actual effectiveness of H2O2 as an antiseptic is questionable, and its use, in general, may be more dangerous than it appears. We review the application of H2O2 in medicine generally and, more specifically, in neurosurgery. This review outlines the reasoning behind the use of H2O2 as an antiseptic and details why it may not be as effective as one might think. We also detail its use as a hemostatic agent in neurosurgery, reviewing a number of techniques in which it has been useful in this role. Finally, we review the documented cases of complications associated with the use of H2O2 in neurosurgery. Ultimately, we conclude that the use of H2O2 in neurosurgery be reconsidered because of its lack of effectiveness as an antiseptic and potentially fatal complications.

Higher functionality of bacterial plasmid DNA in water after peracetic acid disinfection compared with chlorination

Peracetic acid (PAA) is an emerging disinfectant with a low disinfection by-product formation potential, but how PAA destroys gene function after killing bacteria remains to be studied. Bacterial plasmid DNA is a mobile genetic element that often harbors undesirable genes encoding antibiotic resistance and virulence factors. Even though PAA efficiently kills bacteria, bacterial plasmids and other mobile genetic elements might still be intact and functional after PAA disinfection, posing potential public health and environmental risks. This study evaluated the impact of PAA disinfection on the functionality of plasmid DNA in vivo and compared the results with those from chlorination. We delivered a plasmid DNA harboring two antibiotic resistance genes to Escherichia coli TOP10 to form an antibiotic-resistant bacterium (ARB). The planktonic ARB was treated with PAA and chlorine to find the minimum doses inhibiting the regrowth of the strain. PAA and chlorine stopped the regrowth at 8 ± 1 mg PAA·L^-1 and 20 ± 9 mg Cl₂·L^-1, respectively. The functionality of the plasmid DNA after PAA and chlorine disinfection was then determined at higher doses in vivo. Neither PAA nor chlorine completely destroyed the plasmid DNA. However, chlorine was more efficient than PAA in eliminating the plasmid DNA. PAA at 25 mg PAA·L^-1 reduced the transforming activity of the plasmid DNA by less than 0.3 log₁₀ units, whereas chlorine at 25 mg Cl₂·L^-1 reduced the transforming activity by approximately 1.7 log₁₀ units. Chlorine had a more pronounced impact on the functionality of the plasmid DNA because it oxidizes or destroys bacterial components including plasmid DNA faster than PAA. In addition, environmental scanning electron microscopy shows that chlorination desiccated the cells resulting in the flat cellular structure and possibly more complete loss of plasmid DNA, whereas PAA disinfection had a less impact on cell structure and morphology. This study demonstrates that more plasmid DNA remains functional in water after PAA disinfection than after chlorination. These functional genetic elements could be acquired by other microorganisms via horizontal gene transfer to pose potential public health and environmental risks.

A Meta-analysis of Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infections with Topical Application of Povidone Iodine Before Primary Closure

BACKGROUND

Povidone iodine (PVI) is a widely used antiseptic solution among surgeons. A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to establish whether application of PVI before wound closure could reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rates.

METHODS

Systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2017, with no language restrictions. Only RCTs were retrieved. The primary outcome was the SSI rate. Meta-analysis was complemented with trial sequential analysis (TSA).

RESULTS

A total of 7601 patients collected from 16 RCTs were analyzed. A reduction in overall SSI rate was found (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.85, P = 0.002, I² = 65%), which was attributed to patients undergoing elective operations (n = 2358) and mixed elective/urgent operations (n = 2019). When RCTs of uncertain quality (n = 9) were excluded, the use of PVI before wound closure (n = 4322 patients) was not associated with a significant reduction of SSI (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.20, P = 0.29, I² = 51%) and was only significant in clean wounds (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.70, P = 0.008, I² = 0%). For the primary outcome, the TSA calculation using a relative risk reduction of 19% and an 11% proportion of control event rate (CER) with 51% of I², the accrued information size (n = 4322) was 32.8% of the estimated optimal information size (n = 13,148).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no conclusive evidence for a strong recommendation of topical PVI before wound closure to prevent SSI.

Hydrogen peroxide and cutaneous biology: Translational applications, benefits, and risks

Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) is an endogenous reactive oxygen species that contributes to oxidative stress directly as a molecular oxidant and indirectly through free radical generation. Topically applied 1% to 45% H₂O₂ can be used for a range of clinical purposes, which will be reviewed here in addition to its safety. In concentrations from 1% to 6%, H₂O₂ has antimicrobial properties and can act as a debriding agent through its effervescence, making low-concentration H₂O₂ useful for wound care. H₂O₂ has also been shown to promote venous insufficiency ulcer healing, but studies in other wound types are needed. In 1% formulations, H₂O₂ is used outside the United States to treat acne and has shown efficacy similar to or greater than benzoyl peroxide, with reduced side effects. In a concentration of 40%, H₂O₂ is US Food and Drug Administration-approved to treat seborrheic keratoses and may cause fewer pigmentary changes than cryotherapy, although elimination often requires 2 to 4 treatments. However, H₂O₂ should be used with caution, as exposure can cause adverse effects through its oxidant capabilities. Low H₂O₂ concentrations cause only transient symptoms (blanching and blistering), but exposure to 9% to 45% H₂O₂ can cause more severe skin damage, including epidermal necrosis leading to erythema and bullae. Overall, H₂O₂ has numerous therapeutic uses, and novel indications, such as treating actinic keratoses and skin cancers, continue to be explored.

Hydrogen Peroxide Wound Irrigation in Orthopaedic Surgery

As the burden of deep hardware infections continues to rise in orthopaedics, there is increasing interest in strategies for more effective debridement of colonized tissues and biofilm. Hydrogen peroxide has been used medically for almost a century, but its applications in orthopaedic surgery have yet to be fully determined. The basic science and clinical research on the antiseptic efficacy of hydrogen peroxide have demonstrated its efficacy against bacteria, and it has demonstrated potential synergy with other irrigation solutions such as chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine. While hydrogen peroxide is effective in infection reduction, there are concerns with wound healing, cytotoxicity, and embolic phenomena, and we recommend against hydrogen peroxide usage in the treatment of partial knee replacements, hemiarthroplasties, or native joints. Additionally, due to the potential for oxygen gas formation, hydrogen peroxide should not be used in cases of dural compromise, when pressurizing medullary canals, or when irrigating smaller closed spaces to avoid the possibility of air embolism. Finally, we present our protocol for irrigation and debridement and exchange of modular components in total joint arthroplasty, incorporating hydrogen peroxide in combination with povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine.

A new technique in management of pilonidal sinus, a university teaching hospital experience

This paper evaluates a new technique that can lead to excision of pilonidal sinus with less healing time and low recurrence rate. A prospective randomized double-blind controlled study on 142 patients with pilonidal sinus conducted during the period from September 2008 to March 2012. The patients were prospectively randomized to be operated with one of four surgical techniques, excision and primary closure, or excision after using hydrogen peroxide (H202) and primary closure, or excision without closure, or excision after injection of H202 without closure. The main outcome measures were the healing time and the recurrence rate. Out of 142 patients, 118 patients were males (83%), and 24 were females (17%). The mean age was 24.5 years. The recurrence rate in patients treated with excision after injection of H202 without closure was the lowest (1.8%) with P-value < 0.005, and the mean duration of healing was 30.7 days with P-value < 0.005. We recommend using excision after injection of H202 without closure in management of PNS. Injection of H202 into the pilonidal tracts can give a precise delineation of the affected tracts, which can be excised with minimal amount of surrounding normal tissues and hence lead to a quicker recovery and low recurrence rate.

Bacteriology and changes in antibiotic susceptibility in adults with community-acquired perforated appendicitis

This study evaluated bacterial etiology and antibiotic susceptibility in patients diagnosed with community-acquired perforated appendicitis over a 12-year-period. We retrospectively reviewed records of adult patients diagnosed with perforated appendicitis at an 800-bed teaching hospital between January 2000 and December 2011. In total, 415 culture-positive perforated appendicitis cases were analyzed. Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen (277/415, 66.7%), followed by Streptococcus species (61/415, 14.7%). The susceptibility of E. coli to ampicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, cefepime, amikacin, gentamicin, and imipenem was 35.1%, 97.1%, 97.0%, 98.2%, 98.9%, 81.8%, and 100%, respectively. The overall susceptibility of E. coli to quinolones (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin) was 78.7%. During the study period, univariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant decrease in E. coli susceptibility to quinolones (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99, P = 0.040). We therefore do not recommend quinolones as empirical therapy for community-acquired perforated appendicitis.

Topical antibacterial agents

Decreased systemic toxicity, ease of application, and increased concentrations at the target site are some of the important advantages topical antibacterial agents offer. This article reviews the literature on selected indications for these agents and provides in-depth examination of specific agents for the prophylaxis and treatment of skin and wound infections.

Topical antibacterial agents

Decreased systemic toxicity, ease of application, and increased concentrations at the target site are some of the important advantages topical antibacterial agents offer. This article reviews the literature on selected indications for these agents and provides in-depth examination of specific agents for the prophylaxis and treatment of skin and wound infections.

Topical antibacterial agents

Decreased systemic toxicity, ease of application, and increased concentration at the target site are some of the important advantages topical antibacterial agents offer. This article reviews the literature on selected indications of these agents and provides in-depth examination of specific agents for the prophylaxis and treatment of skin and wound infections.

Topical antibacterial agents

Topical antibacterial agents occupy an important niche of antimicrobial therapy for both inpatients and outpatients. These agents, including antiseptic and antibiotic preparations, are used for prophylaxis and treatment of infection. Prophylactic uses include application for traumatic and surgical wounds, burns, intravascular catheters, and eradication of S. aureus nasal carriage. Topical antibacterial agents are also used for treatment of primary and secondary pyodermas. Individual antibacterial agents have been reviewed. Of note, despite the widespread use of topical antibacterial agents, further data on which to guide therapy are needed in many instances.

Dressing the part

Wound care after cutaneous surgery can play an integral role in wound healing. Wound care regimens have changed dramatically over the last 35 years as the physiology of wound healing has become better understood. Foremost is the improvement in wound healing achieved by keeping the wound occluded and moist. This observation has led to an explosion of a whole new category of occlusive dressings at the surgeon's disposal in healing postoperative wounds. These dressings have numerous applications as discussed previously. Generally, for acute surgical wounds, occlusive dressings are most useful for split-thickness wounds, such as graft donor sites and after dermabrasion, chemical peel, or laser treatment, and full-thickness wounds allowed to heal by secondary intention. Occlusive dressings may have greater benefit for the treatment of chronic ulcers of varying etiologies. The different categories of dressings share the common disadvantage of being relatively expensive. For routine sutured wounds, the authors prefer the readily available and inexpensive Telfa-type dressing combined with a topical antibiotic ointment. Topical antiseptics are useful for reducing bacterial counts on intact skin in preparation for surgery. Povidone-iodine (Betadine) and chlorhexidine gluconate (Hibiclens) have emerged as the two agents of choice. However, antiseptics have been shown to be toxic to healing tissue, and should not be used on open wounds. In contrast, topical antibiotic ointments are safe to use on open wounds, effective in preventing wound infections, and promote wound healing by maintaining a moist wound environment. The authors prefer the combination antibiotic ointment Polysporin for routine postoperative wound care. Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery to prevent wound infection is appropriate in certain cases. Surgery performed on grossly contaminated or infected skin requires a full 7 to 10 day course of antibiotics. Procedures in anatomic areas considered contaminated as well as in clean areas with significant environmental or patient risk factors may benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis. The choice of antibiotics should be based on the organism most likely to cause wound infection at the particular surgical site. Evidence supports giving a single preoperative dose 1 hour before surgery with a second dose possible 6 hours later if the procedure is prolonged or delayed. The risk of bacterial endocarditis after dermatologic surgery is not known. Antibiotics are indicated for any procedure on obviously infected skin, but are not routinely required for very minor procedures, such as small biopsies, on intact skin. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be prudent for those patients classified as high risk by the (AHA). The antibiotic chosen should again cover the organism most likely to cause infection. One dose can be given 1 hour before surgery and repeated 6 hours postoperatively. Finally, wound healing can be greatly impacted by what the patient does or does not do after leaving the office. Therefore, wound care instructions should be clear, detailed, and provided in both oral and written form. Information should also be provided about what to expect as the wound heals.

A review of topical agents for wounds and methods of wounding. Guidelines for wound management

This article reviews the effects of antiseptics, antimicrobials, hemostatic agents and surgical methods on the incidence of wound infection and the process of wound healing. A set of guidelines is provided to help decide what to apply topically to wounds and which method of wounding to select in order to achieve the best possible outcome in wound healing.

Surgical audit: A prospective study of the morbidity and mortality of acute appendicitis

Between March and September 1989, acute apendicitis was clinically diagnosed in 317 patients who were studied as part of a prospective surgical audit. The study was designed to determine the accuracy of diagnosis, comparison of the macroscopic appearance of the appendix at operation, and subsequent histopathology and complications associated with the morbidity and mortality of emergency appendectomy. The clinical diagnosis was correct in 278 patients (88%). Thirty-nine (12%) of the patients had a negative laparotomy. There was no mortality, and wound infection was the source of increased morbidity in 37 (12%) patients. The highest incidence of wound infection was among those who had pus in the peritoneum (20%) or had a perforated or gangrenous appendix (25%). When the macroscopic appearance of the appendix was compared with the subsequent histopathological findings, a false positive error of 7% and a false negative error of 42% was found. During appendectomy the gross appearance of the appendix must be carefully noted so that a meticulous surgical technique can be complemented by appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infection, started at the time of surgery.

Preventing wound infection after appendicectomy: a review

An exponential increase in the number of published prospective studies reflects both a continuing interest in, and a lack of consensus on, the optimal prophylaxis of wound sepsis after appendicectomy. Review of the literature over the last 25 years leads us to emphasize both the importance of adequate study size and of stratification of the severity of the sepsis found at operation. For critical comparison of prophylactic regimens the high percentage of wound infections disclosed after discharge from hospital must be taken into account. Antibiotics reduce the frequency of wound sepsis and although low wound sepsis rates have been reported with systemic antibiotics active against only anaerobes, the cumulative evidence favours a spectrum of antibacterial activity against both aerobic and anaerobic organisms. Topical antiseptics have no significant effect but topical antibiotics are beneficial. Wide variations in outcome for similar antibiotic regimens reflect the importance of technical factors in determining the frequency of wound sepsis.

Influence of surgeons' experience on postoperative sepsis

A prospective study was performed on 635 patients with appendicitis operated on by 7 trainees and 119 patients operated on by 6 senior surgeons with more than 8 years of surgical experience. In patients with normal appendices, postoperative sepsis was extremely low. For early and late appendicitis, the infection rates of the trainees decreased as experiences accumulated, but they were still higher than that of the senior surgeons. The difference in infection rates in acute appendicitis did not reach statistical significance between any of the training stages and between the various stages and the rate of the senior surgeons. The differences in infection rates in late appendicitis between stage 1 and stage 3 was significant, as was the difference in infection rates between stage 1 and the infection rate of the senior surgeons. Therefore, we have concluded that overall, the limited experience of trainees is related to the rate of postoperative sepsis in late appendicitis, although the infection rates of individual trainees vary a lot.

Combined topical povidone-iodine and systemic antibiotics in postappendicectomy wound sepsis

Three hundred and fifteen patients with appendicitis were randomized into two groups. One group received pre-operative systemic gentamicin and metronidazole while the other group received 1 per cent topical povidone-iodine solution in addition to the antibiotics. For early appendicitis including normal and acutely inflamed appendices, only one dose of antibiotics was used. The postoperative wound sepsis was very low in both groups of patients and there was no statistical difference between them. For late appendicitis including gangrenous and perforated appendices, the antibiotics were continued for 7 days. Eight out of 51 patients who had the topical agent developed wound sepsis compared with one out of 52 patients who received no topical agent. This difference is statistically significant (P = 0.03). All wound infections presented within 2 weeks of operation and were deep. Povidone-iodine, 1 per cent, adversely affects the wound infection rate in late appendicitis and should not be used.

Randomized, prospective, and double-blind trial of new beta-lactams in the treatment of appendicitis

A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study was conducted with 864 patients operated on for appendicitis. In early cases, including normal and acute appendicitis, one dose of antibiotic was given. The rate of postappendectomy septic complications in patients who received cefotaxime, cefoperazone, or moxalactam was very low (about 3%), and there was no statistical difference between the drugs. For late cases, including gangrenous and perforated appendicitis, the antibiotics were continued for 5 days. Moxalactam decreased significantly the septic complications in these patients when compared with the other two drugs. It is safe, free from serious toxic side effects, and more convenient and easier to administer than combination antibiotic therapy. The main disadvantage of moxalactam is its high cost, but this has to be balanced against the savings in nursing time, the cost of monitoring renal function and serum level when aminoglycosides are used, and the reduced usage and manipulation of infusion sets.

The bacteriology and septic complication of patients with appendicitis

A detailed bacteriologic study was done on 161 patients operated for appendicitis. Aerobic and anaerobic cultures were taken from the blood, the appendicular lumen, mucosa, serosa, fossa, and from the wound after closure of the peritoneum. There is no correlation between the degree of appendicitis and the incidence of positive blood culture. The infection spread through the appendicular wall as the disease progressed. Aerobic infection was common in early appendicitis but a mixed aerobic and anaerobic infection was predominant in late cases. Late appendicitis, a positive wound culture at the end of the operation, the duration of symptoms of over 36 hours before operation and the age of the patient over 50 years were all associated with an increased incidence of septic complication. From the antibiotic sensitivity on the bacteria isolated, the most effective agent against anaerobes was metronidazole. Effective agents against the aerobes were aminoglycosides and cephalosporins. The best single agent against both anaerobes and aerobes was moxalactum.

Prophylaxis of post-appendicectomy sepsis by metronidazole and ampicillin: a randomized, prospective and double-blind trial

Two hundred and eighty-three patients were admitted to a randomized, prospective and double-blind trial of the effect of the addition of ampicillin to metronidazole in the prophylaxis of post-appendicectomy wound sepsis. Nineteen out of 142 patients in the metronidazole and ampicillin group developed wound sepsis compared with 33 out of 141 patients in the metronidazole group. The difference is statistically significant. Early cases, including normal, acutely inflamed and gangrenous appendices, received 2 doses of antibiotics. In late cases with perforation and abscess formation, the antibiotics were continued for 1 week. The difference in wound infection in each of these 2 subgroups was also statistically significant. The commonest organisms isolated from the appendicular fossa and the infected wounds were Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis.

The prophylactic use of antimicrobials in surgery

During the period August 1976 to June 1982, there were 98 reports of antimicrobial prophylaxis in human surgery that were judged unevaluable. Our review, coupled with that of Chodak and Plaut, identified studies of 126 antibiotic regimens that were considered evaluable and a total of 205 studies considered unevaluable. A decrease in infection rate in antibiotic-treated patients compared to non-antibiotic-treated patients was seen in 120 (95%) of the evaluable regimens. Ninety-nine (79%) of these 120 regimens produced statistically significant reductions in the infection rate (P less than .05, chi 2 analysis). The majority of the antibiotic regimens were tested in procedures that were classified as clean-contaminated. Of the regimens that yielded a statistically significant reduction in infection rate with antimicrobial therapy, in 66 (67%) the agents were used for 24 hours or less. Five regimens were identified in which a higher infection rate occurred in specific patient groups when prophylactic antibiotics were used, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the overwhelming majority of evaluable studies, antibiotics decreased the incidence of surgical infection compared with non-antibiotic groups. The available data also support the effectiveness of short prophylactic antibiotic courses of 24 hours' duration or less. The duration necessary for antibiotic prophylaxis was specifically tested in nine regimens. In all nine, a short course (less than 24 hours) of antibiotic prophylaxis was as effective as longer periods of therapy (24 hours to 5 days) in preventing infection.