Little used surgical techniques of value

Retroperitoneal aortoiliac reconstruction

The retroperitoneal approach to the aorta and the iliac arteries provides excellent exposure for reconstruction of these vessels for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Furthermore, the weight of evidence in the literature indicates that this approach is associated with fewer complications, a shorter length of stay in the hospital, and lower costs. The major drawback to this approach at present appears to be a lack of familiarity with the technical aspects of this exposure. It is our hope that this article helps familiarize surgeons with this exposure and encourages them to use it more frequently for "routine" aortoiliac reconstruction.

Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized, prospective trial that compares the transabdominal with the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta for routine infrarenal aortic reconstruction.

METHODS

From August 1990 through November 1993, patients undergoing surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) were asked to participate in a randomized trial comparing the transabdominal incision (TAI) to the retroperitoneal incision (RPI) for aortic surgery. One hundred forty-five patients were randomized, with 75 (41 with AAA and 34 with AIOD) in the TAI group and 70 (40 with AAA and 30 with AIOD) in the RPI group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, postoperative pain control (epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia), or comorbid conditions, except for a higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the TAI group (21 vs 8 patients).

RESULTS

The incidence of intraoperative complications was similar for both groups. After surgery, the incidence of prolonged ileus (p = 0.013) and small bowel obstruction (p = 0.05) was higher in the TAI group. Overall, the RPI group had significantly fewer complications (p < 0.0001). The overall postoperative mortality rate (two deaths) was 1.4%, with both occurring in the TAI group (p = 0.507). The RPI group also had significantly shorter stays in the intensive care unit (p = 0.006), a trend toward shorter hospitalization (p = 0.10), lower total hospital charges (p = 0.019), and lower total hospital costs (p = 0.017). There was no difference in pulmonary complications (p = 0.71). In long-term follow-up (mean 23 months), the RPI group reported more incisional pain (p = 0.056), but no difference was found in incisional hernias or bulges (p = 0.297).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the RPI approach for abdominal aortic surgery is associated with fewer postoperative complications, shorter stays in the hospital and intensive care unit, and lower cost. There is, however, an increase in long-term incisional pain. Current methods of postoperative pain control seem to decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications.

Risberg retroperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta

In a study of the best approach to the infrarenal abdominal aorta, 47 patients were compared retrospectively: 15 underwent a standard transperitoneal incision, 15 a retroperitoneal left flank incision and 17 a new modified lateral pararectus incision, the Risberg approach. Operating time, length of postoperative intubation and hospital stay, mortality rate, morbidity rate and cost were assessed. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in mean(s.d.) operating time (141(21) versus 198(41) min), intraoperative cross-clamping time (74(13) versus 104(46) min) and postoperative intubation time (6.5(8.0) versus 13.3(7.3) h) associated with the Risberg retroperitoneal incision compared with the left flank retroperitoneal route. There was also a significant decrease (P < 0.02) in mean(s.d.) postoperative intubation time (6.5(8.0) versus 17.5(12.0) h), time after operation to discharge (11.0(2.4) versus 17.3(7.6) days) and hospital cost (4885(670) pounds versus 7732(580)) pounds associated with the Risberg incision compared with the transperitoneal approach. The Risberg incision gives better access to the infrarenal abdominal aorta while maintaining the advantages of other retroperitoneal approaches. This technique is recommended as the incision of choice for the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms: the importance of elective repair

Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is being performed with a progressively lower mortality and morbidity. We reviewed 111 patients who underwent repair of their AAA. Sixty-two were electively repaired and 49 had emergency surgery. Eight patients had cocomitant non-vascular procedures carried out. Operative mortality was 3.2% and 49% for elective and emergency cases respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 40% of elective cases and 72% of emergency cases, respiratory complications being the most common, occurring in 25% and 40% of elective and emergency cases respectively. Subsequent graft complications occurred in six patients, five following emergency surgery.

Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

We, as well as other authors, believe that the retroperitoneal approach is an excellent alternative to the transperitoneal route for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This approach is associated with a significant decrease in pulmonary and cardiac complications and therefore can be used in selected high-risk patients with expanding aneurysms. A well-controlled randomized multicenter trial should answer the question: "Is this approach the surgical access of choice for the elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?"

Extraperitoneal approach for aortoiliac reconstruction of the abdominal aorta

The extraperitoneal approach is not usually used for reconstruction of the abdominal aorta; however, herein we have made an attempt to influence vascular surgeons to modify this practice. The results in 200 patients approached extraperitoneally have been compared with those of 70 patients explored by the traditional transperitoneal route. The expeditious technique of extraperitoneal exploration described results in significantly less postoperative morbidity due to the pulmonary complications of atelectasis and pneumonia. Intestinal ileus is uniformly brief, and rarely requires nasogastric suction. Patients explored extraperitoneally have demonstrably less pain and were discharged from the hospital sooner. Furthermore, prosthetic graft patency and mortality were comparable in both groups. Thus, the retroperitoneal approach should be the preferred method of aortoiliac reconstruction since the postoperative convalescence period is smoother and shorter.