Enteroclysis in partial small bowel obstruction

Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal adhesions constitute between 49% and 74% of the causes of small bowel obstruction. Traditionally, laparotomy and open adhesiolysis have been the treatment for patients who have failed conservative measures or when clinical and physiologic derangements suggest toxemia and/or ischemia. With the increased popularity of laparoscopy, recent promising reports indicate the feasibility and potential superiority of the minimally invasive approach to the adhesion-encased abdomen.

METHODS

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic adhesiolysis and to provide technical tips that help in the success of this technique.

RESULTS

The most important predictive factor of adhesion formation is a history of previous abdominal surgery ranging from 67%-93% in the literature. Conversely, 31% of scars from previous surgery have been free of adhesions, whereas up to 10% of patients without any prior surgical scars will have spontaneous adhesions of the bowel or omentum. Most intestinal obstructions follow open lower abdominopelvic surgeries such as colectomy, appendectomy, and hysterectomy. The most common complications associated with adhesions are small bowel obstruction (SBO) and chronic pain syndrome. The treatment of uncomplicated SBO is generally conservative, especially with incomplete obstruction and the absence of systemic toxemia, ischemia, or strangulation. When conservative treatment fails, surgical options include conventional open or minimally invasive approaches; the latter have become increasing more popular for lysis of adhesions and the treatment of SBO. Generally, 63% of the length of a laparotomy incision is involved in adhesion formation to the abdominal wall. Furthermore, the incidence of ventral hernia after a laparotomy ranges between 11% and 20% versus the 0.02%-2.4% incidence of port site herniation. Additional benefits of the minimally invasive approaches include a decreased incidence of wound infection and postoperative pneumonia and a more rapid return of bowel function resulting in a shorter hospital stay. In long-term follow up, the success rate of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions remains between 46% and 87%. Operative times for laparoscopy range from 58 to 108 minutes; conversion rates range from 6.7% to 43%; and the incidence of intraoperative enterotomy ranges from 3% to 17.6%. The length of hospitalization is 4-6 days in most series.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions seems to be safe in the hands of well-trained laparoscopic surgeons. This technique should be mastered by the advanced laparoscopic surgeon not only for its usefulness in the pathologies discussed here but also for adhesions commonly encountered during other laparoscopic procedures.

Intestinal obstruction and perforation--the role of the surgeon

Intestinal obstruction and perforation are always a challenge for the surgeon, not only in respect to the surgical option offered to the patient, but also to the ability to accurately diagnose and stage the disease. The understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanism is also very important in order to classify each patient in order to receive the more appropriate treatment. Mechanisms of obstruction and perforation, methods of diagnosis as well as prevention and treatment of the disease were reviewed.

Current concepts in imaging of small bowel obstruction

The diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction continue to evolve. The imaging approach in the work-up of patients with known or suspected small bowel obstruction and the timing of surgical intervention in this disease have undergone considerable changes over the past two decades. This article examines the current concepts related to the use of imaging technology in the diagnosis and management of patients with small bowel obstruction. The meaning of frequently used but poorly defined terms in describing intestinal obstruction is clarified and illustrated.

Intestinal obstruction role of CT

CT has significantly advanced the evaluation of small and large bowel obstruction, especially in the acute situation where high-grade or possibly strangulating obstruction is being encountered. Any physician involved in evaluating patients with bowel distention and abdominal pain where obstruction becomes a distinct diagnostic possibility should be aware of the attributes and limitations of this modality to provide the best patient care. New technological advances will hopefully limit radiation exposure and provide even more definitive information in the diagnosis of bowel obstruction.

Preoperative evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND

Bowel obstruction is a problematic condition because the main clinical issue is to determine whether emergency laparotomy or observation with a long tube is required. The recent development of imaging diagnostic modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is thought to be promising to support therapeutic decisions in patients with bowel obstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with bowel obstruction who underwent laparotomy were evaluated by plain x-ray film, computed tomography (CT) scan, and MRI preoperatively with regard to the presence or absence of bowel obstruction, and the site and cause of bowel obstruction. Diagnostic accuracies were compared among these radiological modalities.

RESULTS

The presence of bowel obstruction was detected in 22 (81.5%) of 27 patients by plain abdominal x-ray film, in 24 (92.3%) of 26 patients by CT scan, and in 25 (92.6%) of 27 patients by MRI. The sites of obstruction were consistent with surgical findings in 25 (92.6%) of 27 patients by MRI, and in 15 (57.7%) of 26 patients by CT scan. The causes of bowel obstruction were accurately diagnosed by MRI in 25 (92.6%) of 27 patients, and in 23 (88.5%) of 26 patients by CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI could identify the presence and the site and cause of bowel obstruction in most of the cases. MRI is assumed to be superior to CT scan in the preoperative diagnosis of bowel obstruction.

Radiologic evaluation and staging of small intestine neoplasms

The small intestine is an uncommon location for neoplasms in either clinical or radiological practice. Because of its anatomic location and morphology, diagnosis of the diseases that affect small intestine pose difficulties. Symptoms are nonspecific and endoscopy is commonly unsatisfactory. Since early and definite diagnosis is crucial for prompt therapy, radiological imaging plays an essential role. Enteroclysis is the primary and effective radiologic modality in the evaluation of small bowel neoplasms. On the other hand, computed tomography should be the complementary radiologic method as well as for staging. In this review, the most common neoplasms of the small intestine and their common radiologic findings have been discussed.

Role of CT in evaluating patients with small-bowel obstruction

The accurate and rapid diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction has troubled surgeons and radiologists for more than a century. With the advent of CT, solving the problem is now a possibility. CT can accurately diagnose obstruction, determine the likely cause and location, and even suggest whether there is associated bowel ischemia or strangulation.

Nasointestinal tube for decompression or enteroclysis: experience with 150 patients

The initial clinical experience with the use of a triple lumen long tube designed for gastrointestinal decompression and enteroclysis is reported in 150 patients. Based on clinical observations, this tube is effective in suctioning retained gastric and intestinal fluid but requires frequent irrigation of the sump port for effective decompression of distended small bowel. In all patients with a preexisting nasogastric tube, the replacement by the decompression/enteroclysis tube was considered more comfortable by the patients. Successful placement of the tube in the jejunum was achieved in 147 of 150 consecutive patients on the initial attempt. The use of this tube obviates dual intubations for decompression and enteroclysis, the attendant discomfort on the patient, and it expedites subsequent performance of enteroclysis if needed. The complications reported with other long intestinal tubes were not observed with this device.

Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? A long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies

The purpose of our study was to determine if a normal small-bowel enteroclysis excludes small-bowel disease in adult patients, using long-term follow-up as the major reference standard. We reviewed 193 consecutive small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) studies completed during a period from January 1987 to February 1989, of which 83 were judged to be normal at the time of the study. Eight of these latter patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. The indications included detection of gastrointestinal bleeding, small-bowel obstruction, Crohn's disease, nonspecific abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and a miscellaneous group. Each patient was followed for at least 3 years by chart review or until a definite diagnosis was established. Six of the 75 patients whose SBE was originally interpreted as normal were eventually judged to have small-bowel disease. The remaining 69 patients were judged to be free of small-bowel disease by autopsy, surgical laparotomy, endoscopic observation or biopsy, or long-term follow-up for at least 3 years. Therefore, a normal SBE correctly excluded small-bowel disease in 69 of our 75 patients (true negatives) and failed to diagnose disease in six patients (false negatives), for a specificity of .92 +/- .03 (SE). In this experience, SBE was sufficiently specific in most patients to exclude small-bowel disease.

Adult enteric intussusception: additional observations on enteroclysis

Enteroclysis patterns encountered in four patients with adult intestinal intussusception of different etiology--including a leiomyoma, a Peutz-Jeghers hamartoma, a metastatic colon carcinoma, and adhesions--were analyzed and compared to surgical and pathological findings. Emphasis was given not only to radiological signs indicative of impaired circulation but also to the preoperative evaluation of the stimulating cause. A "stretched spring" pattern, corresponding to increased distance between large and thick concentric rings, was found to conform to a stage of strangulation with exudation, whereas sharply demarcated fine rings in close proximity were suggestive of the absence of vascular impairment. The morphology of the underlying lesion was also shown to conform to the dynamic appearance of the intussusception. Benign submucosal, intraluminal tumors led to a long, rather permanent intussusception, with the tumor being the leading point; whereas intussusception associated with annular malignancies or adhesions was shorter and transient or partial, as fixation was present. The cause of the intussusception was correctly identified preoperatively in each case; the vascular compromise involved was also indicated, and the correlation between radiological appearances and morphology at pathology specimens was excellent.

Small bowel perforation during enteroclysis

Small bowel perforation with massive intraperitoneal leakage of barium occurred during the performance of enteroclysis in a 72-year-old woman. It is postulated that an ischemic segment of the partially obstructed ileum had ruptured because of rapid intraluminal flow of contrast material and increased abdominal pressure when the patient was rotated to a prone position.

Use of gastrointestinal contrast studies in obstruction of the small and large bowel

Gastrointestinal contrast studies were performed in 96 (27 percent) of 342 patients with small-bowel obstruction including 57 upper gastrointestinal and 39 barium-enema examinations. In 34 patients, upper gastrointestinal examination disclosed either obstruction or failure of contrast to reach the cecum in 24 hours; all 34 patients required surgery. The remaining 23 patients who had upper gastrointestinal studies recovered with tube decompression. Barium enema demonstrated obstruction in 13 (33 percent) of 39 cases of suspected small-bowel obstruction and localized obstruction in the colon rather than small bowel in 9 of 13 cases. Barium enema was 100 percent predictive of surgery when obstruction was shown, but was not helpful in predicting surgery when obstruction was not demonstrated. Surgery was required in 42 percent of patients whose barium enema did not show obstruction. Barium enema also was performed in 19 of 23 patients with large-bowel obstruction and showed the level of obstruction in all cases. All patients with large-bowel obstruction required surgery except for three who recovered after barium-enema reduction of intussusception or volvulus. Barium upper gastrointestinal examination is recommended in small-bowel obstruction when plain films are nondiagnostic, and in selected cases of small-bowel obstruction that do not resolve with a short trial of tube decompression. Barium enema is not recommended in suspected small-bowel obstruction but should be performed in all cases of large-bowel obstruction, except when perforation is a possibility or when the cecum measures 10 cm or larger in diameter.

Enteroclysis in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction in the early postoperative period

Intestinal obstruction in the early post-operative period may be difficult to diagnose clinically and on plain abdominal radiographs with failure to distinguish obstruction from ileus. During the last 11 years we have examined 14 patients with the enteroclysis technique (small bowel barium enema) for suspected early postoperative small intestinal obstruction. Evidence of obstruction was demonstrated in all cases, the site of obstruction was clearly shown in most patients, and the cause identified in 5.

Closed loop obstruction: diagnosis by enteroclysis

The diagnosis of closed loop obstruction was made by enteroclysis in 5 patients. In each case barium outlined the involved loop, and related segments of marked narrowing were identified as the neck of the closed loop. The findings prompted early surgical intervention, and adhesive bands causing closed loop obstruction were confirmed in all 5 patients.

Obstruction of the large and small intestine

This article provides an overview of mechanical small and large bowel obstruction with emphasis on newer diagnostic and therapeutic surgical techniques. Small and large intestinal pseudo-obstruction is discussed with reference to its diagnosis and appropriate treatment.