Preparation of cellodextrins and isolation of oligomeric side components and their characterization

Overview of Methods for the Direct Molar Mass Determination of Cellulose

The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with an overview of the methods used to determine the molecular weights of cellulose. Methods that employ direct dissolution of the cellulose polymer are described; hence methods for investigating the molecular weight of cellulose in derivatized states, such as ethers or esters, only form a minor part of this review. Many of the methods described are primarily of historical interest since they have no use in modern cellulose chemistry. However, older methods, such as osmometry or ultracentrifuge experiments, were the first analytical methods used in polymer chemistry and continue to serve as sources of fundamental information (such as the cellulose structure in solution). The first part of the paper reviews methods, either absolute or relative, for the estimation of average molecular weights. Regardless of an absolute or relative approach, the outcome is a molecular weight average (MWA). In the final section, coupling methods are described. The primary benefit of performing a pre-separation step on the molecules is the discovery of the molecular weight distribution (MWD). Here, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) is unquestionably the most powerful and most commonly-applied method in modern laboratories and industrial settings.

Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies

Cellulose is the most abundant renewable natural biological resource, and the production of biobased products and bioenergy from less costly renewable lignocellulosic materials is important for the sustainable development of human beings. A reduction in cellulase production cost, an improvement in cellulase performance, and an increase in sugar yields are all vital to reduce the processing costs of biorefineries. Improvements in specific cellulase activities for non-complexed cellulase mixtures can be implemented through cellulase engineering based on rational design or directed evolution for each cellulase component enzyme, as well as on the reconstitution of cellulase components. Here, we review quantitative cellulase activity assays using soluble and insoluble substrates, and focus on their advantages and limitations. Because there are no clear relationships between cellulase activities on soluble substrates and those on insoluble substrates, soluble substrates should not be used to screen or select improved cellulases for processing relevant solid substrates, such as plant cell walls. Cellulase improvement strategies based on directed evolution using screening on soluble substrates have been only moderately successful, and have primarily targeted improvement in thermal tolerance. Heterogeneity of insoluble cellulose, unclear dynamic interactions between insoluble substrate and cellulase components, and the complex competitive and/or synergic relationship among cellulase components limit rational design and/or strategies, depending on activity screening approaches. Herein, we hypothesize that continuous culture using insoluble cellulosic substrates could be a powerful selection tool for enriching beneficial cellulase mutants from the large library displayed on the cell surface.

Biosynthesis of radiolabeled cellodextrins by the Clostridium thermocellum cellobiose and cellodextrin phosphorylases for measurement of intracellular sugars

The Clostridium thermocellum cellobiose and cellodextrin phosphorylases (glucosyl transferases) in the cell extract were used to synthesize radiolabeled cellodextrins with a degree of polymerization (DP=2-6) from nonradioactive glucose-1-phosphate and radioactive glucose. Chain lengths of synthesized cellodextrin were controlled by the absence or presence of dithiothreitol and by reaction conditions. All cellodextrins have the sole radioactive glucose unit located at the reducing ends. Mixed cellodextrins (G2-G6) were separated efficiently by size-exclusion chromatography or less efficiently by thin-layer chromatography. A new rapid sampling device was developed using disposable syringes containing an ultracold methanol-quenching buffer. It was simple, less costly, and especially convenient for anaerobic fermentation. After an impulse feed of radiolabeled cellobiose, the intracellular sugar levels were measured after a series of operations-sampling, extracting, concentrating, separating, and reading. Results showed that the largest amount of radioactivity was cellobiose with lesser amounts of glucose, cellotriose, and cellotetraose, and an average DP of intracellular cellodextrins was ca. 2.

Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step

Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose in aqueous media catalyzed by the cellulase enzyme system suffers from slow reaction rates due in large part to the highly crystalline structure of cellulose and inaccessibility of enzyme adsorption sites. In this study, an attempt was made to disrupt the cellulose structure using the ionic liquid (IL), 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, in a cellulose regeneration strategy which accelerated the subsequent hydrolysis reaction. ILs are a new class of non-volatile solvents that exhibit unique solvating properties. They can be tuned to dissolve a wide variety of compounds including cellulose. Because of their extremely low volatility, ILs are expected to have minimal environmental impact on air quality compared to most other volatile solvent systems. The initial enzymatic hydrolysis rates were approximately 50-fold higher for regenerated cellulose as compared to untreated cellulose (Avicel PH-101) as measured by a soluble reducing sugar assay.

Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems

Information pertaining to enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by noncomplexed cellulase enzyme systems is reviewed with a particular emphasis on development of aggregated understanding incorporating substrate features in addition to concentration and multiple cellulase components. Topics considered include properties of cellulose, adsorption, cellulose hydrolysis, and quantitative models. A classification scheme is proposed for quantitative models for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the number of solubilizing activities and substrate state variables included. We suggest that it is timely to revisit and reinvigorate functional modeling of cellulose hydrolysis, and that this would be highly beneficial if not necessary in order to bring to bear the large volume of information available on cellulase components on the primary applications that motivate interest in the subject.

Cellodextrin preparation by mixed-acid hydrolysis and chromatographic separation

A procedure for preparation of purified cellodextrins in gram quantities was developed for use in biochemical and microbiological studies. Cellodextrins were prepared by hydrolyzing microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel) over a period of 4 to 5.5h in the presence of a mixture of 80% (v/v) concentrated hydrochloric acid ( approximately 37 wt.%) and 20% (v/v) concentrated sulfuric acid ( approximately 98 wt.%) at room temperature (22 degrees C). Acetone precipitation, washing ion exchange, and neutralization with barium hydroxide were used to generate a solution of mixed cellodextrins substantially free of acids and salts. Yields following hydrolysis and precipitation were approximately 0.05, approximately 0.07, approximately 0.06, and approximately 0.02 g/g cellulose for cellotriose (G(3)), cellotetraose (G(4)), cellopentose (G(5)), and cellohexose (G(6)), respectively. Cellodextrins with degrees of polymerization from 3 to 11 were separated chromatographically using a 29 x 5-cm I.D. Bio-Rad AG50W-X4 column arranged in series with a 91 x 5-cm I.D. Bio-Gel P4 column. This two-column system was used to obtain cellodextrin preparations at 240 mg/day for G(3), 330 mg/day for G(4), 260 mg/day for G(5), and 130 mg/day for G(6), with purity >99% for G(3), G(4), and G(5) and >95% for G(6). The overall procedure achieves yields comparable to the highest previously reported, employs a separation system that can readily be reused for multiple runs, and avoids use of fuming HCl.