The "incomplete" resection

Prevalence, Prognostic Implications, and Survival Modulators of Incompletely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the U.S. National Cancer Data Base

INTRODUCTION

The impact of incomplete lung cancer resection on survival has never been systematically quantified, nor has the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy in this setting been determined.

METHODS

We evaluated lung cancer resections in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2011 to identify factors associated with margin involvement. We compared the survival of patients with and without positive margins and evaluated the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Of 112,998 resections performed during the 8 years, 5,335 (4.7%) had positive margins. Patient demographic and clinical factors associated with an increased adjusted OR of incomplete resection included black race (p = 0.006), age-based Medicare insurance (p = 0.006), urban residence (p = 0.01), histologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, high tumor grade, tumor overlapping more than one lobe, and advanced pathologic stage (p < 0.001 for all clinical factors). Community cancer programs (p = 0.002), institutions with high proportions of underinsured patients (p = 0.01), and institutions with a lower volume of cancer resections (p = 0.006) also had an increased adjusted OR. The crude 5-year survival rates of patients with complete versus incomplete resections were 58.5% versus 33.8% (log-rank p < 0.001). After an incomplete resection, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved 5-year survival across all stages (p < 0.01); radiotherapy was associated with worse survival in patients with stage I disease (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Margin involvement significantly impaired survival after lung cancer resection irrespective of stage. Causative institutional and provider practices should be identified to minimize this adverse outcome. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy mitigated mortality risk independently of stage, whereas postoperative radiotherapy exacerbated the risk in patients with stage I disease. These findings need validation in prospective trials.

Improving lung cancer outcomes by improving the quality of surgical care

Surgical resection remains the most important curative treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer, but variations in short- and long-term surgical outcomes jeopardize the benefit of surgery for certain patients, operated on by certain types of surgeons, at certain types of institutions. We discuss current understanding of surgical quality measures, and their role in promoting understanding of the causes of outcome disparities after lung cancer surgery. We also discuss the use of minimally invasive surgical resection approaches to expand the playing field for surgery in lung cancer care, and end with a discussion of the future role of surgery in a world of alternative treatment possibilities.

Surgeon's view: is palliative resection of lung cancer ever justified?

Thoracic surgeons are often asked to see patients with locally advanced primary lung cancer in whom the goal of treatment is palliation for relief of disabling symptoms. The last four decades have brought great changes in the care of patients with primary lung cancer. The goals of the treatment must be well-defined by the interdisciplinary team. The thoracic surgeon has to make the final decision on whether to consider an operation for palliation and what is the expectation of the recommended treatment.

"Incomplete resection" in non-small cell lung cancer: need for a new definition. Canadian Lung Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine the prognostic value of positive surgical resection margin or highest nodal station sampled at thoracotomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently examined the surgical records and pathologic reports from a randomized trial comparing computed tomography versus mediastinoscopy for staging of lung cancer. They recorded pathologic findings at the surgical resection margin, the highest mediastinal nodal station sampled at thoracotomy, histologic type, tumor size, N status, and evidence of vascular or lymphatic invasion. These variables formed the independent variables in logistic regression models to predict recurrence.

RESULTS

Except for 1 patient, follow-up at 3 years for 399 included patients was complete. Significant predictors of recurrence were tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 1.2 (per centimeter); 99% CI [confidence interval], 1.1 to 1.4), and N status (compared with N0, N1: OR, 1.6; CI, 0.8 to 3.1; N2: OR, 3.2; CI, 1.4 to 7.5). Other variables, including positive surgical resection margin, did not predict early recurrence or death.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, surgical resection margin or highest nodal station sampled at thoracotomy that are involved by carcinoma do not predict recurrence. The current definition of incomplete resection has limited prognostic significance.